Hi,
One of my sources(source=*) that I use for streets are geotagged photos,
which I link to directly at the website where they are hosted. Sometimes
when I see that the photo geoposition isn't the way I want it(knowing
that the street sign in my city is on the corner of a building usually),
I
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 16:04, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
John Smith and I know the Truth. Frederik's books should be burnt. He is
an
Apostle of the 'new license'.
I would have said apostle of the CT
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Aun Yngve Johnsen
li...@gimnechiske.orgwrote:
I believe if you are the owner of the data,
But what is an owner? Ownership is the lash of the bourgoise. What you own
is owned by us all. Properety is theft.
Therefore those who steel the map from us the mappers
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a
more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report
myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but
functional to get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured someone else
might like to
Noam,
I am curious to know why you don't simply give OSM attribution and
carry on using the maps?
PY
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
Noam,
Thank you for taking this as seriously as it needs, and solving the
whole issue this fast.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 09:05:18 paul youlten wrote:
I am curious to know why you don't simply give OSM attribution and
carry on using the maps?
If you read the blog post carefully, you'll find a hint:
We are huge fans of OSM and hope to collaborate with OSM through the new
license
But what a shame that so much crowd generated data had
to be erased because of a stupid license !
Nobody of the OSMF board thought of that ?
Regards,
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
Namens Iván
You seem to be misunderstanding something here. No data has been deleted.
Waze is looking forward to use OSM data after the license change,
because the current one doesn't allow them to use the OSM data (even
including attribution) the way they do.
Claudius
Am 01.09.2010 11:13, ce-test,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
Every time OSM contributors have been asked, they have supported ODbL
(or license change before ODbL had a name). All the way back to SotM
Manchester. And all the way forward through polls and surveys and more
SotM conferences. All the time,
On 1 September 2010 20:33, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
You seem to be misunderstanding something here. No data has been deleted.
Waze is looking forward to use OSM data after the license change, because
the current one doesn't allow them to use the OSM data (even including
attribution)
Hi,
I just downloaded josm-latest.jar and got the following errors:
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad
version number in .class file
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:676)
Niklas Cholmkvist towardsoss at gmail.com writes:
Hello,
When I map, sometimes I add sources to my contributions. It could be a
bus route relation where I may add the GPS trace I took while riding the
bus as the source for the route. Other times if I name a street I may
use a
Claudius,
You seem to be misunderstanding something here. No data has been deleted.
Waze is looking forward to use OSM data after the license change,
because the current one doesn't allow them to use the OSM data (even
including attribution) the way they do.
[GG] Citation:
On 1 September 2010 21:06, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
OSM: go to shame ourselves.
Most OSM software is GPL'd are you telling those authors they should
be ashamed of themselves for not publishing under a BSD license
instead?
This is a direct consequence of OSM not being PD !
From our Homepage:
The project (OSM) was started because most maps you think of as free
actually have legal or technical restrictions on their use, holding back
people from using them in creative, productive, or unexpected ways.
This is
On 09/01/2010 10:14 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 19:07, Rob Myersr...@robmyers.org wrote:
If you don't want the effects of a PD OSM for geodata, ODbL is a better way
of ensuring this than BY-SA
The devil you know is better than the devil you don't
The devil is in the details.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 01-09-10 13:14, John Smith schreef:
On 1 September 2010 21:06, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
OSM: go to shame ourselves.
Most OSM software is GPL'd are you telling those authors they should
be
On 1 September 2010 21:21, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
The devil is in the details.
CT+ODBL has a lot of fine print...
But going from these reasonable objections to accusing the actions of the
part of the community that you don't agree with of being dishonest, immoral
and detrimental
On 1 September 2010 21:26, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
GPL is not the problem here. None of the software has to be distributed
to the end user. No distribution = No license violation.
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/LICENSE
___
talk mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 01-09-10 13:33, John Smith schreef:
On 1 September 2010 21:26, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
GPL is not the problem here. None of the software has to be distributed
to the end user. No distribution = No license violation.
