Hello group,
For everybody's interest, it looks like Daniele Passerini (22passi) is
going to post regular updates to his Twitter account regarding the 1MW
E-Cat test supposed to be held today in Bologna:
http://twitter.com/#!/22passi
Alternate URL: http://yfrog.com/user/22passi/profile
The Associated Press reporter would be present at today test.
Sterling D. Allan
AP Writer Approved
I just spoke to Andrea Rossi by phone. He invited me to come earlier
than 11, at 9:30 am [GMT+1], as they “are ready”.
He said the AP writer from NYC has the address, and is approved to
attend;
I make an alternative prediction:
Rating 25 - 50.
Lets assume the input power is measured and confirmed by the electrical company
and it cannot been doubted.
1 MW of energy is enough to vaporize 1.345 m^3 of water (0°C) per hour.
So the vaporized water is easy to measure and it is easy to
My friends, please see:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/10/1mw-test-e-day-or-t-day-for-rossi.html
I have written this before the demo starts- prediction cannot use facts from
the future; the are for postdiction.
. I have considered my duty of blogger and of new energy loyalist to
tell
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markpmills/2011/10/28/the-relentless-pursuit-of-magical-energy/?partner=technology_newsletter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Greetings Vortex,
So much ...from Forbes- they have replaced Mark Gibbs coverage of Cold
Fusion with an Anti_Cold Fusion writer.
His view: He doubts IF it will work..and even IF it works it is
insignificant.
His coverage late Oct 27th is go long on Exxon Mobil...Chevron. Oil
technology has too
- Original Nachricht
Von: Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 28.10.2011 13:22
Betreff: [Vo]:Before the Test- Forbes comes down hard against Cold Fusion
Greetings Vortex,
So much ...from Forbes- they have replaced Mark Gibbs coverage of Cold
Dr. Peter Gluck,
Further to Your comment.
The need for semi-continuous electrical heating of the many E-Cats in the I
MW “Container-Cat” is, at the moment, the largest running cost in addition
to the low-cost fuel (6 month running period) represented by the 10 kg
modified nickel micro powder and
Yes..are some good points to the Mills Forbes article, but not as rosy as
Mark Gibbs.
Gibbs was inspiring.
Ron
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:13 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
- Original Nachricht
Von: Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum:
Greetings Vortex,
It has been a number of years since I read I-Woz by Steve Wozniak, and
according to
memory: Steve Jobs approached HP and tried to get them interested in
making personal
computers...HP responsethere is no consumer market for such devices.
Thank God that HP said that. The
Thank you very much for your detailed and welll docunented answer.
Let's waith the global results of the Demo for the most relevant
calculation.
In your experience and not on;y for Italy what are the price ratios
electric energy/thermal energy?
Peter
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jorn Erik
From Peter Gluck
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markpmills/2011/10/28/the-relentless-pursuit-of-
magical-energy/?partner=technology_newsletter
The conclusion of the article:
Is there a bet here? Root for the Italians if you're like me.
Wouldn't it be fun if they were right? But if you're an
- Original Nachricht
Von: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 28.10.2011 14:50
Betreff: RE: [Vo]:FYI- greater press about the DEMO
Let Joe Six Pack continue to bet on Oil. Meanwhile I hope Joe Public will
simply
Everything you want is here:
http://www.energy.eu/
On 28 October 2011 13:41, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your detailed and welll docunented answer.
Let's waith the global results of the Demo for the most relevant
calculation.
In your experience and not
If his tweets are translating properly, the Reactor is running is the
self-sustaining mode presently. He also says there are
representatives from the Associated Press and the Old Grey Lady.
Could be interesting. Hope it doesn't explode.
T
new wired article about today test.
Cold Fusion: Future of physics or phoney?
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/28/cold-fusion
Thank you, Robert, very good site and I did't knew about it
despite teaching Ecological Energetics to managers.
It happens.
Peter
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
Everything you want is here:
http://www.energy.eu/
On 28 October 2011 13:41,
On 2011-10-28 15:27, Terry Blanton wrote:
and the Old Grey Lady.
With NyT, he meant NyTeknik.
Cheers,
S.A.
if you refer to this Ci siamo appena autosostentati con un abbondante
buffet! :))
it means: we are are eating, there are a lot of things on the table.
bye
C.
