To
G
Do you
still live in Englewood?
Ever
drive by 4184 S Galapago St?
slade
P.S. I
lived there.
intends that the Gospel would follow immediately.
What do you think of Pascal's Wager?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, 28 September, 2004 21.38
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
I am very glad that G asked
eated a contingent
universe.
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of michael
douglasSent: Monday, September 27, 2004 11:00 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/26/2004 3:20:
] Eye of the
Storm
John's response in brown.
In a message dated 9/27/2004 8:02:04 AM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
should Believers pray for God to do that?
No.
We already have a promise from God relating to our
circumstances. Rom 8:28. Michael D
And yes Terry et al, God created storms, but God in flesh also rebuked
them. That tells us that the things God created are manipulated by the
enemy to try and destroy and hinder God's purpose, else Jesus wouldn't
have rebuked "God's creation". Would He.
.
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004
11:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of
the Storm
In a message dated 9/28/2004 6:38:35 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/28/2004 6:38:35 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who
is the Jesus that Lance, Baxter and I follow? He is the eternal Son of
God who before the foundation of the world adopted us to be part of the
relationship between the
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Judy and I
disagree on two crucial points:
the humanity of Christ. Judy does not believe that Jesus fully clothed
Himself with our humanity, only partially. Based upon her
understanding
of Old Testament sacrifices Jesus must be a lamb without spot. She
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Hi G:
Jonathan wrote: A contingent universe is one that is based upon and
upheld
by its Creator. It is created to run self-sufficiently but relies
upon
Jesus Christ in whom all things move and have their being.
jt: I understand
it.
judyt
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 7:19
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Hi Judy,
Do you believe that
Jonathan as JH.
Jonathan Hughes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judith H Taylor
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:37:50 -0400 Jonathan Hughes
in Green.
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:33:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling
In a message dated 9/29/2004 5:45:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Michael, Johns lawyer here J
For the record, I have been reading with interest. I am well represented.
John
John's response in brown.
In a message dated 9/27/2004 8:02:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
should Believers pray for God to do that?
No. We already have a promise from God relating to our circumstances. Rom 8:28.
Michael D: You've got to be kidding!!! (to use an
In a message dated 9/29/2004 8:15:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael, I believe more than you give me credit. God has presented Himself in my life on several occasions. I call them visitations and when I share the circumstance of each occasion, those who listen agree.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Slade
HensonSent: Monday, 27 September, 2004 20.29To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
OH
MY!!! Check this out, Jeffwe thought Botkins was too far with all the kids
el
douglasSent: Monday, September 27, 2004 11:00 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/26/2004 3:20:45 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you believe, John? Does God, or doe
Of Judith H
TaylorSent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:31 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
I don't have a concordance with me so I can't give the scriptural reference
but God does promise his people that they will live in "peaceful dwelling
places" withno fear
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judith H Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
I don't have a concordance with me so I can't give the scriptural reference but God does p
jt: To me living in peace means living free from the fear of anything you mention
Jonathan whether or not they are a present reality and yes, it means freedom from
attack because when a man pleases the Lord he makes even his enemies be at peace with
him. Talking about rain, I've heard
Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
jt: To me living in peace means living free from the fear of anything
you mention Jonathan whether or not they are a present reality and yes,
it means freedom from attack
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:25:20 GMT
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Thanks for defining contingent for me.
how did youinterpret his
comment?
G ~ P235
Hi Judy,
Do you believe that God (Yahweh) was promising His people that they
would live in an idyllic garden of Eden where no harm would befall them
at all? That death would no longer be present in any form? Do you
believe that all the wild animals around them would be peaceful to the
Hi G:
Jonathan wrote: A contingent universe is one that is based upon and upheld by its
Creator. It is created to run self-sufficiently but relies upon Jesus Christ in whom
all things move and have their being.
jt: I understand what he describes as something akin to the watchmaker and clock
is one who trusts in
the work and person of Jesus Christ.
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Hi G:
Jonathan
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 7:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Hi Judy,
Do you believe that God (Yahweh) was promising His people that they
would live in an idyllic
In a message dated 9/28/2004 6:38:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who is the Jesus that Lance, Baxter and I follow? He is the eternal Son of
God who before the foundation of the world adopted us to be part of the
relationship between the Father, Son and Spirit. Against the
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:33:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling
Hi Michael, Johns lawyer here J
Jonathan in Green.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of michael douglas
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004
5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of
the Storm
ShieldsFamily
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jeff
PowersSent: Sunday, 26 September, 2004 22.24To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Slade, Terry,et al,
Is everyone OK? All is well here,this was the
strongest one yet
Lets have a discussion about your most recent post. Right off, let's slow down a little.
