I noticed that for some countries there seems to be more than one node.
E.g. for Slovakia there are 5:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424313572
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/432425079
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424315420
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :) I believe we went through all the
country nodes which didn't have a name:pl= or
Peter Körner schrieb:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :) I believe we went through all the
country nodes which didn't
Mike Ryan schrieb:
Hi All
I'm trying to update the map using a GPS trace I took while on holiday
in Udine in Northern Italy
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?gpx=462905
However, the map itself is really slow to show all the existing ways
once I go into edit mode - I have already
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I also experienced the same issue when mapping in Italy. When I
was in Germany, it was a completely different potlatch-experience
and I was sorry for blaming potlatch in the past ;-)
:)
Potlatch is indeed quite sensitive to
I think name should be what the shop is called like (e.g. what stands on
a sign on top / in front of it). If there are additional information
like the operator it could be added via an additional tag but not as
part of the name.
Peter
Shaun McDonald schrieb:
Could you please give examples of
Morten Kjeldgaard schrieb:
On 05/08/2009, at 10.09, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Maybe it makes sense to use a variation of the motorcar tag which is
already widely used to model car access (e.g. highway=tertiary,
motorcar=4wdonly - or even highway=tertiary, motorcar=no,
motorcar:4wd=yes or
John Smith schrieb:
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
But never the less I think if 4wd-only is common in that
region, why not
tag it? The more data, the better. But I'm unsure if the
renderer should
implement it, as it could just be used in this area
David Lynch schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 09:45, Morten Kjeldgaardm...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
So using the surface=* tag is a
better approach IMHO to warn that a road is in a bad shape for ordinary
traffic.
Surface alone doesn't tell you enough. A standard car can handle just
about any
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Remember that data is no good if it's not rendered,
Remember that rendering a map isn't the only use for geodata.
And also remember that the Main-OSM-Mapnik renderer isn't the only one
out there. If someone wants to render a map with this
John Smith schrieb:
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
Remember that data is no good if it's not rendered, and the
software
can't be expected to deal with a gazillion different
situations. It's
better to keep the data general. So using the surface=*
tag is
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Peter Körner schrieb:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
Peter
Addendum: This seems to be bad imports by user cyana:
http
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x=3492y=1586
It looks to me like a lot of place=town nodes have been added
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/6 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hi
This looks a little like spam to me or at least like bad rendering rules
for tah.
Can anyone confirm one of these?
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?layer=tilez=12x
Roy Wallace schrieb:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Kevo...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
Hi All,
While trying (and failing miserably) to find a parking space in Birmingham
(UK) the other day (terrible sign age - talk about leaving it to the last
minute - AND to top it all I must have parked in
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make translating those countries
more easy, I
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de
wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
The multilingual-country-list[1] tool reveals a bunch of nodes that
are tagged place=country but aren't so by anyone's definition. For
example the uninhabited Bassas da India atoll[2].
There are also various overseas territories of the UK which should
Pieren schrieb:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:08 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com wrote:
The instructions at the top of the pages could also mention the
official_name:* tags - I don't know if these are approved in any way
but I found they were on some of the nodes and I thought it was a
Jonas Häggqvist schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
If you need help translating country
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/13 Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns lafr...@gmail.com:
To me it seems standard MIT license. Maybe someone could contact them
about country name data import into OSM and ask special permision?
There are probably more complete sources like the wikipedia page
titles
Maarten Dammers schrieb:
Hi Peter,
Peter Körner schreef:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
I see you created your
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make
Peter Körner schrieb:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make translating those
Morten Kjeldgaard schrieb:
I realized when mapping today that it would be very useful to have a
set of OSM status POIs that you could use to mark the status of the
mapping at certain places.
I find I sometimes have to skip roads, tracks or paths, because I am
too tired, don't have
. It's
too easy to read through the names and mark them as OK without thinking
too much.
/Erik
Peter Körner skrev:
No, just mark it as ok. If there's an existing one with an identical
name you may also delete the needless translation.
I'll add some highlight to those needless
Micha Ruh schrieb:
Hallo Peter!
