Re: [OSM-talk] adding multiple relations (bus routes) to one road

2011-07-06 Thread Pieren
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.comwrote: are there any suggestions for making it easier? -- robin I suggested a long time ago that adding segment roads in routes relations was a bad idea. The alternative is to put the intersection nodes and end-nodes of

Re: [OSM-talk] adding multiple relations (bus routes) to one road

2011-07-06 Thread Richard Mann
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote: are there any suggestions for making it easier? -- robin Well you could put in a request to make the boundary between the taglist and relations list in Potlatch moveable, so you can see more relations. Having the

Re: [OSM-talk] adding multiple relations (bus routes) to one road

2011-07-06 Thread Jo
There is this proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Route_Segments, which I like, but it seems it's not worked on anymore and it's not rendered, since it involves relations containing relations. I don't really mind having many relations on roads. It doesn't pose a problem

Re: [OSM-talk] adding multiple relations (bus routes) to one road

2011-07-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/6 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: The alternative is to put the intersection nodes and end-nodes of the route. This has the big advantage that ways are not split any more for some abstract features like routes (and you don't have to add a 2nd relation to rebuild the road). But it has the

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Emitter

2011-07-06 Thread Oleg
Cool thing around pictures, as most of twitter clients can upload them themselves and make a short links in the posts, so, we can try to use that links and put them into nodes as well! Also @mentioning - we're adding both ways now - so, you'll be able to use @osm_it - to hide your mappings from

Re: [OSM-talk] adding multiple relations (bus routes) to one road

2011-07-06 Thread Pieren
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:23 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: if you stored only nodes there would be ambiguity problems in cases where several ways connect the same nodes. You also have ambiguity problem in the other model e.g. when you have segments in your relation

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Emitter

2011-07-06 Thread Oleg
By the way, we'v reduced permissions for twitter - just like it should be! Thanks for mentioning that! -- RO 2011/7/6 Oleg gel...@gmail.com Cool thing around pictures, as most of twitter clients can upload them themselves and make a short links in the posts, so, we can try to use that links

Re: [OSM-talk] Sister Projects

2011-07-06 Thread Tobias Knerr
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Why on earth should we give references to proprietary data projects like mapmaker in our wiki? Including it in the list gives us a chance to link to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_map_maker and explain why people should *not* choose GMM instead of OSM. --

Re: [OSM-talk] Sister Projects

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 July 2011 22:03, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Why on earth should we give references to proprietary data projects like mapmaker in our wiki? Including it in the list gives us a chance to link to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_map_maker

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 July 2011 18:20, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote: [GG] I was not talking about copyright. Copyright laws are of no use in the digital era, You were talking about databases, however databases can still store copyrightable content, in this case it's

Re: [OSM-talk] Sister Projects

2011-07-06 Thread Matthias Meisser
Am 06.07.2011 20:17, schrieb John Smith: On 6 July 2011 22:03, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: Why on earth should we give references to proprietary data projects like mapmaker in our wiki? Including it in the list gives us a chance to link to

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dave F. wrote: If, by _used_ you mean that it's a part of the way, then *millions* of nodes have no attributes. No tags. Yes. If one of these gets moved then the whole way gets updated, No. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33

Re: [OSM-talk] adding multiple relations (bus routes) to one road

2011-07-06 Thread Robin Paulson
On 6 July 2011 22:39, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: Detaching intersection nodes is not something usual. At the moment, the complexity is more on managing ways with an increasing amount of relations and an increasing amount of segments within the relations for a single street. hmm, all

[OSM-talk] new zealand, australia

2011-07-06 Thread Robin Paulson
i did a search for new zealand, and was heartened to find we are now part of australia. at last, we have come to our senses and joined as a nation! slightly more seriously, could someone help with the labelling of the node for nz? apart from somehow being part of australia, if i click on the

Re: [OSM-talk] shortened names

2011-07-06 Thread Andrew Guertin
On 07/06/2011 11:35 PM, Robin Paulson wrote: is there any consensus on shortening of parts of names? e.g.: street/st saint/st avenue/ave point/pt mount/mt i was under the impression consensus was to type the full word, then renderers would shorten where necessary? apparently some

Re: [OSM-talk] shortened names

2011-07-06 Thread Jochen Topf
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:35:07PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote: is there any consensus on shortening of parts of names? e.g.: street/st saint/st avenue/ave point/pt mount/mt i was under the impression consensus was to type the full word, then renderers would shorten where necessary?

