2010/6/25 filip wolters filip_wolt...@hotmail.com:
Weet iemand de juiste spelling van een deelgemeente van Meise? Ik vind zowel
Imde als Impde terug in het WWW en op de kaarten.
Op
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.comwrote:
No, they are not out of copyright. All the rights of USSR were
transfered to Russian Federation. Neither USSR, nor Russian Federation
ever transferred those maps to public domain or in any other way
allowed free use
Have you really officially purchased them from Russian government, its
military divisions or perhaps from Roskartografiya?
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.comwrote:
No, they are not out
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
Here the same data is available from a usaid sponsored project :
http://www.bunkertrails.org/maps.php
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Eugene Iline evge...@ily.in wrote:
Have you really officially purchased them from Russian government,
I would like to say this, those maps are not very detailed, and really, have
been used for very rough corrections, and adding in some streams or placing
cities.
mike
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:42 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
We purchased them from
Did they show you any documents confirming that that do really have
ANY rights to sell those maps? I\m sure they did not...
K.
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
Here the same data is available from
Purchasing stolen maps does not make them public domain...
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, they are not out of copyright. All the rights of USSR were
transfered to
It makes no difference how you used them!!! They are not good for osm!
K.
2010/6/24 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
I would like to say this, those maps are not very detailed, and really, have
been used for very rough corrections, and adding in some streams or
He shouldn't draw then into the database, as this mixes OSM data and his
own data. Why not just use a layer on top of the OSM data?
One of the big advantages of OSM is that you the drawing tools. An option
would be to create a blank database on top of the OSM data by using the OSM
tools.
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
He shouldn't draw then into the database, as this mixes OSM data and his
own data. Why not just use a layer on top of the OSM data?
One of the big advantages of OSM is that you the drawing tools. An option
would be to create a blank database on top of the OSM
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Oliver (skobbler)
osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am still concerned that some business users cannot make use of
OpenStreetMap data because of the Share-Alike-rule as they don't want or
cannot share proprietary data.
Umm, if you want it so
Hello, thanks.
Solved. I think the problem was that I was downloading the file to a remote
disk (R: mapped to \\lanserver\data)
Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to Postgres, what
is the size of the largest table created (which I presume will take up 80% of
the
On 06/24/2010 09:34 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Oliver (skobbler)
Really, if people (businesses, charities, individuals or whoever) have
data they wish to keep private, they can still use OSM data
internally. If they want to Publicly Convey this Database, any
Andy Allan gravityst...@... writes:
No. That would be avoiding the whole point of the share-alike license.
If they have geographic data that we don't have, and they mix it with
OSM data, then the whole point is that we end up with access to their
geographic data. It's called share-alike!
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
If they have geographic data that we don't have, and they mix it
with OSM data, then the whole point is that we end up with access
to their geographic data.
[...]
You are obviously reading section 4.5 in a different way that I do.
[...]
For me
On 06/24/2010 10:07 AM, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
For me it looks like business users can feel safe with their data if they do
not
make derivative databases, for example by enhancing their own data by taking
tags from OSM database.
If enhancing means incorporating the data into a single
Richard Fairhurst rich...@... writes:
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Andy Allan writes:
If they have geographic data that we don't have, and they mix it
with OSM data, then the whole point is that we end up with access
to their geographic data.
[...]
You are obviously reading section 4.5
What we're currently seeing is import mania,
poeple trying to stuff every possible bit of information into OSM
because that's the easiest way for them to use it in conjunction with
OSM data. There is too much geodata in the world for this to be
sustainable - OSM must stick to things that mappers
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
AFAIK this is not legal seller of maps, and poehali.org too. They both
hosted outside Russia. So this maps can't be reliable identified as public
domain maps.
Here the same data is available from a usaid sponsored project :
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Users must just take care that they do not edit cable lines according to
what they see on the OSM map, otherwise all of the cable network data
will be considered to be derived from OSM data and thus fall under odbl.
Very very broadly yes, but actually at that point
I think you should take this to the legal list.
As far as I know, the copyright laws of england count for osm, not those of
russia.
mike
2010/6/24 Alexandr Zeinalov shu...@sbin.ru
We purchased them from this site :
http://mapstor.com/
AFAIK this is not legal seller of maps, and
Well that got more of a reaction than floating a discussion on the
tagging list, didn't it? The tagging list was set up so that the main
list wouldn't be bothered with such stuff.
There was no debate on the wiki, except a brief comment that
presumably resulted in the tag-to-higher approach (from
So you want to say that you do not care for those osm-users, which are
in Russia and which may have problems using osm with copyright data in
it? Did I get you right?
