What is a Hydroton? I googled the term and all I could find were references
to a clay-based plant growing medium much prized by marijuana growers ...
[mg]
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.comjavascript:_e({},
I asked Ed to try to find another keyword for precisely that reason.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
What is a Hydroton? I googled the term and all I could find
were references to a clay-based plant growing medium much prized by
marijuana growers ...
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not talking about initiating. I'm talking about sustaining. I have no
problem using electricity to initiate the ecat. But if it's a source
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
A match is needed to ignite a firecracker, but once ignited, the
explosion sustains itself.
A match is needed to start a campfire, but not to sustain it.
Cold
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
There seems to be a serious hangup over why a heat generating device needs
some form of heating input to sustain itself. The skeptics can not seem to
get their arms around this issue so I will make another short attempt
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If we are going to do analogies, a more useful one would be to compare the
Rossi reactor to an internal combustion engine ICE. With an ICE you have to
apply the spark periodically to small portions of the fuel to
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
As dave explains it makes sense if the energy input provides cooling power.
Exactly. The whole thing is nuts. If it really needed to be regulated, it
would make sense to regulate with temperature controlled cooling.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical point
at which the temperature must be reduced depends on the degree of thermal
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest
theories come out.
Yes, I know that happens sometimes. And sometimes things that are common
sense remain common sense.
But I think you
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Beaty has an excellent quote on this subject, here:
http://amasci.com/weird/vmore.html
Every fact of science was once damned. Every invention was considered
impossible. Every discovery was a nervous shock to
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:47 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
If someone is looking for an analogy they could look at the behavior of a
power transistor mounted on a heat sink. For this exercise assume that the
collector is directly connected to a power source. Apply enough base
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
. But my sense tells me that a significant number of scientists are
starting to take genuine interest and that they will stay tuned for further
details.
Read the cold fusion forums for the last 24 years. This has
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and only in a diesel engine do you not need a battery to keep spark
plugs going. Demanding a self-sustaining device is like demanding a diesel
engine. ICEs were first developed in the 1860s, and the diesel engine
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is more about who is the gatekeeper to the ideology and
business of science rather than any exercise in ethics.
The gatekeeper class resents this clique of stiff necked maverick
scientists who have the
Why expect 2-phase customisation for a relatively low-priority scientific
experiment? 3-phase design make sense in the context of the concurrent
high-priority finalisation, testing and shipping of a purported 1 MW device,
which at a claimed COP of 6 would need an electrical input of 167 KW.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering ... Everything I read
in the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
OK -- in fig 6 (Dec) they show a blue-and-yellow CONTROL box and three
triacs.
They don't have a picture for March, so we don't know if it includes the
functionality of the blue-and-yellow box or just replaces the triac.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess is that he is designing for industrial applications.
It's not gonna be useful for industrial purposes with a COP of 3; remember
the electricity was made with an efficiency of 1/3. It's gonna have to be
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:39 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
There are advantages to using a three phase power input that have been
pointed out.
For this application, the disadvantages are greater.
Measurements of 3 phase systems are done every day so this is not
important.
Josh:
Eric's comment about not needing a battery to keep spark plugs going was
referring to a DIESEL engine, and diesels don't have spark plugs. The
compression ratio is high enough to cause ignition of the diesel fuel when
the piston reaches TDC. They do have 'glow' plugs for starting the
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't buy it. The reactor is a sealed faraday cage, so it's not going
to
care about ripple or dc vs ac. It's just a thermal interface.
And then there is a class of non-paid sycophant apologists that make it
their business to curry favor with the gatekeepers. They divine what the
hierarchy wants and proceed to do their best to impress the powers that be.
They want to be like them; like a kid who wants to be “Babe Ruth so they
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:32 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
Josh:
** **
Eric’s comment about not needing a battery to keep spark plugs going was
referring to a DIESEL engine, and diesels don’t have spark plugs.
He said you need a battery for an internal combustion
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that Rossi
was present? Or that that he interfered with the experiment?
