Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Here's what I've been able to glean from their
site.
It is self-powered. There is no input.
No it's not.
Right. The ceo has said he does not know the source of
the energy.
It isn't anything obvious, so maybe it is something
like Frank
One of the more fascinating themes of fiction involves hidden
wealth and the duplicity which is involved in controlling it. Of
course, buried treasure and pirated booty is the prototype for
this alluring theme - but even several of Blackbeard's chests of
Spanish doubloons is little more than
On Sunday 26 November 2006 23:13, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Here's what I've been able to glean from their site.
It is self-powered. There is no input.
No it's not.
It has a COP100% which means it produces more power than it consumes,
but to have a meaningful COP it
Here's another experiment that is extremely
straightforward and simple.
We know that thermo noise has no theoretical upper
crest limit. Normally we refer to noise in terms of
root mean square. When studying real thermo noise we
see that given enough time the noise will eventually
drift to a
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Here's what I've been able to glean from their
site.
It is self-powered. There is no input.
No it's not.
Right. The ceo has said he does not know the source of
the energy.
It isn't anything obvious, so maybe it is
Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Here's what I've been able to glean from their
site.
It is self-powered. There is no input.
No it's not.
Right. The ceo has said he
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Nothing in, something out = efficiency = infinity.
The concept of infinite efficiency is somewhat
interesting. Consider a black box that requires 100
watts input, and outputs 1 KW. When operating the
black box could theoretically do away
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:08:51 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
It is that strange isotope of hydrogen - 18O. Almost one percent
of the unpalatable water in the Great Salt Lake water consists of
this heavy so-called isotope 18O. The fact that there is such an
abundance seems
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:37:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Obviouslybut then again
maybe free electrons and protons have no weight.
[snip]
The Solar corona (no to mention the Sun itself) is largely free electrons and
protons, yet they are kept attached to the Sun by
On 11/27/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the coming decade [and stranger than fiction forms of
wealth], take the national helium repository for instance - close
by a certain ranch in Crawford TX.
Well, now, this gives a whole new slant to the recent news:
On 11/27/06, Rhong Dhong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't anything obvious, so maybe it is something
like Frank Grimer's gamma atmosphere.
You can count on it.
Whatever it is,
it just goes on and on and on, even to powering a
550bhp motor.
This is larger than the alleged Perendev magmo.
I am responding to Standing Bear off list.
It's interesting you should say that. For a long time I've predicted that
the speed of light thru a charged capacitor (say vacuum dielectric, or any
other) should be slower than normally.
Has this experiment been done? According to my interpretation of Dewey B.
Larson's Reciprocal System
Paul wrote:
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Nothing in, something out = efficiency = infinity.
The concept of infinite efficiency is somewhat
interesting. Consider a black box that requires 100
watts input, and outputs 1 KW. When operating the
black box could
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Rhong Dhong wrote:
Here's what I've been able to glean from their
site.
It is self-powered. There is no input.
No it's not.
Right.
--- Robin
I think the explanation for the high concentration
can in this case be found in the mundane...
No, no - I should have been clearer - it is not that
'local' concentration which is the precise anomaly in
question. But yes there is the mundane explanation for
the salt lake also.
The
On 11/27/06, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An example might be an electric motor which produced more mechanical
energy than the electrical energy it consumed -- to close the loop you
need to convert the mechanical energy back into electrical energy, which
introduces losses which
Terry Blanton wrote:
Vorts,
While spying on my neighbors about a mile away, Tournament Players
Club, aka Sugarloaf Country Club, I came across this image:
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8z=17ll=34.010799,-84.115362spn=0.004562,0.
007231t=kom=1
http://tinyurl.com/wclkj
Now, if that is a
'fonly ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHJrSMjuUjwmode=relatedsearch=
You're welcome, Frank.
I am aware that the value of the proton radius is questionable, for example
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Proton.html
the two values listed are 0.805 ± 0.011 and 0.862 ± 0.012 femtometers.
So there is some wiggle room for theory, but 1.4 seems like too big
a
Blank
Jones wrote..
As for the coming decade [and stranger than fiction forms of
wealth], take the national helium repository for instance - close
by a certain ranch in Crawford TX. This one is not yet
fictionalized. It was recently, very quietly, shuttled into
private hands from DoE, in what
21 matches
Mail list logo