K.
24 июня 2010 г. 13:56 пользователь jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com написал:
I think you should
I am not saying that. I am saying that this is a topic for lawyers.
from what I learned about the discussion on wikipedia datapoints, it is uk
law that governs osm data.
mike
2010/6/24 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com
So you want to say that you do not care for those osm-users, which are
Well then assuming this we can even say that anyone not being physically in
UK can use any copyrighted source (Google sat.) for instance to contribute
to OSM, right?
24 июня 2010 г. 14:22 пользователь jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com написал:
I am not saying that.
On 24 June 2010 09:31, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
He shouldn't draw then into the database, as this mixes OSM data and his
own data. Why not just use a layer on top of the OSM data?
One of the big advantages of OSM is that you the drawing
But you should know that there are some copyright international agreements
between many countries. Russian laws can't be used in England, and russian
military secrets can't be protected by English laws. But it doesn't
concern with copyright laws. Roscartographia is a copyright holder for
soviet
Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
I think that OSM as a whole - and this is not a legal issue - needs to
improve interoperability. What we're currently seeing is import mania,
poeple trying to stuff every possible bit of information into OSM
because that's the easiest way for them to use
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well that got more of a reaction than floating a discussion on the
tagging list, didn't it? The tagging list was set up so that the main
list wouldn't be bothered with such stuff.
The tagging list was
I believe this junction is tagged as per the wiki (which Andy kindly
reverted to it's previous state).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.73915lon=-1.10389zoom=15layers=B000FTF
Here's the same junction as per the cycle map layer:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
the root of the discussion seems to have no basis in
the tags, and seems entirely to be around rendering artefacts that you
dislike.
What purpose do the _link tags serve other than rendering?
If there's a serious
When people in one country use servers in another country, the laws affecting
those users may not be the same as those affecting the servers themselves. For
example, some works are public-domain in Australia, but still in copyright in
the USA. So, it is legal for those works to be on the
This is only possible if those countries are nt members of
international copyright treaties. Russia (and USSR) and UK - are
members of those treaties. So same laws apply.
And by the way I am 100% sure that in UK stolen and later sold
copyright materials are not treated us public domain.
K.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.comwrote:
And by the way I am 100% sure that in UK stolen and later sold
copyright materials are not treated us public domain.
Can I see some documentation on this theft?
Why dont you start with some dcma takedown notices for
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
the root of the discussion seems to have no basis in
the tags, and seems entirely to be around rendering artefacts that you
On 24 June 2010 23:00, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can I see some documentation on this theft?
Why dont you start with some dcma takedown notices for the people selling
them, and see what happens?
You do realise DCMA is only for sites hosted in the US
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
What purpose do the _link tags serve other than rendering?
They can be used by routers to give more accurate descriptions...
* Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio juan_lucas...@yahoo.com [2010-06-24 01:34 -0700]:
Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to
Postgres, what is the size of the largest table created (which I presume
will take up 80% of the whole DB)?
I can't speak for the whole planet.osm
Andy Allan wrote:
They can be used by routers to give more accurate descriptions - e.g.
since we don't (yet) indicate junction priorities, it can be helpful
if you are on a *_link and going onto a * to announce it as join the
main carriageway. If it was e.g. just highway=trunk for both, the
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:09:11 +0100, Richard Mann wrote:
[..] But tag-for-lower is better.
And I still haven't read why you think this is better, apart from rendering
issues.
As Andy said, the burden of demonstrating the goodness of a change is up to who
wants to make that change.
--
. ''`.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
juan_lucas...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello, thanks.
Solved. I think the problem was that I was downloading the file to a remote
disk (R: mapped to \\lanserver\data)
Another question: after exporting the whole planet (recently) to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
What purpose do the _link tags serve
On 25 June 2010 00:22, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
And I still haven't read why you think this is better, apart from rendering
issues.
As Andy said, the burden of demonstrating the goodness of a change is up to
who
wants to make that change.
I've been following this thread and
On 25 June 2010 00:28, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
overall disk use ~ 130 GB and growing about 2.5 GB/week at the moment.
Is there a way to reduce this overhead without re-importing?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to explain, without referring to renderering *at any point in
the discussion* why your solution is both conceptually better than
what we have, and why your solution is worth all the hassle and
confusion that
Has the update frequency changed for OpenCycleMap? Some bike lanes added in
late May and early June still haven't appeared yet.
