Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-31 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
...@stanford.edu To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Cc: Greta de Groat gdegr...@stanford.edu Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:50:06 AM Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I will add one thing to Greta's

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-31 Thread JSC Chair
Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Greta de Groat Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:41 PM To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question Good point, Nancy, i didn't remember that the phonogram date

[RDA-L] TR: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-31 Thread Paradis Daniel
Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] De la part de Benjamin A Abrahamse Envoyé : 31 janvier 2013 12:59 À : RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Objet : Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I'm curious if people who oppose the use of t (pub date/copyright date

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread Meehan, Thomas
PM To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.camailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I'm hung up on the RDA instruction for recording a copyright date as a symbol or spelled out element conjoined to a text string otherwise known as a date

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
am Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I agree with Jenny: I would love to know the reasoning behind this. As for machine actionable: although I’m no great programmer, I do know that anyone building something using the copyright date would have to insert at least

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread Deborah Fritz
: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:29 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I think perhaps despite the discussion, a question remains on coding in OCLC: If you're using 264s, and the date of publication and the date of copyright

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread Nancy Lorimer
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:29:20 AM Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I think perhaps despite the discussion, a question remains on coding in OCLC: If you're using 264s, and the date of publication and the date of copyright are the same, which

[RDA-L] thanks -- RE: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread FOGLER, PATRICIA A GS-11 USAF AETC AUL/LTSC
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question Since i see that a Stanford record is being cited in this discussion, i would like to offer a little in the way of explanation. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [RDA-L] thanks -- RE: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread Greta de Groat
FOGLER/LTSC patricia.fog...@us.af.mil To: Greta de Groat gdegr...@stanford.edu, Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:53:13 AM Subject: thanks -- RE: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-30 Thread Greta de Groat
and Access / Resource Description and Access RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Cc: Greta de Groat gdegr...@stanford.edu Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:50:06 AM Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I will add one thing to Greta's very clear explanation. While

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-29 Thread Beth Guay
, January 28, 2013 2:58 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question Patricia Folger wrote: The former coding in OCLC looks like overkill -- How useful/necessary/correct is it to code this dtst to other than s have duplicate dates in the 008

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-29 Thread Benjamin A Abrahamse
: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question I'm hung up on the RDA instruction for recording a copyright date as a symbol or spelled out element conjoined to a text string otherwise known as a date. It seems to me, that here we have an excellent effort to carry our data from

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-28 Thread Paradis Daniel
d'origine- De : Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] De la part de FOGLER, PATRICIA A GS-11 USAF AETC AUL/LTSC Envoyé : 28 janvier 2013 13:12 À : RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Objet : [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-28 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Patricia asked: Do we advise copy catalogers to edit to 264 or let all variations pass if essentially correct for when they were cataloged (as best they can tell!) We will instruct that 264 4 be deleted if the $c is the same as 264 1, that date type be s, and only date 1 be coded, whether

Re: [RDA-L] RDA dtst t + a 260/264 muse on training question

2013-01-28 Thread Buzz Haughton
I have found this 264 _1 with 264 _4 coding to be a major time consumer when using RDA. For my local system, I must now copy what I put in 264 _4, e.g. ©2010 into 264 _1, delete the former, and then download. I fail to see what the repetition of what I put into these two MARC fields accomplishes