Re: [OSM-talk] new zealand, australia

2011-07-06 Thread Toby Murray
Looking at the details it seems like the Australia being referred to is the continent, not the country. The New Zealand node has a is_in:continent=Australia tag and there is a place=continent node that nominatim is associating it with. So I guess this is correct but perhaps a little confusing in

Re: [Talk-in] NRSC Landuse data in public domain

2011-07-06 Thread Arun Ganesh
I managed to download the LULC layer but when I try to download in JOSM, I get a message Sorry! No data available in this scale. This is for very low zoom levels i.e.1 inch = 1 km Any idea why? Shalabh The imagery is for even lower zoom levels since its on the 1:1million scale. I

Re: [Talk-in] NRSC Landuse data in public domain

2011-07-06 Thread Shalabh
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.comwrote: I managed to download the LULC layer but when I try to download in JOSM, I get a message Sorry! No data available in this scale. This is for very low zoom levels i.e.1 inch = 1 km Any idea why? Shalabh The

Re: [Talk-in] NRSC Landuse data in public domain

2011-07-06 Thread Arun Ganesh
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.comwrote: I managed to download the LULC layer but when I try to download in JOSM, I get a message Sorry! No data available in this scale. This is for

Re: [Talk-it] Prova primo messaggio

2011-07-06 Thread Niccolo Rigacci
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:37:54AM +0200, Gromebar wrote: E' solo un messasggio di prova, mi sono iscritto ora alla mailing list, se ho sbagliato qualcosa fatemi sapere, intanto vi porgo un saluto :) Messaggio arrivato, benvenuto! In che zona del mondo mappi? -- Niccolo Rigacci Firenze -

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Luca Delucchi
Il 06 luglio 2011 08:53, ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto: Buongiorno Luca, ciao ale ci sono novità per i rifugi? Per il venerdì è confermato il panepucci, dobbiamo passare a L'Aquila a recuperare le chiavi Il panepucci ha poca disponibilità di acqua ma basta per la cena

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Demon Tage
Buongiorno a tutti, ho potuto valutare come i confini Amministrativi ISTAT 2011 uplodati da David Paleino, almeno nella mia provincia (Salerno), siano molto più precisi degli attuali presenti nel database di OSM, compaiono anche delle isole prima di oggi sconosciute a OSM!!. Quindi ho deciso

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/6 Demon Tage tagede...@gmail.com: Vorrei procedere inoltre, come è stato fatto in Sicilia e in altre zone d'Italia, a far coincidere il confine amministrativo dei comuni costieri, con la linea di costa. l'ho fatto anch'io, e lo trovo molto utile per creare un render migliore (uno può

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Luca Delucchi
Il 06 luglio 2011 12:44, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com ha scritto: Il problema è che probabilmente (non lo so per certo) la linea di costa non è il confine. Invece il confine (regionale, provinciale, comunale?) dovrebbe essere la linea di base (vedi anche wikipedia sulle acque

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/6 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com: La linea di base dovrebbe essere solo rappresentativa del confine di stato, per delimitare le acque nazionali da quelli internazionali; i confini degli altri elementi amministrativi dovrebbe essere la linea di costa Ottimo, allora il lavoro finora

Re: [Talk-it] Prova primo messaggio

2011-07-06 Thread Gromebar
Il 06/07/2011 9.00, Niccolo Rigacci ha scritto: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:37:54AM +0200, Gromebar wrote: E' solo un messasggio di prova, mi sono iscritto ora alla mailing list, se ho sbagliato qualcosa fatemi sapere, intanto vi porgo un saluto :) Messaggio arrivato, benvenuto! In che zona

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Gromebar
Il 06/07/2011 9.53, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: Il 06 luglio 2011 08:53, ale_z...@libero.itale_z...@libero.it ha scritto: Buongiorno Luca, ciao ale ci sono novità per i rifugi? Per il venerdì è confermato il panepucci, dobbiamo passare a L'Aquila a recuperare le chiavi Il panepucci ha

