Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread François Van Emelen
James Hunkins schreef:
 Tried running it and it listed the lines with these procedures as  
 mistakes.  It sounds like you have a toolkit or something that I don't  
 have on my system.
 
 I am running the latest QPC beta release.
 
 jim
 
SNIP
'PW' is a keyword found in ProWesS-Proforma (Joachim Vanderauwera PROGS)
François Van Emelen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Working sotware (was Re: fast find)

2008-01-08 Thread Arnould
After long technical studies of what was done in the past (ie before
1983) Tony Tebby did software that worked (and still works). 
That Marcel managed to make QPC work on top of Windows is a kind of
miracle.

Arnould



On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:33:34 +, Roy wood wrote
 There are two parallel threads here. On the one hand people 
 complaining about Windows and on the other  people 
 struggling with Linux, which, to the uninitiated, it a maze 
 of undocumented and unhelpful commands.
 
 Does this not posit a hypothesis :
 
 i.e. no one writes software/OS that works - except perhaps Marcel.
 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread norman
Morning Jim,

 Tried running it and it listed the lines with these procedures as  
 mistakes.  It sounds like you have a toolkit or something that I don't  
 have on my system.

If these lines are flagged with MIStake :

1190 DEFine PROCedure PW(V)
1200 POKE_W Base + Offset,V
1210 Offset = Offset + 2
1220 END DEFine
1230 :
1240 DEFine PROCedure PL(V)
1250 POKE_L Base + Offset,V
1260 Offset = Offset + 4
1270 END DEFine 

Then do you have some other toolkit installed that defines the PW and PL 
'keywords' perhaps? On an unadorned QL/QPC installation I don't know of PW or 
PL so the SuperBasic versions from Marcel should be ok.

If your boot file loads some toolkits in prior to you loading the above code, 
then I suspect those extras are the cause of the problems.

Can you boot a blank QPC and then run the EXTRAS command and see if you get PW 
and PL listed, if yo do, change the names in the SuperBasic listing to 
something other then PW or PL (plus the calling lines too of course) and see if 
that makes any difference.


Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread norman
Morning Marcel,

 Could you (and anybody else having increased cursor blink frequency)
 run this Basic program? Tell me what values it's printing (47 to 50 is
 normal).
I'll give it a go tonight when I get home.

Cheers,
norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
James Hunkins a écrit :
 Tried running it and it listed the lines with these procedures as  
 mistakes.  It sounds like you have a toolkit or something that I don't  
 have on my system.
 
 I am running the latest QPC beta release.
 
 jim
 
OK, this is most probably due to the fact that when porting these lines 
from your mail app into QPC (perhaps via QD?) some TABS were inserted 
after the line number, to which SBASIC objects when loading the file- 
try editing the mistakes out via ED and re-run...


Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread Marcel Kilgus
James Hunkins wrote:
 I don't have PW or PL commands on my system so this fails to run.

It's a pure SBASIC program that specifically was written to not use
any outside keywords. As François wrote there might be a name clash
with a loaded toolkit, but then it's better to run the program on a
clean system anyway. But feel free to rename PW and PL to anything you
like ;-)

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] fast find

2008-01-08 Thread David Tubbs
At 23:11 07/01/2008 +, you wrote:
  Go to control panel (classic view) - administrative tools -
  services
  Then find Indexing Service.
  Right click on it and STOP the service
  Right click and select properties - change startup to Disabled.
Ah, thanks. Done.

  When clicking on 'Services' I get:
 

Not only stopping indexing, also auto search network, and many other 
Services eat up runtime resources, here is a useful link.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1786008,00.asp

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread James Hunkins
Thanks all - it was the suggested imported tabs which became special  
characters and messed up the procedure definitions.

Will test more tonight and report.

jim

On Jan 8, 2008, at 1:49 AM, James Hunkins wrote:

 Tried running it and it listed the lines with these procedures as
 mistakes.  It sounds like you have a toolkit or something that I don't
 have on my system.

 I am running the latest QPC beta release.

 jim

 On Jan 8, 2008, at 1:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 7 Jan 2008 at 23:29, James Hunkins wrote:

 I don't have PW or PL commands on my system so this fails to run.

 jim

 Neither do I, but I believe that these are basic procs defined in the
 program itself.