Ed Hillsman
Senior Research Associate
Center for Urban Transportation Research
University of South Florida
4202 Fowler Ave., CUT100
Tampa, FL 33620-5375
813-974-2977
there is no mention of PD for these maps at mapstore.com. they are not even
free of copyright from poehali.net
free download doesn't mean PD
Can I use the maps in my own project?
You have the right to use maps for the purpose of familiarization for personal
use. To use the maps or other
i think this can be a good start point
http://linfiniti.com/dla/
videopdf to introduce the GIS with qgis
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2010/6/24 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
views or oppose them, but certainly the main point of this discussion
is that should we want to change it you can't just change the wiki and
declare it done!
I completely agree to this and think it also applies to many other
wiki edits. Sadly, as
Updates that I've made in the past week are now showing on zooms = 12. It's
not quite there for zooms 12, but I suspect that that's simply because the
tiles haven't managed to upload to Andy's web host yet from the machine
where he carries out the main rendering.
I do remember seeing Andy
El 23/06/2010 16:33, sko...@free.fr escribió:
Would anyone recommend a good book on GIS/Geodesy/etc that could be
used to understand the underlying concepts behind most GIS
applications ?
Try:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Library
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Libros_de_SIG
Best,
--
Iván Sánchez
Hi Gregory,
Your a little out of date of the way that the cycle map is run. It uses the
live mapnk rendering, with no upload required. However it is still a weekly
update, and can take a week to fully update assuming that the disk doesn't fill
up first.
Shaun
On 24 Jun 2010, at 16:40,
Yeah I emailed Andy when I first started contributing to OSM because
changes weren't showing up and some zoom levels in my area returned
nothing but error tiles. He said the server was totally overloaded but
that he was working on an upgrade. Since then updates have been hit
and miss and the zoom
Ooops. Thanks for correcting my Shaun. Unfortunately I've not had quite so
much time to keep up-to-date on OSM happenings of late.
From: Shaun McDonald [mailto:sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk]
Sent: 24 June 2010 16:55
To: Gregory Williams
Cc: 'Hillsman, Edward'; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re:
On 24/06/2010 16:57, Toby Murray wrote:
Two days ago he tweeted that the new server
was nearly ready so hopefully things will improve soon!
And don't forget, if you think OpenCycleMap.org is great, you could
always call in at the shop on the way out:
http://shop.opencyclemap.org/
On 24 Jun 2010, at 5:24 , Richard Mann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
the root of the discussion seems to have no basis in
the tags, and seems entirely to be around rendering artefacts that you
dislike.
What purpose do the _link tags
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
Subject:
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Postgres table sizes (was: Failed to download 9.5 GB
planet)
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010,
4:28 PM
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:34 AM,
Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio
juan_lucas...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Yeah. Also, as Toby says, it's pretty much totally overloaded, and
has been for the last few months.
What's happened recently was that the updates broke for a few weeks,
and were restarted last Wednesday. The disk cache then filled up
completely on Friday, so there was only a small window for the
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to duplicate the information.
In practice a renderer such as Mapnik may not allow you to write such
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to duplicate the information.
But how do you know that a way IS a slip from one
On 25 June 2010 02:59, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
download a section of map. As well as taking care of the different kinds of
link road, these could also provide 'is_in', 'leading_to' and 'dead_end' for
dead_end can't be guessed at, it could be bad mapping, is_in is
redundant, you can
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags for the
two
roads it connects. In principle there is no need to
Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Isn't this tagging redundant? If a link road leads from a
primary to a
secondary, or whatever, this can be seen by looking at the tags
An alternative is to use Maperitive and render on the local PC. Its just a
matter of using the right rules for rendering but you do need an .OSM file
from the web unless you have a local copy.
Cheerio John
On 24 June 2010 12:53, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. Also, as Toby
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:39 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2010 00:28, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
overall disk use ~ 130 GB and growing about 2.5 GB/week at the moment.
Is there a way to reduce this overhead without re-importing?
I'm not sure I
On 25 June 2010 04:37, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Over time, the overhead increases, not just the amount of data.
You can import a bounding box or extract and have smaller tables.
You can import without --slim, if you have the hardware for
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Anthony wrote:
You could always have highway=link.
But some links ARE motorway rules and some ARE trunk road so just saying
link does not work.
I guess, but now you're using a different definition of *_link. Not
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Andy Allan wrote:
It starts coming down to questions of time and money, and I only have
a limited supply of both :-)
Usually one has either time OR money, and never both at once
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
You could always have highway=link.
But some links ARE motorway rules and some ARE trunk road so just saying link
does not work.
highway=*
link=yes
?
