Hello Stipe,
The problem is solved, it wasn't related to the SMSC configuration, I have
defied another SMSC, and when I sent it, I got an error message related to
the text field is null because I'm using SQLBOX the msgdata was empty.
After I fixed it I was able to send it without any problems
Am 25.05.21, 09:54, schrieb Web Min:
It is already in the SMSC before the host
allowed-prefix = 1
when your users inject as destination addr 1xxx that is fine, but if
they use a international prefixed addr +1xxx that would not be able to
pass via the configured SMSC then.
this would then
it looks like the IP is not accepted ?
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] De la part de Web Min
Envoyé : mardi 25 mai 2021 09:54
À : Mesbahuddin Malik
Cc : kannel users@kannel.org
Objet : Re: DISCARDED SMS / NACK/Retries Exceeded
It is already in the SMSC before the host
SellerAJ] [to:1946873251]
>> [flags:-1:2:-1:-1:31] [msg:0:] [udh:0:]
>> 2021-05-02 00:25:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 Receive DLR [SMSC:] [SVC:] [ACT:]
>> [BINF:] [FID:26][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16]
>> [msg:12:NACK/no SMSC] [udh:0:]
>> 2021
lags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16]
> [msg:12:NACK/no SMSC] [udh:0:]
> 2021-05-02 00:26:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 DISCARDED SMS [SMSC:MySMSC] [SVC:]
> [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:25][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251]
> [flags:-1:2:-1:-1:31] [msg:0:] [udh:0:]
> 2021-05-02 00:26:30 2021-05-02 00:26:30 Receive DLR
:] [udh:0:]
2021-05-02 00:25:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 Receive DLR [SMSC:] [SVC:] [ACT:]
[BINF:] [FID:26][from:SellerAJ] [to:1946873251] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16]
[msg:12:NACK/no SMSC] [udh:0:]
2021-05-02 00:26:30 2021-05-02 00:25:30 DISCARDED SMS [SMSC:MySMSC] [SVC:]
[ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:25][from:SellerAJ
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Robin C <ro...@zincron.co.in> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are some messages showing FAILED Send SMS and its report coming as
> NACK/ . What will be the reason for this error. Any Idea?
>
> --
>
>Thanks & Regards,
>
Hi,
There are some messages showing FAILED Send SMS and its report coming as NACK/
. What will be the reason for this error. Any Idea?
--
*Thanks & Regards,*
Robin C
Linux System Administrator
*ZIN-CRON | Bulk Sms, Voice Calls, Long Codes, Short Codes, Software
Develop
Hello there,
I'm having this issue where the sms got rejected, but from the log all I
can see was the [msg:13:NACK/REJECTED]. I'm new in this and I don't know
what's wrong with the sms. I can't see what's the error in the logs. Kindly
advise.
Logs :
12194741:2015-11-05 17:01:48 [13705] [4769
:14:17 [2578] [10] DEBUG: receipted_message_id: 21f20c77
2013-09-28 02:14:17 [2578] [10] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
//---
Now you can clearly see NACK/No SMSC in the response. Please guide me how
do I fix this.
:47 +0530
From: Saurabh Pandey sam.it.develo...@gmail.com
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Opensmppbox issue: NACK/No SMSC
Message-ID:
cahipy2xp1-upxqd_0bt-y4efsv3xqqu2hvg9ro7-lu6qzav...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi,
I am submitting SMS from Kannel
...@gmail.com
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Opensmppbox issue: NACK/No SMSC
Message-ID:
cahipy2xp1-upxqd_0bt-y4efsv3xqqu2hvg9ro7-lu6qzav...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hi,
I am submitting SMS from Kannel based SMPP client to a different server
having kannel
From: Ashish Agarwal [mailto:ashisha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 08 March, 2012 05:22
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: users@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: NACK reporting help
Hi,
Please help me how can this be achieved.
On Mar 8, 2012 2:00 AM, Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org wrote
if it works or not.
=+= Rene
From: Ashish Agarwal [mailto:ashisha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 08 March, 2012 05:22
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: users@kannel.org; Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: NACK reporting help
Hi,
Please help me how can this be achieved.
On Mar 8, 2012 2:00 AM
of kannel. I have come across an issue with NACK reports
generated for messages that fails or are rejected by the smsc.
I have the following problem:-
As per the PDU user receives the command_status: 1153 = 0x0481 from the
smsc but the kannel esme does not interpret it correctly
a failure message per message part.
