@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Re: the waiver request by ReconRobotics for 420 - 450 MHz operation.
Hams get the shaft again...
George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
I feel a little pessimistic about this, in that I expect it to happen more
frequently as time passes. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't help feeling that
we are going to gradually lose our spectrum as companies with deep
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of George Henry
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:15 PM
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Re: the waiver request by ReconRobotics for 420 - 450 MHz
On 3/3/2010 1:11 PM, Richard wrote:
I feel a little pessimistic about this, in that I expect it to happen
more frequently as time passes. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't help
feeling that we are going to gradually lose our spectrum as companies
with deep pockets buy our frequencies out from
If it crosses international boundries I expect it not to happen
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: gbis-reply-...@gbis.com
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:11:05 -0800
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage.
Maybe, but in my opinion the foot is clearly in the door.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: David Jordan
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Ah George,
Don't
At 11:15 AM 03/03/10, you wrote:
Re: the waiver request by ReconRobotics for 420 - 450 MHz operation.
Hams get the shaft again...
George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413
Someone needs to turn the tables on the rest of them - file for
primary on 220-222 MHz.
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DCFluX
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Take that crap up to 2.4
...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *DCFluX
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm
Band
Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage.
*From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *DCFluX
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Since they'd be competing with high powered repeaters and government radars,
I thought 2.4 gig would have been a better choice than 70cm, but that's just
me...
Richard
www.n7tgb.net
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, George Henry wrote:
Re: the waiver request by ReconRobotics for 420 - 450 MHz operation.
Hams get the shaft again...
Who wants to be the first to sue the FCC?
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DCFluX
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of George Henry
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:15 PM
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Re: the waiver request
03, 2010 1:03 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Ah George,
Don't worry! The first time the device fails to deliver the goods to the
Public Safety guys, they'll stop using it. Good luck to them. They'll have
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
On 3/3/2010 1:11 PM, Richard wrote:
I feel a little pessimistic about this, in that I expect it to happen more
frequently as time passes. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't help feeling that
we are going
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:22 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
On 3/3/2010 1:11 PM, Richard wrote:
I feel a little pessimistic
--
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:03 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Ah George
...subjective opinion of
one!
- Original Message -
From: k7...@skybeam.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
This is why public safety has its own band
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, David Jordan wrote:
There are plenty of options?the FCC has set aside spectrum just for
Public Safety and such devices, but they need input from us or all
they hear is the vendor biased story?not sure why the FCC felt
compelled to allow this request. Perhaps the vendor
I want to see what happens when the USAF complains of interference to the
PAVE PAWS system, like they did with the 70cm repeater operators. After
all, the coppers in the Bay Area (SF/Oakland) and New York have deep pockets
and each will probably buy a few of these at several grand a piece - only
Didn't the ARRL do that over BPL?
Mark - N9WYS
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Kris Kirby
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, George Henry wrote:
Re: the waiver request by ReconRobotics for 420 - 450 MHz operation.
Hams get the shaft again...
Who wants to
Amateur Radio is NOT PRIMARY on 70cm in the U.S.. Never have been.
Never will be.
We are SECONDARY ...and NTIA let's us behave like we're primary... most
of the time.
That's why we lost with previous military systems (ask folk near Camp
Pendleton about that one), we lost with PAVE PAWS, and
-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *DCFluX
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm
Band
Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Actually, DPL/PL doesn't help. It only signals to the receiver when to open
squelch is all. If someone is transmitting and this thing decides
On 3/3/2010 5:29 PM, WA3GIN wrote:
That is a real stretch...these things are to be used for incidents
that require them...how many many high rise building fires do you have
in your town...think you can live with a little interference every 20
yrs. Get real.
The numbers are public in every
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 07:11 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
I feel a little pessimistic about this, in that I expect it to happen more
frequently as time passes. I hope I'm wrong
Of Mark Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:40 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
This is already happening in Australia. Amateurs are secondary users for
420-450MHz, with military and radio location being
, 2010 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
So... is anyone gonna buy one of these things to see just what kind of
interference it will actually make in the 70cm band? 1 watt max and .25
watt nominal is enough to key up a poorly tuned and set up
-
*From:* Brian Raker mailto:brian.ra...@gmail.com
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:51 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur
70cm Band
So... is anyone
Except for the fact these users will be SECONDARY to US.
Still, try telling your local PD they have to shut their robot down
because they are causing interference...
Joe M.
Nate Duehr wrote:
Amateur Radio is NOT PRIMARY on 70cm in the U.S.. Never have been.
Never will be.
We are
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the
Amateur 70cm Band
Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage.
-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:25 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC RO Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
I want to see what happens when the USAF
34 matches
Mail list logo
