Hi all,
Rossi made the following statement on his journal:
/Andrea Rossi
January 10th, 2012 at 4:05 PM/
/Dear Keith W:
We are making the certification .
Attention: I did not say that we will begin to deliver in August, I
said we can be ready to make order confirmations
.
Not as good as the 35th of May.
Peter
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de
mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
Rossi made the following statement on his journal:
/Andrea Rossi
January 10th, 2012 at 4:05 PM/
/Dear Keith W
you not agree with what I have
stated and I am ready to discuss - with pleasure.
Robotization is good, the great drawback is that you need robots.
Peter
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de
mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear Peter,
could you elaborate
It is even directly featured on the Technologygateway main site:
http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/
On the right, headlined with the words: *NASA's Method for a Clean
Nuclear Energy For Your Power Operated Technology
http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html*
Wolf
David, I
I didn't follow the discussions on the potential catalyst here (as I am
no physicist), but could carbon be the missing ingredient (as C is being
mentioned in the video)? Have there ever been publications on a H-Ni-C
LENR experiment? Or is this something that NASA is working on and hasn't
Excellent post! I wondered about Krivits behavior too. Some days ago I
wanted to post a comment on one of his articles, where he started to
repeat himself. I just wanted to show what I think of Rossi and his
behavior (just to give a little IMHO reasonable counter weight to his
article) and how
I am a little bit surprised to see such comments...
The technologygateway is not intended for scientists or for details on
science which is going on at NASA. It is for showing the / a broader
public what NASA is doing. It's a kind of advertisement place for NASA
to a broader public! This is,
Also if it is just an extra dose of powder: How do you contain the
vacuum..? What kind of cheap and save mechanism could it be to contain
the vacuum? Or to create a new one after refueling? Or will the reactor
core completely be replaced and recycled in a factory?
Wolf
At a minimum a
Hi Jed,
I think, what you are looking for, is a Content Management System (CMS),
e.g. Joomla http://www.joomla.org/, which is free and seems to have a
nice and big community.
Once you have a layout (there are also websites which provide free
standard and minimalistic layouts), you can easily
Didn't Ampenergo put some cash into Rossi last year in May?
Here it is:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/05/fast-facts-about-ampenergo-andrea-rossis-north-and-south-american-commercial-partner/
Wolf
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Alan J Fletchera...@well.com wrote:
January 13th, 2012 at
Where did you get the information that the customer sent the 1MW plant
back? Are you an employee of the customer? (as you mention the word we)
Wolf
Why read something else into this? LOL. You must be joking.
Because Rossi spoke it, for one thing - and because it is misleading for
another,
: Wolf Fischer
Where did you get the information that the customer sent the 1MW plant
back? Are you an employee of the customer? (as you mention the word we)
Wolf
Why read something else into this? LOL. You must be joking.
Because Rossi spoke it, for one thing - and because it is misleading
. Rossi has mentioned the N-word
before. Another clue is that the report - which others on vortex know about,
apparently comes out of Brussels. A hint: there could be some kind of
Payola involved. Use the Italian spelling.g
-Original Message-
From: Wolf Fischer
Thanks for the info! Can you
Hi AG,
Jones gave a lot of hints in his answer to my questions 4:30 hours
earlier. The customers name seems to start with N, is an organization
in Brussel, Rossi also once mentioned the name in the context of the
28th october 1MW test while talking about the Colonel (my guess, the
name has
the plant. Later he
stated, he, the customer's engineer and NI are working on the advanced
control system and they have made excellent progress.
AG
On 1/15/2012 9:17 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Hi AG,
Jones gave a lot of hints in his answer to my questions 4:30 hours
earlier. The customers name
Hi there,
Rossi was just on the Smart Scarecrow Show. There were some new
information / clarification (although I can't remember them all; the
information below should be correct however I sometimes had problems
understanding Rossi because of a pretty low audio quality and me not
being a
On 1/15/2012 10:29 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Hi there,
Rossi was just on the Smart Scarecrow Show. There were some new
information / clarification (although I can't remember them all; the
information below should be correct however I sometimes had problems
understanding Rossi because of a pretty
-Cat has a 30 year expected life.
Customer price between $400 to $500 for a home E-Cat 10 kW thermal unit.
AG
On 1/15/2012 10:29 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Hi there,
Rossi was just on the Smart Scarecrow Show. There were some new
information / clarification (although I can't remember them all
Mary, aren't you getting tired of repeating yourself all the time?