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/6 Gromebar grome...@distruzione.org: Ah andate in montagna verso l'aquila? se mi fossi un attimo smosso prima magari partecipavo visto che sono abruzzese! Uhm, magari la prossima volta, così mi organizzo (tanto che sarei venuto solo a farvi compagnia non essendo ancora un mapper, però

Re: [Talk-it] Prova primo messaggio

2011-07-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/6 Gromebar grome...@distruzione.org: Vorrei iniziare a mappare in abruzzo, all'interno della provincia di chieti, ho già guardato un po la zona e non è mappata in modo capillare. giusto Le mie intenzioni sono comprare un gps e portarmelo in bici o a piedi per alcuni posti. Mi sono

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Gromebar
Il 06/07/2011 13.28, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: 2011/7/6 Gromebargrome...@distruzione.org: Ah andate in montagna verso l'aquila? se mi fossi un attimo smosso prima magari partecipavo visto che sono abruzzese! Uhm, magari la prossima volta, così mi organizzo (tanto che sarei venuto solo a

[Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Simone Cortesi
Ciao, ho sentito il Comune di Forlì per quanto concerne i dati geografici. Mi hanno esplicitamente detto che i dati possono essere utilizzati anche in basi dati commerciali. Essi sono dichiarati compatibili sia con la ODBL che e con la CCBYSA. Conoscono OSM e sono contenti del fatto che noi li si

Re: [Talk-it] Prova primo messaggio

2011-07-06 Thread Gromebar
Il 06/07/2011 13.34, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: 2011/7/6 Gromebargrome...@distruzione.org: Vorrei iniziare a mappare in abruzzo, all'interno della provincia di chieti, ho già guardato un po la zona e non è mappata in modo capillare. giusto Le mie intenzioni sono comprare un gps e

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Luca Delucchi
Il 06 luglio 2011 11:43, Gromebar grome...@distruzione.org ha scritto: Le informazioni relative le trovo nel archivio delle discussioni oppure l'evento delle discussioni è stato pubblicato da qualche parte. Do un occhiata ma penso di non farcela :( qui [0] trovi qualcosa, da se riesci fai un

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Gromebar
Il 06/07/2011 13.57, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: Il 06 luglio 2011 11:43, Gromebargrome...@distruzione.org ha scritto: Le informazioni relative le trovo nel archivio delle discussioni oppure l'evento delle discussioni è stato pubblicato da qualche parte. Do un occhiata ma penso di non farcela

Re: [Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Maurizio Napolitano
Questo lo hanno anche formalizzato sul sito? 2011/7/6 Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com: Ciao, ho sentito il Comune di Forlì per quanto concerne i dati geografici. Mi hanno esplicitamente detto che i dati possono essere utilizzati anche in basi dati commerciali. Essi sono dichiarati

Re: [Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Stefano Salvador
Questo lo hanno anche formalizzato sul sito? ho trovato questo: http://www.comune.forli.fc.it/cartografiavettoriale/default.asp?sect=informativa in cui si legge: -- I dati della cartografia digitale del territorio forlivese sono di proprietà

[Talk-it] Problema gps garmin

2011-07-06 Thread mimalfa
Ciao a tutti, sono Michele e sto' mappando un po' di zone del Trentino dove giro o in bici o a piedi. Mi hanno dato un gps edge 800 e ho un problema. Scarica la traccia in formato .fit e poi posso convertirla in gpx ma il formato originale non si porta i wp nel file .fit quindi ora ho tracce ma

Re: [Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Simone Cortesi
2011/7/6 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com: -- I dati della cartografia digitale del territorio forlivese sono di proprietà dell'Amministrazione Comunale; di essi è vietata la commercializzazione diretta. E' autorizzata l'elaborazione e

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Demon Tage
La linea di base dovrebbe essere solo rappresentativa del confine di stato, per delimitare le acque nazionali da quelli internazionali; i confini degli altri elementi amministrativi dovrebbe essere la linea di costa Ecco il dubbio in effetti mi era venuto soprattutto per quanto riguarda la