Ich habe ein paar Übersetzungen mit Hilfe deines sehr gelungenen Tools
und Wikipedia erstellt.
Dabei ist mir bei der Sprache der traditionellen chinesischen
Schriftzeichen eine
Inkonsistenz zwischen Deinem Tool und Wikipedia aufgefallen: Es werden
Marc Schütz schrieb:
What is the opinion for translations that are the same in other
languages? For
instance: Andorra is Andorra in a lot of languages. Do you add a
translation
even though the translation is the same as the original name?
Maarten
No, just mark it as ok. If there's an
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 14. August 2009 13:34 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
I understand your concerns when looking at the country-level, but what
should we do on the city-level? add the name of all cities in all
languages as a translation? Or: what should we do
Marc Schütz schrieb:
But this implicates that if there is no different name, no name:xx-tag
should be set (even if it's not *bad* to have one, its also not
*necessary*). Do you agree with that, Marc?
I was replying in a hurry, and I see now that it is not as easy as I thought
it to be. I
Peteris Krisjanis schrieb:
HI there!
I am new to this list, so if this question is already answered, please
don't be harsh :)
I browsed archive, and I didn't saw anything for answer, but maybe I
didn't look hard enough.
As far as I understand mapnik render rules have been subject of
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make
Marc Schütz schrieb:
Still I think a case could be made for country names to be different:
most of them are so prominent that I would say they exist in most languages,
even if they are identical to the native names.
For example, the German names for most European countries are different
from
Jonas Häggqvist schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Marc Schütz schrieb:
[Should name:xx equal to name tags stay or not?]
In my eyes the rule should be: If it has a name in language xxx *that
differs from it's native name*, then add a name:xxx tag
That seemed sensible to me also, but now that I
Arlindo Pereira schrieb:
I need some advice: I'm currently translating the names to Portuguese,
and for some countries the portuguese name differ from the brazilian
portuguese (which I speak) to the european portuguese. So, should I
tag, official_/name:pt=one of the forms or
This is true if you use Greasemonkey to *remove* existing josm-links,
but (in my eyes) not if you're proposing a Greasemonkey-script to add them.
Peter
These kinds of things can easily be fixed using a tool like
Greasemonkey. I've made a few scripts myself, but none that is
suitable for
Thank you for the bug-report, i'll check both bugs soon.
Peter
I think there was a bug introduced during resorting of the list or
during the transition from
zh-classic - zh-classical. The list behaves strange. Once I noticed
that when i changed a
country name in one language, the status
Lennard schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
It reaches 100% when /Tromelin Island /is set to not-ok.
I got Bahasa Indonesia at 229/230 with 2 countries (Tromelin, Turkey) as
not ok.
This happened because some countries were degraded to states, so they
don't show up in the list but are still
This is not possible at the moment, as the list is based upon the list
of existing wikipedias [1]. Which language do you want to add? Send me
the name, the code, and the link to an wiki article and i'll think about
how to add it.
Peter
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:SiteMatrix
Hi
As I guessed the bug with the 100% comes from countries that aren't
countries anymore. They are removed from the list with the hourly
update, but if you got your list open while this happens you can still
mark it as ok. so we got a country that only exists in this language -
and more than
Whooohoow this is so cool! Looks like a lot of Voodoo to me :)
As I saw from the samples It doesn't work well on blurred images, so it
won't work with sth. like a helmet or a car camera, would it?
Peter
Tijs Zwinkels schrieb:
Hey All,
As of yesterday, the Google Summer of Code has ended.
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/18 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Namely they are http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424313867 and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424317578 which are both
islands now. By the way i added
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/19 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/18 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Namely they are http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424313867 and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/424317578 which are both
Since this version can't be trained to handle white background signs,
I wonder what color are streetname signs around the world?
Netherlands white on blue
Sweden black on white
German Black on White (newer) or White on dark Blue (older, but not
uncommon) and sometimes White on dark Red
What's left to be clarified is how lanes are numbered.
