People,
I have been using SD since 2009 but have only been keeping decent
records of spam that makes it through to my server since 2015:
20151,003
20163,734
20177,999
20183,566
20192,921
20207,463
202110,209
20227,997 so far
As you can see I have become lazy
Bucky,
On 2020-09-29 00:19, BC via spamdyke-users wrote:
On 9/28/2020 7:51 AM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote:
You need to block by header contents as it offers more wildcards:
https://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#HEADERS
From:*
Hmm . . I thought I had tried
Marcin,
On 2020-09-28 23:22, Marcin Orlowski via spamdyke-users wrote:
Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote on 28.09.2020 06:34:
People,
I have tried a few different options but mails like these are still
getting through:
From: "Mark Milton"
I want to block all email
People,
I have tried a few different options but mails like these are still
getting through:
From: "Mark Milton"
I want to block all email addresses that start with "mmilton01" - I
presume it is possible but I haven't had any success so far . .
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box
Sam,
I am gradually getting organised to change my netqmail installation over
to IndiMail:
http://www.indimail.org
but have struck problems with getting SD working with it. It looks like
SD is hard-coded to expect stuff to be in:
/var/qmail
What files does SD need from qmail?
Is
Eric,
On 2018-06-04 04:41, Eric Broch via spamdyke-users wrote:
can you have a comment (# philsdiscourse) on your IP whitelist entry
line? maybe, remove '#philsdiscourse' and see what happens.
Same problem - thanks anyway.
P.
On 6/3/2018 12:05 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
People,
I am trying to use my host qmail server as a relay for a docker
container that is running on the host but mails are not being accepted -
I have this in spamdyke.conf:
ip-whitelist-entry=172.17.0.6 # philsdiscourse
and I see this in the logs:
Jun 4 03:53:59 prix
People,
I think I have seen this a couple of times recently:
Apr 25 18:03:22 prix spamdyke[6851]:
ERROR(filter_recipient_valid_inner()@filter.c:3085): unknown exit code
from validation command, code 255: /usr/local/bin/spamdyke-qrv
I haven't updated the code for a long time - maybe I should
ou can block "To: undisclosed-recipients"
with the header blacklist filter, if that's really how it appears in
the message headers.
I'll give that a shot.
Blocking emails with no "To" line in the header
isn't something spamdyke can do right now, sorry!
OK.
Thanks!
Phil.
-- Sam
People,
It has been almost a year since the last report - here is the updated GD
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GqinPR2mA0Jz-uTZ2zVJgutpiDl62HNbn2gWGNpd7Tk/pubhtml
Unfortunately the amount of spam getting through the SD filtering, then
seen by me and being moved to
People,
On 2016-05-06 13:10, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote:
Sam,
On 2016-05-06 02:50, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
You may need to recompile spamdyke-qrv with excessive output and run
it with two "-v" flags to see the details you need. You don't need t
livery to jackspratt is still attempted
. .
Thanks,
Phil.
-- Sam Clippinger
On May 4, 2016, at 4:39 AM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
People,
Last year I reported some stats after I had been using SD for about
a month and now I have a second se
People,
Last year I reported some stats after I had been using SD for about a
month and now I have a second set - unfortunately I forgot to increase
the number of backlogs for logrotate and I lost a few months of data to
compare delivered spam to but the latest stats are from 100 days of
and do a nightly cron job that
produces both of the needed files from the master file . .
Thanks again!
Phil.
That should do it! More info here:
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_SENDERS
-- Sam Clippinger
On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:54 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-u
People,
I thought of starting a new thread but the question relates to this
discussion so I thought I would revive it - see inline comments:
On 2015-06-21 04:57, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote:
Sam,
On 2015-06-21 03:12, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
Regex support
for this post, but I would consult them taking
advantage of the conversation can be locked via e-mail comes without
sender? I'm getting a lot of spam that has this pattern.
Best regards,
Paul
2015-10-03 1:05 GMT-03:00 Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>:
Sam,
On 2015-10
On 2015-10-02 15:42, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users wrote:
Sam,
On 2015-09-26 01:12, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
The header blacklist file has a different format from the sender
blacklist file, so just copying entries from one to the other won't
work. You need to provide
ber of lines offends my sensibilities . . this works:
[FR][re][op][ml]*:*iskysoft.com*
Also, sorting this issue out forced me to sort out the rDNS problem for
my main web server - so thanks for that too!
Regards,
Phil.
-- Sam Clippinger
On Oct 2, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Philip Rhoades via spam
or example).
-- Sam Clippinger
On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:31 AM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
Sam,
On 2015-09-15 07:27, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
Actually, no. The sender-blacklist-* and recipient-blacklist-*
filters
operate on diff
Martin,
On 2015-09-26 22:10, Martin H. Sluka via spamdyke-users wrote:
Sam wrote:
For testing, you certainly can use telnet -- I do it all the time.
Tip: You might want to have a look at Swaks (Swiss Army Knife
for SMTP, http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks/).
I find it very convenient
it?
Thanks,
Phil.
-- Sam Clippinger
On Sep 13, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
Sam,
On 2015-09-14 11:38, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
I'm not entirely sure I understand your question... if the
Reply-To
address is always t
People,
One variety of spam that is successfully delivered to me has a different
"From:" addresses but the same "Reply-To:" address - I can't see a way
of blocking these mails in the conf file via the "Reply-To:" address -
is it possible?
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra
Rhoades via spamdyke-users
<spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org> wrote:
People,
One variety of spam that is successfully delivered to me has a
different "From:" addresses but the same "Reply-To:" address - I
can't see a way of blocking these mails in the conf file v
People,
Here are some stats after a couple of months of happy Spamdyke usage -
thanks! If I had remembered to set the logrotate number higher I would
have had more data but I think the last 31 days is sufficient to
illustrate some things:
Total spamdyke lines in maillog files for the last
undo hard limits set by the ulimit
program, but it can (and does) undo softlimit.
-- Sam Clippinger
On Jun 20, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org wrote:
People,
I played around with the logging verbosity and found if I used debug
mode I saw
People,
I played around with the logging verbosity and found if I used debug
mode I saw suggestions (commands!?) in the log about remove the
softlimit function from the start script for qmail-smtpd - while I was
trying to sort out the last bug that was preventing eQmail from working,
I did
On Jun 19, 2015, at 9:09 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org wrote:
Sam,
See inline comments:
On 2015-06-20 11:53, Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users wrote:
You're correct spamdyke does not support regexes for any of its
options, but you can use a wildcard
or a filter like spamdyke.
-- Sam Clippinger
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:21 AM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org wrote:
People,
I have been using GreyLite for many years but it hasn't been
supported for quite a while - I think it is time to update to
SpamDyke . . but I have
People,
As well as using GreyLite I have done my own thing for many years with
qmail-qfilter and a Ruby script (it started off as a Ruby learning
exercise . . ) - anyway for my white and black lists I was able to have
in the plain text files things like:
ad...@phillipsfinancial.com.au
as the mail body and do whatever I wanted before accepting the
mail.
Header filtering doesn't support regexes either, but it does use
globbing to allow more wildcard options.
Right.
Thanks,
Phil.
On Jun 19, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Philip Rhoades via spamdyke-users
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
People,
I have been using GreyLite for many years but it hasn't been supported
for quite a while - I think it is time to update to SpamDyke . . but I
have some questions - first one:
I looked at the SpamDyke web site and it is still not clear to me - it
says 'connection-time means spamdyke
31 matches
Mail list logo
