Why so people think this is? It seems to me that if this topic is
difficult, it indicates a deeper problem about the two sides not crossing
in their reasoning, which means the Arizona bill goes back to fundamental
questions about the role of religion, which is hard to debate.
On Sat, Mar 1,
Thanks, Eugene! I think your advice is well taken. I certainly intend to spend
more time breathing deeply over the next few days since I don't think I can
contribute anything thoughtful or useful to the list given the current tenor of
the discussion.
Alan
There's no such thing as a purely secular government. And do you have
software that automatically gripes about whatever I say? Every time I post
something that's pithy, to the point, packed with wisdom, and?with no
bloviating, you complain. And my most recent statement, and the one that begins
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN LOFTON
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 4:56 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: LOFTON / Re: From the list custodian
There's no such thing as a purely secular government. And do
you
.
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:13 pm
Subject: RE: LOFTON / Re: From the list custodian
??? I don't insist that people speak in thousands of words -- but in my
experience
I agree.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Landsberg
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:22 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: From the list custodian re: theological discussions
Hallelujah!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/2/2006 1:02
Larry Darby wrote:
My post was very much material and relevant to law and religion. I
believe our ListMeister fears any criticism of Judaism or world Jewry or
global endeavors of its adherents. No matter how often or who opposes
freedom of religion, which includes criticism of Judaism, the
(of the HoloHoax) is expanding across the Earth.
For a USA-First government!
Larry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 11:33 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: From the list custodian
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: From the list custodian RE: Pink Triangles and
Religious Liberty
Larry Darby wrote:
My post was very much material and relevant to law and religion. I
believe our ListMeister fears any criticism of Judaism or
world Jewry
or global endeavors
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Darby
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:44 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: From the list custodian RE: Pink Triangles and
Religious Liberty
My post was very much material
. Darby
wants to provoke are a waste of everyone's time.
Best,
Stuart
From: Volokh, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: From the list custodian
You bigots are funny!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:23 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: From the list custodian RE: Pink Triangles and Religious
Liberty
] On Behalf Of Larry Darby
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:44 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: From the list custodian RE: Pink Triangles and
Religious Liberty
My post was very much material and relevant to law and
religion. I believe our ListMeister fears any
(i.e., the written
Constitution) might best be interpreted to mean?
sandy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:15 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: From the list custodian
Noted -- though I thought Sup Ct, oath, judges might be in the area of law of
government and religion. John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com.
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
Eugene wrote on 11/21/2005 11:18:15 AM:
For instance, does it mean Congress shall make no law totally
prohibiting all religion, so that no religion may be practiced?
If so,
Congress could outlaw Catholicism, on the theory that it's not
prohibiting religion generally, only one religion.
For
Eugene:
My point was a serious one about how one organizes a course, and
reminder that when people teach a course to argue for a viewpoint and to
ignore other information it undermines academic integrity. The fact is
this: a History of the Influence of Christianity in American history
In a message dated 9/6/2005 3:41:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My point
was a serious one about how one organizes a course, and reminder that when
people teach a course to argue for a viewpoint and to ignore other
information it undermines academic
I think Paul is wrong. Theologically conservative Protestant Christians are
concerned about the abuses of religion. The ones who have set up schools are
mostly in the tradition of the dissenters (like Roger Williams) who were the
subject of religious persecution. It is an unfortunate stereotype to
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Finkelman
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: From the list custodian
Eugene:
My point was a serious one about how one organizes a course, and
reminder that when people teach
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Finkelman
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: From the list custodian
Eugene:
My point was a serious one about how one organizes a course, and
reminder that when people teach a course to argue
Academics
Subject: Re: From the list custodian
Eugene:
My point was a serious one about how one organizes a course,
and
reminder that when people teach a course to argue for a
viewpoint and to
ignore other information it undermines academic integrity.
The fact
: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 2:28 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics; Volokh, Eugene
Subject: RE: From the list custodian
Eugene: You obviously did not read the first two paragraphs
of the post if that is all you saw!
Quoting Volokh, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, all I
Title: Message
I dont see how Hendersons post is
appropriate, under the circumstances. This list is not comprised of
disembodied brains, devoted to nothing more than abstract formalist acontextual
reasoning, even if some might appear to think so. Frances has been a solid
contributor to
Considering my hand "spanked." I can only plead being deprived of conversations with law professors.
"Broader moral or religious questions, such as whether homosexuality is morally proper, how religious people should react to it, and so on are *not* on-topic. Naturally they're related to the
I want to take this occasion publicly to thank Eugene for his calm,
levelheaded responses. I am not sure that I deserve it, even though I
hit the wrong button, but I want to thank Eugene.
-Original Message-
From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004
26 matches
Mail list logo