I'd suggest to be the inner one to be 1, ascending the more you're going
to the border
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Has anyone ever made an whether-overlay for openstreetmap using the
Google [1] or the Yahoo API [2]? I think this would be possible with mapnik:
* load a planet.osm into some kind of db (or process it in-place with
a sax-parser)
* find the regions with ZIP, PLZ or whatever
* fetch the
Wmm why can't we say:
1L for the leftmost lane
2L for the second lane from left
1R for the rightmost lane
where left and right is seen in driving-direction. So then the 2
rightmode lane seperates you can talk about 1R and 2R.
Peter
Yann Coupin schrieb:
Plus what does inner mean on a oneway
The building tag could be a multiple value tag like building, so:
business=yes or
business=printer or
business=pr_consultant or
business=logistics or
business=medical_devices or
...
If it's a building use
building=yes
if it's a business-building use
building=business
if you know
IN such circumstances I use building=... or landuse=retail to outline
the combined structure or area, and then use landuse=retail NODES within
them to label each unit
How can a node be of any landuse - it's no land, just a 0-dimensional
point..
Peter
Any suggestions on exporting admin boundaries from a database to kml format?
If you have some kind of database anyway (e.g. postgis for
mapnik-rendering on cassini, it shouldn't be the problem. You may also
try query2map [1]. If none of this works for you, you may consider
processing a
Hi PB,
you're wrong here. Go to josm ticket-system [1] and search for a ticket.
If you're unable to find one, describing your problem, ask at the
josm-dev list [2] or, if you're really sure that this is a bug (all
components up2date and still happening), open a new ticket at [1].
Good luck!
/8/09, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
If you have some kind of database anyway (e.g. postgis for
mapnik-rendering on cassini, it shouldn't be the problem.
I have a suitable query, I just don't know how to turn the query into kml
data, such as lines.
select way from
admin_level=2 is country level, 4 and lower for state and regional boundaries.
I'm aware of that and the admin_level=2 is only used in the subquery to
determine the boundary of germany. The main query runs without a
admin_level-condition, only with boundary='administrative', does it?
Peter
John Smith schrieb:
--- On Sat, 22/8/09, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
I'm aware of that and the admin_level=2 is only used in the
subquery to determine the boundary of germany. The main
query runs without a admin_level-condition, only with
boundary='administrative', does
John Smith schrieb:
--- On Sat, 22/8/09, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Any :) I'm just getting started. I tried to find any
boundaries in a given Area, in this case in Germany.
Leave admin_level= out of the query
Thank you for the hint :)
Please take a look at my query
John Smith schrieb:
--- On Sat, 22/8/09, Jon Burgess jburgess...@googlemail.com wrote:
This admin.kml loads up fine in GoogleEarth and the
boundaries appear as lines.
Thanks for your help, just admin_level=10 information for only the Australia
region is 186M uncompressed and 76M when
The second should fetch the border of Germany and the first
one all boundaries in that. At least that's what I want it
to do :)
I just ran that query on my database and used name='Australia' and it works
as you thought it should.
Yes, you're right. It works with
Nederland, Australia,
I have read the above mentioned discussion[1] (unfortunately it is
spread among two mailing lists)
Sorry for that.
(1) Default tags can be changed. We should remember that default tags
can be edited by somebody later and they will no longer be good for
other languages.
This will mark all
What's the URL for the code, again, for those of us running the bot who are
daft enough to have deleted that original email?
Take a look into the Archives:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-August/040750.html
Peter
___
talk mailing
Hi
take a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=38.18236lon=-44.91328zoom=15layers=B000FTTT
In fact there are 3 ways in the middle of the ocean, but the object-list
shows 9 - each of them 3 times:
* Way 35373399
* Way 35373587
* Way 35373412
* Way 35373399
* Way
Vincent MEURISSE schrieb:
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 02:48:26 pm Peter Körner wrote:
In fact there are 3 ways in the middle of the ocean, but the object-list
shows 9 - each of them 3 times:
What are these way doing there ?