Wolf
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote: Last I heard, Rossi was
still saying you need a WATER line to the eCat. I hope that's changed. If
it hasn't, I'm sure it
Can't this type of gamma rays be shielded (I think he meant 511 keV
gammas)? Using google I found, e.g., the following (although I don't
know how well the shielding works):
http://www.corning.com/specialtymaterials/products_capabilities/radiation_shielding_glass/Med_Pet.aspx
Further here
This depends on how you classify the statement. If you expected it to
help in the Rossi case, sure, it's not useful. But this was not NASA
intentions. In the other case, where they are promoting LENR, this is
tremendously helpful / useful. Therefore, I think, Gibbs headline is
misleading and
S.A.,
thanks for the vid! I have taken the liberty of creating a little
collage where I try to compare pictures of the different 1 MW units
which I have found (one version from mid september, one from the
beginning of october, then the 1MW plant from the end of october as well
as the newest
The National Instruments press release (although interesting) is quite
old (from November 14th). Here is the original:
http://digital.ni.com/worldwide/bwcontent.nsf/websearch/2c6b449a3f0f8f3a862579480060a07f
Wolf
At 12:19 PM 1/18/2012, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2012-01-18 21:12, Alan J
I don't like Krivits behavior, still: Why don't they just throw him out
/ cancel his membership / whatsoever? Shouldn't be too difficult, or?
Also, if information should be kept confidential, then why post it on
any kind of semi-public forum?
Wolf
It wouldn't be the first time that Krivit
Jed,
I agree with you that it all depends on how fast the LENR community gets
the truth out. Therefore, as much as I would prefer your scenario over
Eds, getting the truth out is exactly the problem IMHO: The media will
brainwash people and the big energy lobby will brainwash the
Just some speculation from my side, but I think that the reactor has
been moved at least once. In the following video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t19C-7WJPTMfeature=related
taken from the october 28th, the camera man starts at the back of the
BBB and then moves along the left side of the
I did some further analysis of the picture and I am now pretty sure that
the Ecat has either NOT been moved or it has been put back to exactly
the same position. I have reuploaded the picture in the following link:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/696/ecatcollage.png/
The important stuff is
I think, this is the first time for me that Rossi was caught in a direct lie...
Or is it just me, remembering Rossi saying that the container had been shipped?
Of course this also sheds some light on all the insider sources ;) Or Rossi is
lieing again...
Wolf
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von
I searched a little bit online. I can find some websites claiming that
the Ecat was delivered to the customer. However I am not capable of
finding a statement from Rossi where he says that the plant had been
delivered to the customer. Just that the customer is happy and so on...
Wolf
I
AG,
Can you give us a link where he said that? I can't find any except for
some websites (not directly related to Rossi) which say so.
Wolf
EL,
Rossi has stated the plant was shipped and installed in the customers
US location and that he attended to do the install.
AG
On 19/01/2012
(hiring) in the US?
Best wishes,
Luke Mortensen
AG
On 19/01/2012 10:38 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
AG,
Can you give us a link where he said that? I can't find any except for
some websites (not directly related to Rossi) which say so.
Wolf
I think, this is actually one of the better explanations pro Rossi so
far that I have heard of... Then the question remains where he did build
the other 1MW cats..? In the US directly? And the more general question
to me is, why he has a place in Italy at all if he is seemingly doing
most the
Frank,
Thanks for the info! Just for verification: When did you write Rossi the
Mail and when was has this same interpretation been posted here on
vortex? There was a user which thought of the same interpretation...
Wolf
I emailed Andrea Rossi this morning about this issue and recieved the
.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de
mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Frank,
Thanks for the info! Just for verification: When did you write
Rossi the Mail and when was has this same interpretation been
posted here on vortex? There was a user which
Some of us tried to find where he said that the thing was shipped. The
only thing that we found was his answer on the question Is it gone?
-- Yes. The question leaves a little room for interpretation in my
opinion, but really - it's only very little room...
Wolf
On 12-01-19 10:11 AM, Jed
Mary,
NI is not publishing _such_ a press release on any NI customer (again:
Remember the mentioning of CERN / LHC in the same section as Leonardo
Corporation). We had this topic here before.
Wolf
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Jed,
Great statement! And (just to point this one out again): The cherry on
the pie in the press release is the mentioning of CERN / LHC in the
sentence prior to the one about Leonardo Corporation / Rossi.
Wolf
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com mailto:cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
As
Jed,
you have to admit that it just must be difficult for some people to
believe in Rossi because of the way he behaves (and therefore also
separating the behavior from his claimed inventions as this requires
some abstract and very rational thinking, no harm intended). The fact
that you have
Shaun,
Bryce may be well respected but he is doing a very poor job regarding
his research on the technology (and LENR in general).
Regarding his calculation: This is also no prove of Rossi conducting a
scam but just leaves the possibility that there could still be something
else going on.
And
:) There are
still perfectly valid interpretations for both sides of the coin.
