Problem resolved!!I disconnected the Linksys BEFW11S4 wireless
router power source for about 30 seconds, reattached the power and
then checked the QRZ website again.all is OK now. This has
happened
before where strange things happen while surfing the internet so
Back to surfing.
At 02:11 AM 7/6/2005, Doug W7FDF wrote:
Problem resolved!!I disconnected the Linksys BEFW11S4 wireless
router power source for about 30 seconds, reattached the power and
then checked the QRZ website again.all is OK now. This has
happened
before where strange things happen while surfing the
My linksys used to stop working about once a week so I did exactly that. The
timer shut it off for 1 minute at 4AM. Eventually I dumped the stupid
linksys and am now using a linux box as a router. I haven't looked back
since.
Steve,
kf6fkk
- Original Message -
From: Dave VanHorn
At 02:40 AM 7/6/2005, Steven Passmore, kf6fkk wrote:
My linksys used to stop working about once a week so I did exactly that. The
timer shut it off for 1 minute at 4AM. Eventually I dumped the stupid
linksys and am now using a linux box as a router. I haven't looked back
since.
It's on my todo
Doug
Run a Virus scanner like SOPHOS
Mcafee and Norton wont find all trojans.. sophos will
free trial at www.sophos.com
sounds like your Router is getting flooded by a trojan
I was getting the same thing had to unplug the router to clear the
flooding
NEAL-ka2acf
Doug W7FDF wrote:
Comments mixed into the text below...
Mike WA6ILQ
At 07:58 PM 7/5/05, you wrote:
Mathew,
The Maggiore EV-1 is a very basic, crystal-controlled exciter that has none
of the filters, power control, or SWR protection features of commercial
units. I have one that I took off the air because of its
I never got a scan in my email.
Mike WA6ILQ
At 05:46 PM 7/5/05, you wrote:
Hi Gang, did this thing ever get scanned if so where is it?
Thanks
AC0Y
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Morris WA6ILQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone has a IAI manual and wants to loan it out to be
At 12:20 AM 7/6/05, you wrote:
At 02:11 AM 7/6/2005, Doug W7FDF wrote:
Problem resolved!!I disconnected the Linksys BEFW11S4 wireless
router power source for about 30 seconds, reattached the power and
then checked the QRZ website again.all is OK now. This has
happened
before where
hi all, seems i'm trying to get a db 4062 duplexer to work also i have
the tuning info however its the 'c' model and i would like to make it
a 'b' model, which meens i suppose the cable harness lengths are longer
and one set of loops is longer...i've tried to get the info from DB
SPECTRA but
At 02:35 AM 7/6/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Over 30 years ago, when Standard introduced the first japanese mobile
radios to the USA, the model 806 and 826, some of the users of the
146.82 system were being heard by the Torrance (one of the 86
communities that make up Los Angeles county) police
I had a Standard 826 back in the mid-70's. On one trip to the San Francisco Bay
Area, we were pulled over by the Police while talking on the 146.85 Repeater.
We were asking for some directions to a ham gathering, and we were giving
detailed descriptions of where we were at the time. It was easy
Ok, something new has been discovered this morning, while going back
to the repeater for further testing. I turned on the SM to get ready
to check a few things, while set to 132.950 the squelch on the SM was
open I could hear a pulsing noise. I then went to the output of the
repeater, I
I powered down the Mastr Pro receiver, noise still there,
only thing left was the cat controller, powered it down and noise is
gone. This noise was heard over a large frequency spread in the
aircraft band on the SM. Could it be possible that the controller
could be the cause sending havac out
Well, wellNeal Newman KA2CAF! When I saw your name then saw your
[typo] callsign at the end of your comments.I said, I know this
Dude!!!. Anyway thanks Neal, I will review the URL you enclosed on the
Sophos antivirus stuff. I believe you and I had some email contact a
couple of years
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good 6m repeater antenna from some
one that is still able to supply one? All I can seem to find is unity
gain antennae. Looking to put a 6M repeater back on the air as soon
as we can get antennae for a split site. We will be running RCA
radios.
Walter,
At 7/6/2005 02:35 AM, you wrote:
Comments mixed into the text below...