I do not think that Levi or his co-authors has said that Rossi was absent.
Only
Yes it is unfair. Quit sneering. It is a violation of rule #2. One of
the debunkers was recently removed due to sneering.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, May 30,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:35 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I thought that the DC issue was put to rest.
Only according to the credulous true believers. Essen said they excluded
it, but he didn't say how. If we're just going to accept what they say
without scrutiny, then why
I talked with Celani about the use of Zeolites but he's not very supporting
using zeolites when it comes to preventing sintering of the actual nickel
powder. Maybe I am a bit bypassed by Celani.
I have some Nickel sputtered carbon powder that I will use for first tests
the upcoming period.
I like
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously? Do you really not know how an internal combustion engine
works?
Man, this place is crawling with ignoramuses.
***Sneering. Against the rules.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:35 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
I thought that the DC issue was put to rest.
Only according to the credulous true believers.
you want it to be true.
***Sneering.
Hi,
On 31-5-2013 4:45, Eric Walker wrote:
Yes, and only in a diesel engine do you not need a battery to keep
spark plugs going.
Call me a nitpicker, but I think it should probably read:
Yes, and only in a diesel engine do you not need ANYTHING to keep spark
plugs going.
Of course, because
Hi,
On 30-5-2013 22:48, Edmund Storms wrote:
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical
point at which the temperature must be reduced depends on the degree
of thermal contact between the source
Interesting.
It seems that with the resonance hypothesis, like Einstein did with
Sternglass, they explore the evident possibility of collective behaviors.
I won't be surprised if some young theorist in closed room, consider some
ideas from LENR, but carefully don't cite that banned domain...
It
Kevin, that doesn't look like sneering to me, more like simply Joshua's
assessment of the motivations for positions that others are taking, without
invective or nastiness that I can see.
I am generally saddened to see the recent witch-hunt/culling of
dissent/heresy in the Vort. The 'sneering'
k0iwFQ32HjA@ma
il.gmail.com
In-Reply-To:
cadzc6n9pielm6_xd4qakmtt-lmozaq8xmplp3obk0iwfq32...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:50:32 +0200
Message-ID: 001601ce5dec$ac655470$052ffd50$@ch
MIME-Version: 1.0
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Good grief. The resistors are coils, presumably helical solenoids with the
axis parallel to the reactor cylinder. The magnetic field is near zero
outside a solenoid, except at the ends.
The magnetic field outside a
k0iwFQ32HjA@ma
il.gmail.com
In-Reply-To:
cadzc6n9pielm6_xd4qakmtt-lmozaq8xmplp3obk0iwfq32...@mail.gmail.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:55:08 +0200
Message-ID: 002101ce5ded$511424b0$f33c6e10$@ch
MIME-Version: 1.0
To deceive an electronics guy, one may use a chemistry trick.
To deceive a chemist, one may use software tricks.
To deceive a computer scientist, one may use a physics trick.
But using an electricity trick to deceive a group of experts sent
by a power industry association is stupid.
--
Berke
Hi,
On 31-5-2013 12:44, Robert Lynn wrote:
I am generally saddened to see the recent witch-hunt/culling of
dissent/heresy in the Vort. The 'sneering' rule is being applied
asymmetrically, and frankly of late it is becoming more like a
doctrinal church.
Killing off opposing views like Abd,
On May 31, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
There's various ways to create illusions, and I don't necessarily know how it
might have been done.
That is very healthy attitude. Many people often forget how easy it is to
create illusions and how hard it is expose them
Robin, I would agree with your atoms as time crystals assessment. IMHO or
working man's model, Time and gravity are related in a relativistic way. the
nucleus opposes displacement along the time axis much more than it's orbitals
such that the electrons swirl behind on their electrical tethers
On May 30, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Harry, imagine balls held in line by springs. If the end ball is
pull away with a force and let go, a resonance wave will pass down
the line. Each ball will
Mark, the word Hydroton is a word I applied to the structure required
to cause fusion between hydrogen isotopes. It consists of a linear
molecule of hydrogen, deuterium or tritium nuclei held together by 2p
bonding of electrons. It can only form in a gap in a solid material
having a
Josh, I am quite happy to see that you are finally willing to discuss the
operation of a positive feedback system. Every one of your points can be
addressed and explained. It would be easier to handle only a couple at a time
since that would allow us to focus upon the particular issue until
Harry Veeder wrote:
I suspect hand waving began as a derisive reference to occult
activities since these might involve the waving of hands and/or a wand. .
