[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2347:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
Removing the exception throws from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2347.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Comitted at r667376. Looking through this very long series of patches I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2384:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2384-NEW.patch
Message Conversion for Contribution
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would
Ant,
I am not sure how relevant this is, but in the context of versioning Tuscany
for OSGi, Tuscany modules are being built as OSGi bundles with real
versions (eg. the current build uses 2.0). The version used is not
currently derived from the maven version, instead it is specified
independently
Are the OSGI real versions required to be numeric, which would also mean
1.x wouldn't work so well as a version for OSGi right?
...ant
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant,
I am not sure how relevant this is, but in the context of versioning
On 6/13/08, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the OSGI real versions required to be numeric, which would also mean
1.x wouldn't work so well as a version for OSGi right?
Yes, the versions need to be numeric, 1.x wont work.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Rajini Sivaram
null elements in Object array not getting passed over binding.ws
Key: TUSCANY-2389
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2389
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed TUSCANY-2385.
Problem with Databinding for URI and UUID objects when using binding.ws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2379:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
CompositeProcessor.java is calling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2379.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed at 667470. Thanks for the patch Ram
CompositeProcessor.java is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2384:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
Message Conversion for Contribution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2267:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
Raise a warning if both reference target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2384.
-
Resolution: Fixed
committed at r667472, Thanks for the patch Ram.
Message Conversion for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2267.
-
Resolution: Fixed
committed at r667472, Thanks for the patch Ram.
Raise a warning if both
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andreas
I was wondering whether there is somewhere a specification or documentation
that gives a clear overview of what types of messages Synapse's JMS
transport is supposed to accept and how it should process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam closed TUSCANY-2362.
Fix for test failure in TUSCANY-2344 5 validation message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam closed TUSCANY-2345.
NPE from implementation.resource for missing location attribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam closed TUSCANY-2344.
NPE from implementation.widget for missing location attribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2242:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2242.patch
Incorrent port name in wsdlElement leads to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2242:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Incorrent port name in wsdlElement leads to NPE
That would be great! Thanks Ant.
Paul
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:42 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andreas
I was wondering whether there is somewhere a specification or documentation
that gives a clear
My java interface: org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.wsbinding.AService.
@Remotable
public interface AService {
public String getGreetings(String name);
}
I have the following wsdl, which I assume is doc/lit/unwrapped or bare.
wsdl:definitions targetNamespace=
Vamsi,
It looks like all your failure cases require runtime Java2WSDL. In order
to generate a doc-lit-unwrapped WSDL from Java,
the Java should contain annotation:
@SOAPBinding(parameterStyle = SOAPBinding.ParameterStyle.BARE)
I believe this the new rewrite of the Java2WSDL code that Simon
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andreas
I was wondering whether there is somewhere a specification or
documentation
that gives a clear overview of what types of messages
ant elder wrote:
So just to be clear on what is being suggested this would be like the
launcher we used to have back in M2 days right?
...ant
No, the M2 launcher mixed too many different aspects:
a) load the Tuscany JARs
b) download then from the network as necessary
b) launch your
Default property value in Component Type Fiel not used to initialize property
-
Key: TUSCANY-2390
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2390
Project: Tuscany
Scott,
You are right. Adding @SOAPBinding annotation lead to further problems with
wsdl generation.
++Vamsi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vamsi,
It looks like all your failure cases require runtime Java2WSDL. In order
to generate a
Well Mike, you broke a working test! :-)
I tried your suggestion and initializing the property via the
component type file does not seem to work. I opened T-2390.
--Kevin
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I just make the
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
So just to be clear on what is being suggested this would be like the
launcher we used to have back in M2 days right?
...ant
No, the M2 launcher mixed too many different aspects:
a)
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:51 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Asankha C. Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is one of those discussions where there is no 'right'
answer. I wonder if we can start with an initial, fairly crude,
approach and refine it as we learn from experience. I like to have
faith in folks doing the right thing until they demonstrate otherwise,
so having version ranges of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker closed TUSCANY-2109.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, immediate issue fixed. Any new findings or requests should
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Luciano
I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this time
so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for
committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are
functionally complete when we cut the branch and
ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a plan for Tuscany to support Axis2 1.4?
Axis2 1.4 and the associated wss4j and rampart releases for 1.4 are all
out and
Hi,
I cannot find the getting started tutorial on the website any longer. We
used to have a link to this on the main page and on the SCA download page.
Was this moved intentionally? If yes, to where? If not, I recover it.
Haleh
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing
this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you let me know if there
I'm looking into a JSR-250 issue, but changes should be minimal and localized.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch. I'm planning on doing
this first thing tomorrow morning UK time. Can you
Here is the link,
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-started-with-tuscany.html
I found it at
Apache Tuscany Home SCA Overview SCA Java
Also you can find here,
Apache Tuscany Home SCA Overview SCA Java Java SCA Documentation Menu
cheers
charuka
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:20
Hi,
I think I found the root cause of the issue and fixed it as part of r667641.
There were two databindings competing for the same java type (SAXON NodeInfo
extends from javax.xml.transform.Source).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL
I just checked in some improvements in the databinding area after a full
clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:16 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm just trying to finish up the changes required to unhook the old domain
modules from the runtime, tests and samples. Then I'm pretty much done
with
things I want to do before cutting the R1.3 branch.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked in some improvements in the databinding area after a full
clean build. Now I will stay away from the code :-).
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL
Simon Nash wrote:
Actually this isn't quite what I was saying. (Sorry that I wasn't clear.)
I'm talking about the lowest level components that we distribute as
binaries, not about larger groupings that are created from these components
to provide convenient aggregations of functionality. These
Folks,
I'll chip in with one observation here.
If Tuscany itself allows the use of a range of versions of some 3rd party library, then in principle
given that we attempt a form of test driven development, we should be testing with ALL of the
versions of that 3rd party library.
If we don't
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Yes, stands a chance of working in most situations, where most is the
key word. We will work in all situations where applications dont install
different versions of Tuscany's 3rd party libs. Once we have an application
and Tuscany within one OSGi runtime with multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604979#action_12604979
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2215:
-
The problem is that
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
On 6/12/08, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is true. But how narrow should the range be? SpringSource assumes
compatibility at major version. Should we assume minor version? Or should we
restrict to revision? Are we saying that we work with 1.3.0, so we would
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Following on from the discussion on OSGi-enabling third party libraries (
http://markmail.org/message/snltdk2yovr6maq5), this thread addresses the
options for versioning Tuscany bundles and 3rd party libraries distributed
with Tuscany and the implications of choosing these
Hi,
I have created a Google group to provide a forum for Chinese-speaking
developers and users to exchange ideas and practices in Chinese about Tuscany
and SCA. The group home page is:
http://groups.google.com/group/tuscany-sca-chinese.
You are invited to join and contribute to the forum!
Hi, Mike.
It's a very good summary. The different perspectives are now well separated
and they should be discussed on different threads to avoid further
confusions :-).
Please see some more comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Mike
I'm done with the JSR 250 issues, and got a clean build from latest
svn revision.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked in some improvements in the databinding area after a full
54 matches
Mail list logo
