What tokenizer are you using? I think, but I'm not entirely sure, that
this would require a bug in a tokenizer.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Ryan, Michael F. (LNG-DAY)
michael.r...@lexisnexis.com wrote:
I'm using Solr 4.9.0. I'm trying to figure out what would cause an error like
this to
Why do you think that this is a good idea? Hanja are used for special
purposes; they are not trivally convertable to Hanjul due to ambiguity, and
it's not at all clear that a typical search user wants to treat them as
equivalent.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Eyal Naamati
A query I posted yesterday amounted to me forgetting that I have to
set qt.shards when I use a URL other than plain old '/select' with
SolrCloud. Is there any way to configure a query handler to automate
this, so that all queries addressed to '/RNI' get that added in?
-4349-b644-8e29e80e2...@gmail.com%3E
you can add qt.shards into handler defaults/invariants.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
A query I posted yesterday amounted to me forgetting that I have to
set qt.shards when I use a URL other than plain old
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/25/2015 5:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
So, found the following line in the guide:
java -DzkRun -DnumShards=2
-Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=myconf -jar start.jar
using
)
at
com.basistech.rni.index.internal.SolrCloudEvaluationNameIndex.init(SolrCloudEvaluationNameIndex.java:53)
with corresponding log traffic in the solr log.
The cloud page in the Solr admin app shows the IP address in green.
It's a bit hard to read in general, it's all squished up to the top.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Benson Margulies
)
at
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processDelete(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/25/2015 5:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
So, found the following
)
at
org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/25/2015 8:35 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Do I need a zkcli bootstrap or do I start with upconfig? What port does
zkRun
Do I need a zkcli bootstrap or do I start with upconfig? What port does
zkRun put zookeeper on?
On Feb 25, 2015 10:15 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/25/2015 7:44 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Shawn, I _am_ starting from clean. However, I didn't find a recipe for
what you
-Duser.timezone=UTC -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
-DzkRun -jar start.jar
and then:
curl
'http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATEname=rninumShards=8replicationFactor=1collection.configName=rnimaxSh\
ardsPerNode=8'
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Benson Margulies
We have a pair of customized search components which we used
successfully with SolrCloud some releases back (4.x). In 4.10.3, I am
trying to find the point of departure in debugging why we get no
results back when querying to them with a sharded index.
If I query the regular /select, all is
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Unfortunately, this is all 5.1 and instructs me to run the 'start from
: scratch' process.
a) checkout the left nav of any ref guide page webpage which has a link to
Older Versions of this Guide (PDF)
b) i'm
://www.appinions.com/
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
With so much of the site shifted to 5.0, I'm having a bit of trouble
finding what I need, and so I'm hoping that someone can give me a push
in the right direction.
On a big multi-core machine
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Michael Della Bitta
michael.della.bi...@appinions.com wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/SolrCloud
Unfortunately, this is all 5.1 and instructs me to run the 'start from
scratch' process.
I wish that I could take my existing one-core
With so much of the site shifted to 5.0, I'm having a bit of trouble
finding what I need, and so I'm hoping that someone can give me a push
in the right direction.
On a big multi-core machine, I want to set up a configuration with 8
(or perhaps more) nodes treated as shards. I have some very
So, I had set up a solr core modelled on the 'multicore' example in 4.10.3,
which has no /browse.
Upon request, I went to set up /browse.
I copied in a minimal version. When I go there, I just get some XML back:
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime4/int
lst
I think perhaps there is a minor doc drought, or perhaps just I'm
having an SEO bad hair day.
I'm trying to understand the relationship of codecFactory and postingFormat.
Experiment 1: I just want to use my own codec. So, I make a
CodecFactory, declare it in solrconfig.xml, and stand back? If
OK, I see, I forgot to include the core name in the URL.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6302 but I don't see
what I am supposed to do about it.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Benson Margulies ben
I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6302 but I don't see
what I am supposed to do about it.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
4.10.3: Customized solrconfig.xml.
My log shows:
2/9/2015, 8:14:44 PMWARNRequestHandlersMultiple
4.10.3: Customized solrconfig.xml.
My log shows:
2/9/2015, 8:14:44 PMWARNRequestHandlersMultiple requestHandler
registered to the same name: /update ignoring:
org.apache.solr.handler.UpdateRequestHandler
But there is only one:
requestHandler name=/update class=solr.UpdateRequestHandler
Running bin/start with a command like:
/data/solr-4.10.3/bin/solr start -s $PWD/solr_home -a
-Djava.library.path=$libdir -Dbt.root=$bt_root\
$@
I note that the logs are ending up in the solr install
dir/examples/logs. Can I move them?
Basis Technology's toolset includes sentence boundary detectors. Please
contact me for more details.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Sandeep B A belgavi.sand...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the delayed response.
I was out of office for last few days and was not able to reply.
