Hi Vojtěch,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
> Hi,
> thank You for the advice. I tried:
> densiTree(x=hirta, type="phylogram", scaleX=TRUE, width=2,
> col=rainbow(length(hirta)), font=3, underscore=FALSE)
> looks relatively nicely. I just wonder why last 2
Thank You!
densityTree(trees, use.gradient=TRUE, fix.depth=TRUE, alpha=0.5, lwd=4)
is really nice. Could You finally point me how to add supports (nodelabels)
for each tree in its respective color?
Sincerely,
V.
Dne středa 26. dubna 2017 22:10:27 CEST, Liam J. Revell napsal(a):
> I have now
I have now incorporated all of these methods into the phytools function
densityTree which I have also completely re-written. More information
can be seen on my blog here:
http://blog.phytools.org/2017/04/complete-re-write-of-phytools.html.
The function is already in phytools which can be
Hi,
this looks like really great tool. The chapter about median trees at https://
thibautjombart.github.io/treespace/ is something different from what I need.
But I will definitely use it, for little different task. :-)
Thank You,
V.
Dne úterý 25. dubna 2017 19:59:34 CEST jste napsal(a):
> Hi
Yes, it helps and makes the tree in good scale. Just branches of one tree do
not reach the right edge like the others. And tip labels are still missing.
V.
Dne středa 26. dubna 2017 18:52:04 CEST jste napsal(a):
> Oops. ylim should be c(0,Ntip(trees[[1]])) rather than c(0,11) (that was
>
Hi,
thank You for the advice. I tried:
densiTree(x=hirta, type="phylogram", scaleX=TRUE, width=2,
col=rainbow(length(hirta)), font=3, underscore=FALSE)
looks relatively nicely. I just wonder why last 2 options have no effect (i.e.
I wish tip labels in italics and without underscore). I also
Hello,
Liam, thank You very much! It is what I was looking for. Unfortunately, I have
problem with Your solution 4 and onward (attached). Previous 3 solutions
worked as expected. Some trees were unrooted, rooting did not help. Branch
lengths were variable, but all were ultrametric. Also I don't
Hi Vojtech.
I just posted a handful of different possible solutions using phytools
on my blog:
http://blog.phytools.org/2017/04/showing-multiple-conflicting.html. Let
me know if any of them work for you.
All the best, Liam
Liam J. Revell, Associate Professor of Biology
University of
Hi
Dne úterý 25. dubna 2017 19:57:16 CEST jste napsal(a):
> a simple solution might be par(new=TRUE):
> > library("ape")
> > A <- rtree(10)
> > B <- rtree(10)
> > plot(A)
> > par(new=TRUE)
> > plot(B,edge.col="blue")
Thank You for the hint. This is simple, but it doesn't align the tip labels. I
Hi Vojtěch,
you could try adopt densiTree() in phangorn to do this. It just plots each
tree separate over each other. You probably want to of move each tree a bit
up or down and add some more control for colors. It is based on the
internal function of from plot.phylo().
Cheers,
Klaus
On Tue, Apr
Hi Vojtěch.
This kind of plot is possible to make using plotTree in phytools via the
arguments tips (which sets the vertical coordinates of the tips,
regardless of topology) & add (a logical value indicating whether to add
the tree tree to an existing plot or to open a new plot). (All
Hi there,
treespace would be an alternative, but its usefulness for 5 trees will
be quite limited. Just in case:
https://github.com/thibautjombart/treescape
Cheers
Thibaut
--
Dr Thibaut Jombart
Lecturer, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London
Head of RECON:
Very interested in this too!
Jake
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
>
> Hello,
> for comparison of two trees I can use very nice function cophyloplot plotting
> two trees (left and right) and connecting respective nodes by lines. Very
> nice
> and
13 matches
Mail list logo