Roy Wallace wrote:
But I agree with Tobias also - we should first create a good
concept for modelling the lanes themselves. Tobias, could you link to
the latest/most promising proposal, if there is one?
If we already had a superior proposal, this would be a lot easier. What
we have so far is:
Wmm why can't we say:
1L for the leftmost lane
2L for the second lane from left
1R for the rightmost lane
where left and right is seen in driving-direction. So then the 2
rightmode lane seperates you can talk about 1R and 2R.
Peter
Yann Coupin schrieb:
Plus what does inner mean on a oneway
2009/8/20 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Wmm why can't we say:
1L for the leftmost lane
2L for the second lane from left
1R for the rightmost lane
where left and right is seen in driving-direction. So then the 2
rightmode lane seperates you can talk about 1R and 2R.
I'm opposing
On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/20 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Wmm why can't we say:
1L for the leftmost lane
2L for the second lane from left
1R for the rightmost lane
where left and right is seen in driving-direction. So then the 2
rightmode
2009/8/20 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
how could you do this practically? aligning 18 lanes as individual
ways is impossible in the current data model and editors.
Why? It's very possible: just do it.
Btw: I's not 18 lanes, but
then we are closer as I thought. still mapping multiple parallel lanes
with multiple lines is too difficult. consider a bestcase accuracy of
+/- 2-3m with handheld gps and current areal pics.
this is the size of a typical car lane. aligning many smaller
structures is just magic guessing.
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I'm opposing this approach of just tagging different lanes to one way
as this gets too complicated in complex situations (I know situations
with more than 18 lanes). I'd prefer to get to a
map-all-lanes-and-dividers-as-separate-ways-approach and then
recombine them
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:48:18 +1000, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
I believe it fits the project's general spirit to allow mappers to
choose their level of detail (and other mappers to increase it if they
are
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Yann Coupin wrote:
I once started a proposition to do just that but it didn't get much traction,
feel free to discuss it.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Droute_instruction
I've not read the discussion page yet, but some initial
Steve Hill wrote:
Is there any suggested way of marking up turn restrictions for individual
lanes of a road to enable sat navs to provide lane guidance (e.g. keep
right, move into the left lane, etc)?
There is no accepted or widely used approach to do this, and actually I
don't think it
I admit that I ended up with a large and complex proposal. Since then
it appeared that some aspects have already been covered. But not all
of the lane part AFAIK. What you suggest whould probably be an
independant proposal, at least for clarity reason, but has value
nonetheless although I
What's left to be clarified is how lanes are numbered.
I'd suggest to be the inner one to be 1, ascending the more you're going
to the border
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Peter Körner wrote:
What's left to be clarified is how lanes are numbered.
I'd suggest to be the inner one to be 1, ascending the more you're going to
the border
The police tend to number them with lane 1 being closest to the footway
(i.e. the left lane in the UK,
Plus what does inner mean on a oneway road? I think it's crucial
that lane 1 is either left or right depending uppon what is decided
but that it stays the same accross the world. It'll be unusable
otherwise.
I propose 1 is left because we start to write from the left. It's
completly
If we just add lane information to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign can we
make it work?
/Martin
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:55:01 +0100 (BST)
From: Steve Hill st...@nexusuk.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Lane turn restrictions
To: Yann Coupin y...@coupin.net
Cc: talk
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Yann Coupiny...@coupin.net wrote:
Plus what does inner mean on a oneway road? I think it's crucial
that lane 1 is either left or right depending uppon what is decided
but that it stays the same accross the world. It'll be unusable
otherwise.
I propose 1 is
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:01:24 +0100 (BST), Steve Hill st...@nexusuk.org
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Peter Körner wrote:
What's left to be clarified is how lanes are numbered.
I'd suggest to be the inner one to be 1, ascending the more you're going
to
the border
The police tend to
Well, I don't know about Hebrew. But at least some of the languages
that use Arabic script (there are many) write the sentences and words
from right to left, but the numbers from left to right. I have no
idea about Chinese/Japanese etc. But I think that left to right for
numbers, while not
18 matches
Mail list logo
