Michael Foord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
It worries me that there might be a valid expression allowed here that I
haven't thought of. My current rules allow anything that looks like
``(a, [b, c, (d, e)], f)`` - any nested identifier list. Would anything
Neal Norwitz wrote:
If you are addressed on this message, it means you have open issues
that need to be resolved for 2.5. Some of these issues are
documentation, others are code issues.
Documentation missing:
+++
Fredrik: ElementTree
Gerhard: pysqlite
Martin: msilib
Thomas Heller wrote:
[...] I'm now happy with the tool that converts the ctypes tutorial from reST
to LaTeX,
I will later (today or tomorrow) commit that into Python SVN.
Did you commit that already? Alternatively, can you send it to me, please?
-- Gerhard
Gerhard Häring wrote:
Thomas Heller wrote:
[...] I'm now happy with the tool that converts the ctypes tutorial
from reST to LaTeX,
I will later (today or tomorrow) commit that into Python SVN.
Did you commit that already? Alternatively, can you send it to me, please?
-- Gerhard
I meant
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Thomas Heller wrote:
Gerhard Häring wrote:
Thomas Heller wrote:
[...] I'm now happy with the tool that converts the ctypes tutorial
from reST to LaTeX,
I will later (today or tomorrow) commit that into Python SVN.
Did you commit that already? Alternatively, can you send
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Thomas Heller wrote:
I could imagine three parts of the ctypes docs:
...
3. Some articles/howtos which cover advanced issues.
Note that there's now a Doc/howto directory, so you could put articles
there. The howtos aren't built as part of the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:58:49PM -0700, Neal Norwitz wrote:
If you are addressed on this message, it means you have open issues
that need to be resolved for 2.5. Some of these issues are
documentation, others are code issues. This information comes from
PEP 356.
There are also these items
From a numerical standpoint, floats shouldn't generally be compared using
equality. I came across a bug at work yesterday where I had written:
if not delta:
return 0.0
where delta was a floating point number. After a series of calculations
piling up round-off error delta took on a
On 4/28/06, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are also these items in the 'possible features' section:
Modules under consideration for inclusion:
- bdist_deb in distutils package
(Owner: ???)
At 07:38 AM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 4/28/06, A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- wsgiref to the standard library
(Owner: Phillip Eby)
I still hope this can go in; it will help web framework authors do the
right thing long term.
I doubt I'll have time to
Thomas Wouters wrote:
On 4/27/06, Thomas Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alrighty then. The list has about 12 hours to convince me (and you) that
it's a bad idea to generate that warning. I'll be asleep by the time the
trunk un-freezes, and I have a string of early meetings tomorrow. I'll get
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:02:07AM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I doubt I'll have time to write documentation for it before alpha 3. If
it's okay for the docs to wait for one of the beta releases -- or better
yet, if someone could volunteer to create rough draft documentation that I
could
Thomas Wouters wrote:
Indeed! I hadn't realized that, although I might've if I'd been able to
find where Modules is put on sys.path. And, likewise, I would do as you
suggest (which feels like the right thing) if I could only find out
where Modules is put on sys.path :) I don't have time to
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 09:54 PM 4/27/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Note that I was talking about the .pth file being
writable, not the directory.
Please stop this vague, handwaving FUD. You have yet to explain how this
situation is supposed to arise. Is there some platform on which
At 11:54 AM 4/28/2006 -0400, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:02:07AM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I doubt I'll have time to write documentation for it before alpha 3. If
it's okay for the docs to wait for one of the beta releases -- or better
yet, if someone could volunteer
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
No, I'm talking about a format which has the same if not
more benefits as what you're trying to achieve with the
.egg file approach, but without all the magic and hacks.
It's not like this wouldn't be possible to achieve.
That may or may not be true. Perhaps if you had
On 28-apr-2006, at 17:07, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
For the OSX icons, I guess Ronald Oussoren owns the task of getting
them into the distribution.
That's fine by me. I'll be adding them to the universal
On 28-apr-2006, at 17:41, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
- Support for building fat Mac binaries (Intel and PPC)
(Owner: Ronald Oussoren)
Yes, this would be cool.
This is nearly committed. For some reason, SF apparently dropped
my last change request for it, and Ronald's patch
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
That's fine by me. I'll be adding them to the universal python 2.4
tree soon and to 2.5 when that's is done. Do have to wait for the
contributor agreement, which the folks over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] say is
good enough, to do that?
If the artist has informally
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
Nobody, so far (for Windows). Somebody should contact the owner and
find out what the license on this work is, and then tell me what
to do with them. I assume the py and pyc icons
There's a new SoC mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can sign up here: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/soc2006
This list is for any SoC discussion: mentors, students, idea, etc.
Student can submit applications starting May 1, so now is the time to
get students interested in your
(Thank you, by the way, for actually reading some of the documentation
before writing this post, and for asking questions instead of jumping to
conclusions.)
At 06:43 PM 4/28/2006 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
I've now found this section in the documentation which seems to
have the reason:
Georg Brandl wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
Who is the owner for getting new icons installed with the new logo?
Nobody, so far (for Windows). Somebody should contact the owner and
find out what the license on this work is, and then tell me what
to do with them. I assume
PEP 333 specifies WSGI, the Python Web Server Gateway Interface v1.0;
it's written by Phillip Eby who put a lot of effort in it to make it
acceptable to very diverse web frameworks. The PEP has been well
received by web framework makers and users.
As a supplement to the PEP, Phillip has written a
Is another bug day planned in the next week or two?
John
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I'm inviting people to discuss the addition of wsgiref to the standard
library. I'd like the discussion to be finished before a3 goes out;
+1.