John Harvey j...@johnharveyphoto.com wrote:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a
more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report
myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but
functional to get a breakdown of tag
Hi.
Since end of July JOSM requires Java 6.
Perhaps that's the reason for the exception.
I would say: check your Java version ;)
regards
Peter
On 01.09.2010 12:41, maning sambale wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded josm-latest.jar and got the following errors:
Exception in thread main
John Harvey j...@johnharveyphoto.com wrote:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. ...
Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2010, 13:40:23 schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange:
In cas you don't know it, there is tagstat, a little bit slow but more
accurate and with updated data :
Thanks Peter.
I switched to JAVA 6. All is fine.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peter Wendorff
wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Hi.
Since end of July JOSM requires Java 6.
Perhaps that's the reason for the exception.
I would say: check your Java version ;)
regards
Peter
On
On 01/09/2010 12:56, Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
And just to get a full list.
There is also the older, but still working and updated Tagwatch
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagwatch
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/
I maybe missing something, but is there a search facility?
Cheers
Dave F.
Hi,
take the coordinates from Google
Earth/Maps.
I will not. That is a non-free source, the same reason I do not
look/consider Wikimapia(google maps based) or any other proprietary
maps.
OSM may currently be the freest data collection that exists (since
CC-BY-SA-3.0 is legally invalid for OSM
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more
modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself -
very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to
get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured someone else might like to read
On 09/01/2010 12:30 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 21:21, Rob Myersr...@robmyers.org wrote:
The devil is in the details.
CT+ODBL has a lot of fine print...
So does BY-SA. And you should see GNU's GPL/copyright waiver/copyright
assignment combination. They are all trying to be
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more
modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself -
very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to
get a breakdown of tag usage.
Jane Smith schrieb:
The longer we keep our secret about BigTinCan John, the longer we can
disrupt things!
Thanks for stating in a very obvious way what you are here for.
And what this community needs is collaboration, not disruption, so
either try working together with everyone else or go
2010/9/1 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
What is the problem in running the import, that you did once, again,
completely replacing the outdated data.
he wrote on the German ML that he lost the program which did the import.
cheers,
Martin
___
On 01/09/2010 14:15, Lars Francke wrote:
Well thank you very much.
Cheers,
Lars (author of OSMdoc)
Hi Lars
The search facility appears to only search the key tag not the values
tag. Is there a way to overcome this?
For instance - parking. It doesn't list amenity=parking or any other
On 1 September 2010 14:42, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Francis Davey schrieb:
Agreeing with the person you assign to that they will only use the
copyright in certain ways won't protect you against a subsequent
assignee of the copyright (eg OSMF assigns to XXX Ltd), subject to
certain
On 09/01/2010 03:05 PM, Francis Davey wrote:
Bear in mind that OSMF may cease to exist and its assets be
transferred to someone else who you may trust less. I'm not saying it
will happen or is even likely to happen, but I'm afraid as a lawyer
I'm inclined to be cautious about the far future.
Hi,
Because I'm curious to read how new users see openstreetmap when they
register (and also a curious chance to see the new contributor
terms :) ) I went to the registration page of openstreetmap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/new .
Why does that page load scripts from ethnio.com? Those
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious as to what specifically is stopping them with the current
license, because the current license hasn't stopped MS or MapQuest
from using OSM's data...
It's that pesky ShareAlike part, I'm sure. When looking
On 01/09/2010 10:22, Andy Allan wrote:
...leading to simply unbelievable volumes of email[3].
Too whinge purely because you can't deal with a few emails is
childishness in itself.
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
I don't know why this script is included and when the target shows up,
but it targets (whenever) to
https://ethnio.com/remotes/62786/edit?
May be anyone knows what's the reason for putting ethnio-recruting
service on the page
Marco
Am 01.09.2010 16:07, schrieb Niklas Cholmkvist:
Hi,
Because
On 01/09/10 15:07, Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
Because I'm curious to read how new users see openstreetmap when they
register (and also a curious chance to see the new contributor
terms :) ) I went to the registration page of openstreetmap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/new .
Why does that
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone wrote:
take the coordinates from Google
Earth/Maps.