Il giorno venerdì 28 ottobre 2011, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
If his tweets are translating properly, the Reactor is
It can be alluding to autosustaining of the Setup but it seems
it says Daniele is autosustaining himself at the buffet.
I have asked him if he happens to see much steam- no answer yet.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
If his tweets are translating
As noted, Forbes has published an attack on cold fusion:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markpmills/2011/10/28/the-relentless-pursuit-of-magical-energy/?partner=technology_newsletter
This is by someone named Mark Mills. I believe he's a shill for the coal
industry. It is a common name I suppose but
Dr. Peter Gluck,
Further to Your question:
The 1 MW “Container Energy Catalyser” (ContainerCat) Power Plant in its
present form generate heath in the form of steam / hot water. As a thermal
power plant it can be made to generate space water heating for factories
and buildings.
However, to put
Dear Jorn,
Please accept my renewed thanks- I am waiting to see how mature is the 1MW
demo.
peter
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Jorn Erik Ommang j...@enerley.com wrote:
Dr. Peter Gluck,
Further to Your question:
The 1 MW “Container Energy Catalyser” (ContainerCat) Power Plant in its
From Peter:
...
We have this already seen many times.
There is definitely excess energy.
Especially after the Kullander Essen Demo it was very clear that
the input energy was too low to heat the water.
But we also have seen errors in measurement that reduce the amout
of energy and that
sigh Thanks for the corrections. So, it's after 3 pm there. When
does the show begin? After the barrel of wine is consumed? :-)
T
Midnight... hope it doesn't turn out to be a sooner-tha-expected Halloween.
2011/10/28 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
sigh Thanks for the corrections. So, it's after 3 pm there. When
does the show begin? After the barrel of wine is consumed? :-)
T
Earlier I said that I do not know the limits of self-sustaining operation
and it might go on in that mode indefinitely. Recently, Rossi said that the
limit for this particular machine is around six hours. I do not recall where
he said that but I am sure he did.
Some people have said he should
Good news is: nothing exploded!
2011/10/28 Bruno Santos besantos1...@gmail.com
Midnight... hope it doesn't turn out to be a sooner-tha-expected
Halloween.
2011/10/28 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
sigh Thanks for the corrections. So, it's after 3 pm there. When
does the show begin?
So far... :-)
2011/10/28 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Good news is: nothing exploded!
2011/10/28 Bruno Santos besantos1...@gmail.com
Midnight... hope it doesn't turn out to be a sooner-tha-expected
Halloween.
2011/10/28 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
sigh Thanks for the
Terry, show begun some four hours ago. Daniele tweeted 60 minutes ago:
»The coffee machine made famous by Krivit has never been put to the
whip as it is today! :) Boys has the exclusive AP, Focus, NYT,
expecting 22p»
This means, that they are already making coffee there for the guests.
Also
Twitter screens do not auto-translate with Chrome. It seems you have to run
the text through Google translate manually, here:
http://translate.google.com/
- Jed
When a new batch of books soon to be published documenting the
contentious history of Cold Fusion comes out, on the front cover of
one of these books will be a photo of a coffee machine... perhaps with
a modified eCat on top.
A few insiders will get it. Most probably won't.
Regards
Steven
Pretty clear from Passerini (@22passi) that the assembled witnesses are
tailgating in the parking area (http://yfrog.com/z/hs6dppsj) while being
allowed in one at a time to see the plant in operation.
-- Sean
I understand why it is not permitted to make photos of the Consultants of
the Customer, but why not of the steam coming out from the Demo?
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Sean True sean.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty clear from Passerini (@22passi) that the assembled witnesses are
tailgating in
Per Rossi's blog, the steam is going into a dissapater, and then back
into the plant.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand why it is not permitted to make photos of the Consultants of
the Customer, but why not of the steam coming out from the
So, if the steam is recirculating, is there a secondary flow and heat exchanger?
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:43:59 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tailgating on day zero for the E-Cat 1MW.
From: ecatbuil...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Per Rossi's blog, the steam is going into a dissapater,
Amazing! Rossi even finds time to write on his blog!
http://goo.gl/ahMEA
Andrea Rossi
October 28th, 2011 at 10:37 AM
FIRST INFORMATION REGARDING THE 1 MW PLANT TEST:
WE SARTED REGULARLY THE TEST THIS MORNING . EVERYTHING IS GOING WELL
SO FAR. THE 1 MW E-CAT IS WORKING IN SELF SUSTAINING.