___
talk mailing list
2010/6/24 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
highway=*
link=yes
actually I like this, but it's not the first time it is proposed here,
and I think you can hardly change tags used as often and for so long
time as this. It would probably end up in a similar mess than path and
footway.
cheers,
Il 23 giugno 2010 22.15, Matteo matservi...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
l'edificio della stazione invece l'ho disegnato e taggato così:
area=yes
building=train_station
name=nome stazione
railway=station
Perché area=yes? Io non l'ho usato.
Considerazione personale: i treni non hanno bisogno di
Il 24 giugno 2010 09.19, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Considerazione personale: i treni non hanno bisogno di routing.
ma gli umani si, a qualcuno potrebbero interessare tutti i percorsi
ferrovairi per andare da A a B
L'avevo notato anch'io. Non disegna neanche gli embankment (il
collegamento
Il 24 giugno 2010 09.54, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 24 giugno 2010 09.19, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Considerazione personale: i treni non hanno bisogno di routing.
ma gli umani si, a qualcuno potrebbero interessare tutti i percorsi
ferrovairi per andare da A a B
Se vuoi
2010/6/24 Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com:
Considerazione personale: i treni non hanno bisogno di routing.
ma gli umani si, a qualcuno potrebbero interessare tutti i percorsi
ferrovairi per andare da A a B
Però il routing dei treni non si fa così: Gli umani vanno da A a B
prendendo un treno,
2010/6/23 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Supponi la classica stazione piccolina di paese (un binario solo) in
cui metti il nodo sul binario all'altezza dell'edificio della
stazione. Sembra corretto, no?
Eppure per il routing potrebbero capitare disastri.
Di solito in questi paesi ci sono
2010/6/24 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com:
mi par di capire che è proprio quello che fanno i tedeschi:
http://osm.org/go/0MbGwL2O
Quello pero non è una stazione ma un posto di manutenzione di treni.
La stazione principale di Berlino:
2010/6/24 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
La stazione principale di Berlino:
Secondo me ci conviene guardare di più alle piccole stazioni piuttosto
che alle grandi.
Una stazione grande deve essere mappata in maniera complessa (ha più
ingressi ecc.) e può tornare utile l'Oxomoa-schema
Quello pero non è una stazione ma un posto di manutenzione di treni.
ops ... a non conoscere le lingue si fanno figuracce ...
Ad amburgo hanno messo la stazione non conesso ai binari. A Strasburgo
ho visto che hanno messo una stazione ad ogni binario invece
(evidentemente non funziona bene
2010/6/24 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
2010/6/24 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
La stazione principale di Berlino:
Secondo me ci conviene guardare di più alle piccole stazioni piuttosto
che alle grandi.
il consenso è di mettere un nodo su un binario con railway=station,
Con JOSM non riesco più a vedere le ortofoto...vedo solo sfondo rosa con
il watermark...
quindi ho fatto le modifiche indicate dal PCN
cache.wmsplugin.expire=0
cache.wmsplugin.maxsize=70
wmsplugin.timeout.connect=0
wmsplugin.timeout.read=0
wmsplugin.url.overlap=false
Ma la situazione resta la
2010/6/23 Filippo Dal Bosco - filippo.dalbo...@libero.it:
con la nuova generazione di satelliti gps ( investimento americano 8
miliardi di dollari) l' accuratezza dovrebbe arrivare a 1 metro. Segue
che per l' altezza dovrebbe essere 10 metri.
non mi aspetterei troppo della nuova generazione,
On 6/24/10, Filippo perscrive...@gmail.com wrote:
Con JOSM non riesco più a vedere le ortofoto...vedo solo sfondo rosa con
il watermark...
quindi ho fatto le modifiche indicate dal PCN
io avevo gia` fatto le modifiche, usato una volta le immagini, e
stamattina ho sfondo rosso con exception
Il 23/06/2010 18:53, niubii ha scritto:
Io ho un IP dinamico, credo di essere stato bannato ad perpetuam
perche' vedo solo il watermark su uno sfondo azzurro.
Ciao
Anch'io con IP dinamico vedo solo il watermark, ma non credo dipenda dal
ban, altrimenti non vedremmo neanche quello.
Uso
2010/6/24 Filippo perscrive...@gmail.com:
Con JOSM non riesco più a vedere le ortofoto...vedo solo sfondo rosa con
il watermark...
è rimasta veramente pallosa la situazione. Sto disegnando in una zona
abbstanza ampia e di questo comportamento del PCN risulta che non
riesco a collegare le
Anch'io con IP dinamico vedo solo il watermark, ma non credo dipenda dal
ban, altrimenti non vedremmo neanche quello.
