Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-07 Thread Malcolm Lear
I have always wanted to take the existing QL mainboard schematic and do an updated version with improved power, and on-board IDE, floppy and mouse, and a 680X0 and faster memory. Something like Peter Graf's work, but all on one replacement PCB. I understand it's not the most viable project,

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-05 Thread gdgqler
On 4 Feb 2011, at 20:09, Geoff Wicks wrote: Until 2005 an item on the agenda of the AGM was always Any Other Business. When John Mason became chairman he ruled that Any Other Business was unconstitutional. Instead we now have an open discussion which does not have decision making

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-04 Thread Malcolm Lear
On 04/02/2011 03:17, Plastic wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.ukwrote: Sad though that, as Tobias said, it seems that Jan has no plans to do any further work on the 'new' Qubide. Dilwyn Jones If I had a schematic and code, I would be happy to

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality check and semantics

2011-02-04 Thread gdgqler
On 4 Feb 2011, at 00:01, Peter Baily wrote: I shall continue to use the QL notwithstanding its lack of internet access because, as I noted before, it enables me to devise routines to do what I need without the clutter of what someone else thinks I should have. ' This hits my nail on the

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-04 Thread Tony Firshman
Billy wrote, on 4/Feb/11 10:54 | Feb4: On 03/02/2011 21:23, Tobias Fröschle wrote: Am 03.02.2011 21:09, schrieb Dilwyn Jones: snip his plans for the replacement Qubide (http://omega.webnode.com/ or http://omega.webnode.com/products/product-1/) - Anybody still in snip Hello readers, there

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-04 Thread Lee Privett
ooh look here http://www.qlforum.co.uk/download/file.php?id=28mode=view Lee Privett - Sent from my Laptop running XP but emulating the QL using QPC2 I would venture - more beneficial would be the USB port, lots and lots of USB HDD

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-04 Thread Mark Martin
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Tony Firshman t...@firshman.co.uk wrote: Billy wrote, on 4/Feb/11 10:54 | Feb4: On 03/02/2011 21:23, Tobias Fröschle wrote: Am 03.02.2011 21:09, schrieb Dilwyn Jones: snip his plans for the replacement Qubide (http://omega.webnode.com/ or

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-04 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:30 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check speaking as member D.Jones, not as committee member for this email Of course, but the most

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread peet vanpeebles
--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Geoff Wicks gtwi...@btinternet.com wrote: From: Geoff Wicks gtwi...@btinternet.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Reality Check To: ql-users ql-us...@q-v-d.com Date: Wednesday, 2 February, 2011, 20:39 Last weekend several people castigated me for suggesting that Quanta should be

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Rich Mellor
On 02/02/2011 23:18, Peter Graf wrote: Hi Geoff, Last weekend several people castigated me for suggesting that Quanta should be wound up. Now it's time to see if you are prepared to put your money where your mouths are. I guess QUANTA members benefit more if my time goes into QL hardware and

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Rich Mellor
On 02/02/2011 22:25, Lee Privett wrote: Taking what has been said at face value and as a returning member of Quanta and living in the south east I am both excited and saddened by the current state of affairs, my response to each point is as follows: 1: QUANTA MAGAZINE - I would volanteer for

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
The Quanta website should not be too difficult, as it is built around a content management system, so updating the content should be a matter of just editing the text. -- Rich Mellor If only it were that simple! I've used CMS'es in work over the years and they generally are, when they work.

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Rich Mellor
On 03/02/2011 10:33, Dilwyn Jones wrote: The Quanta website should not be too difficult, as it is built around a content management system, so updating the content should be a matter of just editing the text. -- Rich Mellor If only it were that simple! I've used CMS'es in work over the years

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Peter
Rich Mellor wrote: However, this year, as I am no longer able to subsidise my business through full time employment, I am seriously having to look at the cost of staying overnight in Manchester and with current attendance levels, wonder whether a 2 day show is justifiable, or whether Quanta

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Now that we finally seem close to new QL hardware, I wonder if it's the right time to ask for another decline in QUANTA activities. I rarely attend an AGM, but I consider to come this year. If I find the time, I would demonstate some of the QL projects I had started but abandoned due to the

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality check

2011-02-03 Thread Peter Baily
Geoff wicks wrote: Last weekend several people castigated me for suggesting that Quanta should be wound up. Now it's time to see if you are prepared to put your money where your mouths are. I am not asking you to to do anything drastic like joining the committee, but something more

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality check

2011-02-03 Thread Tony Firshman
Peter Baily wrote, on 3/Feb/11 13:11 | Feb3: snip However, we should not be surprised that most people use PCs; after all this exchange of views, news, etc. would not exist unless we were using PCs. By PCs I take it you mean machines running Windows. I access this group but don't use a PC.

