(of course, I think he should have appealed, but that is another story)
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Michael Worley <mwor...@byulaw.net> wrote:
> Thank you. This is what I thought you meant, and it is internally
> consistent with what I know of your view on such issues.
>
thy, whatever one thinks of its propriety.
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Michael Worley <mwor...@byulaw.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Marty, I, for one, would be curious what you meant by "sigh."
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Marty Lederman <leder
gionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>>
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>> private. Anyone can subscribe
ly) forward the messages to others.
>
> ___
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
&g
o swimming rather than to “living
> arrangements” – necessarily be excluded?
>
>
>
>Eugene
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Michael Worley
> *Sent:* Thursday, J
h are most often defended using
> “racial diversity” arguments) are troublesome enough; religion-based
> preferences strike me as even worse.
>
>
>
>Eugene
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On
d, see
>> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>>
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
>> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list me
gt;
>> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
>> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
>> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
>> wrongly) forward the messages to oth
an provide a justification for my views that would be adopted by
> legislators or persuasive to voters. To do that – particularly when
> concerns about LGBT discrimination are so obvious and salient – may
> require a real world narrative.
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> *From:* rel
igned to accommodate religious objectors to same-sex marriage or
> other LGBT rights.
>
>
>
> Alan Brownstein
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Michael Worley
> *Sent:* Monday, March 28,
list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw
see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly
Are employees and students at objecting institutions like Wheaton presently
getting contraception even though the institution has not submitted the
form?
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
If the entire function of the opt out notice is merely to provide
or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin
that the form is
essential for providing contraception.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Marty Lederman lederman.ma...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's probably not wise even to engage with Michael Worley on this, in
light of how patently inappropriate and misleading the forcing the nuns to
distribute
on
that denial of services.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:02 AM, David Cruz dc...@law.usc.edu wrote:
Michael Worley wrote: “the Commissioner should have rejected emotional
damages based on the TV interview.” This takes/keeps us further in the law
of free speech than directly law and religion
Would it make a difference for anyone here whether or not the baker was
planning to deny service again at a later time?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
I agree with Eugene.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Volokh, Eugene vol...@law.ucla.edu
wrote
to the discriminatory act” in the sense of having been
motivated by the lawsuit related to the act.
Eugene
David Cruz writes:
Michael Worley wrote: “the Commissioner should have rejected emotional
damages based on the TV interview.” This takes/keeps us further in the law
of free speech
can we accommodate political speech here? the ALJ's logic
seems sensible if he fines them that much for emotional damages.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe
on behalf of Michael Worley
mwor...@byulaw.net
*Sent:* Friday, July 3, 2015 1:21 PM
*To:* Scarberry, Mark
*Cc:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics; conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu
*Subject:* Re: The Remarkable Disappearance of State Justifications in
Obergefell
My understanding is Roberts did
A cultural norm cannot contradict the first amendment rights of freedom
of speech.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Jean Dudley jean.dud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 3, 2015, at 7:34 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
To those who believe in the wisdom of public accommodation laws
of that order in contradiction of the (incorporated) First Amendment rights
of freedom of speech.
David B. Cruz
Professor of Law
University of Southern California Gould School of Law
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071
U.S.A.
On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
A cultural
that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe
, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
The commissioner even relied on publicity given to the case as related to
the emotional damages to the couple; thus, any further advocacy, whatever
the language, is problematic. (p. 38-39)
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Michael Worley
The commissioner even relied on publicity given to the case as related to
the emotional damages to the couple; thus, any further advocacy, whatever
the language, is problematic. (p. 38-39)
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
Mr. Lawrence:
I doubt your
*From:* Eric J Segall [mailto:eseg...@gsu.edu eseg...@gsu.edu]
*Sent:* Friday, July 03, 2015 10:33 AM
*To:* Michael Worley; Scarberry, Mark
*Cc:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics; conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu
*Subject:* Re: The Remarkable Disappearance of State Justifications in
Obergefell
writing.
