On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:39:50AM -0600, Toby Murray wrote:
Thanks for sharing the details. I have done some limited mapping based
on TIGER 2010 and 2011 data.
I wonder if this is available as a WMS layer somehwere.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner
changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a
decliner that I have personally been in touch with about the license
change and my best
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:46:24PM -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
And if I messed with Texas, sorry. I'll go screw with Oklahoma instead :)
I believe you got burned for doing that, too. Could you please tread
lightly in territory where you have not yet physically put boots on
the ground? Maybe
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 15:42 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 1/17/2012 3:39 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:46:24PM -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
And if I messed with Texas, sorry. I'll go screw with Oklahoma instead :)
I believe you got burned for doing that, too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 It looks like some folks in the
Minot area are using OSM and noting it's not reflecting it's post-flood state.
Is anybody aware of current, post-flood WMS imagery for this area?
http://www.mapdust.com/detail/1416573 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 08:43 +1100, Nick Hocking wrote:
If someone is driving past, could they clarify this for me please?
Be sure to pin it on OpenStreetBugs, too.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Talk-us
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1/24/2012 9:20 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 1/24/2012 8:33 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Nathan Edgars
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I'm making my way down I-35 from Dallas to Waco right now,
processing data I collected over Christmas and license cleaning at the
same time. I would be happy to keep going and do some license cleaning
on down to
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:41 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
All mappers make some errors, whether you are talking about the mappers
who originally created the data found in TIGER, OSM mappers, or even Google
Maps. I found a case in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1/30/2012 8:38 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Many in Multnomah County only have diamonds, no arrows, no other
markings, with a ◊ RIGHT LANE BIKE ONLY sign**every half mile or every
block, whichever comes first
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 17:14 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
[..]and copy in the TIGER 2011 name from the TMS overlay (remembering to
un-abreviate as you go).
As a reminder: the JOSM URL for that is
Well, drat, I'm heading out of Portland, hopefully for good this time,
sometime between April and July.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hi all,
The SOTM US bid committee has considered the bids entered to hold this
event later this year. I'm excited to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:41 PM, TC Haddad tchad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.orgwrote:
but overall, the automation saved countless hours of manual name
expansion for the minor cost of having to deal with a very small number of
largely
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
If the directional prefixes are not generally used as part of the name,
they should probably not be in the name tag, but instead as an address tag
(I've used addr:direction e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/**
Southwest Town Center Loop West comes to mind as a great example of just
plain brain damaged street naming Wilsonville tends to have.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dion Dock dion_d...@comcast.net wrote:
You're assuming the street signs make sense. Do you preserve signs with
mistakes or
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Alan Millar grunthos...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Southwest Town Center Loop West comes to mind as a great example of
just plain brain damaged street naming Wilsonville tends to have.
You know, I should find out if I
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
Another update: they now color motorway_links with toll=yes green (and
display toll booths at high zooms - not sure if this is new). The overlap
where a toll motorway becomes a free motorway is a bit messy though.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2/29/2012 12:17 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
mailto:nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Another update: they now color motorway_links with toll=yes green
Still needs fixing:
'Banners' on county roads (e.g. CR 35 Alternate, CR 50 Old)
C-* is a county road (in Ohio at least; it may be used for state highways in
Colorado)
Overlaps
I believe in the OSM scheme, CR is county road. Colorado and Kansas
typically stylize their state roads as C and K
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but when a local insists on tagging it one way, what's one to do?
Let 'em know about consistency. Whenever practical, we should try to
be as globally consistent as possible, if for no other reason than
being able
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11154859 has the comment
proposed bikeways (primary greenways as rcn). I wonder, are these
actually state cycleways? If not, then LCN would be the correct
network.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
(These are, in a way, part of a state network, with FDOT providing planning
assistance and perhaps funding for connections between rural trails and city
centers.)
Cool, that's what I was curious about. But hey, stay
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* CrystalWalrein closed...@hotmail.com [2012-04-02 15:45 -0700]:
For areas in New Jersey, when I look at this rendering, I get county shields
for all 500-series roads, but no shields are shown for 600-series roads
anywhere.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Alexander Jones happy5...@gmail.com wrote:
And oddly, in the San Diego area, CA 209 and CA 75 (Point Loma
and Coronado, respectively) don't render with your newer shields, but
the old style Mapnik shields. Even in read only mode I am unable
coax JOSM to read
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2012-04-03 07:21 -0700]:
Also curious how some of the more interesting edge cases work out,
such as Missouri Secondary State Highways
Someone seems to have made route relations for a lot
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
The edge cases are an opportunity for we, as a community, to get it
right. There are many many more signed routes that will be interesting
to one or more groups, as long as we have a reasonable way to tag
them.