 Running it on QPC2 under windows gives me 49 or 50.

 I'll test tonight under Wine.

 Wolfgang

 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] 2.5 inch HD

2008-01-08 Thread Tony Firshman
hitchies wrote:
 Tony said (of me) -
 =
 Oh dear you misunderstand again I am afraid.  Isn't text ridiculous.
 I have not intended to criticise or patronise or insult or anything else.
 I was just saying what I had experienced.
 
 I am sorry if you have read something else into the raw text.
 .
 I think I had better withdraw and not say anything more in the future
 =
 
 Thank you Tony; I fully accept that this originated in a hurried 
 misunderstanding.
 
 If you withdraw, you will be sorely missed. :(
 
I simply don't have enough time.  I am re-developing a house and also 
program for worldnews.com .
These activities actually pay the bills. I cannot afford expensive 
hobbies like the QL trading now. I will still be doing QL work, but 
only when I can.  I cannot offer a sensible turnaround for work now.

Tony


-- 
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
 TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening Marcel,

 Could you (and anybody else having increased cursor blink frequency)
 run this Basic program? Tell me what values it's printing (47 to 50 is
 normal).
Ok, managed to get it to run quite happily - couldn't type it in though,
too many foibles with the keyboard. Created a file in ~/.wine/dosdevices
and loaded it from dos1_ - worked a charm and no problems with the PW or
PL procedures.

Anyway, I ran it and the results were :

3 (yes, three!)
50
48
49
43
49
50
50
38
and so on. There were quite a few 50s turned up after about 30 or 40
repetitions, then after a few dozen of those, it started varying again.
The first run was a 3 that is ot a typo.

I have just run it again and it started with 40, then repeated 50 a few
dozen times before I CTRL-SPACEd it.


Cheers,
Norman.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC and notebook

2008-01-08 Thread Per Witte
Norman Dunbar writes:


Talking of which, I thought QL users just might get excited about:

ASUS have created the brand new UMPC Eee PC 701 4GB for total mobile 
internet computing.  £219.73 inc VAT

Features

Choice of black or white finish
Simple and easy to use
Fast boot up and switch on
Powered by Linux Operating System
(WXP compatible)
WiFi 802.11b/g
900MHz Intel Celeron M ULV
512GB RAM
4GB SSD Memory
7 Display (800 x 480)
22.5 x 16.4 x  2.15~3.5 cm
Lightweight at just 920g
1 x USB 2.0
SD expansion slot
10/100 Mbps Ethernet
WLAN WiFi 802.11b/g
Web-Cam
etc

Might make a nice QL system with uQLx or XP and QPC. Probably couldnt 
handle Wine..

Per
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread James Hunkins
I get nearly all 50s after the first few startups.

And I do see my CPU meter peg maximum while running this, just the  
same as if I am moving the cursor around the screen (idle mode it  
stays around 25-33%, Windows by itself is  5% in idle.

jim


On Jan 8, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Norman Dunbar wrote:

 Evening Marcel,

 Could you (and anybody else having increased cursor blink frequency)
 run this Basic program? Tell me what values it's printing (47 to 50  
 is
 normal).
 Ok, managed to get it to run quite happily - couldn't type it in  
 though,
 too many foibles with the keyboard. Created a file in ~/.wine/ 
 dosdevices
 and loaded it from dos1_ - worked a charm and no problems with the  
 PW or
 PL procedures.

 Anyway, I ran it and the results were :

 3 (yes, three!)
 50
 48
 49
 43
 49
 50
 50
 38
 and so on. There were quite a few 50s turned up after about 30 or 40
 repetitions, then after a few dozen of those, it started varying  
 again.
 The first run was a 3 that is ot a typo.

 I have just run it again and it started with 40, then repeated 50 a  
 few
 dozen times before I CTRL-SPACEd it.


 Cheers,
 Norman.


 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hi Norman,

For tests, I've gone back to the normal Suse Kernal, but there was no change, 
it still works OK 
here.

A -probably stupid - question:

have you switched off all the stuff that Suse autostarts (e.g. the *-
+**$ Beagle indexing, Man pages autoupdate etc...)?
If not, could you leave the machine on for an hour while they do 
their stuff and then retry it? Perhaps the irregular keyboard is due 
to other jobs whittling away in the background?