Thanks
Trying to shoehorn business name resolution or correction purely into
Solr tokenization and spell checking is not, in my opinion, a viable
approach. It seems to me that you need a query parser that does
something very different from pure tokenization, and you might also
need a more complex
Your problem has nothing to do with Japanese. Perhaps a content-type
for CSV would work better?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Bala Iyer grb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Solr japanese.
I added the support for japanese on schema.xml
How can i insert Japanese text into that field
Some months ago, I talked to some people at LR about this, but I can't
find my notes.
Imagine a function of some fields that produces a score between 0 and 1.
Imagine that you want to combine this score with relevance over some
more or less complex ordinary query.
What are the options, given
Say that I have 10 fieldTypes for 10 languages. Is there a way to associate
a naming convention from field names to field types so that I can avoid
bothering with all those dynamic fields?
!-- an exact 'path' can be used instead of a 'dir' to specify a
specific jar file. This will cause a serious error to be logged
if it can't be loaded.
--
is the comment, but when I put a completely missing path in there -- no
error. Should I file a JIRA?
MT is not nearly good enough to allow approach 1 to work.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
It Depends (tm). Approach (2) will give you better, more specific
search results. (1) is simpler to implement and might be good
enough...
On Mon, Jan 20,
I think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623 should be
ready to go. Would someone please commit from the PR? If there's a
preference, I can attach a patch as well.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, that's the recipe that I need
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters never
mentions an Analyzer class.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins talks about subclasses of
SolrAnalyzer as ways of delivering an entire analysis chain and still
'minding the gap'.
Anyone care to offer a comparison of the
15, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Benson,
Using lucene analyzer in schema.xlm should be last resort. For very specific
reasons : if you have an existing analyzer, etc.
Ahmet
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:52 PM, Benson Margulies
ben...@basistech.com wrote
OK, patch forthcoming.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: The problem manifests as this sort of thing:
:
: Jan 3, 2014 6:05:33 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
: SEVERE: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: startOffset must be
:
Is there a neighborhood of existing tests I should be visiting here?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, patch forthcoming.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: The problem manifests as this sort
Thanks, that's the recipe that I need.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Is there a neighborhood of existing tests I should be visiting here?
You'll need a custom schema that refers to your new
MockFailOnCertainTokensFilterFactory, so i would
and provide more context in the logs?
-Mike
On 01/03/2014 03:33 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Robert,
Yes, if the problem was not data-dependent, indeed I wouldn't need to
index anything. However, I've run a small mountain of data through our
tokenizer on my machine, and never seen the error
Using Solr Cloud with 4.3.1.
We've got a problem with a tokenizer that manifests as calling
OffsetAtt.setOffsets() with invalid inputs. OK, so, we want to figure out
what input provokes our code into getting into this pickle.
The problem happens on SolrCloud nodes.
The problem manifests as this
at 1:56 PM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
Using Solr Cloud with 4.3.1.
We've got a problem with a tokenizer that manifests as calling
OffsetAtt.setOffsets() with invalid inputs. OK, so, we want to figure out
what input provokes our code into getting into this pickle.
The problem
TokenizerFactory changed, incompatibly with subclasses, from 4.2.0 to
4.3.0. Subclasses must now implement a different overload of create, and
may not implement the old one.
Has anyone got any devious strategies other than multiple copies of code to
deal with this when supporting multiple
I am not a lawyer.
The Apache Software Foundation cannot 'protect Solr developers.'
Patent infringement is a claim made against someone who derived economic
benefit from an invention, not someone who writes code.
The patent clause in the Apache License requires people who contribute code
to
Could I have some help on the combination of these two? Right now, it
appears that I'm stuck with a finalizer to chase after native
resources in a Tokenizer. Am I missing something?
I am currently testing some things with Solr 4.0.0. I tried to make a
tokenizer CoreAware, and was rewarded with:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid 'Aware'
object: com.basistech.rlp.solr.RLPTokenizerFactory@19336006 --
org.apache.solr.util.plugin.SolrCoreAware must be an
The comment here is clearly wrong, since there is no division by two.
I think that the code is wrong, because this results in not starting
runners when it should start runners. Am I misanalyzing?
if (runners.isEmpty() || (queue.remainingCapacity() queue.size() // queue
// is
//
Ah. So now I have to find some other explanation of why it never
creates more than one thread, even when I make a very deep queue and
specify 6 threads.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Benson Margulies
.
If the idea is that we want to pile up 'a lot' (1/2-of-a-q) of work
before sending any of it, why start that first runner?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah. So now I have to find some other explanation of why it never
creates more than one
I can't quite apply SolrMeter to my problem, so I did something of my
own. The brains of the operation are the function here.
This feeds a ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer about 95 documents, each about
10mb, and 'threads' is six. Yet Solr just barely uses more than one
core.
private long
I'd like to run a repeatable test of having Solr ingest a corpus of
docs on disk, to measure the speed of some alternative things plugged
in.