I think it's faily low-risk. WSGI has been discussed and implemented
for well over a year; there are many working implementations of the
spec. Adding
At 11:03 AM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
(I'm asking Phillip to post the URL for the current
source; searching for it produces multiple repositories.)
Source browsing: http://svn.eby-sarna.com/wsgiref/
Anonymous SVN: svn://svn.eby-sarna.com/svnroot/wsgiref
Georg Brandl wrote:
As I posted here previously, I contacted the owner, and he said that he
didn't care about specifying a license. I guess that means that we can
pick one ;)
Can you please ask whether he would be willing to fill out a contrib
form
i commited mkpydoc to docutils/sandbox/pydoc-writer with some small
modifications
- Patch for python 2.3.
- Filenames from command line.
- Guard definition of ``locallinewidth`` against redefinition.
- latex needs definition of ``locallinewidth``.
1. there isnt a copyright in
Is there a reason why the alternate format isn't documented for float
conversions in http://docs.python.org/lib/typesseq-strings.html ?
'%#8.f' % 1.0 keeps the decimal point while '%8.f' % 1.0 drops it.
Also, for %g the alternate form keeps trailing zeroes.
While at it, I noticed a difference
Guido van Rossum wrote:
PEP 333 specifies WSGI, the Python Web Server Gateway Interface v1.0;
it's written by Phillip Eby who put a lot of effort in it to make it
acceptable to very diverse web frameworks. The PEP has been well
received by web framework makers and users.
As a supplement to
Georg Brandl wrote:
Is there a reason why the alternate format isn't documented for float
conversions in http://docs.python.org/lib/typesseq-strings.html ?
'%#8.f' % 1.0 keeps the decimal point while '%8.f' % 1.0 drops it.
Also, for %g the alternate form keeps trailing zeroes.
While at
On 4/28/06, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to include paste.lint with that as well (as wsgiref.lint or
whatever). Since the last discussion I enumerated in the docstring all
the checks it does. There's still some outstanding issues, mostly where
I'm not sure if it is too
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I think another useful addition would be some prefix-based dispatcher,
similar to paste.urlmap (but probably a bit simpler):
http://svn.pythonpaste.org/Paste/trunk/paste/urlmap.py
IMO this is getting into framework design. Perhaps something like this
could be added
At 02:32 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
PEP 333 specifies WSGI, the Python Web Server Gateway Interface v1.0;
it's written by Phillip Eby who put a lot of effort in it to make it
acceptable to very diverse web frameworks. The PEP has been well
received by
It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
take care of.
I don't expect you to agree with me. But I don't expect you to be able
to
At 01:19 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
take care of.
I'm fine with a
On 4/28/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's small enough, I'd say to add this mapper to wsgiref.util, or if
Guido is strongly set against it being in the code, we should at least put
it in the documentation as an example of how to use 'shift_path_info()' in
wsgiref.util.
I'm
On 4/28/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:19 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
something that the infrastructure (Apache server
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I'd like to include paste.lint with that as well (as wsgiref.lint or
whatever). Since the last discussion I enumerated in the docstring all
the checks it does. There's still some outstanding issues, mostly where
I'm not sure if it is too restrictive (marked with @@ in
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 01:19 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
take
At 04:04 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
I don't see why not to use prefix matching. It is more consistent with
the handling of the default application ('', instead of a method that
needs to be overridden), and more general, and the algorithm is only
barely more complex and not what I'd
Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov wrote:
* To adapt allocation of blocks of memory with other alignment. Now
alignment is rigidly set on 8 bytes. As a variant, it is possible to
use alignment on 4 bytes. And this value can be set at start of the
interpreter through arguments/variable environments/etc.
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 04:04 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
I don't see why not to use prefix matching. It is more consistent with
the handling of the default application ('', instead of a method that
needs to be overridden), and more general, and the algorithm is only
barely
At 05:47 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
It will still be only a couple lines less than prefix matching.
That's beside the point. Prefix matching is inherently a more complex
concept, and more likely to be confusing, without introducing much in the
way of new features. If I want to
At 04:34 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Titus Brown wrote:
Hi, Phillip,
I'm getting this error when I run the tests, with both Python 2.3 and
2.4:
==
FAIL: testHeaderFormats (wsgiref.tests.test_handlers.HandlerTests)
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 05:47 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
It will still be only a couple lines less than prefix matching.
That's beside the point. Prefix matching is inherently a more complex
concept, and more likely to be confusing, without introducing much in
the way of new
Here's what's left for 2.5 after the most recent go around.
There's no owner for these items. If no one takes them, they won't
get done and I will move them to deferred within a week:
* Add @decorator decorator to functional, rename to functools?
What's the benefit of @decorator? Who
Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 378 open ( +7) / 3199 closed ( +4) / 3577 total (+11)
Bugs: 901 open ( -7) / 5792 closed (+25) / 6693 total (+18)
RFE : 214 open ( +3) / 214 closed ( +2) / 428 total ( +5)
New / Reopened Patches
__
Allow
On 4/28/06, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no owner for these items. If no one takes them, they won't
get done and I will move them to deferred within a week:
* Add @decorator decorator to functional, rename to functools?
What's the benefit of @decorator? Who made
[Georg Brandl]
As I posted here previously, I contacted the owner, and he said that he
didn't care about specifying a license. I guess that means that we can
pick one ;)
[Martin v. Löwis]
Can you please ask whether he would be willing to fill out a contrib
form
[Georg Brandl]
...
Reviewing the printf man page, this is okay since for %f, the precision is the
number of digits after the decimal point while for %g, it is the number of
significant digits. Still, that should be documented in the Python manual.
Well, there are a lot of little details in
52 matches
Mail list logo