I will not. That is a non-free source, the same reason I do not
look/consider Wikimapia(google maps based) or any other proprietary
maps.
OSM may
What is the problem in running the import, that you did once, again,
completely replacing the outdated data.
he wrote on the German ML that he lost the program which did the import.
Thank you Martin.
He is correct. I don't have the script anymore that did the import and
it didn't work very
I just noticed that someone changed some time ago the rules for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresaction=historysubmitdiff=424831oldid=422949
I cannot remember that there was any discussion about this. I believe
that RFC and voting-announcements should go to
On 01/09/2010 17:12, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I just noticed that someone changed some time ago the rules for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresaction=historysubmitdiff=424831oldid=422949
I cannot remember that there was any discussion about this. I
Martin wrote:
I cannot remember that there was any discussion about this. I
believe
that RFC and voting-announcements should go to [talk], while
[tagging]
is for discussions about tags and tagging schemes.
Perhaps I'm a bit jaded at the moment, but I think [tagging] is a
better choice. If
On 08/30/2010 10:41 AM, Graham Jones wrote:
I think we might need some finer grained assessment of c, because as
my son gets bigger (or I get older!) I am finding I give up on more
tracks than I used to...
Does anyone know if there is such a scheme in use already, or would we
need to invent a
2010/9/1 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 01/09/2010 17:12, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I just noticed that someone changed some time ago the rules for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresaction=historysubmitdiff=424831oldid=422949
I cannot remember
++
jim
From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Emilie Laffray
Sent: 01 September 2010 10:39
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Sock puppetry is not welcome here
On 1 September 2010 10:36, Andy
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more
modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself -
very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to
get a breakdown of tag usage.
Am 01.09.2010 22:32, schrieb Peter Körner:
it took 6m50.329s for the germany/bremen extract [2] which is about 4MB
of bz2 compressed xml (imported 65046 nodes, 125824 ways).
I just ran it on a much faster server and it took 0m33.193s for the same
extract. This sounds reasonable. I won't be
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Albertas Agejevas a...@pov.lt wrote:
But FlightGear, for instance, currently uses cooked scenery files,
distributing OSM data separately is not an option. So it is not
included at all. (I am not associated with FlightGear).
would it not be possible to create
The complete lack of any arguments left in the brains of the pro-ODbL lobby
shows in the complete falling apart of any discussion on this list, with
previously thoughtful people concentrating on personal attacks on others,
mostly claiming that they are making personal attacks.
So
1. From where
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I don't see how CC-By-SA 3.0 explicitly does not apply to
databases more than 2.0. It explicitly applies to things like maps
however (possibly this only means maps as images though)
Well, it explicitly applies to
Barrier=ditch would be logical for a ditch that is intended to keep people or
animals out, but is not intended for drainage. Examples would be a dry moat
around a castle, or a ha-ha (a dry trench used as a livestock barrier).
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Waterway
Barrier=ditch would be logical for a ditch that is intended to keep people or
animals out, but is not intended for drainage. Examples would be a dry moat
around a castle, or a ha-ha (a dry trench used as a livestock barrier).
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Waterway
On 1 September 2010 17:40, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com
wrote:
Someone wrote:
take the coordinates from Google
Earth/Maps.
I will not. That is a non-free source, the same reason I do not
look/consider Wikimapia(google
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:25 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:40, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com
wrote:
Someone wrote:
take the coordinates from Google
Earth/Maps.
I will not. That is
On Thu, 2 September, 2010 11:22:54 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Besides, there's nothing in the Google Terms of Service which says you may
not
make use of the facts you learn by using this website. That'd just be silly.
Not to mention unconscionable, and therefore
[0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.939lon=13.3026zoom=14layers=M
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.68689lon=13.08742zoom=15layers=M
la laguna di grado e marano è sempre opera dello stesso mapper, merita
anche qui:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.68689lon=13.08742zoom=15layers=M
Quello che sto facendo (a molto rilento) su [0] è un test su un'area
limitata per vedere fino dove posso spingermi a mappare. E se ciò
serve effettivamente...