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality check

2011-02-03 Thread Norman Dunbar
By PCs I take it you mean machines running Windows. I access this group but don't use a PC. Likewise, given the definition above. But not the same as you. Guess how. Forbidden fruit is a clue (8-)# Um, is a pineapple? :-) Cheers, Norman. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality check

2011-02-03 Thread gdgqler
On 3 Feb 2011, at 14:24, Tony Firshman wrote: Norman Dunbar wrote, on 3/Feb/11 14:19 | Feb3: By PCs I take it you mean machines running Windows. I access this group but don't use a PC. Likewise, given the definition above. But not the same as you. Guess how. Forbidden fruit is a clue

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Lee Privett
Any new hardware for th QL is always welcome especially if it enables people who have never upgraded to upgrade to something that extends the life of the QL or brings it up to date with current technology in some small way. For those of us that emulate through a variety of OS's, hardware

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
who have missed the whole move through Gold Card/Super Gold Card/Q40/Q60 phase and are unable to do anything with with their 128K QLs either. So my question is are there enough QL users out there to warrant additional hardware projects? and if not, what else can the QL be used for in its

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Geoff Wicks
Many thanks to all the people who have replied although we still need a lot more replies. I particularly like the positive content of many of the replies. Why can't we recreate this sort of enthusiasm right throughout Quanta? After all I did not say I wanted Quanta to close, I said the time

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 11:18 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Reality Check I guess QUANTA members benefit more if my time goes into QL hardware and drivers, than into the other work

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 9:21 AM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check Many thanks for the email and raising these points for discussion. Perhaps you would be so kind

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Malcolm Lear
I hate to disappoint some people but the idea of Quanta sponsoring a new Gold Card is a non-starter. As I understand it the components of the old Gold Cards are no longer available and the development of a new one would be a complicated and risky matter. Halfway through the last decade some

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Malcolm Lear
PS, I'd be able to put on an SPI interface as well. This would allow the Microdrive units to be replaced by SD FLASH slots. Malcolm ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Robert Heaton
On 3 February 2011 19:29, Malcolm Lear malc...@essex.ac.uk wrote: PS, I'd be able to put on an SPI interface as well. This would allow the Microdrive units to be replaced by SD FLASH slots. Malcolm That would be awesome!! Rob. ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Are the Super Gold Card schematics available along with the CPLD equation file? With this info, designing a replacement using up to date components (apart from the CPU) would be fairly easy and I'd be happy to do it and make it open source. Cheers Malcolm This would be fantastic if

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check Are the Super Gold Card schematics available along with the CPLD equation file? With this info, designing

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Geoff Wicks
In the context of putting my own money where my mouth is, I would be happy to help in any project to rewrite the constitution. I am not a lawyer, but I have had some legal training in the UK plus Works Council training in the Netherlands and have had a lot of experience of constitutions. I

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Mark Martin
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk wrote: Oops, failed to spot that some schematics at least are already on his website (haven't looked at them in detail). Also, I didn't stop to think that not many IDE hard disks are available nowadays, they all seem to

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
In the context of putting my own money where my mouth is, I would be happy to help in any project to rewrite the constitution. I am not a lawyer, but I have had some legal training in the UK plus Works Council training in the Netherlands and have had a lot of experience of constitutions. I

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Tobias Fröschle
Am 03.02.2011 21:09, schrieb Dilwyn Jones: - Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check Are the Super Gold Card schematics available along with the CPLD

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Lee Privett
This might help though, so Qubide still an option? http://www.amazon.co.uk/IDE-SATA-Bi-Directional-Adapter/dp/B000YSMBSW Lee Privett - Sent from my Laptop running XP but emulating the QL using QPC2 This would be fantastic if

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - From: Lee Privett lee.priv...@gmail.com To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check This might help though, so Qubide still an option? http://www.amazon.co.uk/IDE-SATA-Bi-Directional-Adapter/dp

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Stephen
I'm afraid I'm one of the apathetic subscribers but will put my head above the parapet to comment Having been a Quanta member since close to its inception I am happy to continue to pay my sub. It's trivial enough to be hardly worth the bother of cancelling the direct debit. However, I start

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Roy Wood
On 03/02/2011 22:43, Dilwyn Jones wrote: - Original Message - From: Lee Privett lee.priv...@gmail.com To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check This might help though, so Qubide still an option? http://www.amazon.co.uk

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Peter Graf
Hi Geoff, Thanks for participating in this discussion, Peter. Thank _you_ for your QUANTA work! You have always been very loyal to Quanta after the help they gave you over the Q60. Just for the records, the Q60 design and prototypes were all completed and financed by me, without any help...

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality check and semantics

2011-02-03 Thread Peter Baily
On 03/02/2011 16:48, ql-users-requ...@lists.q-v-d.com wrote: Peter Baily wrote, on 3/Feb/11 13:11 | Feb3: snip However, we should not be surprised that most people use PCs; after all this exchange of views, news, etc. would not exist unless we were using PCs. By PCs I take it you mean

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-03 Thread Plastic
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.ukwrote: Sad though that, as Tobias said, it seems that Jan has no plans to do any further work on the 'new' Qubide. Dilwyn Jones If I had a schematic and code, I would be happy to (re)design anything out there. I

Re: [Ql-Users] Reality Check

2011-02-02 Thread Lee Privett
Taking what has been said at face value and as a returning member of Quanta and living in the south east I am both excited and saddened by the current state of affairs, my response to each point is as follows: 1: QUANTA MAGAZINE - I would volanteer for editor but have very little experience