That does sound like the word origin. Similar to hocus-pocus.
I think Gibbs meant something like papering over a problem or hiding
the
On May 31, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 30-5-2013 22:48, Edmund Storms wrote:
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several
years without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The
critical point at which the temperature must be reduced depends
It is great to see that we are in such close agreement. Let's handle the
issues related to positive feedback as I requested and you will improve your
understanding. I promise to squawk if I see any attempts by Rossi to fake the
process.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude
Of course it is not the exact same. Positive heat feedback is what we are
mainly interested in. You know that, so why bring up the obvious differences?
Compare the similarities for an analogy.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
Josh, please refrain from insults.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 31, 2013 3:07 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Eric Walker
Josh, your entire theory will be shot if you acknowledge that the COP is
greater than 1. Are you now ready to accept this condition?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 31, 2013 3:22 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new
Cude wrote:
Is it unfair to be suspicious if he can't spell his own title?
On the contrary, this adds versimillitude to his posting. Based on my
experience editing papers, I conclude that many American chemistry
professors cannot spell. Neither can I, but I use voice input so I can
Every one of the points you make are pure speculation. There is absolutely no
evidence that Rossi is using 3 phase power to conduct any scam. How do you
expect for anyone to believe your side of the discussion if there is never any
proof of any one of your points? You are basically shooting
Robert Lynn wrote:
Killing off opposing views like Abd, Andrew and others does not
improve the quality of the discourse.
Bill Beaty told me he did not precipitously throw out Andrew. They
discussed the rules, and concluded that this forum is not the best fit
for Andrew at this time.
- Jed
you have a point.
a good idea for latter as someone said in a forum is:
- to invite students who will play the skeptics, with stupid ideas, most
stupid, some not so stupid... with naive, not far from the one of
incompetent or voluntarily stupid skeptics.
- to invite few stage magicians, that will
If he does not know such a simple thing, I think he can be safely ignored
as plainly he is significantly ignorant of basic physics.
Only toroidal coils/cores have negligible external detectable field.
And actually it is present but cancelled, hence only detected inductively.
Very long solenoids
Bring on your proof that what I have pointed out is not true. Take a few
moments to show how DC flowing into the control box due to its internal
rectification changes the power delivered to it. You will fail miserably I
assure you! You love to make unsupported statements and then fail to do
I suggest that you study the magnetic fields associated with solenoids Josh.
Obviously you must not realize that they have an external field much like a bar
magnet. This is simple for you to study and realize your mistake.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude
Rob, it would be an easier task if Rossi were able to restrict the environment
within which his device operates. If he were to pursue this too far, then the
applications for which his ECAT can operate are quickly reduced.
Now is the time for him to optimize the control system and he appears
a group of experts sent by a power industry
Are you suggesting the power industry association had a hand in picking these
experts and the group they eventually came up with included Giuseppe Levi and
Hanno Essen based on their expertise?
Von: Berke Durak
Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
But using an electricity trick to deceive a group of experts sent
by a power industry association is stupid.
Well said! The whole notion is hilarious.
Even if it were shown that these people are not experts, you can be sure
someone at Elforsk read
Ed,
I still think this strange behavior you mention is in violation
of our present definition of COE.. the resonance should dampen out before doing
any useful work if powered by temperature - random motion of atoms.. if you are
saying the tight confinement of the cavity is
Jed wrote: I do not think it takes
long for an electrical engineer to conclude that there is no possibility of
fraud in these tests.