Anyone have some advice to share? One approach would be a quick SolrJ
program that pushed the entire stack as one giant collection with a
commit at the
it is completely correct,
mind you) is that the presence of a cores tag defines which checks
are performed. Errors are thrown on old-style constructs when no
cores tag is present and vice-versa.
Best
Erick
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
One point
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
does not point to any information on solr.xml.
Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
does not point to any information on solr.xml
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul
on a fork between 4791 and this.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond
Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
On May 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style str child to
configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
Caused
One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1 claims that Solr3.1 is available in a
place where it is not, and I can't find a link on the front page to the
archive for old releases.
tanks.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/16/2013 2:21 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**Solr3.1http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1claims
that Solr3.1 is available in a
place where it is not, and I can't find a link
I am thinking about trying to structure a problem as a Solr plugin. The
nature of the plugin is that it would need to read and write the lucene
index to do its work. It could not be cleanly split into URP 'over here'
and a Search Component 'over there'.
Are there invariants of Solr that would
We've got a tokenizer which is quite explicitly coded on the
assumption that it will only be called from one thread at a time.
After all, what would it mean for two threads to make interleaved
calls to the hasNext() function()?
Yet, a customer of ours with a gigantic instance of Solr 1.4 reports
.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I've got some code that stores the same documents in a Lucene
3.5.0 index and a Solr 3.5.0 instance. It's only five documents.
For a particular field, the Solr norm is always 0.625, while the
Lucene norm is .5
So, I've got some code that stores the same documents in a Lucene
3.5.0 index and a Solr 3.5.0 instance. It's only five documents.
For a particular field, the Solr norm is always 0.625, while the
Lucene norm is .5.
I've watched the code in NormsWriterPerField in both cases.
In Solr we've got
CoreContainer.java, in the method 'load', finds itself calling
loader.NewInstance with an 'fname' of Log4j of the slf4j backend is
'Log4j'.
e.g.:
2012-05-01 10:40:32,367 org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer - Unable
to load LogWatcher
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
logging as a by product.
Don't remember the issue # offhand. I think there was a dispute about what
should be done with it.
On May 1, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
CoreContainer.java, in the method 'load', finds itself calling
loader.NewInstance with an 'fname' of Log4j
)
at
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:304)
at
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:101)
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Miller markrmil
There is no such thing as a 'solr forum' or a 'solr forum account.'
If you are subscribed to this list, an email to the unsubscribe
address will unsubscribe you. If some intermediary or third party is
forwarding email from this list to you, no one here can help you.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:09
2012/4/24 Mindaugas Žakšauskas min...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I maintain a distributed system which Solr is part of. The data which
is kept is Solr is permissioned and permissions are currently
implemented by taking the original user query, adding certain bits to
it which would make it return less
I found myself wanting to write ...
OR _query_:{!lucene fq=\a:b\}c:d
And then I started looking at query trees in the debugger, and found
myself thinking that there's no possible representation for this -- a
subquery with a filter, since the filters are part of the
RequestBuilder, not
I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
disassembling and partially rescoring queries. Every helpful response
(thanks) has led me to further reading, and this leads to more
questions. If I haven't before, I'll apologize now for the high level
of ignorance at which I'm
?
Yup.
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
(e)dismay's bf, or dismay's boost params.
Erik
On Apr 15, 2012, at 08:43 , Benson Margulies wrote:
I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
disassembling and partially rescoring
Since I ended up with 'fund' instead of 'func' we're even. I made the
edit. I'd make some more if you answered more of my questions :-)
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
_val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery should
explain the *effect* of including an _val_ term in an ordinary query,
starting with a constant.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr
dig.
Paul
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com a écrit :
Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I can provide 'why on earth
, should be pretty speedy for a mere 200 items.
Maybe I'm missing some even easier way, given a DocList and a query,
to obtain scores for those docs for that query?
paul
Le 14 avr. 2012 à 15:34, Benson Margulies a écrit :
yes please
On Apr 14, 2012, at 2:40 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net
A discussion over on the dev list led me to expect that the by-if
field retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
handler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in the
search handler that is configured with my custom QT. (I have a
'prepare' method that sets
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:43 PM, John Chee johnc...@mylife.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I need
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
: that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
You have to just execute the subquery itself ... doc collection
and score
to be configurable
just like the uniqueKey in the schema.
schema.xml
You must have a _version_ field defined:
field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I didn't have a _version_ field, since nothing in the schema says
I'm probably confused, but it seems to me that the case I hit does not
meet any of Yonik's criteria.
I have no replicas. I'm running SolrCloud in the simple mode where
each doc ends up in exactly one place.