That just
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/3/2012 11:19 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
A lot of those still don't render because they duplicate the
subnetwork in the ref tag, so Loop 5 (picking an arbitrary number) might
be represented as network=US:TX:LOOP, ref=5
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/3/2012 11:57 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
FM and RM should render identically (obviously since they're actually
the same network)
Er no. On roadside assemblies the text FARM ROAD and RANCH ROAD appears,
and on green
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
Ah, okay. I'll set them up just like other
named-but-not-publically-numbered routes like the New Jersey Turnpike and
look for network US:OK, no ref, and whetever their name is.
Just to avoid confusion with ODOT highways
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/3/2012 12:52 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com [2012-04-03 11:44 -0400]:
On 4/3/2012 11:19 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
A lot of those still don't render because they duplicate the
On Apr 3, 2012 3:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
That tagging is nonsense. There's no Truck U.S. Highway network, only a
U.S. Highway network that includes truck-bannered routes.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't bannered routes pretty much the reason
for the modifier tag?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
I stayed up way too late last night. Try visiting those URLs again.
(Once again, most of the map will rerender after you've looked at it so
the way to see the
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
Meh. I was mostly referring to weird stuff like US:TX:FM:Business or
US:US:Business:MD. To me, US:US:Business:MD falling back on
US:US:Business is fine. Tagwatch processes should catch common cases
like
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
After more thought, in the general case, deprecating modifier and just
using network to denote variations using the established : separator
convention is probably sanest.
Well, that kind of breaks the whole network
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
I'm experimenting with the Java code from Traveling Salesman
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traveling_salesman
I'm making library calls to the routing code and it seems that the
router does not understand cul-de-sacs
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com wrote:
A roundabout (or mini_roundabout) implies to me (although it is not defined
on the wiki) that there is more than one entry / exit road. So intuitively
I'd say that is not an appropriate tag.
Additionally, a
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com wrote:
The wiki actually says 'there might be also a low, fully traversable dome'.
My test is is it readily possible to drive over it? If yes, then
mini. Otherwise, I treat it as any other median island. A
theoretical North
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
That's only correct if there are signs saying it's one-way.
That's pretty shaky considering that a dividing island (and an island
in what would otherwise be a flat turning circle is still such an
island) is passed on
On Apr 11, 2012 11:48 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
From what I've read, all US highways in California should get similar
treatment, in that they're signed with different shields than the standard
ones. Are there other regional sign variants for broader road networks in
the US (or
On Apr 4, 2012 12:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/4/2012 2:43 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Renderers can fallback to the longest
left-anchored substring they understand for weird things they don't
understand.
Bad idea. Google Maps does something like this and it
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org [2012-04-11 17:33 -0700]:
On Apr 11, 2012 11:48 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
From what I've read, all US highways in California should get similar
treatment, in that they're
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com [2012-04-12 16:03 -0400]:
Also I-270 Spur in Maryland, which *is* part of the Interstate
Highway System and thus belongs in network=US:I
First off, I still feel that there was a
On Apr 13, 2012 6:31 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some cases, the
tainted nodes will have been in the proper locations to match the real
world. So, in order to make the cleanup bot not consider the nodes to be
tainted,
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.html
for the full discussion around the removal
In summary:
- The Fresno import has a number of issues
- No one is opposed to removal if there are no
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Do those individual polygons have any useful information on them (addresses,
for example)? If so, we should generate addr points from their centroids.
Why?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Do those
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Because that information is useless in OSM. It was out of date the second
someone ran the upload script and unless the city of Fresno decides to
switch to OSM for their official tax plat information (which I'm pretty sure
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
In OSM, the use case for address data is geocoding and I would argue
that general use geocoding users would rather get a building outline
or even a node at the main entrance of a location, not the centroid of
the
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
If parcel data is important to disaster response, I would expect the
responder to go get the most up to date data from the source, not use stale
data that was imported into OSM (potentially) some years ago
Doesn't Haiti and
On May 4, 2012 5:41 PM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
...and we need to examine what our existing user tools and server
processing and storage resources are and how they can handle the amount of
data desired before just blindly throwing many times the existing data size
at them.
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com wrote:
3. Merge landuse areas with the same tag. This will essentially get rid of
most of the individual parcels and turn them into one area for areas that
are touching. Initially I had hoped the parcels could be addressed. But
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I've mapped dozens of these as miniroundabouts in the midwest:
http://g.co/maps/w7mnr
That's not a mini, though, since you can't just drive over the island.