Re: [Talk-it] Problema gps garmin

2011-07-06 Thread Luca Delucchi
Il 06 luglio 2011 16:22, mima...@tin.it ha scritto: Ciao a tutti, sono Michele e sto' mappando un po' di zone del Trentino dove giro o in bici o a piedi. che zone del trentino? Mi hanno dato un gps edge 800 e ho un problema. Scarica la traccia in formato .fit e poi posso convertirla in

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Stefano Pallicca
2011/7/6 Demon Tage tagede...@gmail.com Per la mia provincia ho trovato che, visto che i vecchi confini sono molto imprecisi rispetto agli ISTAT 2011, sia molto più facile e pulito cancellare le vecchie way (sempre utilizzando il protocollo Paleino) per inserire le nuove una alla volta,

[Talk-it] R: Re: Problema gps garmin

2011-07-06 Thread mimalfa
Alto Garda, Val Rendena. Uso tcx converter --Messaggio originale-- Da: Luca Delucchi A: mima...@tin.it A: openstreetmap list - italiano Oggetto: Re: [Talk-it] Problema gps garmin Inviato: 6 Lug 2011 15:07 Il 06 luglio 2011 16:22, mima...@tin.it ha scritto: Ciao a tutti, sono Michele e

Re: [Talk-it] Problema gps garmin

2011-07-06 Thread Luca Delucchi
Il 06 luglio 2011 17:31, mima...@tin.it ha scritto: Alto Garda, Val Rendena. Uso tcx converter Bene, quelle zone sono già abbastanza ben mappate, ma un ulteriore controllo non fa di certo male qui trovi qualcosa che potrebbe esserti utile per risolvere il tuo problema

Re: [Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Maurizio Napolitano
http://www.comune.forli.fc.it/cartografiavettoriale/default.asp?sect=informativa in cui si legge: -- I dati della cartografia digitale del territorio forlivese sono di proprietà dell'Amministrazione Comunale; di essi è vietata la commercializzazione

Re: [Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Davide Giunchi
Ciao, ho sentito il Comune di Forlì per quanto concerne i dati geografici. Mi hanno esplicitamente detto che i dati possono essere utilizzati anche in basi dati commerciali. Essi sono dichiarati compatibili sia con la ODBL che e con la CCBYSA. Conoscono OSM e sono contenti del fatto che noi li si

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Stefano Salvador
IMHO è meglio non perdere lo storico della vecchia linea, aggiungendo quindi i nodi interni che mancano e spostando quelli esistenti sulla nuova posizione. O almeno, questo è quanto ho fatto quando ho ricalcato i confini dei comuni della mia zona, dopo essermi consultato in lista. io invece

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread ale_z...@libero.it
Messaggio originale ci sono novità per i rifugi? Per il venerdì è confermato il panepucci, dobbiamo passare a L'Aquila a recuperare le chiavi Il panepucci ha poca disponibilità di acqua ma basta per la cena e la colazione, ricordarsi di portare o un saccolenzuolo [0] o un sacco a

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
2011/7/6 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com: io invece sono dell'idea contraria, non ha senso conservare lo storico per due import distinti. In Friuli abbiamo fatto così: caricati i nuovi dati e buttati via quelli vecchi. Anche io concordo che questo sia il metodo migliore per i motivi

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Luca Delucchi
Il 06 luglio 2011 18:03, ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto: Messaggio originale ci sono novità per i rifugi? Per il venerdì è confermato il panepucci, dobbiamo passare a L'Aquila a recuperare le chiavi Il panepucci ha poca disponibilità di acqua ma basta per la cena e

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
2011/7/6 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com: Io per il momento ho preso 3 buste (tot 6 porzioni) di risotto ai funghi e 2 buste (tot 6 porzioni) di crema d'asparagi. ne prendo anch'io 2? Se sono quelle dell'esselunga, io consiglio di provarle prima di considerarle per 2 (anche se c'è scritto)

Re: [Talk-it] mapping party montagna

2011-07-06 Thread Roberto Moretti
Il 06 luglio 2011 18:03, ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto: Cose da sapere e da fare: - Per sapere come organizzarsi coi viveri: Quanti saremo venerdì sera? E sabato sera? Io per il momento ho preso 3 buste (tot 6 porzioni) di risotto ai funghi e 2 buste (tot 6 porzioni) di