I bet you won't find any EE with any experience in the business who would sign
such a statement.
Fran, I don't know how to explain this process any more clearly. The
resonance is not using energy or emitting energy. It simply occurs as
a result of the ambient energy, i.e. temperature. All chemical
structures vibrate and resonate. This behavior is not visible unless
something happens
I do not see a direct violation of the COE with Ed's theory. It is somewhat
kin to what happens when an electron and proton are far removed from each
other. The electron comes into a tighter orbital as energy is released.
If you make a classical model with two protons separated by an
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Of course, because a diesel engine works with GLOW PLUGS as it doesn't have
any spark plugs.
But these glow plugs still require electricity generated by an alternator
which is connected by a V-belt to the engine.
Glow
Well, I graduated from Georgia Tech in 1977 with an EE, am a
registered professional engineer and manage a group of mostly EE
consulting engineers and I agree with Jed.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Yamali Yamali yamaliyam...@yahoo.de wrote:
Jed wrote: I do not think it takes long for an
With corp experience, I can confirm, but the question is only if the boss
agree with my opinion, I can give it... and if it is unsure I protect my
private parts safe.
so a positive report mean that the bos was ok, that the engineer was ok or
menaces to be fired.
that the boss was ok mean that
I join Terry and Jed on this. EE, 1962.
I might hesitate, in view of the subversion of some holy pronouncements
of the physics establishment, but sign I would.
Ol' Bab
On 5/31/2013 12:46 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Well, I graduated from Georgia Tech in 1977 with an EE, am a
registered
Terry,
I won't hold that degree against you, I have hired a bunch of GA Tech
Engineers... I agree with Jed also. Sometimes I wonder if physicists ought
to be required to have an undergrad degree in engineering. Lots of
electromagnetic and thermodynamic stuff going on when you are dealing with
Greetings Vortex-L.
A wild guess on my part:
A google search of: Boeing LENR Sugar for
Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research shows
that Boeing is commited to Green Aircraft.
LENR is forseeable in Boeing s future and obvious
links can be found on google.
Zawodny of NASA has a LENR or Ni
A weakness regarding the recent Ecat paper by Levi et al. is the apparent
absence of an EE. In a future test they would ideally include a power
engineer along with thermal image and data logging specialists.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:40 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Of course it is not the exact same. Positive heat feedback is what we are
mainly interested in. You know that, so why bring up the obvious
differences?
Because it's not positive heat feedback.
Time Crystals search: Kozyrev ( Russian Astrophysicist) Time and Turpentine
..a Levo-Chiral
natural molecule.
Ron Kita, Chiralex
as they say: turpentine is cheap.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Robin, I would agree with your atoms as time
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is great to see that we are in such close agreement. Let's handle the
issues related to positive feedback as I requested and you will improve
your understanding.
I thought you were keeping an open mind, not a
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:41 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Josh, please refrain from insults.
Please refrain from telling me what to refrain from.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:32 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
With that in mind, please submit for discussion your main reason for
discounting my explanation so that it can be properly addressed and
everyone who is following this concept can draw their own conclusions. It
is my
Cude, please admit to the obvious. The LENR effect has positive
feedback. Increased temperature causes increased power generation.
This is an established fact. Of course, if as you believe, CF is not
real, than this statement is irrelevant to you and any discussion is a
waste of time.
For the record: Jed wrote:
Whether these people are experts or not I'm sure the Association reviewed
their work carefully before issuing a statement. I do not think it takes
long for an electrical engineer to conclude that there is no possibility of
fraud in these tests.
You've read their
Storms, please read the exchange. I was saying the transistor was not a
good analagy because it's not positive thermal feedback.
The claim that cold fusion is positive thermal feedback, is the basis of my
argument that it should easily self-sustain if there were a COP of 3.