They were added by a new OSMler. He was notified and the ways were
I use
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path/Examples
and have concluded to use
highway=path, wheelchair=no
The first tag classifies the way as being an unpaved and small path while the
second clarifies that you can't use it for anything on wheels.
Are you sure?
The wiki should not only match the reality, it should suggest proper
behaviour to (new) users. Text like
If a section of road in the US looks like a motorway then it can
be tagged as a motorway without researching its funding sources or
driving up and down the road looking for
Hi
I'm sorry to tell you that there was a major issue with the Multilingual
Country-List that I didn't realize when it happend and now we to bite
the bullet and face the problem: There are 70 countries in the osm-db
that got lost in the list on 2009-08-21 between 17:00 and 18:00 for
unknown
Ed Avis schrieb:
Peter Körner osm-lists at mazdermind.de writes:
I'm sorry to tell you that there was a major issue with the Multilingual
Country-List
I'm glad you mentioned it because I missed the original announcement.
The site is
http://cassini.toolserver.org/~mazder/multilingual
Hi
http://osmxapi.hypercube.telascience.org/ states
The source database is a mirror of the main OSM database and is
updated via the per-minute diff dumps. The data is normally no more
than about 10 minutes behind the main database.
But i added a name:de-Tag to node 462226505 [1] about 3
It was finally updated, but it took about 4 hours (at least as i can tell)
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Could the tool be extended to support names of cities? For these, a
percentage
completion indicator makes little sense, since most city names are not
translated, but there are still a hundred or so worldwide which do have their
own
name in most major languages.
Currently the tool gets
[3] http://cassini.toolserver.org/tile-browse/
The Danish map[1] is simply a blank map at all zoom levels. What gives?
[1] http://cassini.toolserver.org/tile-browse/browse-da.html
It is just not yet rendered. The tiles will get in the render-queue as
you try to see them. Take another look
Are the tiles of the localized maps re-rendered at all? I've finished
adding persian country names to the OSM db last week already and the
persian map still shows the state from when it was initially set up [2].
I think this question rather goes to Ævar Arnfjörð as he set up the
localized
I'm amazed that anyone experienced in OSM is proposing *not* using
tags and getting the order of usage (leads to) convention (leads to)
documentation (leads to) presets back to front - you don't start with
presets in order to force convention.
I agree but until now I used the tags to tell in
Tom Hughes schrieb:
On 01/09/09 23:02, Pieren wrote:
I'm just questionning myself if I will continue to contribute to OSM
if the admins are not able to react faster to something which looks
like the worst form of vandalism.
As an admin with the technical ability to do these things I'm
Hi
I'd like to do a Brainstorming about how a Revert-Tool could look like,
that is more open to the Community, can be used without programming
knowledge and is able to to reverts fast.
Please throw in you're ideas, thoughts, whatever you have to say. I'll
add my own Ideas in a separate mail.
I'd like to do a Brainstorming about how a Revert-Tool could look like,
that is more open to the Community, can be used without programming
knowledge and is able to to reverts fast.
I'm thinking of a process like this:
- Identify the Changeset you'd like to be reverted.
- Go to tool and
Hi
1.) with great power comes great responsibility!
We'll have to distribute this responsibility to many shoulders and do it
crowdsourced.
2.) the number of votes should depend on the complexity (number of
affected objects?)
that's cool..
3.) mailing lists might be flooded because every
Karl Guggisberg schrieb:
- tool shows you a list of all members of the Changeset
... for which we would need a /api/0.6/changeset/1234567 which includes the
primitives, if possible
even a /api/0.6/changeset/1234567/full. Currently, editors/offline tools
would have to screen scrap
I'm against voting. Voting is a way to take responsibility away from the
individual. I think that in most cases we should strive to have
individuals responsible for everything (just like with mapping - you
don't suggest something which the community then votes upon, you just map).
But this
For the local area mappers, i would recommend the reverse approach.
Assume that the user is 'just a newbie trying to be helpful'.
Has anyone invited this user to a mapping party?
He'd have to responde to mail for that.