Additionally and apparently, you do not believe that Romans 8:28 has anything to do with the discussion. I draw that conclusion because you ignored my reference to it. Perhaps you could explain why 8:28
Sorry - that last post was to Michael et al
J
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004
18:42
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
We
have power, phone (house), no damage to our house. Some of our neighbors have
some damage. We have no cell phone
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jeff
PowersSent: Monday, 27 September, 2004 19.22To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Hey ya have a phone!!! My cell service is so sporadic
I quit trying to call anyone. Where are you going for Sukkot? I can't find
In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms.
I don't
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004
12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of
the Storm
In a message dated 9/25/2004 6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:48:38 -0400 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
In a message dated 9/25/2004
6:55:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This
is interesting
Of michael
douglasSent: Saturday, 25 September, 2004 22.43To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Michael D: What do you make of
it, Slade? This is very serious business. I feel for you guys. I am
fighting with you all. As I write here
Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004
10:32
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004
In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:33:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a mandatory evacuation of low-lying areas, mobile homes, and manufactured homes. This has been an interesting six weeks with four storms.
I
Of michael
douglasSent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 18.40To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Michael D: I'm relieved to see that. This area is to
volatile to take lightly. Anyway, another storm threat is looming over the
U.S. Florida again is in the firing
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of michael douglasSent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 18.40To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Michael D: I'm relieved to see that. This area is to volatile to take lightly. Anyway, another storm threat is looming
I do
understand where you're coming from, Michael.
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of michael
douglasSent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004 21.25To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Slade
PROTECTED] wrote:
I do understand where you're coming from, Michael.
-- slade
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of michael douglasSent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004 21.25To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Slade Henson [EMAIL
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of
the Storm
Michael D: I'm relieved to see that.
This area is to volatile to take lightly. Anyway, another storm threat is
looming over the U.S. Florida again is in the firing line according to latest
forcasts. How tough a prospect for you
n Behalf Of Judith H TaylorSent: Thursday, 22 July, 2004 08.41To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:26:09 -0400 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael D: When I've share with believers things (even idiomsand slang) that the
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:26:09 -0400 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Michael D: When I've share with believers things
(even idiomsand slang) that they need to watch, they've frown on it or
dismissed it as nonsense
I am one who disagrees
with you. Our Master and King
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:17:53 +0100 (BST) michael douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
jt said: Hi again Slade; I don't know about others but we do
need to watch what comes out of our mouths as we have another Kingdom
watching and
Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified by faith. God can do anything He chooses, but our
In a message dated 9/21/2004 9:04:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor dissent?
Wow -- I am embarrassed fr some reason.
Jnho
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D: When I've share with believers things (even idiomsand slang) that they need to watch, they've frown on it or dismissed it as nonsense
I am one who disagrees with you. Our Master and King used idioms when He was walking the Earth and Our Father in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/21/2004 9:04:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor dissent?
Wow -- I am embarrassed fr some reason. Jnho
Michael D: One might be excused for wondering why you spelt your name wromg all the time, Jhno...
ALL-NEW
Yahoo!
lade
said, "I'm all ears!" Is Slade a walking pair of ears or is he listening
intently?
GOT
IT?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judith H
TaylorSent: Thursday, 22 July, 2004 08.41To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
In a message dated 9/22/2004 3:20:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan said to John, "Quit beating around the bush!" Let me ask you a question... Was John ACTUALLY beating around the bush or was he verbally not getting to the point?
Slade said, "I'm all ears!" Is Slade a
hehehehehehe
yes.
In a message dated 9/22/2004 4:51:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hehehehehehe
yes.
;-)
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:21:27 -0400 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
jt said: Hi again Slade; I don't know about others but we do
need to watch what comes out of our mouths as we have another Kingdom watching
and waiting for a doorpoint of entry into our lives and God will
ference between the "could" [the inability]and the
"would" [the unwillingness].
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Monday, 20 September, 2004 16.11To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]S
Exactly Terry - couldn't have said it better. Glad to hear that you
and Vee were safe through
the storm. jt
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:31:14 -0400 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Slade Henson wrote:
My
point is the difference between the "could" [the inability]and
jt said: I
do believe that Jesus is anequal member of the Godhead but during His
earthly ministry He made Himself subject to the Father in every way. What would
makeyou suggest that I don't believe in His deity Slade?