Judy
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
Yes.
The premises supporting this concept of marriage are so fundamental
that they rarely require articulation. The human race must procreate to
survive. Procreation occurs through
as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post
as
outdated and irrational.
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
I'll rest easier when out-of-wedlock childbearing is widely condemned
worldwide as harmful to kids; when people acknowledge there are good
arguments on both side of this difficult issue, and when the re
one
parent is worse than not being born at all.
JB
Sent from my iPhone
On May 23, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
I understand many disagree with my concern about out-of-wedlock births.
This apathy over my concern worries me, because without an acknowledgement
...@lists.ucla.edu [
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Michael Worley [
mwor...@byulaw.net]
*Sent:* Saturday, May 23, 2015 8:16 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Ireland
I understand many disagree with my concern about out-of-wedlock births.
This apathy over
by permission I mean convey an equivalence to. My apologies.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:54 PM, David Cruz dc...@law.usc.edu wrote:
Since Michael Worley asked these questions of Marty in a post, rather
than private email, I'd like to ask for a clarification of what he's asking
with number 2
be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post
/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael
://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/
Twitter: @RickGarnett https://twitter.com/RickGarnett
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
wrote:
To emphasize two policy changes in the LDS faith is legitimate; however
the centrality of traditional sexual norms to the LDS faith is extremely
more
(by fornication i simply mean pre-marital sex.)
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
I appreciate Marty's respect for the beliefs of those like myself who
oppose same-sex marriage.
I think Marty's distinction-- between opposition by individuals
AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
wrote:
To emphasize two policy changes in the LDS faith is legitimate; however
the centrality of traditional sexual norms to the LDS faith is extremely
more central than those changes.
It is like saying to a Catholic because you did away with indulgences
of these issues.
Alan B.
--
*From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Michael Worley
mwor...@byulaw.net
*Sent:* Friday, May 1, 2015 7:47 AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Religious
think you significantly
overstate your case when you equate them with transubstantiation.
*From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Michael Worley
*Sent:* Friday, May 01, 2015 10:45 AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D
; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http
sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
efforts to combat
sexual-orientation discrimination. Almost all of the talk by Democrats in
this area has been about combating discrimination by for-profit businesses,
not nonprofit religious organizations.
- Jim
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
wrote
/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael
the Administration's position on sexual orientation,
listen to Don Verrilli's argument yesterday.)
And there hasn't been any threat to pull Gordon College's accreditation.
Other than that, though , , ,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
wrote:
Given this administration's
or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin
/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael
is unique to Utah, and it's no model for anywhere else.
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:29:41 -0600
Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
To clarify, the Human Rights Campaign, the ACLU and Equality Utah all
endorsed the main Utah bill, SB 296.
http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/after-gop-legislature-passes
; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http
without being
demonized by the other side, that chills freedom of speech.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
I agree with Ryan and Doug that RFRA is sound public policy and many of
the outrageous claims about RFRA should be condemned. For instance
, or simply receive a courtesy copy of the brief once filed.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
Brigham Young University does not support in any way the content of this
message.
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
of marriage
contract.
On 02/23/2015 07:41 PM, Michael Worley wrote:
Our position seems inconsistent with yours. You argue that marriage is
simply a contract and government should not forbid any form of contract. We
argue, to the contrary, that it is important that the state be involved
, TX 78750 512/299-5001 jon.rol...@constitution.org
--
--
Michael Worley
J.D., Brigham Young University
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change
brief needs to anticipate all the
counterarguments, not just advance one position. Just a suggestion.