Il 31 agosto 2010 21:12, Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
è un po' quello che sta facendo con infinita pazienza un
Il 01 settembre 2010 01:29, Alberto Nogaro bartosom...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
-Original Message-
From: talk-it-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-it-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of G Zamboni
Sent: mercoledì 1 settembre 2010 0.38
To: talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re:
2010/9/1 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
Per carità, va tutto bene, i tag sono tag, non importa come li
scriviamo e tutto il resto. Ma... bbq?! Perché non barbeque? Per
curiosità eh! Niente flame :-)
Sospetto perché l'ortografia di barbecue (per gli anglofoni) è incerta
tra barbeCue e
Magari sara' uscita già questa discussione, ma sul wiki non trovo
indicato nulla:
Le pizzerie al taglio come le taggo?
amenity = fastfood
cusine = ?
ed gli uffici dove vendono case tipo Tecnocasa?
Grazie
Alessandro
___
Talk-it mailing list
Bighi, on 01/09/2010 12.41, wrote:
Magari sara' uscita già questa discussione, ma sul wiki non trovo
indicato nulla:
Le pizzerie al taglio come le taggo?
amenity = fastfood
cusine = ?
amenity = fast_food
cusine = pizza
ed gli uffici dove vendono case tipo Tecnocasa?
direi
Damjan Gerli, on 01/09/2010 12.49, wrote:
amenity = fast_food
cusine = pizza
attenzione, ho sbagliato a scrivere. Giusto sarebbe
cuisine = pizza
Ciao
Damjan
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
On 9/1/10, Bighi bi...@ngi.it wrote:
Le pizzerie al taglio come le taggo?
amenity = fastfood
cusine = ?
cousine = pizza
(poi si dovrebbe ritirar fuori la discussione sul taggare i forni a
legna e la qualita` della pizza, ma e` un'altra questione)
--
Elena ``of Valhalla''
homepage:
Elena of Valhalla, on 01/09/2010 12.53, wrote:
On 9/1/10, Bighibi...@ngi.it wrote:
Le pizzerie al taglio come le taggo?
amenity = fastfood
cusine = ?
cousine = pizza
cuisine... ;-)
(poi si dovrebbe ritirar fuori la discussione sul taggare i forni a
legna e la qualita` della pizza, ma e`
Ma in questo caso potrebbe essere nenissimo pizza tonda al trancio.
Non e' meglio specificare?
Il 01/09/2010 12:50, Damjan Gerli ha scritto:
Damjan Gerli, on 01/09/2010 12.49, wrote:
amenity = fast_food
cusine = pizza
attenzione, ho sbagliato a scrivere. Giusto sarebbe
cuisine = pizza
Il 01/09/2010 12:59, Damjan Gerli ha scritto:
Elena of Valhalla, on 01/09/2010 12.53, wrote:
On 9/1/10, Bighibi...@ngi.it wrote:
Le pizzerie al taglio come le taggo?
amenity = fastfood
cusine = ?
cousine = pizza
cuisine... ;-)
Si ho sbagliato anche fast food che va con il _ in mezzo
On 9/1/10, Damjan Gerli dam...@damjan.net wrote:
Elena of Valhalla, on 01/09/2010 12.53, wrote:
On 9/1/10, Bighibi...@ngi.it wrote:
cusine = ?
cousine = pizza
cuisine... ;-)
ehm, si`, fortuna che c'e` il preset di josm, perche' non imparero`
mai a scriverlo giusto O:-)
--
Elena ``of
Bighi, on 01/09/2010 13.01, wrote:
Ma in questo caso potrebbe essere nenissimo pizza tonda al trancio. Non
e' meglio specificare?
Non ho trovato nessun tag nel wiki inerente a questo. Si potrebbe
inventarne uno tipo:
pizza_type=*
Ciao
Damjan
___
Il 30 agosto 2010 17:51, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 30 agosto 2010 17:36, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com ha scritto:
2010/8/30 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
Ho due domande su come vanno usati i landuse.