Why not assume that the user is 10years old and just learning how to
Well that's the problem - the best thing we have at the moment is the
foundation and it's working groups. In this case the Data Working Group
is the appropriate one I guess.
I think a crowdsourced approach against vandalism would scale better
than dedicated working-groups. See my
Sybren A. Stüvel schrieb:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
A revert is changing a lot of things in one time, which would be
much more time-consuming with e.g. josm. I see this (doing a lot of
things with just a single click) as the main problem with an easy
revert
How do you (automatically) distinguish revert from ordinary edit (or
almost-revert from ordinary edit)? I think you can't at least not
reliably (you can't rely on the commit message, etc ...)
This decision would be made in the revert-tool we talk here about. It
would not be includes as part of
How whow what a great post. Thank you for that! I was nodding most of
the time while reading :)
Yes, I would like to see a revert function available to which I could
give a changeset to and it would revert all the changes made to the
database within that changeset. It must flag the changes
Peter Miller schrieb:
On 2 Sep 2009, at 21:52, MP wrote:
Until this is possible I want to try to (or at least collect all
necessary information to) write an external tool for this.
Adding revert to main site could attract vandals (ok, let's just
revert stuff) or experimentators (what does
Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period of at
least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be
sufficient I would have thought. That would mean that a newbie who gets
on with it can be 'established' within 2 weeks. I think that was how
long it took
maning sambale schrieb:
Revert my own and only my own changeset.
Okay.. and how about vandalists?
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
You could check the tool on the edits made over the previous two months
by Liam123, some of which have still not been reverted for lack of a
suitable tool to achieve it.
Are you talking about http://openstreetmap.org/user/liam123 ? Are we
sure that this is really vandalism?
For now I won't
You might want to investigate setting up some test scripts to import,
edit and then revert data. But do any testing against a test database
and not the real thing :-)
Hmm the tool I'm working on at the moment will work with tha API and
without a local DB, so I'd need a test-api. Do we have
Richard Weait schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Making 10 changesets of more than 10 features each over a period of at
least 2 weeks without attracting reverts or complaints should be
sufficient I would have thought. That would mean that a
maning sambale schrieb:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Peter Körner wrote:
maning sambale schrieb:
Revert my own and only my own changeset.
Okay.. and how about vandalists?
Peter
i though maning meant this was a separate option
Yes, let's
John Smith schrieb:
2009/9/3 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
I'm talking about building an external tool without any integration into
osm.org, as this is what i'm capable of. This tool can be visited by any
user and any user may do OAuth-Sign-In with this tool. The tool can't
tell
I wasn't thinking of that case so much as someone being a little over
zealous and reverting a changeset by accident and needing to revert
their change.
This will of course be possible
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
I thought about these cases and I think for some of them a tool could do
the check anyway.
Bad changeset #123: delete the node London. Was node 456 v10, now
456 v11 (deleted)
(Intermediate changeset: add a node for London)
Revert changeset #123: node 456 hasn't been touched since, so
tagging@ would be a start.
And vandalism@
Peter
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Exactly. Call it what you like, but it'll need to ask for user input,
which makes it an editor rather than a blind revert tool. So long as
everyone remembers when they're designing the system that you can't do
blind reverts with confidence!
Oh no I would never want to write a tool that allow
shop=vacant; empty stores should be marked vacant, not removed from map.
I usually use
shop=[what it was before]
disused=yes
shop=supplements; specialty food and dietary supplements.
shop=cash; non-bank cheque cashing or short term payday loans
shop=beauty; personal beauty services,
Marjan Vrban schrieb:
Anyone have idea when will http://cassini.toolserver.org/tile-browse/
update rendering tiles (last time 23.07.2009).?
As said on maps-l [0] this will happen as soon as the production servers
are up. The Hardware is in place but we need admins to set up the
software [1].
Dual CPU 2.5 GHz AMD
3-4GB RAM Each
Most have 80 GB or larger HDD
I don't know if that's enough for rendering. If it is we could set up
some other styles on the page (car view with just streets and car
related things, transportation map, free time map with all those
leisure, a map with
1 - 100 of 690 matches
Mail list logo