On 02/23/2015 08:37 PM, Michael Worley wrote:
I simplified our position. Our logic as to why licensing is not required
by the Fourteenth requires one believe tat states may regulate marriage
If any of you are interested, here is a brief filed at the cert stage
explaining why the animus rationale is the wrong one for deciding the
same-sex marriage issue. Both supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage
worked on or signed it.
that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe
the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
-Original Message-
From: Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Tue, Feb 25, 2014 8:47 pm
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Kansas/Arizona statutes protecting for-profit
businesses
Would you say the Federal RFRA is egregious, Marci
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
(212) 790-0215
http://sol-reform.com
https://www.facebook.com/professormarciahamilton?fref=ts
https://twitter.com/marci_hamilton
-Original Message-
From: Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw
be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Yeshiva University
55 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
(212) 790-0215
http://sol-reform.com
https://www.facebook.com/professormarciahamilton?fref=ts
https://twitter.com/marci_hamilton
-Original Message-
From: Michael Worley mwor
messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe
that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe
?: the LS employees do not receive the
benefit to which virtually all other women are entitled.
Grand theft auto, I tell ya.]
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.netwrote:
If I say; I oppose robbery but here are the keys to the car, and I give
the keys to someone who
be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
hole here . . .
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.netwrote:
Sending the form to the third-party insurer is the burden, because it is
an implied message of support Insurer, you need to provide contraception
because we don't
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:31 PM
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
a lawsuit. May I please ask for a
clarification of what Michael Worley meant by this phrasing below?
David B. Cruz
Professor of Law
University of Southern California Gould School of Law
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071
U.S.A.
From: Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
Reply-To: Law Religion issues
cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
, not nothing.
On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
And yet, without some form of heightened scrutiny, the free exercise
clause becomes a shell-- a hollow clause. I'm not saying RFRA gets the
balancing right (I could make that argument, but I'm not), I'm
@Marci_Hamilton
On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
And yet, without some form of heightened scrutiny, the free exercise
clause becomes a shell-- a hollow clause. I'm not saying RFRA gets the
balancing right (I could make that argument, but I'm not), I'm saying
.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note
Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
*From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Michael Worley
*Sent:* Monday, December 02, 2013 12:48 PM
*To:* Law
oops, that should read over n+1 instead of n.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
Some at the time of Vietnam thought otherwise:
In *Imus v. United States* 447 F.2d 1008 (10th Cir. 1971), drafted Utahns
where LDS Missionaries got an exemption claimed
The Court did not, of course, reach the merits in *Imus*, but people
thought there was a disparate impact.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
oops, that should read over n+1 instead of n.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe
and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Obviously, I'm not degrading the interest in contraception; I just think
saying this isn't lunch is a weird thing to say given the importance of
food.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
Marci--
Would you think that a mandate that all (private
to employment or who, in my view, craft
benefits and/or salaries based on religion or gender.
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
Obviously, I'm
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
and for-profit photographers who hold themselves
out as a public accommodation.The govt does not have civil rights.
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Michael Worley mwor
photographers who hold themselves
out as a public accommodation.The govt does not have civil rights.
Marci A. Hamilton
Verkuil Chair in Public Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School
Yeshiva University
@Marci_Hamilton
On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote
, 2013 9:00 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: New Mexico decision and other First Amendment expression
Of course the civil rights point matters. And the court said as much.
On Aug 23, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote
that a vendor denying services is the proper party to
raise it.
From: Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net
Reply-To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 9:27 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
in purchasing a product translates to the state's compelling
interest in providing a product is not supported by case law. Personal
interests provide governmental rational basis, of course, but not a
governmental compelling interest.
Just my 2¢,
Michael
--
Michael Worley
BYU Law School, Class of 2014
If we were debating banning contraception, Marci's argument would work and
make perfect sense. We are, instead, debating government-mandated funding
of contraception.
Michael
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Michael Worley mwor...@byulaw.net wrote:
As far as I understand the situation
This commentator
http://www.bilerico.com/2013/07/slow_down_indianas_new_marriage_law_isnt_real.php
seems to think it hasn't. Since he presumably endorses same-sex marriage,
I would think he would point it out if there had been one example of
enforcement.
Michael Worley
J.D. Candidate, 2014
89 matches
Mail list logo