Landuse non è stato pensato per simili
Il 01 settembre 2010 14:35, Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 30 agosto 2010 17:51, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Mi è venuta in mente un'altra cosa. Usando il landuse, è possibile
colorare l'intera superficie di una città: qui residential, lì
commercial, l'area
Qualcuno mi può spiegare perché dopo un anno di proposte, RFC,
sondaggi ecc. qualcuno si sente autorizzato a creare la pagina
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dice_cream
Notare che la proposta era per amenity=ice_cream, la pagina è per shop=ice_cream
A questo punto mi sento
volendo si potrebe anche indicare sulla strada covered=yes per il pezzo
sotto.
Cercando sul wiki ho trovato la pagina dove parla della chiave covered[0].
C'è scritto di evitarne l'uso qualora si debba indicare una strada che passa
sotto un ponte la cui traiettoria/percorso sia facilmente
In data 01 settembre 2010 alle ore 15:08:35, MrFrem82
prettyvisit...@gmx.com ha scritto:
volendo si potrebe anche indicare sulla strada covered=yes per il
pezzo
sotto.
Cercando sul wiki ho trovato la pagina dove parla della chiave
covered[0].
C'è scritto di evitarne l'uso qualora si
Il giorno 01 settembre 2010 15:03, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Qualcuno mi può spiegare perché dopo un anno di proposte, RFC,
sondaggi ecc. qualcuno si sente autorizzato a creare la pagina
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dice_cream
Hai già contattato l'autore
2010/9/1 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Qualcuno mi può spiegare perché dopo un anno di proposte, RFC,
sondaggi ecc. qualcuno si sente autorizzato a creare la pagina
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dice_cream
Notare che la proposta era per amenity=ice_cream, la pagina è per
2010/9/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Io mi riccordo che erano 2 modi/tipi di gelaterie: amenity=cafe,
N per piacere non ri-discutiamo tutto ancora...
La proposta era amenity=ice_cream.
Forse l'errore è stato di non portarla ancora in votazione. Dovremmo
votarla punto e basta.
2010/9/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
propongo il subtag:
ice_cream=industrial, ice_cream=artisanal
da aggiungere a qualsiasi posto che vende gelato (cafe, shop, amenity(?) )
se non si sa che roba viene venduta: ice_cream=yes da aggiungere a
qualsiasi posto che vende (non solo)
Federico Cozzi, on 01/09/2010 16.17, wrote:
Forse l'errore è stato di non portarla ancora in votazione. Dovremmo
votarla punto e basta.
Se passa è passata, altrimenti si ritorna a mappare ognuno come vuole
+1 per portarla in votazione
ad oggi:
amenity=ice_cream475
shop=ice_cream
Ho inviato il messaggio alla mailing list Tagging (sono in attesa che
venga sbloccato) e ho aggiornato lo stato nella pagina wiki.
Io ho già messo il mio voto, votate anche voi! E votate sì!!!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ice_cream
Ciao,
Federico
-- Forwarded
2010/9/1 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Ho inviato il messaggio alla mailing list Tagging (sono in attesa che
venga sbloccato) e ho aggiornato lo stato nella pagina wiki.
Io ho già messo il mio voto, votate anche voi! E votate sì!!!
2010/9/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
di solito si fa prima un RFC (request for comments) in talk, non in
tagging, poi aspetti 14 giorni, e poi si va alla votazione. Lo so che
Martin,
l'RFC è stato aperto il 5 marzo 2010.
Ora è proprio il momento di votare.
Ciao,
Federico
2010/9/1 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
2010/9/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
di solito si fa prima un RFC (request for comments) in talk, non in
tagging, poi aspetti 14 giorni, e poi si va alla votazione. Lo so che
Martin,
l'RFC è stato aperto il 5 marzo 2010.
Ora è
2010/9/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
l'RFC è stato aperto il 5 marzo 2010.
Ora è proprio il momento di votare.
OK, scusa, ora mi riccordo ;-), allora manda [voting] etc. a t...@osm,
non si manda solo a tagg...@osm (se non sbaglio) ;-)
Qui non è d'accordo:
2010/9/1 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
2010/9/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
l'RFC è stato aperto il 5 marzo 2010.
