Snip...message from Jed
...I did not realize that people there are uninterested in the
politics of cold fusion. Since that is my main area of expertise,
I do not have much else to contribute, so I don't see much point
to rejoining...
I didn't think there was a lack of interest in Jed's
Alexander has a crucial fact wrong. Jed did not 'take his ball and go
home'. Bill Beaty, the list moderator, expelled Jed from the list.
I am pleased with Jed's comments below. It is factual, straightforward, as
Jed has always been.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message -
From: Alexander
If Jed stays away however after he has been let back in and does so despite
knowing he had plenty of support.
Well yes that could be considered worthy of that term, that however has not
happened yet.
Essentially let's sum it up thus, Grok is/was an ass.
He has lead to MR. Beaty drawing a line in
Considering that the other person banned has already been reinstated
after asking Bill directly and saying he won't do it again, and the
fact that Jed said,
I did not
realize that people there are uninterested in the politics of cold
fusion.
Since that is my main area of expertise, I do not
Alexander Hollins wrote:
Can we get back to discussing actual science, pretty pretty please,
with deuterium on top?
Then, about 8 hours later, Alexander Hollins wrote:
[ ... ]
Is him[Jed] saying, well hell, if you won't let me post politics, im just
not going to post.
That is dead on him
From Mr. Hollins:
Considering that the other person banned has already been
reinstated after asking Bill directly and saying he won't
do it again, and the fact that Jed said,
From Jed:
I did not realize that people there are uninterested in the
politics of cold fusion.
Since that is my
OrionWorks wrote:
[ ... ]
I believe you are conveniently reinterpreting Jed's comments to craft
your own vision of Jed, implying that he is behaving like a sulking
child for not getting his own way...
Where is the technical content here?
Encouraging Grok by responding to his messages --
Im just saying, lets not martyrize him. and, if someone personally
responds to me, even if its in such as way as to speak about me as if
i wasn't persent, I'm going to respond.
and, there is still a place for his political rants, on VoB. whether
he does so or not, is up to him. and im not
From Stephen Lawrence
OrionWorks wrote:
[ ... ]
I believe you are conveniently reinterpreting Jed's comments
to craft your own vision of Jed, implying that he is behaving
like a sulking child for not getting his own way...
Where is the technical content here?
Encouraging Grok by
OrionWorks wrote:
From Stephen Lawrence
OrionWorks wrote:
BTW, I seem to recall that once you yourself attempted to perform a
thorough analysis of the grok persona.
Right. On 2/24, about four months before the big blowup, I replied to
one of Grok's posts with such an analysis. And at
?Jed, we want you to come back.? I enjoy your posts.? I saw somthing you would
like when I visited the Oak Ridge science mueseum.? I positive exhibit on cold
fusion.?I will post the text once I such a picture.? ?I took of it into my
computer.? ?I asked the exhibition manager about it.? He said
If its actual politics that has to do with the technology and
development of the science, thats one thing.
The moment it extrapolates to world politics, ect, thats taking it a bit far.
And Jed's response is pretty much, well, I'm taking my ball and going home.
Sorry if i have no respect for
12 matches
Mail list logo
