Re: picolisp-mode

> On Jan 22, 2019, at 15:58, Alexander Burger wrote: > > Hi all, > > Or should we change the one in the distribution? I can do that, but as a > non-emacs user I don't know exactly what is needed. So if there is a general > agreement, please let me know what I should do. It would be nice to

Re: picolisp-mode

Hi, As an Emacs user, it would be nice to have Picolisp package in Debian updated. I use Emacs but I've tweaked some other lisp libs. I don't use MELPA either. Kind regards, Manu El mar., 22 ene. 2019 a las 10:20, Jean-Christophe Helary (< brandel...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > On Jan 22, 2019

Re: picolisp-mode

> On Jan 22, 2019, at 22:04, Manuel Cano wrote: > > Hi, > > As an Emacs user, it would be nice to have Picolisp package in Debian > updated. I use Emacs but I've tweaked some other lisp libs. > I don't use MELPA either. The problem is that on Debian (and derivatives) the most recent mode tha

Re: picolisp-mode

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:41:24PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > The problem is that on Debian (and derivatives) the most recent mode that > Alexis has developed is not available. I discovered that when I found > discrepancies between the mode in raspian and the mode on my Mac when I was

Re: picolisp-mode

> On Jan 22, 2019, at 23:23, Alexander Burger wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:41:24PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: >> The problem is that on Debian (and derivatives) the most recent mode that >> Alexis has developed is not available. I discovered that when I found >> discrepanc

Re: picolisp-mode

I'm working with picolisp and emacs, also using the older picolisp-mode which comes with the picolisp distribution (the official upstream one from http://software-lab.de/down.html). I greatly enjoy using paredit, which works well. I have not tried out the other emacs modules for picolisp, and I

Re: picolisp-mode

andr...@itship.ch writes: I greatly enjoy using paredit, which works well. I have not tried out the other emacs modules for picolisp, and I don't know if the one in MELPA works well with paredit, which I see as the essential feature for an emacs picolisp-mode. i myself don't use paredit -

PicoLisp v. MicroPython ?

MicroPython (micropython.org) is apparently an implementation of Python intended for *bare metal* implementations. Is PicoLisp aiming for some of the same applications? -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: PicoLisp v. MicroPython ?

Hi Henry, From what I know, these are the options for PicoLisp: 1. PilOS 2. miniPicoLisp 3. And the one Im still working on which is PilMCU. There is also another Lisp which is similar to this: uLisp BR, geo > On Jan 23, 2019, at 8:58 AM, Henry Baker wrote: > > MicroPython (micropython.org)

Re: PicoLisp v. MicroPython ?

well there is MicroPicoLisp which aims for the low ram embedded space. PicoLisp itself depends on some Unix abstractions which are not present in all systems but MicroPicoLisp should be fine.   Ursprüngliche Nachricht   Von: hbak...@pipeline.com Gesendet: 23. Januar 2019 01:06 An: picolisp@soft

Re: picolisp-mode

> On Jan 23, 2019, at 6:00, Alexis > wrote: > > Having said all that, if the PicoLisp community generally felt it would be > best to settle on the mode currently bundled with the distribution as /the/ > Emacs mode for PicoLisp, and wanted me to remove my mode from M

Re: picolisp-mode

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:47 -05:00, andr...@itship.ch wrote: > In the end everyone should use whatever fits that person the best, > we don't need one way to rule them all. > > - beneroth Exactly. Well said, beneroth. I too am an emacs user. I use tj's picolisp-mode. I'm glad other people are wr

Re: picolisp-mode

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:11 -05:00, Alexis wrote: > Having said all that, if the PicoLisp community generally felt it > would be best to settle on the mode currently bundled with the > distribution as /the/ Emacs mode for PicoLisp, and wanted me to > remove my mode from MELPA - or at least, rename it

Re: picolisp-mode

Rick, Thank you for explaining your position. My wording may have been clumsy but I agree with everything you write. The discussion is not about changing anything for people who already use one or the other mode. It is about proposing something easy to use *and* not confusing to new comers. B

Re: picolisp-mode

Hi Jean-Christophe! On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 02:33 -05:00, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > There is also a maintenance issue for the official mode. From what I > understand, there seems to be 3 different versions of that mode and the > authors are not active anymore (and have not been for 6 years)...