This dissipator or dissapator must be some type of condenser in which the
steam is converted in water, supposedly hot. How is the heat produced by the
setup- measured?
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:43 PM, ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
Per Rossi's blog, the steam is going into a
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Sean True sean.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty clear from Passerini (@22passi) that the assembled witnesses are
tailgating in the parking area (http://yfrog.com/z/hs6dppsj) while being
allowed in one at a time to see the plant in operation.
That's not tailgating.
There may be a good reason for a limitation of 6 hours for self-sustaining
mode. It would be far better if the reaction slowly damped out with time than
for someone to have to vent the hydrogen or add much additional input water to
achieve that result. You would thus be able to turn off the
Rossi wrote:
FIRST INFORMATION REGARDING THE 1 MW PLANT TEST:
WE SARTED REGULARLY THE TEST THIS MORNING . EVERYTHING IS GOING WELL
SO FAR. THE 1 MW E-CAT IS WORKING IN SELF SUSTAINING.
That is SPLENDID! Congratulations to Andrea Rossi.
Say what you like about him, he has guts, and he has
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what you expect from engineers and programmers. They may
cheat on their wives and their taxes but when it comes to machines, they
tell the truth.
We never, ever cheat on our taxes!!
T
(you never know who's
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I am hoping that the test today will be well documented and we have access
to the data. Am I dreaming?
If, as Rossi claims, a third-party engineer is collecting the data we
probably will have access to it.
In lieu of that, Lewan is there and he will
I wrote:
Twitter screens do not auto-translate with Chrome.
Ah ha. Left click and select translate.
Thanks Jouni Valkonen for telling me that.
- Jed
Has anyone seen any data come through on test protocols?
If the water/steam is recirculating, does this mean that the 1MW is entirely
closed-loop?
Is there NO water being added to the system?
How is water flow rate in the primary being measured, if at all?
How is temperature in the primary
Greetings Vortex,
Here is the spin on the Oct 28th Test by Wired. It is based on no current
results.
I was expecting a worse article from Wired:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/28/cold-fusion
Ciao,
Ron Kita
At 10:29 AM 10/28/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah ha. Left click and select translate.
Thanks Jouni Valkonen for telling me that.
Right-click for me.
Terry,
That is true... hope your wife doesn't changes the locks :_)
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi writes on the blog
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at
The skeptics remind me of defense lawyers. They can always come up with
reasonable doubt as to whether or not their clients committed the crime. The
extent to which the skeptics of the ECAT go to convince themselves that it is a
scam amazes me. Of course it is always possible to perform
Everyone has the right to be wrong. It will be interesting to hear from these
guys when the dust settles from the test.
The supporters of Rossi likewise need to admit their error if by chance his
ECAT monster system is a scam.
I am hopeful that a small passage of time will reveal the truth.
So today is supposed to be the big day, but I've said that enough times to
my friends and family over the last few months that I am starting to get
embarassed, if you simply posit that Rossi is perpetrating a scam (even
though I don't think he is) then we are still sitting here without solid
from...
PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.
Stirling Allan reports:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during *
*self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.*
I definitely like this client!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
sounds about right compared to Oct 6 test 50 units * 3 cats per unit would
imply about 3kW per e-cat
On 28 October 2011 19:25, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
from...
PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
from...
PESNetwork PES Network, Inc.
QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.
At half nameplate! Hah!
T
I have heard that observers of today's tests are only being allowed to look
at the equipment for a few minutes at a time, and they are not being
introduced to the engineers who are taking the data. They are not being
given a chance to establish the bona fides of these engineers, or to confirm
that
That's ~3KW for every core... So, that's much less than the other test on
6th october, or at lest at the low end. And the client was promised 1 to 6
amplification! Wow, happened?
2011/10/28 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
Stirling Allan reports:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's ~3KW for every core... So, that's much less than the other test on
6th october, or at lest at the low end. And the client was promised 1 to 6
amplification! Wow, happened?
If there was no input power, the
There certainly was input, as it always happen to achieve
a threshold temperature to begin the reaction. But, anyway, this was not the
promised test...
2011/10/28 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's ~3KW for every
Stirling Allan reported:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during . . .*
I believe Terry Blanton's prediction was the closest to this. He wins the
prize here, if these results are confirmed.