Here's an eponymous example of a mini roundabout:
http://goo.gl/6Qswf
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/7/2012 12:41 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
It vaults right over any supposed definition of mini-roundabout.
I suppose if you ignored
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/7/2012 1:02 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Still, the diverging use overlaps improperly with the actual
roundabout correctly as a ring using junction=roundabout. ;o)
You're assuming that each real-world situation has
So, you're suggesting we stop mapping nontraversable, hard medians?
Because that's what it sounds like.
Get your ears checked.
Not necessary, I'm not the one suggesting node tagging is a substitute for
mapping a nontraversible median.
___
Talk-us
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Mills nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
So this is not/should not be a mini_roundabout? It seems a little silly to
call it anything else, since the city just dug a hole in the center of the
existing intersection, built a circular curb, and planted a tree:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Nathan Mills nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
On 5/7/2012 3:30 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Millsnat...@nwacg.net wrote:
http://g.co/maps/hnbp9
All three are roundabouts, yes.
How are you going to properly map the first one
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 06/24/2012 02:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Wow, the 4000MB image is looking a wee bit light...indeed the kml
indicates a serious swiss cheese factor. What happened?
Looks like Lambertus has been busy. A bunch of stuff has
One thing I've been wondering about for a while now is if it's possible to
get the maxspeed and possibly minspeed values to be included. This would
be handy to have as some areas have fairly complete speed data, and make it
easier to spot inaccuracies and missing speed data.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 06/26/2012 08:09 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
One thing I've been wondering about for a while now is if it's possible
to get the maxspeed and possibly minspeed values to be included. This
would be handy to have as some areas
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Kristian M Zoerhoff k...@lavabit.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:02:32PM -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
there are a couple of Heritage Corridors in NY State, i'm not aware of
any
efforts to tag them as such.
Wisconsin has an actual state network of
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
In Maryland, the state has a brochure showing more or less where the
byways are, and they're not entirely consistently signed[0]. I've put one
into OpenStreetMap[1] and tagged it much as you did the Western Vistas
Historic
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Richard Weait schrieb:
Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance. Other mappers will
understand that a single mapper can't do everything at once, so you
shouldn't be criticized if you fix a few things but not
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 7/12/2012 11:26 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I like that idea, especially given the high number of obviously not
urban roads that would be better off tagged as track or unclassified
getting counted as residential (a more urban
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.comwrote:
Everyone,
****Having looked over the damage and deletions for the last
hour, I feel the redaction has left the LA map essentially unusable. Huge
blocks of streets are missing, including major roads and
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.comwrote:
Do you have any idea how big LA is?
Do you have any idea how big the rest of the world is? It's not always
about LA, sister. Get over it and start fixing.
___
Talk-us
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:44 PM, the Old Topo Depot
oldto...@novacell.comwrote:
What do folks on the list think of using a page such as
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:JohnANovak/Interstates
to track progress on Interstates (and similarly for other major road
classes as well)
Not
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to complete local bicycle infrastructure here in and around
Salt Lake City. I obtained GIS data (a shapefile) containing local
bike infrastructure[1], and a lot of it is already in there. I do have
a
On Jul 26, 2012 11:30 PM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
ref=FH nn - USFS Forest Highway
ref=FR nXn[n][.n] - USFS Forest Route/Road
ref=FT nXn[n][.n] - USFS Forest Trail
IIRC, all three of these are a single NFD network, for National Forest
Development, and are distinguishable
On Jul 27, 2012 8:07 AM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At least in Region 5 (CA), the roads have N or S in the X position, while
trails have E or W. However, I wasn't sure that everyone would necessarily
know that, so I went with a more descriptive prefix, based on the
OK, to the list this time...damn gmail and lack of reply-to-list...
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netwrote:
Getting the road/trail names/numbers out of the USFS is difficult,
requiring a fair amount of research to find a map on which it is legible,
I know I was put in charge of the next Portland beering, but I'm going to
have to pass the torch...life got a bit complicated pretty much right off
the bat after I took the torch, so I wasn't able to follow through on that.
I'm leaving Portland in about two weeks thanks to some happy developments
On Aug 2, 2012 2:19 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
What is an emergency Interstate? I don't think I have ever heard that
phrase before. Is it a detour to be used while the Interstate highway is
under repair?
For when the mainline is closed due to emergency, in locations
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed user SimMoonXP (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimMoonXP ) reclassifying a few
isolated stretches of KS highway 7 in the Kansas City area. I sent a
message asking why and he indicated that he was
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know there is some disagreement about road classification,
especially when it comes to trunk but I'm pretty sure most people
would agree
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/expressway
expressway=yes, seems to be a fringe tag at best.