== Rene
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Alexander Malysh
Sent: Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 13:51
To: Ashish Agarwal
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: NACK reporting help
Hi,
this is not easy to fix
Hi,
Thanks for your response but in situation where I use concatenation = true,
it should be understood that I am only interested in the first report with
actual NACK/xxx value.
Also, in this case only one dlr is pending, which is one complete long
message.
whats do you say?
On Mar 7, 2012 6:21
: NACK reporting help
** **
Hi,
** **
this is not easy to fix because you send only one but long message and
awaiting only one DLR.
BUT kannel splits message into peaces for you and receive two DLRs. How
would you put both reason
codes into one DLR? In you case
That shouldn't be a problem if the dlr-url your pass is also generic.
From: Ashish Agarwal [mailto:ashisha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 15:36
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Alexander Malysh; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: NACK reporting help
I agree with you Rene, but the problem
.
This way, you will get a failure message per message part.
== Rene
*From:* users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On
Behalf Of *Alexander Malysh
*Sent:* Wednesday, 07 March, 2012 13:51
*To:* Ashish Agarwal
*Cc:* users@kannel.org
*Subject:* Re: NACK reporting help
Hello All,
Any update on the below query.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ashish Agarwal ashisha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I have been using kannel for over 2 years now and I am currently using the
latest 1.5 version of kannel. I have come across an issue with NACK reports
generated
in handle_pdu() in gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c (? - I think).
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:01 PM
Subject: SMPP ACK/NACK Method
Hi everyone,
I've been following up the list for a couple of years
, February 28, 2011 2:01 PM
Subject: SMPP ACK/NACK Method
Hi everyone,
I've been following up the list for a couple of years, and it has been
MOST
helpful. So first I'd like to thank everyone for their participation.
Now, to the point.
There's a client with whom we'll
using SMPP. We estimate this platform
we'll have peaks of around 500 messages/sec.
The client is wondering what method does Kannel use for ACK/NACK over SMPP.
The truth is I don't even know where to start looking for this answer.
Could anyone please help me out?
Thanks!!
David Szanto
?mode=mail_to_individualemail=us...@kannel.orgoutput=webels=9f7d1dbec44c47f17b204f700a401c51
*Sent:* Friday, December 04, 2009 8:46 PM
*Subject:* Re: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)
Hi,
Faced similar issues with 2 major operators in India
: Sandesh K To:
n...@amdtelecom.net Cc: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com ; users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 8:46 PM Subject: Re: Re: Capturing
submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)
gt;Hi,
gt;
gt;Faced similar issues with 2 major operators in India. But the question
Firstly apologies to all if this is documented somewhere already, please
point me there.
I have a connection (SMPP3.4) where the operator decided not to use DLRs
but reject submit_sm on Premium MT messages when an MSISDN does not have
enough credit to receive.
I need to pass this information to
Enabling dlr-mask and dlr-url will get you the NACK message as a DLR. If
you're using latest CVS you'll get some extra values as meta-data as well.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kyriacos Sakkas kyria...@netsmart.com.cywrote:
Firstly apologies to all if this is documented
:
Enabling dlr-mask and dlr-url will get you the NACK message as a DLR.
If you're using latest CVS you'll get some extra values as meta-data
as well.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kyriacos Sakkas
kyria...@netsmart.com.cy mailto:kyria...@netsmart.com.cy wrote:
Firstly
the DLR returns nothing, not doubting you but at least on the
version I am running a DLR record does not even get created when its
NACked, so that something can be returned.
Kyriacos
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
Enabling dlr-mask and dlr-url will get you the NACK message as a DLR
This works fine on latest cvs for sure. Dlr-mask 24 should give you ack and
nack, and also extra meta-data (error code, message I'd, etc).
Regards,
Alex
BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@
-Original Message-
From: Arne K. Haaje a...@drlinux.no
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009
...@gmail.com
To: Arne K. Haaje a...@drlinux.no; us...@kannel. us...@kannel. Org
users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)
This works fine on latest cvs for sure. Dlr-mask 24 should give you ack
and nack, and also
; us...@kannel. us...@kannel. Org
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Capturing submit_sm_resp NACK (command_status: 8)
This works fine on latest cvs for sure. Dlr-mask 24 should give you ack
and nack, and also extra meta-data (error code, message I'd, etc
Hi Hafez,
Regarding to SMPP 3.4 specification (part 5.1.3) NACK/69 is ESME_RSUBMITFAIL
error that doesn't describe reason for not accepting submit_sm. Seems better
solution would be request to operator or SMSC vendor.
--
Regards,
Michael Bochkaryov
www.rattler.kiev.ua
2009/7/23 hafez ahmad
Hi All,
I am trying to send billing SMS to my users, but I get in the
Acknowledgement report this NACK/69/Submit failed for all users, any Ideas
what happened, I read about the NACK in general and there many reasons for
that like:
- The PDU is unrecognised
- The PDU is malformed
,
Oren
-הודעה מקורית-
מאת: Oren Ein-gal
נשלח: ד 30/04/2008 16:15
אל: users@kannel.org
נושא: binfo and NACK Status
Hello list,
I have a Kannel version 1.4.1 with EMI2 configuration working perfectly.
The operator wants me to send a transaction ID (number) together with the
message
Hello list,
Does any one have an answer?
Thanks,
Oren
-הודעה מקורית-
מאת: Oren Ein-gal
נשלח: ד 30/04/2008 16:15
אל: users@kannel.org
נושא: binfo and NACK Status
Hello list,
I have a Kannel version 1.4.1 with EMI2 configuration working perfectly.
The operator wants me to send
using http interface.
Has anyone tried it before? Do I need to change the Kannel
configuration?
In addition in case there is a problem with the transaction ID the
operator will send me a NACK response.
What will be the Kannel response via http and behavior?
Thanks in advance,
Oren Ein
SMS [SMSC:SIEMENS_MC35i] [SVC:XXX]
[ACT:] [BINF:] [from:XXX] [to:XXX] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:18] [msg:75:Host As
XXX is DOWN Info: PING CRITICAL -] [udh:0:]
2007-11-27 19:30:49 DLR SMS [SMSC:SIEMENS_MC35i] [SVC:] [ACT:]
[BINF:] [from:] [to:] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16]
[msg:14:NACK
Negative ACKnowledgement
-Original Message-
From: Huber, Gottfried [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 Април 2007 г.
To: seik
Subject:NACK/MALFORMED in acess.log
Hello to all
does somebody know what this means in access.log ?
[msg:14:NACK/MALFORMED]
thank you
Hello to all
does somebody know what this means in access.log ?
[msg:14:NACK/MALFORMED]
thank you
:] [BINF:] [from:0043xxx] [to:xxx] [flags:-1:0:-1:-1:3] [msg:11:xx] [udh:0:] 2005-12-13 09:05:56 DLR SMS [SMSC:MC35] [SVC:CommandPost] [ACT:] [BINF:] [from:0043] [to:xxx] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16] [msg:14:NACK/MALFORMED] [udh:0:] What does the DLR - NACK/MALFORMED meen
SMS [SMSC:MC35] [SVC:CommandPost] [ACT:] [BINF:] [from:0043]
[to:xxx] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:16] [msg:14:NACK/MALFORMED] [udh:0:]
What
does the DLR -
NACK/MALFORMED meen
thank you for help !!
Gottfried
Huber
Title: RE: NACK/MALFORM in DLR status
What kind of mailing list this one is? I've asked a question several days ago, and repeated it twice, but no one seems to care.
-Original Message-
From: Amin abbaspour
Sent: Wed 1/19/2005 10:40 AM
To: Amin abbaspour; users@kannel.org
Subject
their attention if they are busy
with kannel coding or earning a buck or two to pay the bills.
Good luck
Peter Farmer
-Original Message-
From: Amin abbaspour
Sent: Wed 1/19/2005 10:40 AM
To: Amin abbaspour; users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: NACK/MALFORM in DLR status
Hi all,
I searched a bit
Title: RE: NACK/MALFORM in DLR status
Hi,
This is a free mailing list and not the official
support forum for a paid product. People on this list are volunteers who may or
may not reply to your messages. I do not think that asking a question in this
format will get you any responses either
Title: RE: NACK/MALFORM in DLR status
Hi all,
I searched a bit, and noticed that NACK/MALFORMET is generated in gw/smsc/smsc_at.c. It seems that after sending AT+CMGS whether '' does not appear or after sending message modem does not return OK msg. Has anyone encountered such a problem
Title: NACK/MALFORM in DLR status
Hi all,
Would you please let me know what is NACK/MALFORM in DLR status, when it happens and what is to be done to resolve it. I'm using AT interface for sending SMS.
Sincerely,
Amin
] INFO: EMI2[IP-Address:Port]: closing connection.
2003-11-19 17:34:07 [6] WARNING: EMI2[IP-Address:Port]: received neither
ACK nor NACK for message 19 in 60 seconds, disconnecting and reconnection
What does it mean? Are the messages lost? In kannel DLR's for all messages
are created and do not get
49 matches
Mail list logo