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/6 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com: non ha senso conservare lo storico per due import distinti. In Friuli abbiamo fatto così: caricati i nuovi dati e buttati via quelli vecchi. +1, tanto il db non si dimentica niente (rimangono anche i way cancellati). l'unica cosa da

[Talk-it] Convertire nodi con shp-to-osm

2011-07-06 Thread Milani Alessio
Ciao a tutti. Quando tento di convertire files .shp composti da soli nodi il programma mi da questo messaggio di errore: Exception in thread main java.nio.BufferUnderflowException at java.nio.Buffer.nextGetIndex(Unknown Source) at java.nio.DirectByteBuffer.getDouble(Unknown

Re: [Talk-it] Convertire nodi con shp-to-osm

2011-07-06 Thread Simone Cortesi
2011/7/6 Milani Alessio klava...@gmail.com: Nessun problema invece con linee e aree. Qualche idea su come risolvere? su quali dati lavori? -- -S ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Convertire nodi con shp-to-osm

2011-07-06 Thread Milani Alessio
In data mercoledì 6 luglio 2011 22:53:24, Simone Cortesi ha scritto: 2011/7/6 Milani Alessio klava...@gmail.com: Nessun problema invece con linee e aree. Qualche idea su come risolvere? su quali dati lavori? CTR Veneto Ciao Alessio ___ Talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Confini ISTAT 2011 - dump provinciali

2011-07-06 Thread Simone Cortesi
2011/7/6 Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com: 2011/7/6 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com: io invece sono dell'idea contraria, non ha senso conservare lo storico per due import distinti. In Friuli abbiamo fatto così: caricati i nuovi dati e buttati via quelli vecchi. Anche

Re: [Talk-it] dati forlì

2011-07-06 Thread Simone Cortesi
2011/7/6 Davide Giunchi davide.giun...@gmail.com: Ciao, ho sentito il Comune di Forlì per quanto concerne i dati geografici. Mi hanno esplicitamente detto che i dati possono essere utilizzati anche in basi dati commerciali. Essi sono dichiarati compatibili sia con la ODBL che e con la CCBYSA.

Re: [talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] OSM Emitter

2011-07-06 Thread maning sambale
A typical address should something like this: addr:housenumber=1 addr:street=Rizal addr:city=Makati #osmit 121.43167, 14.53816 80 characters in all. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Noli Sicad nsi...@gmail.com wrote: Maning, this really good to get Street Address (i.e. House No. Street Name and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Andreas Perstinger
Sorry for replying late but I had to leave for the night shift yesterday. On 2011-07-05 15:28, John Smith wrote: On 5 July 2011 23:04, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote: What do you consider as same result? How far away do I have to place a node? If I put one additional

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com] Verzonden: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:17 PM Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions. Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes On 6 July 2011 02:49, ce-test, qualified testing

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Dave F.
On 02/07/2011 17:15, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, suppose there's a node that has been created by user A with no tags on it. Suppose the node has later been moved by user B. A has not accepted the CT, while B has. Will the node have to be removed when we go to phase 5 of the license change?

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dave F. wrote: I must be missing something, because I believe this discussion is a complete waste of time. It is good that you have the modesty to assume that you're missing something rather than 10 others are completely wasting their time ;) in this case you are indeed missing (or I

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey

2011-07-06 Thread Kai Krueger
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote: On 16 June 2011 09:55, Richard Fairhurst lt;rich...@systemed.netgt; wrote: Robert Whittaker wrote: A major purpose of the CTs is to ensure that all the data remaining in OSM is suitable for re-licensing under any Free and Open license without the need for

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 04:03, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote: Although it still seems to be controversial how clause 1 and 2 of the CT interact, with the recent draft intent of the LWG to issue a clarifying statement[1] that indeed data only has to be compatible with the current license and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 July 2011 16:46, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote: Then what about the attached alternative versions? For each version I started JOSM, opened a new layer, added the node (-31.069902030361792, 152.728383561) which is close to the beginning of the road, loaded the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 04:20, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 July 2011 16:46, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote: Then what about the attached alternative versions? For each version I started JOSM, opened a new layer, added the node (-31.069902030361792,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Dave F.
On 06/07/2011 18:29, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, Dave F. wrote: I must be missing something, because I believe this discussion is a complete waste of time. It is good that you have the modesty to assume that you're missing something rather than 10 others are completely wasting their time ;)

