The most important thing to remeber is that the survey only shows the
views of the people on the list.
The real question we have to tackle is how do we attract new members to
the community?
Or put it differently what is the advantage of QDOS or SMSQE over all the
other operating systems out
, March 01, 2011 7:50 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] The First Survey - Results!
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk
wrote:
In all fairness to Dave, he did say that the email was in HTML format
and quite large. Unfortunately, it seems
On 1 Mar 2011, at 21:25, Dave Park wrote:
Okay, I have gone through the XML with a fine tooth comb to remove all the
javascript, any privacy-invading links and various hidden forms.
The main survey page is here:
http://www.nonstickglue.com/QL_Hardware_Library/Survey.html
From here
The main survey page is here:
http://www.nonstickglue.com/QL_Hardware_Library/Survey.html
Nicely laid out, Dave.
Some comments, for discussion, based on just a quick look through the
results earlier this morning:
Question 1: Only 3% with a 128K or 640K QL. Seems to fly in the face
of
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Dilwyn Jones
dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.ukwrote:
The main survey page is here:
http://www.nonstickglue.com/QL_Hardware_Library/Survey.html
Nicely laid out, Dave.
You can thank the survey website for the layout. I just had to convert the
XML and javascript
Morning Geoff,
Could you then please put your survey results on your website with a
link? Much easier to read that as a poor text file at the end of an email.
In all fairness to Dave, he did say that the email was in HTML format
and quite large. Unfortunately, it seems that the list prevents
Dave,
As I thought, only George and I read my articles on QL Assembly
Language! ;-(
You read your own articles? Isn't that like laughing at your own jokes? :P
But of course. Don't you know that's one way to double my readers! Plus,
I get to find all sorts of mistakes that I didn't see when I
I agree with a lot of what you say about the importance of websites,
but that is not what QL-ers appear to want. On the last published
figures only 21 UK Quanta members out of 154 have opted to receive
the magazine electronically. The equivalent figures for overseas
members is 9 out of 23 and
At 08:33 01/03/2011 +, you wrote:
Could you then please put your survey results on your website with a link?
Much easier to read that as a poor text file at the end of an email.
I DOOO agree, no more informative than the non appearing results of the '95
survey, ie none atall.
At 12:11 01/03/2011 +, you wrote:
The QL community is a good deal more conservative that we probably would
like to think,
Strange one this - conservative in some respects yet not in others. We do
have to bear in mind that as a community we are using a base computer
which is not far from 3
At 08:54 01/03/2011 +, you wrote:
Someone scanned in one issue recently - check the list archives - and it
came to around 50MB for a text searchable pdf. That was during a long
run of emails on why can't we get a pdf copy of QL Today? - which has
been covered here, in the magazine and I
Heck, next thing you'll be saying is 'do away with a postal one altogether
make it all electronic and then Monthly!' :)
Lee
- Back to the QL-
- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users
Noel Edmonds found that out to his shame with 'Gotcha Oscars'
So how about the Cue Ella's
Lee
- Back to the QL-
Also, how about an annual award ceremony for best new h/w, software,
utility, lifetime achievement awards - so we can all pat ourselves on the
back? *grins* Heck, I might
Ladies and Gentlemen its the 'QLimb that Mountain' Awards 2011
Lee
- Back to the QL-
- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] The First Survey - Results!
Suggestions
Qlutz of the year
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.ukwrote:
In all fairness to Dave, he did say that the email was in HTML format
and quite large. Unfortunately, it seems that the list prevents HTML
postings and has converted it to plain text - with all the attendant
formatting
--
From: Dave Park plasticu...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 7:50 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] The First Survey - Results!
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Norman Dunbar
nor...@dunbar-it.co.ukwrote:
In all
Mind you is does depend on how you would treat the awards, as prestigious or
turkeys
The 'Clive's C5s' has nice ring to it but not necessarily a good connotation
Lee
- Back to the QL-
Also, how about an annual award ceremony for best new h/w, software,
utility, lifetime achievement
In message 4d6cb2c2.7020...@dunbar-it.co.uk, Norman Dunbar
nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk writes
Hi,
I think that the argument is that it is a preference to have a physical
magazine to read, rather than an electronic imitation.
I do receive another magazine in electronic form, which is very well
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Geoff Wicks gtwi...@btinternet.com wrote:
--
From: Dave Park plasticu...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 7:50 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] The First Survey - Results!
On Tue
Question 14*Can you program in Assembly Language?* Yes 32
44% No 40
56%
As I thought, only George and I read my articles on QL Assembly
Language! ;-(
...
4340156 do not no, never seen it but people seem to refer to it as ql toady
which implies its full of mistakes
This is a joke
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.ukwrote:
Question 14*Can you program in Assembly Language?* Yes 32
44% No 40
56%
As I thought, only George and I read my articles on QL Assembly
Language! ;-(
You read your own articles? Isn't that like laughing at
21 matches
Mail list logo