Mike WA6ILQ
At 07:58 PM 7/5/05, you wrote:
Mathew,
The Maggiore EV-1 is a very basic, crystal-controlled exciter that has none
of the filters, power control, or SWR protection features of commercial
units. I have one
At 7/6/2005 07:37 AM, you wrote:
Ok, something new has been discovered this morning, while going back
to the repeater for further testing. I turned on the SM to get ready
to check a few things, while set to 132.950 the squelch on the SM was
open I could hear a pulsing noise. I then went to the
Hi
have you considered maybe a tri band ant, ie 2,70cm and 6mtrs. Gain on 6mtrs
is about 3dB. Here in the UK I use a Moonraker tri band, works fine
73
Steve M1SWB
- Original Message -
From: Walter Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 06,
Sinclair makes two one with a 3 dbd gain
You should be able to get Cook Tower phone number off the repeater builder
web page they have both in stock. I bought one from them back in the fall
and it work very well.
- Original Message -
From: Walter Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
One note...are they hearing your RF or are they hearing someones
aviation radio rebroadcasting your repeater. Had similar problem
here in Tamps Bay, FL few years back. The FCc sent sitations to 5
users who ID'd.
I would listen on the aviation freq close to your site to determine
if you are
Beware, all the antenna adverts I see in the UK mags quote dBi !!! 3dBi
gain over a dipole is not worth mentioning!
When you consider that the folded dipoles I have on my repeater are almost 8
feet long, compare that with your tribander - you aint gonna get any gain
without the extra length
No - 157.870 IS the correct mix to combine with 145.410 and end up on
132.950 MHz - do the math again. The difference is 12.460 MHz.
145.410 - 12.46 = 132.950
145.410 + 12.46 = 157.870
Joe M.
Bob Dengler wrote:
At 7/6/2005 02:35 AM, you wrote:
Having a look at 157.5275, which is 12.1175
Hi
well 3dB is double the power 6dB is 4 times etc, etc
So in theory 20w into ant = 40w ERP
Yes I know 50Mhz folded dipoles are big. I was toying with making one, but
never did
73
Steve M1SWB
- Original Message -
From: Matt Beasant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
At 7/6/2005 12:26 PM, you wrote:
No - 157.870 IS the correct mix to combine with 145.410 and end up on
132.950 MHz - do the math again. The difference is 12.460 MHz.
145.410 - 12.46 = 132.950
145.410 + 12.46 = 157.870
Joe M.
OK, 12.46 is the difference between the actual spur Mathew's output,
Steve wrote:
Hi
well 3dB is double the power 6dB is 4 times etc, etc
So in theory 20w into ant = 40w ERP
Yes I know 50Mhz folded dipoles are big. I was toying with making one, but
never did
73
Steve M1SWB
But dB is relative. And the dBi means that it is referenced to an
isotropic
At 02:47 PM 7/6/2005, Bob Dengler wrote:
At 7/6/2005 12:26 PM, you wrote:
No - 157.870 IS the correct mix to combine with 145.410 and end up on
132.950 MHz - do the math again. The difference is 12.460 MHz.
145.410 - 12.46 = 132.950
145.410 + 12.46 = 157.870
Joe M.
OK, 12.46 is the
How about the gain diamond monobander. I believe it will handle up to
500watts.
Andy KC2GOW
445.125 PL 141.3 Staten Island,NY
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send
The DB probucts folded dipoles are good. Good job keeping the RCA stuff on the air!
Chris (ex RCA employee)
N9LLO
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your
Is the 12.46 that you are coming up with, the xtal inside of the transmitter itself. I'm looking, there is a repeater near here that is right around 158 megs, I'm looking it up now.
Mathew
Dave VanHorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:47 PM 7/6/2005, Bob Dengler wrote:At 7/6/2005 12:26 PM, you
At 7/6/2005 12:51 PM, you wrote:
Steve wrote:
Hi
well 3dB is double the power 6dB is 4 times etc, etc
So in theory 20w into ant = 40w ERP
Yes I know 50Mhz folded dipoles are big. I was toying with making one, but
never did
73
Steve M1SWB
But dB is relative. And the dBi means
At 7/6/2005 01:26 PM, you wrote:
Is the 12.46 that you are coming up with, the xtal inside of the
transmitter itself. I'm looking, there is a repeater near here that is
right around 158 megs, I'm looking it up now.
Mathew
No, 12.46 MHz is the difference between your repeater output the freq.
The repeater pair that is about 3 miles from here is, and I have not checked to see which way the offset is, but 153.920 and 158.820 is the pair given.
Mathew
Bob Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 7/6/2005 12:26 PM, you wrote:No - 157.870 IS the correct mix to combine with 145.410 and end
Ok, now I get where they came up with that. Was just trying to make the association. I've realigned the transmitter, checked everything that I can think of and still can be heard clipping on 132.950, bu then if I goto 133.075 I can hear the repeater real plain, as also another user that is
OK, 145.410 MHz. I should have read ALL the posts before asking that. Is
there anything in your area on 157.875 MHz? Those could mix to end up on
132.945 MHz. Same with something on 139.180 MHz, although that us much
less likely, I think.