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Andreas Perstinger
On 2011-07-06 20:23, John Smith wrote: On 7 July 2011 04:20, John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 July 2011 16:46, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote: Then what about the attached alternative versions? For each version I started JOSM, opened a new layer, added

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 06:12, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote: But even if I'm just one person the question still remains: Do you consider any of these 4 versions a violation of your copyright? Are you planning to try and replace all my work one way at a time like this? Which is of

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Andreas Perstinger
On 2011-07-06 22:17, John Smith wrote: Are you planning to try and replace all my work one way at a time like this? No, I just wanted to show you that you can't really tell if someone retraces a removed way by looking at an aerial imagery, by looking at the current OSM map or by just moving

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 07:25, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote: No, I just wanted to show you that you can't really tell if someone retraces a removed way by looking at an aerial imagery, by looking at the current OSM map or by just moving randomly some nodes.The same goes for IMHO

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 08:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Google in addition have their ToS. So one person copies tiles and breaches contract and gives them to another person who is only bound by copyright ... ___ legal-talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Dave F.
On 06/07/2011 21:04, Anthony wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote: Dave F. wrote: If one of these gets moved then the whole way gets updated, No. Substantively, that is what happens, but technically, in the database, it is not. In the database, we

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
Am 06.07.2011 20:31, schrieb John Smith: On 6 July 2011 18:20, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote: [GG] I was not talking about copyright. Copyright laws are of no use in the digital era, You were talking about databases, however databases can still store

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 09:34, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: That does not imply that individual contributors actually hold any rights in the data they contributed. As we know, that is a difficult question and depends on jurisdiction and so on, and my take on it would be: probably not. For all

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
Am 06.07.2011 23:25, schrieb Andreas Perstinger: BTW I've just found some high court decisions which clearly state that a map (and its content) isn't protected by copyright automatically here in Austria. You have to prove individual creativity. Just reproducing geographical facts like

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 09:47, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: Normally none of them lead to a protected work and nobody would confuse it for creativity I'm not sure if I'm more amused that you have to try and scale things down to the size of a brick or the fact that even you state it's the morally

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
Am 07.07.2011 01:40, schrieb John Smith: On 7 July 2011 09:34, Simon Poolesi...@poole.ch wrote: That does not imply that individual contributors actually hold any rights in the data they contributed. As we know, that is a difficult question and depends on jurisdiction and so on, and my take

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
Upps you are really confused about the origins of copyright protection, which are rather recent and had nothing to do with morals. Simon Am 07.07.2011 01:54, schrieb John Smith: On 7 July 2011 09:47, Simon Poolesi...@poole.ch wrote: Normally none of them lead to a protected work and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 10:04, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: Upps you are really confused about the origins of copyright protection, which are rather recent and had nothing to do with morals. I didn't know the late 1800s was considered rather recent ___

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
Am 07.07.2011 01:56, schrieb Anthony: ... There certainly is creativity involved in making a brick wall. Choosing a herringbone bond vs. a stretcher bond, for instance. And in some cases it can be copyrightable - not if it's just a herringbone or a stretcher bond, but if the pattern is

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
In terms of laws, sure. Am 07.07.2011 02:08, schrieb John Smith: On 7 July 2011 10:04, Simon Poolesi...@poole.ch wrote: Upps you are really confused about the origins of copyright protection, which are rather recent and had nothing to do with morals. I didn't know the late 1800s was

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread Simon Poole
Well 300 to 400 years earlier (as in printing press with movable letters) which doesn't make it recent, but still twice as old as copyright law. The main point however is that copyright law has a economic motivation, not moral as you imply. Simon Am 07.07.2011 02:12, schrieb John Smith:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 10:20, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: Well 300 to 400 years earlier (as in printing press with movable letters) which doesn't make it recent, but still twice as old as copyright law. The main point however is that copyright law has a economic motivation, not moral as you

[talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Andrew Harvey
Since the ban on all contributors who didn't sign the CTs, and ban on all new contributors from using NearMap and other CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources, I'm no longer actively contributing to the OSM database. Instead I am now actively contributing to the fosm database. I am interested to hear what other

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Franc Carter
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote: Since the ban on all contributors who didn't sign the CTs, and ban on all new contributors from using NearMap and other CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources, I'm no longer actively contributing to the OSM database. Instead I am now

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread waldo000...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote: Are you going to stop contributing data altogether? Or are you putting you efforts on hold at the moment. My efforts are on hold at the moment. Still disillusioned... ___

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Chris Barham
Hi Andrew, On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 21:29, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote: snip Are you moving to the fosm db? If so, great! Less problems with trying to merge your data into fosm, and we can all get back to mapping. Do you have any concerns over the switch? I have concerns. The

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Steve Coast
This is exactly right. On 7/6/2011 5:35 AM, Chris Barham wrote: Hi Andrew, On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 21:29, Andrew Harveyandrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote: snip Are you moving to the fosm db? If so, great! Less problems with trying to merge your data into fosm, and we can all get back to mapping.

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 July 2011 22:35, Chris Barham cbar...@pobox.com wrote: I'd like to think all this rather dull licence bickering will play out and OSM will continue and strengthen. It's sad that people with agendas are talking up the 'possible' deletion of data, and rushing off to fork. That energy

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Mark Pulley
On 06/07/2011, at 9:29 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: because any CC-BY-SA derived data you add may be removed if OSM abandons CC-BY-SA at some point in the future (or may even be conflicting with your agreed CTs now...). How could I add CC-BY-SA derived data if I use GPS traces, audio

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread John Smith
On 7 July 2011 07:54, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote: How could I add CC-BY-SA derived data if I use GPS traces, audio recordings of names, or imagery like Yahoo or Bing? The only way I could see this happening would be if I was to deliberately go out of my way to add a Actually it's

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Sam Couter
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: This is exactly right. It's only exactly right if you don't have a problem with the new licence, with the process by which it was implemented, with mass deletion of data, with the proliferation of incompatible open licences, with irrevocable and eternal

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread Steve Coast
On 7/6/2011 3:20 PM, Sam Couter wrote: Steve Coastst...@asklater.com wrote: This is exactly right. It's only exactly right if you don't have a problem with the new licence, with the process by which it was implemented, with mass deletion of data, with the proliferation of incompatible open

Re: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

2011-07-06 Thread David Murn
As others have said.. 1) Ive moved to fosm since the lockout 2) Im feeling pretty disillusioned at the whole thing, and seriously wonder if its not worth just paying 5 bucks for a map that I cannot share, rather than deal with the politics of a staggered mapping project 3) Ive made a couple of

Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 49, Issue 1

2011-07-06 Thread Nathan Odgers
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:29:54 +1000 From: Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes Message-ID:

[talk-au] Very cheap Garmin Vista Hcx - legit?

2011-07-06 Thread Christopher Barham
Hi Is anybody good at spotting eBay scams? This dude has 64 new Garmin Vista HCx's on eBay for about $120 less than comparable offers. Apart from zero feedback and the price, it looks legit to me. Hmm - any thoughts on a possible GPS bargain? (I was thinking it could be ok as Canada is awash

Re: [talk-au] Very cheap Garmin Vista Hcx - legit?

2011-07-06 Thread David Murn
The URLs you sent didnt work here, but personally Ive bought a few GPS receivers from dealextreme.com Theyre a hong kong based business but have free shipping and low prices. I think my GPS data logger cost about $15 there. Most of their LCD GPS units simply run windows CE so you simply have to

Re: [Talk-br] OpenStreetMap no Android

2011-07-06 Thread Diogo W
Você pode baixar os mapas daqui: http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/south-america/ (baixe o PBF, o OsmAnd reconhece). A atualização é semanal, se não me engano. O OsmAnd permite atualizar nomes de vias e sentido ? O iOS tem alguma aplicação que permita isso ? Se não tiver, alguém quer me ajudar a

  1   2   >