+1, credo stiano lavorandoci sopra, ieri funzionava. oggi non ho fatto
niente e adesso anche da browser vedo solo il watermark.
attendiamo con pazienza.
Ciao,
Stefano
Il 24 giugno 2010 10.00, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 24 giugno 2010 09.54, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 24 giugno 2010 09.19, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Considerazione personale: i treni non hanno bisogno di routing.
ma gli umani si, a qualcuno
2010/6/24 Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com:
non mi sono spiegato bene, ho scritto tutti i percorsi non il
percorso migliore, mi riferivo a un grafo dei percorsi ferroviari
dove farebbe più comodo avere name=* su un nodo che fa parte di una
way con railway=rail piuttosto che uno esterno nelle
2010/6/24 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Supponi anche di fare le cose per bene (mappi l'edificio della
stazione, i percorsi pedonali dalla piazza della stazione all'edificio
ai binari ecc.)
+1
Ma se sei in macchina e attivi il profilo auto sul navigatore (99%
dei casi) tutto questo è
2010/6/16 Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com:
ieri mi sono sentito al telefono un paio di volte con Salvatore
Costabile del PCN,...
Il PCN si è dimostrato ragionevole e disposto ad ascoltare le nostre
necessità e a modificare le proprie soglie di accesso, nonche' a
rendere disponibile una
ci sono delle notizie? Vedo solo watermark su sfondo nero da ieri
sera. Hanno già cambiato la soglia? Mi sembrava ultimamente ancora
abbastanza limitata. Questo nuovo comportamento di non bloccare più
l'acesso con errore 403 (o simile) ma di mandare dei tiles vuoti con
watermark cmq. crea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefano Salvador wrote:
+1, credo stiano lavorandoci sopra, ieri funzionava. oggi non ho fatto
niente e adesso anche da browser vedo solo il watermark.
Da un'ora all'altra il watermark è diventato un po' troppo visibile e
fastidioso.
Jacopo
-
Il 24 giugno 2010 12.02, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Probabilmente
dovresti specificare in questi casi (IMO rari, dove passano due strade
alla stazione ma solo una è conessa --- io connosco nella realtà solo
posti dove si accede da ambi lati, altrimenti vedo lì anche
Il -10/01/-28163 20:59, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
Eppure al primo incontro/mapping party a Roma (Domenica, 20 Aprile 2008, ore
16:00 fuori la stazione Metro Monti Tiburtini) era più di 0,1- 1 persona.
si, siamo stati in 3, pero uno si è ritrasferito a Napoli oramai ;-)
2010/6/24 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com:
A parte questo direi che il watermark è del tutto illegale (quello
presente ora) perchè se le foto sono loro possono metterci
www.pcn.minambiente.it se no devono metterci per forza quello di
terraitaly/cgr/bool o come c...@#!o si chiama la ditta
A parte che non capisco tutta sto casino che state facendo per delle
mappe di merda che se vogliono farle utilizzare senza tanti problemi
bene se no che se le tengano chiuse nel cassetto e che si ci facciano
delle pugnette sopra!
A parte questo direi che il watermark è del tutto illegale (quello
In questi giorni ho avuto modo di usare in maniera intensiva il wms con
le ortofoto del PCN.
Non ho riscontrato i problemi rilevati da molti (non so se è per botta
di culo), per cui riporto quello che ho rilevato:
1) ho usato sia pc ad IP fisso (quello di lavoro) sia ad IP dinamico (il
A parte che non capisco tutta sto casino
Se a te non interessano puoi tranquillamente non usarle ed evitare di
leggere queste mail (metti un bel filtro sul termine PCN e sei a
posto).
Ciao,
Stefano
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
On 22/06/2010 14:26, Infoweblan di Roberto Vito Gerardo wrote:
Archeologia + Informatica + Gis + Mappe del progetto OpenStreetMap
L'idea di base è quella di utilizzare le mappe del progetto
OpenStreetMap e l'esperienza maturata durante la mappatura della zona
archeologica di Pompei per creare
2010/6/24 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com:
Credo che stiano rigenerando le immagini con il watermark [1] (oppure
ci sono stati errori nella generazione): dalle mie parti ho trovato
affiancate zone a posto ad altre con solo il watermark. Non credo
sia una questione di ban. Forse
Il giorno Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:03:59 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com ha scritto:
non mi aspetterei troppo della nuova generazione, già il sistema
vecchio permette una precisione inferiore ad un metro, solo che è
lasciando da parte le possibili interferenze ( non mi ricordo l'
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