I believe our German friends use motorroad=yes for this.
Not quite. American expressways
This is probably of interest to us.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Todd Fagin tfa...@coordinatesolutions.com
Date: Aug 23, 2012 11:35 AM
Subject: [okgis] 2012 TIGER files
To: ok...@gis.ou.edu
For those interested in these things, it looks as if the 2012 TIGER files
are now
On Sep 11, 2012 10:43 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
a lot of the tiger looks the same, but for some of the really awful
areas, tiger 2011/12 looks a great
deal better. i'm planning on some selective replacement of unedited bad
tiger data with newer, better
tiger in upstate NY
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.comwrote:
**Was there ever consensus on whether to use SR (or some
variation on that) for state highways versus an abbreviation of the state
name (CA or NY). I remember that there was discussion, but I don't
remember
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA, NJ among other states where he did
a lot of this.)
this was, of course, tagging for
On Sep 18, 2012 10:09 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Does anybody have an update on their local OSM meetings?
Just looking at nearby mappers, I would hazard to guess Tulsa probably has
the critical mass to get the local chapter party started.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Plus, there's going to be an interesting talk on the schedule about
the trip planner and the headway OSM has made in Portland, in part as
a part of this project.
A little sorry I'm not going to be able to make it
Speed limit and/or lane data as available would be awesome, too.
On Oct 1, 2012 8:54 AM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On 09/30/2012 11:47 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
Could you annex part of BC into the west coast?
Sure. I'll look in to it the next time I tear in to the code. :)
...@averillpark.netjavascript:;
wrote:
On 10/1/12 2:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Does Lambertus follow the list?
i don't know, but he does read and respond to messages sent through the
openstreetmap.org
messaging system.
richard
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
Downloads:
http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2012-10-09
Don't get too excited, folks... most of the southern plains including
almost all of Kansas, Arkansas and Missouri, half of Oklahoma, and half of
Was hoping to see a 10/16 or 10/17 snapshot, since I just did a good size
edit for Tulsa highway construction and the brand new overpass now
permanently closed over Charles Page Boulevard that a garbage truck
totalled on Monday...
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
to have some idea how I'm going to handle
that problem when I start going over my Route 66 traces).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com
Date: Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations
To: Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.comwrote:
I think there is still some misunderstanding.
One of the transforms is:
1704295,road,US:TX:Spur,601,,US:TX,601,Spur,happy5214,5
Spur in Texas is not a modifier; it's a distinct type of route that is
numbered
On Oct 22, 2012 9:57 AM, Alexander Jones happy5...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
FM and RM are the same network...seems odd for them to show up twice
here...
I could've sworn that the general consensus from a previous argument was
one network per shield type.
They use the same
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
Did they switch from one term to the other at some point? If so, the mix
of signs on the same route might be because some of the signs have been
replaced as they rusted out and/or got used for target practice.
Not
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.com wrote:
You can check the highway designation file for the correct designation
of specific routes. If something else is on the sign, the local
district probably screwed up (several TxDOT district offices aren't
exactly known
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Moderation is one thing. Important messages can still go through, if
someone is moderated. But in this case he apparently was kicked off the
list completely. I'm not sure what behavior caused such a severe sanction,
but if it
I'm going to go ahead and get it started by nominating beautiful Tulsa,
Oklahoma for SOTM 2013.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Hey Kate -
Good question. Given the fact that we're shooting for an early SOTM next
year, we're really strapped of time for a
Looks like someone mapped a haymaze.
On Nov 13, 2012 9:12 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I got this from a MapRoulette user:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.414586lon=-84.815333zoom=18layers=M
Anyone know what this is about?
--
Martijn van Exel
Oh, and they're flat out hosed in the Tulsa County area, particularly at
the same latitude as Broken Arrow (TIGER carries Broken Arrow-specific
street names into Tulsa City improperly).
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.comwrote:
Toby,
****We do
I don't think the Tulsa one is going to happen, lack of venue.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote:
Hi Folks,
the organisation of Operation Cowboy seems to be nearly finished.
together this weekend (it's not really a good
weekend for get togethers in the US), I would love to attend a mapping
party in OK in the future. So planning a mapping party in the future could
also be a good idea.
--
Jim
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Paul Johnson
ba
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Toby Murray wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Brian May b...@mapwise.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On 11/27/2012 7:06 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29
On Thursday, November 29, 2012, Brian May wrote:
On 11/29/2012 9:12 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Secondly, about Census data... The Census Bureau publishes ZIP Code
Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs, as polygons) but they are an approximation of US
Postal Service data and used for downstream analytical
701 - 800 of 1503 matches
Mail list logo