What is your crystal frequency and multiplication factor?
The only frequency close to that anywhere in the are is the town's sewer repeater at 153.920 and 158.820. The output is 145.410 and the multiplication factor is by 12.
Mathew
mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, 145.410 MHz. I should have read ALL the posts before asking that. Isthere anything in
12.46 is the difference if it's a mix. Look at the math I posted.
145.410 - 132.950 = 12.46
145.410 - 12.46 = 132.950
145.410 + 12.46 = 157.870
If it's mixing, the repeater would have to mix (well, the most likely
mix which is 2A-B) with 157.870 to end up on 132.950 MHz.
Joe M.
Yahoo!
158.820 is too far away. That would mix to produce 133.000 MHz. You're
looking for something on 158.875 MHz which would mix to end up on
132.940 MHz, but that's close enough to hear on 95 if the frequencies
are a little off (145.41 is a little high and 158.875 is a little low).
Joe M.
Ooops! I messed up the math. 15*8*.820 MHz is WAY too far away. That
would end up on 132.000 (not 133 MHz - that would be a mix with 157.820
MHz).
You're looking for something on 157.875 MHz, not 158.875 MHz as I stated
below. That is the input to an old IMTS pair, but it wasn't used in the
USA -
Nothing in the area that I can find that is on that frequency. Will have to listen over then next few days.
Mathew
mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
158.820 is too far away. That would mix to produce 133.000 MHz. You'relooking for something on 158.875 MHz which would mix to end up on132.940 MHz,
Hi guys
With all this talk about 6m antennas, can I mention that I have a pair
of Sinclair SRL-110 dipoles to dispose of. They were used in a
commercial system at 48/49 MHz. I have not tested them at 52/53 MHz but
the SRL-x10 series antennas are usually quite broadband.
The catch is that
Decibel Products or Sinclair. Serious antennas. Folded dipoles - but you'll
need some tower.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Walter Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:59 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 6 M Gain
At 06:57 AM 7/6/05, you wrote:
At 02:35 AM 7/6/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Over 30 years ago, when Standard introduced the first japanese mobile
radios to the USA, the model 806 and 826, some of the users of the
146.82 system were being heard by the Torrance (one of the 86
communities that make
At 07:08 AM 7/6/05, you wrote:
I had a Standard 826 back in the mid-70's. On one trip to the San
Francisco Bay Area, we were pulled over by the Police while talking on the
146.85 Repeater. We were asking for some directions to a ham gathering,
and we were giving detailed descriptions of where
Walter,
See if you can find a local two-way shop with an old low band antenna
laying around. I found a two bay, 43 mhz unit for free. The 30 to 50 mhz
band is being abandoned by many users for cell phones and 800 mhz stuff.
Often the shops can't give away the equipment and have to pay to
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
How about Repeater Appreciation Week ?
We need to have another one of those around here... soon. :-)
That or I'm going to take a Wouff Hong to someone's head the next time
they say, Well, I'm not a member of the club, but I'd really like the
club to __..
I've
Hi Matthew,
I powered down the Mastr Pro receiver, noise still
there,only thing left was the cat controller, powered it down and
noise isgone. This noise was heard over a large frequency spread
in theaircraft band on the SM. Could it be possible that the
controllercould be the
Do you mean Ringo Ranger or Ringo Rangeless? ;-)
At 08:22 PM 7/6/2005 +0100, you wrote:
BTW I think Cushcraft make a 6m ringo ranger which is quite large so may not
be suited to an exposed site but supposed to work very well.
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Ringo, Negitave. --W3KKC
On 7/6/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean Ringo Ranger or Ringo Rangeless? ;-)
At 08:22 PM 7/6/2005 +0100, you wrote:
BTW I think Cushcraft make a 6m ringo ranger which is quite large so may not
be suited to an exposed site but supposed to work very well.
The Ringo for 6 is a BAD choice for repeater use.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 6 M Gain Antenna
Do you mean Ringo Ranger or Ringo Rangeless?
Hello to All,
I just got a new neighbor at my 6 meter repeater site, a low power (30
watt) FM broadcast station on 94.9MHZ. I now have low level
interference on my MastrII repeater input frequency.