Ora è proprio il momento di votare.
OK, scusa, ora mi riccordo ;-), allora manda [voting] etc. a t...@osm,
non si manda solo a tagg...@osm (se non sbaglio) ;-)
Il 01 settembre 2010 15:00, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Il 01 settembre 2010 14:35, Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 30 agosto 2010 17:51, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Mi è venuta in mente un'altra cosa. Usando il landuse, è possibile
Ciao,
tutte le discussioni sul tag giusto per la gelateria mi hanno fatto
riflettere...
1. nessuna persona normale, cioè al di fuori di una mailing list di
OSM, capirebbe il problema. Una gelateria è una gelateria, punto e
basta. Non è uno shop, né una amenity (come si traduce in italiano?
Se si
2010/9/1 Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com:
On 9/1/10, Bighi bi...@ngi.it wrote:
Le pizzerie al taglio come le taggo?
amenity = fastfood
cusine = ?
cousine = pizza
(poi si dovrebbe ritirar fuori la discussione sul taggare i forni a
legna e la qualita` della pizza, ma e` un'altra
2010/9/1 MrFrem82 prettyvisit...@gmx.com:
volendo si potrebe anche indicare sulla strada covered=yes per il pezzo
sotto.
Cercando sul wiki ho trovato la pagina dove parla della chiave covered[0].
C'è scritto di evitarne l'uso qualora si debba indicare una strada che passa
sotto un ponte la
On 01.09.10, 14:35, Ruggero wrote:
ciao, visto che ho riempito di giallo la zona di crema rispondo un
po'. Innanzitutto vale il solito discorso che non si mappa per il
rendering, quindi se il colore non piace si può pensare di cambiarlo,
ma questo non è un motivo per non mappare il landuse.
esistono dei metodi per visualizzare i benzinai di una vasta area che
hanno il tag gpl=yes?
esistono metodi per modificare (non a mano) il nome di tutti i
supermercati di una città (ad esempio da GS a Carrefour)?
___
Talk-it mailing list
Schönen guten Tag!
Gestern (Di, 31. August 2010) verlautete Familie Geramb:
ich habe den Radweg Schilcher-Tour-Nord und das Verbindungsstück zur
Schilcher-Tour-Süd fertig gemappt. Für die Seite
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Austria/Radwege#Genuss.radeln
On 31/08/10 19:17, Magnus Bäck wrote:
In the Skånetrafiken public transport network in southmost Sweden, bus
stops are identified not only by name but also by a capital letter that
identifies this particular platform (or stop position, if you will). In
most cases you have an A platform for one
maybe these private orgs / foundations / charities can be temporarily
classified all under NGO classification (or a more general term).
not all foundations / NGO's are charitable. Maybe, charity should just be
a sub-category of foundation or NGO(?)
Charitable institutions are most likely a
Hmmm... I guess we can declare this coastline correction task complete?
There are still red spots in the webmap but I think these are all residual
errors and I'm guessing there are no more SRTM-based coastlines remaining. I
think all are now based on Landsat or PGS (which has small sawtooth coasts
hi all!
i'm doing a trip pre-planning to Sta. Cruz, Ilocos Sur with a
highly-probable side-trip to Vigan and noticed OSM needs some sort of
a Vigan mapping party. the tourist place needs lots of mapping works
to do; I expected the opposite though. I remember the calesa route
merely circled the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:12 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 07:21, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think that most people would say that's a feature, not a problem.
But you aren't asking most people since you don't want to know the true
answer.
2010/8/31 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net
Am 31.08.2010 12:30, schrieb Liz:
I was referring to user-mapped data. Imports have to fit the license,
not the other way around.
At the time of import the data imported fitted the licence.
Perhaps you had better look back at the archives
You would have had more luck sticking to one alias (Jane Smith), now
you're just making it obvious as to your goals.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that some are now stooping to
questionable tactics, but it just re-enforces the fact that I no
longer have any faith in those that are pushing
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