On Fri, May 31,
I'd like to throw in as the 4th EE, graduated from University of California
Santa Barbara 1998. I would sign. But if I were there and had the
wherewithal, I would have insisted on bringing in our own generator to
provide the input power.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David L Babcock
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Even the people here such as Cude cannot come up with anything. They are
scraping the bottom of the barrel when they say that three-phase
electricity is difficult to measure or there might be a hidden wire under
the
There is a wealth of information contained within the shape of the output
temperature curve associated with operation of the ECAT. My spice model also
demonstrates this behavior and the testers eluded to some of the important
issues. It is apparent to anyone reviewing the output temperature
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Put yourself in the shoes of those 7 scientists who have placed their
reputations on the line.
I don't think it's a big risk. They can plausibly claim ignorance. In fact
their ignorance is the most plausible
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
What is the best thing about this new demonstration that it excludes
definitely steam based tricks from the possible repertoire. So from the
beginning it was all about the feeding extra input power via hidden
Yamali Yamali yamaliyam...@yahoo.de wrote:
You've read their report, Terry, and you are an EE. And you would, based
on what you read in the report and what Hartman and Essen said in
interviews afterwards, sign a statement to the effect that there is no
possibility of fraud in these tests???
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:59 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Bring on your proof that what I have pointed out is not true. Take a few
moments to show how DC flowing into the control box due to its internal
rectification changes the power delivered to it.
You're just repeating
What is not positive heat feedback?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 31, 2013 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into question
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:40 AM, David Roberson
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
And I'm not convinced those guys stripped any wires.
How does one measure voltage without stripping wires?
It's far from clear it wasn't Rossi or his delegate who didn't do all the
setup.
Okay, so you are saying they attached the voltage probe to
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
And I'm not convinced those guys stripped any wires.
How does one measure voltage without stripping wires?
Watch the cheese video. The ends of the wires that the magician
Dear Dr. Storms,
Yours is a fascinating theory, but I don't understand the mechanism you
propose of slowly reducing the Coulomb barrier by photon emissions from
the nucleus.
The Coulomb barrier, as I understand it, is the proton-proton electric
field repulsion between the hydron elements of the
No problem, I will meet you here in a couple of years and we can compare notes.
Sorry if it came out patronizing, perhaps I was getting a little out of hand
due to being inundated with so many unsupported claims. I assure you that I
can speak to any of the objections that you have provided
I am attempting to keep you form getting banned since I want to use you to
clear up a number of issues. It is hoped that you will go back to the other
skeptics and then set them straight.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
Good grief. The resistors are coils, presumably helical solenoids with
the
axis parallel to the reactor cylinder. The magnetic field is near
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Watch the cheese video. The ends of the wires that the magician wants you
to measure are already exposed. Clever, huh.
Too clever by half. This would not begin to fool any scientist, electrician
or EE on God's Green Earth. There has not been an
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:44 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Josh, your entire theory will be shot if you acknowledge that the COP is
greater than 1. Are you now ready to accept this condition?
No. The only thing you seem to be able to do is miss the point.
The claimed COP is
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Every one of the points you make are pure speculation. There is
absolutely no evidence that Rossi is using 3 phase power to conduct any
scam.
Right but all the excuses for why he might need them are pure speculation,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:52 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I suggest that you study the magnetic fields associated with solenoids
Josh. Obviously you must not realize that they have an external field much
like a bar magnet. This is simple for you to study and realize your
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:59 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
If he does not know such a simple thing, I think he can be safely ignored
No one's holding a gun to your head.
This is a good start Josh. I think I can explain that to you since you seem to
be a pretty sharp guy. Just keep an open mind.
The ECAT operates as a device with a positive temperature coefficient with
respect to heat. At low temperatures there is little if any extra heat being
internally
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:11 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Lets start with one of your choice regarding the many heat generation
issues. How about how a small amount of heat can control a much larger
amount?
I agree this is possible under certain circumstances. But I don't
So, do you need help with that spice model? The remainder of your discussion
is nothing more than using words to avoid the issue. It would take you less
time to perform the spice experiment than to write a million words that prove
nothing.
You wrote a large number of unsubstantiated and
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