Wolfgang

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Jan 2008 at 21:18, James Hunkins wrote:

 I get nearly all 50s after the first few startups.

Do you have the same problem as Norman?

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 8 Jan 2008 at 21:18, James Hunkins wrote:

 And I do see my CPU meter peg maximum while running this, just the  
 same as if I am moving the cursor around the screen (idle mode it  
 stays around 25-33%, Windows by itself is  5% in idle.

It does that under a normal Windows, too, so that doesn't mean 
anything.

Wolfgang

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread James Hunkins
The problem is that the CPU meter is pegging and it kills my laptop  
battery.  On my office computer I don't care.

I do not have this problem with any other Windows program.

My case may be special as I run QPC in Windows XP but in a virtual  
machine on a Mac.  I had the same problem with it back when it was the  
VirtualPC emulator.

I see the cursor occasionally behave itself and then often just take  
off.  Marcel and I have discussed this briefly before and it would  
seem that the pause mechanism that he uses between cursor updates/ 
pointer checks, etc. is handled differently on different systems. We  
even tried extending the delay period and it seemed to have no affect.

Looking at this test code I am guessing that Marcel is verifying that  
the time clock function in QPC is reporting as expected, which I am  
guessing that it is.

jim

On Jan 9, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:

 On 8 Jan 2008 at 21:18, James Hunkins wrote:

 And I do see my CPU meter peg maximum while running this, just the
 same as if I am moving the cursor around the screen (idle mode it
 stays around 25-33%, Windows by itself is  5% in idle.

 It does that under a normal Windows, too, so that doesn't mean
 anything.

 Wolfgang

 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread norman
Morning Wolfgang,

 A -probably stupid - question:
There's no such thing as a stupid question! ;-)

 have you switched off all the stuff that Suse autostarts (e.g. the *-
 +**$ Beagle indexing, Man pages autoupdate etc...)?
I have indeed turned them off. It's one of the first things I normally do after 
an install, however, just to be absolutely certain, I shall check again tonight.

However, there is no disc accesses going on while I'm trying to run QPC unless 
I ask it to dddir iii1_ :-)

I have to say that once again this list is proving just how friendly and 
helpful we are in the QL community. I have help from yourself and from Marcel - 
and why should he bother, QPC is a Windows program after all - but he is still 
helping.

It is all very much appreciated. Thank you.


Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread norman
Morning Jim,

 The problem is that the CPU meter is pegging and it kills my laptop  
 battery.  On my office computer I don't care.

I've just plugged QPC into my work PC running Windows 2000 - with QPC sitting 
there doing nothing the CPU is fine. When I simply move the move across the 
display, CPU flat lines at 100% - so your set up is not likely to be the cause.

Better get it unplugged now - I'll get shot for having unauthorised devices 
plugged in!


Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread James Hunkins
Was that just the cursor or were you moving a full window?

jim

On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Morning Jim,

 The problem is that the CPU meter is pegging and it kills my laptop
 battery.  On my office computer I don't care.

 I've just plugged QPC into my work PC running Windows 2000 - with  
 QPC sitting there doing nothing the CPU is fine. When I simply move  
 the move across the display, CPU flat lines at 100% - so your set up  
 is not likely to be the cause.

 Better get it unplugged now - I'll get shot for having unauthorised  
 devices plugged in!


 Cheers,
 Norman.
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC and notebook

2008-01-08 Thread norman
Morning Per,

 ASUS have created the brand new UMPC Eee PC 701 4GB for total mobile 
 internet computing.  £219.73 inc VAT
I saw a review of this recently in a Linux comic and while it got a pretty god 
review, it has afew faults as a Linux laptop. For running as a QL emulator base 
system, I suspect it will be fine. Wine might not be all that big a problem 
though - but who knows!

I love this bit - I'm sure you meant MB by the way!

 512GB RAM

The 7 screen might be a tad small for my aging eyes though!


Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-08 Thread norman
Hi Jim,

 Was that just the cursor or were you moving a full window?

No, QPC was sat still in the corner and all I diod was move the mouse over the 
QPC display. All I has on screen were the wtv 4 windows and the button frame 
with pick, rjob, jobs, sysmon, clock and files all buttoned.

Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm