From Dr. Melvin Miles:
/Jones Beene is simply wrong about the accuracy of helium-4
measurements. The laboratories that I used for my samples specialized
in highly accurate helium measurements. The DOI lab in Texas could
easily measure 1 ppb. The Rockwell lab with Dr.Brian Oliver was even
The Reference to Neutron production is telling.
This gives an area to research for others and a clue as to the process, eg
one that is capable of producing Neutrons of an energy n.
Neutron decay is: n0 → p+ + e− + νe.
p and e could be the more important energy producers in LENR!
What energy
Hmm... Boron.
On 18 September 2014 09:32, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote:
The Reference to Neutron production is telling.
This gives an area to research for others and a clue as to the process, eg
one that is capable of producing Neutrons of an energy n.
Neutron decay is: n0 → p+ +
Hmm... Lithium
Hmm... Graphite and Beryllium or maybe a Hydrocarbon.
Moderation may well be the key and granular size and percentage in the mix.
On 18 September 2014 09:43, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... Boron.
On 18 September 2014 09:32, Ian Walker walker...@gmail.com
Well, Ruby I hope Miles is correct (from the standpoint of strong LENR
advocacy on my part) and I thank you for following up with the proper
question. All of us here should only be concerned with the science - not
promoting one theory or another. Most of us do want to promote a proper
It is interesting to consider the higher COP. I went back and read Rossi
Forcadi's original article, which is astounding in the level of energy
production and COP. The most impressive result to me was .2 watts in and
83 watts out. It would be hard to make an error of that magnitude even
with
Its pretty clear that the SPAWAR experiments saw high energy neutrons in their
experiments, which were reasonable well funded. They also saw high energy
protons and alphas. These were apparently hot fusion type reactions.
However, they also saw what they called cold fusion--LENR--reactions
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
But again, all it takes is an experiment where ppm of helium is being
made, and we should have that report in a matter of months.
1. McKubre did an experiment where ppm of helium was produced.
2. When you can measure ppb levels with confidence at a
Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
From Dr. Melvin Miles:
*Jones Beene is simply wrong about the accuracy of helium-4
measurements. The laboratories that I used for my samples specialized in
highly accurate helium measurements. The DOI lab in Texas could easily
measure 1 ppb. The Rockwell lab
It's findings like this that have lead some people to the same conclusion:
Multiple reaction pathways are taking place in one system (a cocktail of
sorts). As a result, we see perpetual conflation of the FP Heat Effect
(aka radiationless cold fusion) w/ whatever unusual hot fusion effect is
being
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/a-contribution-to-heathelium-discussion.html
It is about 5 criteria of acceptance.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Thank you dear Lennart
I have answered in part with my essay of today.
We will discuss later the political issues by private posts
it's more polite so.
Peter
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Yes, Peter it was a bit depressive.
I am more
Multiple reaction pathways are taking place in one system (a cocktail of
sorts). As a result, we see perpetual conflation of the FP Heat Effect
(aka radiationless cold fusion) w/ whatever unusual hot fusion effect is
being produced (i.e. like Axil linking LeClair's work to cold fusion, which
Hi Peter,
I saw your post. I agree that the old proverb prepare for the worst and
hope for the best is valid.
It is just that it feels better to approach problems with a positive
attitude - for me at least.
I agree about the political side of the issue. I merely wanted to express
that I am not
How a system behaves is determined by its interaction properties
http://phys.org/tags/properties/. An important concept in condensed
matter physics http://phys.org/tags/condensed+matter+physics/ for
describing the energy distribution of electrons in solids is the Fermi
surface
I went to the Wattsup.. source article, and found that the problem
(apparently) is undersized transformers at the towers.
This is NOT a reflection on the feasibility of wind power, but on the
so-called prowess of German engineering.
But yes, the engineers maybe were pressured by management to
On 9/18/14, 6:24 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Well, Ruby I hope Miles is correct (from the standpoint of strong LENR
advocacy on my part) and I thank you for following up with the proper
question. All of us here should only be concerned with the science --
not promoting one theory or another. Most
Hello Jones
Helium was also measured in the experiment done by A. de Ninno e.a published in
2002.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DeNinnoAexperiment.pdf
Unfortunately after the publication only silence was the result.
The youtube video about what happened before and after the publication has
Hi all
If the mention of Neutron emission by Paul on e-catworld is correct; then
is Rossi fully vindicated by the Goldilocks nature of LENR in his choice of
an Edisonian approach to LENR development?
I say Goldilocks nature of LENR because I conjecture that control of the
Neutron emission is the
Dear Erik Ander:
I am in very good health, even if I work 16 hours per day with my E-Cats.
*As I said, we have not neutrons and high energy gamma emissions, and we
know now perfectly why. I will give the theory in November.*Thank you for
your attention,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Hi Peter,
This is a good experiment, and thanks for mentioning it (but it is only in the
range of 10-20 milliwatts total power) and it depends completely on a NEG to
enrich the very low helium production by a factor of ~1000:1. OTOH the
equipment at ENEA is top notch. I suspect that it is
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Miles knew the history of the samples, but he did not tell the groups
operating the mass spectrometers.
Miles described this in his papers, and I described it in my review:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question. We put boron just for safety, as Prof. Focardi teached to
me. Kind of just in case…
I'm going to guess that they have boron to shield from spallation neutrons
resulting from this reaction:
p + d → 2p + n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
However, they also saw what they called cold fusion--LENR--reactions that
produced no gammas and apparently fused D-D to helium with a 24 Mev
distribution of energy.
The discussion of a possible dd reaction (reaction 5,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
... whatever is producing the tritium has got to be a strange reaction
pathway as well, because its certainly not commensurate with the excess
heat either.
I'm wondering whether tritium might occur through reactions such as
25 matches
Mail list logo