Just wondering, Grace and Peace,
judyt
slade
says; A comment you made a
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified by faith. God can do anything He chooses, but our faith/response to Him regulates His response to us. Jesus did
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jt said: Hi again Slade; I don't know about others but we do need to watch what comes out of our mouths as we have another Kingdom watching and waiting for a doorpoint of entry into our lives and God will not keep them out, this is our responsibility.
Michael D: When I've share with believers things (even
idiomsand slang) that they need to watch, they've frown on it or dismissed
it as nonsense
I am one who disagrees
with you. Our Master and King used idioms when He was walking the Earth and Our
Father in Heaven used idioms(even gross
, soul, and spirit, as well as in your
finances and callings. Is there any way we can pray for you?
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of michael douglas
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004
5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye
michael douglas wrote:
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's
and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the
Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified
by faith. God can do anything He chooses, but our faith/response to Him
regulates
In a message dated 9/21/2004 2:55:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified by faith. God can do
In a message dated 9/21/2004 5:28:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To advocate for more is to advocate error... in my (apparently singular opinion on this forum)...
Silence is not necessarily descent.
John
Nor dissent?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004
9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of
the Storm
In a message dated 9/21/2004 5:28:36 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL
rom:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of michael
douglasSent: Monday, 13 September, 2004 17.33To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Michael D: Hey Slade, I am happy to hear that
something shared on the 'weather managemen
jt said: Even Jesus Himself could do no mighty
works in his hometown because of their unbelief.
slade says: A little limiting
but that's ok. You don't believe in the Deity of Messiah Yeshua, do
you? (I.e., Do you believe Jesus is God)?
Since Judy's statement comes from the Bible, which
ROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
jt said: Even Jesus Himself could do no mighty works in his
hometown because of their unbelief.
slade says: A little limiting but that's
ok. You don't believe in the Deity of Messiah Yeshua, do you? (I.e., Do you
believe Jesus
Slade Henson wrote:
My point is the difference between the "could"
[the inability]and the "would" [the unwillingness].
=
I don't think that Judy or any other true believer would question God's
ability. He is omnipotent. Still ,the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004
8:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of
the Storm
Slade Henson wrote:
My point is the difference between the
could [the inability
Hey,
Thanks everyone for the encouragement. God is so good. We had wind howling and rain
beating on our little camper all night as well as acorns dropping on the roof from the
trees all around but when we woke up this morning the storm had abated; still a lot of
rain but that is supposed to
Michael D: PTL, Judy. Good to hear you're okay. I wonder what's the situation with Terry? Hope he's doing well also. God is a faithful God! HE's worthy of our praise.
Terry was asking for rain all the time. I guess we better be careful about what we ask for...
Did the eye miss him as he was
Hi Slade:
It's not God who is killing people, but our speech gives the enemy a doorpoint and he
is the one who comes to implement the curse. We are responsible for what comes out of
our mouths and a man shall live by the fruit of his lips I sure don't want to set
myself up to be blessed by
Hang in there, Judy! Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 6:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
Hi Slade:
It's not God who
] Eye of
the Storm
Hey Terry, thanks for confirming the
receipt of that account. I got Izzy's mail confirming it as well. Strange
enough, neither showed up on my TT inbox, nor my 'Eye of the strom' post
that you are replying to here. I have to look into that. I am getting everyone
else's
IL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the
Storm
Michael D: Hey Slade, I am happy to hear that
something shared on the 'weather management theme seemed to benefit you (I am
assuming that you're not pulling our legs). Do you care to give some insight
into the passage you're re
'miraculous adjustments' from florida to
louisiana?
check this out while your prayin' for
Rudy--ancientshadows of whatiz to come:
http://www.geocities.com/hurricanene/hurricanecamille.htm
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:19:41 -0400 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
michael douglas
Michael D: Hey Slade, I am happy to hear that something shared on the 'weather management theme seemed to benefit you (I am assuming that you're not pulling our legs). Do you care to give some insight into the passage you're referring to. This may be a bit of a selfish request, butjusta hint that
It came through both times Michael. Both times I rejoiced that you
were still there and in one piece. Can't affoed to get you blown
away. It might shake someone's faith. :-)
Terry
michael douglas wrote:
Michael D: Hey Slade, I am happy to hear
that something shared on the 'weather
I
would like to thank Michael Douglas for a small Biblical passage he mentioned in
one of his last Weather Management emails.
I
alsowould like to provide you all a small look at Hurricane Ivan the
Terrible... http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
May
God continue to provide
83 matches
Mail list logo