The difference between 470 kW and 1 MW is unimportant.
- Jed
I am so sorry that I don't know who is the Customer.
I want to offer him a Trabant 1963 and ask the price of a Rolls Royce 2009.
So I lose a great opportunity.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
There certainly was input, as it always happen to achieve
a
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
And the client was promised 1 to 6 amplification! Wow, happened?
The amplification was reportedly infinite, but anyway, how do you know what
the customer was promised? Were you there during the negotiations?
There certainly was input, as it always
If Rossi's Reactor output 470,000 watts using a sustained
Nickel/Hydrogen reaction and an industrial client from the US just
bought it, the world has changed more dramatically than when the
Trinity site as alit.
Vishnu also creates worlds.
T
He always promised, during all these months, that the costumer would get a 1
to 6 ratio amplification. And we know that from what he says that self
sustaining is not stable for long. Now, he does a test that is very within
the energy density of 1L or 2L of propane in every core.
--
Wouldn't the client bother to open each unit and check what's inside? I
wouldn't buy without taking a look inside each and every cat.
2011/10/28 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
He always promised, during all these months, that the costumer would get a
1 to 6 ratio amplification. And we
If you do so, you are NOT the Good Customer and NOT the Good Fairy.
Not joking, it's a very special Customer, too good to be true/real.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Bruno Santos besantos1...@gmail.comwrote:
Wouldn't the client bother to open each unit and check what's inside? I
wouldn't
The first priority is to win the sale. Getting outbid while kicking
the tires would be devastating to the customer. The contract will
specify that the sale is void if Rossi is using chemical shenanigans.
The sooner the customer can start working on the technology, the
faster they can establish
In fact, I am questioning the existence of a client. If no weird rumor
appears in a few months, well, I will be sure that there was never an e-cat.
Of course, the client can give up the deal like Defkalion did, and we(except
me) will never know if anything happened today...
2011/10/28 Bruno
You have made an excellent point. I noticed that the self sustaining power was
quite a bit below the driven power and this may demonstrate that phenomenon.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Oct 28, 2011 2:45 pm
Wait until the final results are posted and then we will know the score. I
recall that there were to be two of the 500 kwatt units to make up a complete
system. This test may just evolve one.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
On 2011-10-28 20:26, Peter Gluck wrote:
Stirling Allan reports:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during *
*self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.*
I definitely like this client!
Interesting comment on 22passi blog by an unidentified user
NASA reports that although they planned to send TWO men to the
surface of the moon, they decided at the last minute (due to a leaky
gasket, and some control issues) to send only one (the other --
selected by a coin-toss) staying on the orbiter.
Neil Armstrong successfully landed Eagle on the
On 2011-10-28 21:52, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Interesting comment on 22passi blog by an unidentified user (who appears
to be truthful), translated in English by me. I think he mistook kW and
MW with kWh and MWh:
More interestingly, the same user is also reporting that during the
press
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
NASA reports that although they planned to send TWO men to the surface of
the moon, they decided at the last minute (due to a leaky gasket, and some
control issues) to send only one (the other -- selected by a coin-toss)
If they only have heated water by about 50° then he would not need any
permission. This would be 2 liters of hot water per second (estimated,
not calculated). this are 7.2 m^3 per hour. This should be possible.
However, how did they cool down the water (or condense the steam) to
recycle it?
Peter Heckert wrote:
If they only have heated water by about 50° then he would not need any
permission.
In the U.S. you are not allowed to operate a boiler as large as this
without a permit. It makes no difference whether it produces steam or
hot water. You must have a permit; the machine
Self-Sustaining mode for the 1MW ecat is ~470kw. (No input!)
Regular operation with electrical input (~167kw) outputs the 1MW of thermal
energy claimed by the nameplate. 6:1
Exciting day! 10 months of waiting!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri,
Am 28.10.2011 22:59, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert wrote:
If they only have heated water by about 50° then he would not need
any permission.
In the U.S. you are not allowed to operate a boiler as large as this
without a permit. It makes no difference whether it produces steam or
hot
Am 28.10.2011 23:15, schrieb Peter Heckert:
The problem is, the heat must be dissipated or stored somewhere. Even
at 470kW this cannot been done easily.
How was this done? Has nobody seen something. Where there big
ventilators running?