As a simple troubleshooting tool, I thought about putting a low pass
filter on the receiver or
You might have better luck with shorted coax stubs on the target
frequency with tees to the feeder line and at both ends of the coax.
On 7/6/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to All,
I just got a new neighbor at my 6 meter repeater site, a low power (30
watt) FM broadcast station on
A little off topic, but what are you doing with the linux box? My linksys
has issues as well, and I have several old PC's around that I could turn in
to a router.
Mike Short
WA7UNW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 02:55:09 -0500
From: Dave VanHorn [EMAIL
One thing to think about.
145.41/12 = 12.1175 MHz
12.1175 x 11 = 133.2925 MHz
It could be related to this as it is harmonic of the fundamental crystal freq.
A low pass filter would not take this out. A band pass cavity might do the job if from your tx.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Hi learned friends.
I have a few Qs that you may be able to help with.
One: Can a very good notch filter be made from coax stub as I need
to make one for each of the Aust cb chs approx 500 kHz spacings for
a portable repeater.
I am going to use a TX and an Rx feeder so I will not need a
Joe,
Because the separation (about 45 MHz) is significant, you might consider
installing a cavity filter on your receiver input. A less expensive
solution might be to order up a helical resonator filter from DCI.
Don't forget that the FM station operator has an obligation to not
interfere with
I'm looking information on Motorola Saber Modules . Looking for the Modules to Convert a Motorola Saber UHF 440-470 To a 490 - 512 MHz .Pleas let me know .
Thanks .
Steve .
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
To unsubscribe
Check out http://clarkconnect.com they offer a free firewall, router, web
server, ftp server, mail server and Samba file server package running under
Redhat Fedora Core 2. The is a GUI that makes it very easy to setup. I have
been running a Clarconnect Box for over a year and am very happy with
I'm looking for something to replace this repeater. I'm not sure if
it is the Vocom Amp, Antenna, Exciter or just plain messed up. I'm
told the GE Mastr II's are easy to convert. How true is this. Does
any one have one lying around. Or who has what available. Must be
price competative,
At 02:57 PM 7/6/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Was it Roland Sammelman?
---I'm not really sure! I can't even remember his call :-). But he was
well-known at the time (and the 37/97 machine was hot property back in the
70's!).
Then there was the one particular W6 who just would not get his
radio
But the interference is to 132.950 MHz, not 132.2925 MHz.
The harmonic is about 657.5 kHz away!
Joe M.
From: Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing to think about.
145.41/12 = 12.1175 MHz
12.1175 x 11 = 133.2925 MHz
It could be related to this as it is harmonic of the fundamental
Steve,
In order for you to do this it will more than a new radio. The Synthesizer
alone will cost over $500.00. Are you sure you want to do this?
Charles Miller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 9:23 PM
I had several problems with my maggiore exciter on 220, and others I
have gotten to work on that were on 144. Have you tried running another
radio into the amp and see if it is there?? Have you tried listening on
a different radio to see if more than one unit see the spur?? Have you
tried
I'm not opposed to coming up there.
I have some personal business to take care of tomorrow, and a
committment on friday, but after that I think I'm free. We should be
able to run it down pretty quick, at least to pin down what's causing
it. Doesn't sound like you're having any trouble getting
Sorry folks, I dropped the ball. Busy with setting up and other
repeater here in the area and forgot all about it. I will send the book
to Mike, WA6ILQ, to scan it for the group. Mike what is your snail
mail address? Email me direct.
Rod KC7VQR
Hi Gang, did this thing ever get scanned if
At 7/6/2005 01:31 PM, you wrote:
The repeater pair that is about 3 miles from here is, and I have not
checked to see which way the offset is, but 153.920 and 158.820 is the
pair given.
Mathew
Doesn't sound like that has anything to do with the problem. If you can
see the spur coming out of
It is very weird, all evening I have been working with the repeater, and what ever it is, it is very inttermittant, because it will come and go, and there is no pattern for it. I just learned of that pair, but it is the only pair that is close to me that I know of.
Mathew
Bob Dengler [EMAIL
I no longer have a functioning scanner - the long thin
(pencil-diameter) scan light on my Scanjet 3 burned
out about a couple of months ago and those lamps
are pure unobtanium.
And being unemployed, I have no money for new toys.
Can someone else scan it and send me the file?
If so, contact Rod
Mathew you said this problem started when you
changed the antenna. Did you cut back on the feedline and use a new
connector? Awhile back there was discussion on here about problems if you
don't use a new connector. Just a thought hope it helps.
73
Mike/K1EG
- Original Message
68 matches
Mail list logo
