Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Is overriding the Xcode mandated (afaik) 10.3 compatibility in Makefile.PL
the right approach here? Or back to LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
I think back to LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the easiest, though it's called
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH so darwin needs to be special-cased anyway.
Hmmm …
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Anders F Björklund a...@rpm5.org wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Is overriding the Xcode mandated (afaik) 10.3 compatibility in
Makefile.PL
the right approach here? Or back to LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
I think back to LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the easiest, though it's
devzero2000 wrote:
I watch and think whether I should … it certainly would be popular
to flip RPM to cmake instead. And I'm pretty sure that devzero200 would
like to see colorized based on his nicely done POPT AutoFu.
But the popt autogen.sh seems to be failing on gettext, as it is
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when released if
I don't get sucked into some CVE black hole) will propagate the
change
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when released if
I don't get sucked into some CVE black
On Apr 6, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
NIce!
Be forewarned however:
RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE - RPM_STRING_TYPE for
description/summary/group has already been achieved in rpm-5.4.9.
The remaining work (this month, will be in rpm-5.4.9 when
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
I don't think changing devtool.conf to a db version that actually
exists/works is going to change that, but thanks for the warning.
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:435: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'DB_SEQUENCE'
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:492: error: expected
On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
I don't think changing devtool.conf to a db version that actually
exists/works is going to change that, but thanks for the warning.
./rpmdb/rpmdb.h:435: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
Jeff Johnson wrote:
No idea whether it works, but at least it seems to build...
... the point being that libtsan1 is headed for the bit bucket
anyways, and openssl is so so so much easier to use than gnutls
(but only by a hair's breadth) and the One True Crypto: NSS is actually
okay
On May 12, 2011, at 3:35 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
No idea whether it works, but at least it seems to build...
... the point being that libtsan1 is headed for the bit bucket
anyways, and openssl is so so so much easier to use than gnutls
(but only by a hair's
Jeff Johnson wrote:
One other problem is that the tools are using $(OPENMP_CFLAGS)
but not $(OPENMP_LIBS), which leads to missing symbols at runtime:
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _GOMP_parallel_start
One workaround is --disable-openmp, but for it to work it also
On May 12, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
One other problem is that the tools are using $(OPENMP_CFLAGS)
but not $(OPENMP_LIBS), which leads to missing symbols at runtime:
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _GOMP_parallel_start
One
I'll snip the libtasn1 dependency out if it causes pain ...
... its an implicit dependency from
rpm - neon - gnutls - libtasn1
which can be flipped into --with-openssl in a flash
now that --with-neon=internal is in place.
Note neon 0.29.5 - 0.29.6 looms on the todo++ list ...
... no
Jeff Johnson wrote:
I'll snip the libtasn1 dependency out if it causes pain ...
... its an implicit dependency from
rpm - neon - gnutls - libtasn1
which can be flipped into --with-openssl in a flash
now that --with-neon=internal is in place.
Easy enough to install, just hadn't been
On May 11, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
No idea whether it works, but at least it seems to build...
From my investigations with TSS and TCG and TPM and MTM
which led me to a decision to attempt a ASN.1 embedding not
only into RPM libraries but also into the *.rpm/*.wdj
Thank you!
FYI:
I'm on 2010.1 stabilizing the 5.3.6 eastham:8010 waterfall right now ...
... grr ... ntpd clock skew is/was the issue ...
... and that (modulo fixup's) _IS_ rpm-5.3.6, leaving the rest of the month
(modulo other duties) to get conversion in place.
Expect a
This config change probably went to the wrong devtool target,
%macosx instead of %standalone ? (needed in both, though...)
--anders
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
__
__
Server:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009, Anders F Björklund wrote:
This config change probably went to the wrong devtool target,
%macosx instead of %standalone ? (needed in both, though...)
No, I intentionally changed both %standalone and %macosx because it is
needed in both and I don't wanted that it is
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
This config change probably went to the wrong devtool target,
%macosx instead of %standalone ? (needed in both, though...)
No, I intentionally changed both %standalone and %macosx because it is
needed in both and I don't wanted that it is forgotten for %macosx.
On Fri, May 23, 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Do you want -lssl only? I.e no -lbeecrypt?
I can drill the pgpImplVecs for digests any time you want ...
No, my intention here was to support OpenSSL just _optionally_ in
addition to BeeCrypt. But we could add some Autoconf glue to let one
easily
Do you want -lssl only? I.e no -lbeecrypt?
I can drill the pgpImplVecs for digests any time you want ...
73 de Jeff
On May 23, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
[...]
RPM successfully ported to one more (esoteric ;-) platform: Mac OS X
[...]
Thanks to devtool standalone and all recent cleanups and fixes,
RPM 5 now out-of-the-box also builds fully cleanly under Mac OS X:
| Powermac:~/rpm rse$ sh
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
I guess this makes Jeff happy... ;-)
Jeff gets grumpy when he can't hack. Yes, my disposition is
improving. ;-)
I'm almost to fire-and-forget bliss, AutoFu has always made my head
hurt.
As long as I have a devtool.conf cheat
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
I guess this makes Jeff happy... ;-)
Jeff gets grumpy when he can't hack. Yes, my disposition is improving. ;-)
I'm almost to fire-and-forget bliss, AutoFu has always made my head hurt.
As
Add an inline here document
cat GO_SYSIN_DD
(the usual glop)
GO_SYSIN_DD
and do ./which instead.
Don't forget
BuildRequires: /bin/csh
Just in case: hehe
73 de Jeff
On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
I'm trying to see as complete a build as possible so that
I can see breakage.
Both python/perl broke when I refactored
#include rpmio.h
out of rpmlib.h
These are trivial problems to fix immediately IFF a build can
be seen.
73 de Jeff
On Jul 23, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
I'm trying to see as complete a build as possible so that
I can see breakage.
Sure, but first we have to adjust the build-environment to correctly
handle the special perl/ area.
Ralf S. Engelschall
Hehe, devtool:ERROR: failed to download file-4.21.tar.gz
On Jul 20, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
__
__
Server: rpm5.org
On Jul 20, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Hehe, devtool:ERROR: failed to download file-4.21.tar.gz
Yes, yesterday their server worked fine, today it seems dead.
Now we have an own mirror. Just retry with the latest stuff.
On Jul 19, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
+## o 2007-07-18: ix86-fedora7-gcc4.2.0
+## o 2007-07-19: ix86-fedora7-sunstudio12
+## o 2007-07-19: ix86-fedora7-icc10.0
Please notice especially those three
Nice. Expect my bipolar meds to kick in shortly ;-)
On Jul 16, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
__
__
Server: rpm5.org
On Jun 22, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Log:
allow people like Jeff to build with more internal stuff
(although I
personally think we shouldn't do this ;-)
We agree.
I still gotta get 4.5/5.0 srpm snapshots together this evening.
Shall I feature regress?
73
On Jun 22, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
OK. I'll likely have more info shortly.
Here's config.status snippet:
s,@CFLAGS@,|#_!!_#|-g -O2 -fPIC -DPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -
Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-
char-subscripts -fpie
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jun 22, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Ah, yes, grep is my friend. Digging ...
Here's set -x spew:
[..]
+ test . '!=' .
=== isn't the IFS=: missing here?
+ for __rcl_location in '${with_beecrypt}'
On Friday, 15 June 2007, at 19:06:17 (+0200),
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
CVSROOT/modules' versioning is a global one, but one has to version
the checking out of sub-modules differently on each RPM
branch. Example: for branch rpm-X_Y one might need a particular set
of N modules, each with a
35 matches
Mail list logo