I think that it's just a bug that the code refuses to do the local
deletion when there's
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
google must not have found it - i put that in a month or so ago I believe -
at least weeks. As you can see, there is still a bit to fill in, but it
covers the high level. I'd like to add example snippets for the rest
forward from there or back out your configs and plugins until it
works again.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
In my cloud configuration, if I push
delete
query*:*/query
/delete
followed by:
commit/
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents
it
works again.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
In my cloud configuration, if I push
delete
query*:*/query
/delete
followed by:
commit/
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents remain
in the index, visible to /query.
Here's what
presumably you've defined in solrconfig.xml...
What does debugQuery=on show?
It turned out that I had left an extra(eous) declaration for /query
with my custom RT, and when I removed it all was well.
thanks,benson
Best
Erick
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul
.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Um, maybe I've hit a quirk?
In my solrconfig.xml, my special SearchComponents are installed only
for a specific QT. So, it looks to me as if that QT is not propagated
into the request out to the shards
Another thought: currently I'm using qt=ME to indicate this process. I
could, in theory, use some ME=true and make my components check for it
to avoid this process, but it seems kind of peculiar from an end-user
standpoint.
I've updated the doc with my findings. Thanks for the pointer.
How are URP's managed with respect to cloud deployment? Given some
solrconfig.xml like the below, do I expect it to be in the chain on
the leader, the shards, or both?
updateRequestProcessorChain name=RNI
!-- some day, add parameters when we have some --
processor
field.
That seems to imply that 'before' processors run both on the leader
and on the shards. Where do the afters run? Just on the leader or just
on the shards?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:43:36 -0400, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
How are URP's managed with respect to cloud
After I load documents into my cloud instance, a URL like:
http://localhost:PORT/solr/query?q=*:*
finds nothing.
http://localhost:PORT/solr/query?q=*:*qt=standard
finds everything.
My custom request handlers have 'default=false'.
What have I done?
In my cloud configuration, if I push
delete
query*:*/query
/delete
followed by:
commit/
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents remain
in the index, visible to /query.
Here's what seems my relevant bit of solrconfig.xml. My URP only
implements processAdd.
I'm working on a prototype of a scheme that uses SolrCloud to, in
effect, distribute a computation by running it inside of a request
processor.
If there are N shards and M operations, I want each node to perform
M/N operations. That, of course, implies that I know N.
Is that fact available
Starting the leader with:
java -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/conf -Dcollection.configName=rnicloud
-DzkRun -DnumShards=3 -Djetty.port=9167 -jar start.jar
and browsing to
http://localhost:9167/solr/rnicloud/admin/zookeeper.jsp
I get:
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing
or another
framework for distributed computation, see e.g.
http://java.dzone.com/articles/comparison-gridcloud-computing
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 9. apr. 2012, at 13:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
I'm
I specify -Dcollection.configName=rnicloud, but the admin gui tells me
that I have a collection named 'collection1'.
And, as reported in a prior email, the admin UI URL in there seems wrong.
-write the query for each shard? Seems unnecessary.
For reasons described in previous email that I won't repeat here.
brbrbr--- Original Message ---
On 4/9/2012 08:45 AM Benson Margulies wrote:br Jan Høydahl,
br
brMy problem is intimately connected to Solr. it is not a batch job
If you would be so kind as to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3342, you will see that I
tried to use a working configuration for a URP of mine with SolrCloud,
and received in return an NPE.
Somehow or another, by default, the XmlUpdateRequestHandler ends up
using (I think) the
Those of you insomniacs who have read my messages here over the last
few weeks might recall that I've been working on a request handler
that wraps the SearchHandler to rewrite queries and then reorder
results.
(I haven't quite worked out how to apply Grant's alternative
suggestions without losing
, Benson Margulies wrote:
Those of you insomniacs who have read my messages here over the last
few weeks might recall that I've been working on a request handler
that wraps the SearchHandler to rewrite queries and then reorder
results.
(I haven't quite worked out how to apply Grant's alternative
Um, maybe I've hit a quirk?
In my solrconfig.xml, my special SearchComponents are installed only
for a specific QT. So, it looks to me as if that QT is not propagated
into the request out to the shards, and so they run the ordinary
request handler without my components in it.
Is this intended
I've made a RequestHandler class that acts as follows:
1. At its initialization, it creates a StandardRequestHandler and hangs onto it.
2. When a query comes to it (I configure it to a custom qt value), it:
a. creates a new query based on the query that arrived
b. creates a
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've made a RequestHandler class that acts as follows:
1. At its initialization, it creates a StandardRequestHandler and hangs onto
it.
2. When a query comes
Grant, let me see if I can expand this, as it were:
{!benson f1:v1 f2:v2 f3:v3} (or do I mean {!query defType='benson' ...}?)
I see how that could expand to be anything else I like.
However, the Function side has me a little more puzzled.
The information from the fields inside my {! ... } gets
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