This must give more than 7 m^3 of hot water per hour or
On 2011-10-28 23:15, Peter Heckert wrote:
The problem is, the heat must be dissipated or stored somewhere. Even at
470kW this cannot been done easily.
How was this done? Has nobody seen something. Where there big
ventilators running?
Another 22passi user who was there mentions there were six
Hello group,
This is from PESN. Great video quality:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sZHOQ6P-Rw
Possibly more coming soon.
Cheers,
S.A.
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Another 22passi user who was there mentions there were six large (1.5x1.5
meters) heat exchangers with approximately 1 meter wide cooling fans.
Ah! Finally some technical details. That sounds good. Six large heat
exchangers sounds like what
More here: reactor running:
http://www.youtube.com/user/PESNetwork
Possibly more coming soon.
Sheese... hold the camera still. Love that crazy sweater!
--On Friday, October 28, 2011 2:57 PM -0700 ecat builder
ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
More here: reactor running:
http://www.youtube.com/user/PESNetwork
Possibly more coming soon.
On 2011-10-28 23:56, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah! Finally some technical details. That sounds good. Six large heat
exchangers sounds like what you would need.
Where did you read that? URL please!
I read it in one of the latest comments of 22passi Blog user nemo here:
More:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFiJb2UhzqYfeature=youtu.be
That is wonderful! Splendid!
You have to love a gigantic noisy machine.
I can't wait to hear the details.
Rossi is right about one thing: people will be impressed by the sheer scale
of this thing. Some will believe it just because it is so big and so
wonderfully loud. In the short video he
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First video from the October 28th, 1 MW E-Cat test event
Obviously told to point the camera down most of the time
Hard to fudge the input figures when the ecat is powered by a gen set - I
like that
and very easy to work out the
have been posted on Rossi's blog (JONP).
Let the digestion begin.
-- Sean
On 2011-10-29 00:23, Sean True wrote:
have been posted on Rossi's blog (JONP).
Download link in ZIP format:
http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk
Cheers,
S.A.
Yikes. This kind of confirms what I heard. I fear this may mean we will not
find out who did this test or whether they are independent. I don't want to
jump to conclusions but this sounds bad:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/News:October_28%2C_2011_Test_of_the_One_Megawatt_E-Cat
QUOTE
I just got
Am 28.10.2011 23:38, schrieb Akira Shirakawa:
On 2011-10-28 23:15, Peter Heckert wrote:
The problem is, the heat must be dissipated or stored somewhere. Even at
470kW this cannot been done easily.
How was this done? Has nobody seen something. Where there big
ventilators running?
Another
At 03:24 PM 10/28/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-10-29 00:23, Sean True wrote:
have been posted on Rossi's blog (JONP).
Download link in ZIP format:
http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk
Hmmm ... I don't see any measurement of steam quality in the contract jpg's
This report is meaningless. We need the raw data from a reliable source
outside Rossi's circle of trust.
At Daniele Passerini's blog comments someone said that the company is a food
producer (!??!). Weird.
2011/10/28 Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
At 03:24 PM 10/28/2011, Akira Shirakawa
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:21 PM, John Harris jfhar...@dodo.com.au wrote:
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First video from the October 28th, 1 MW E-Cat test event
Obviously told to point the camera down most of the time
Hard to fudge the input figures when the ecat
Documents downloaded here:
http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk
This includes the spreadsheet and three photographs of a document. I just
read the document aloud to voice input. This is practically uncorrected. I
left out some parts.
I apologize for uploading uncorrected text. I would appreciate if someone
/snip/ We will all await further data before issuing judgement, right? /snip/
Anxiously awaiting
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:21 PM, John Harris jfhar...@dodo.com.au wrote:
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First video from
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
For the customer (omitted – confidential): engineer
Appears to read Colonel - Domenico Fioravanti
The Colonel is scratched out.
Colonel Sanders?? KFC?
A new way to cook chicken?
Kewl!
Hot!
T
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Appears to read Colonel - Domenico Fioravanti
Digital Solutions Srl.?
http://www.linkedin.com/in/domenicofioravanti
T
At 03:48 PM 10/28/2011, Bruno Santos wrote:
This report is meaningless. We need the raw data from a reliable
source outside Rossi's circle of trust.
At Daniele Passerini's blog comments someone said that the company
is a food producer (!??!). Weird.
Why weird? They use LOTS and LOTS of
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