Wolf
On 21/01/2012 11:01 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Shaun,
Bryce may be well respected but he is doing a very poor job regarding
his research on the technology (and LENR in general).
Regarding his calculation: This is also
Shaun,
I don't know if you know the following thread but this topic has been
analyzed before:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg52981.html
Further, Rossi answered to a question regarding the thermocouple placement:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg52669.html
Shaun,
I didn't say anything about believing or not Rossi. I was more kind of
questioning if this topic has to be discussed once more.
Wolf
On 22/01/2012 10:15 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Shaun,
I don't know if you know the following thread but this topic has been
analyzed before:
http
This is were you clearly crossed the line. Get some air and do something
else besides insulting people and repeating yourself!
Wolf
You are not very bright are you Jed.
*From:* Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
*To:*
]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on
Rossi blog
+1
On 01/22/2012 07:45 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
This is were you clearly crossed the line. Get some air and do
something else besides insulting people and repeating yourself!
Wolf
You are not very bright are you Jed
Yup. The way they argue I think Shaun Taylor and Eff Wivakeef are
actually the same persons... I think I might also start creating a kill
list like Jed although perhaps there is a time when one of both might
actually have something worthwhile to contribute to a discussion
(although this seems
Hi Mark,
there have been two different news lately:
The first one being that Ampenergo seemingly has gone inactive
(although I don't know what this exactly means, if this is even the
company which is related to Leonardo, how this would affect Rossi, etc.):
http://ecatnews.com/?p=1897
Second:
being the first to market it
commercially. Rossi is his own worse enemy.It may be as Jed said that
he could be doing this deliberately to keep people off his back and to
keep competitors from homing in.
On 24/01/12 12:18, Vorl Bek wrote:
Wolf Fischer wrote:
there have been two different news
Jones,
I also agree. However one question: Why does DGTs reactor provide an
inferior ratio? As far as I remember, DGT claims a COP larger than 20
for a single reactor, whereas Rossi speaks of 6.
Wolf
Thank you, Robert. This is essentially what I have been saying for
many weeks: Rossi has
On the LENR Facebook page, someone wrote that it perhaps is not a
bad thing but more of a joke:
http://www.facebook.com/EnergyCatalyzer
Giuliano
Bettini @Patrick.
It's not properly a "bad news". In Italian it's something like a
joke IMO
Jones,
if they don't know Rossis catalyst - why do they allow independent
parties to test the reactor? They seem to be pretty sure about what they
are doing.
Perhaps they are just trying to optimize the reaction?
Wolf
This thread on isotopic enrichment of nickel, from a couple of weeks
Hi Vortex,
as it seems, Ian Bryce got hold of the possiblities of the Internet and
tries to spread his word... He makes appearances in some of the
Ecat-News-Site's comment sections as well as, e.g., on the Defkalion forum.
To be honest - i am a little bit surprised by the effort that he puts
I don't understand the comment about the amount of Hydrogen being
consumend by a 5KW unit... Does Defkalion really not know how much
Hydrogen it consumes if running at full power for 6 month?
About the temperature: I think this is quite interesting as Rossi
somewhen stated that his reaction
Thank you for the clarification!
Wolf
I believe the hydrogen loss they are referring to is centered about hydrogen
containment, not hydrogen consumption.
As for Rossi's 60°C reaction point, that was the temperature of his surrounding
water during the EK testing. At around 60°C water temp,
It seems to me as Dick Smith doesn't want to understand what Defkalion
offers:
http://ecatnews.com/?p=2068
Where do they talk of a minimum COP of 3? They just say, that 3 will
definitely be met and even surpassed... This is totally in line with the
proclaimed COP of 20 and above as Defkalion
Hm if NI was working under an NDA they would use another choice of words
to deny a relationship with Rossi, I think, wouldn't they? Betts words
are pretty clear (if it is correct what Krivit states on NET) and do not
seem to leave much room for interpretation... Further as they explicitly
Some weeks ago, Rossi said that NI, he and the customer were working
together on the 1MW plant. And now the customer wants something
different? Why change a running system (if it ever was running)? And why
is it important to the customer, which company supplies the controlling
mechanism for a
, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de
mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Some weeks ago, Rossi said that NI, he and the customer were
working together on the 1MW plant. And now the customer wants
something different? Why change a running system (if it ever
I wonder where the test protocols are... It's by now nearly 16:00 in
Athens, so when do the tests start? The protocols should be published
before the tests begin AFAIK.
The way i see it (thanks to Jed) the first paper about Ni-H goes back
to 1979, and the first Focardi paper about Ni-H was
.
also maybe the testers don't wan't to be identified before the test
succeed to avoid looking ridiculous...
cold fusion is really frightening for corp and officials...
I feel like a kid waiting for santa klaus in front of the chimney.
2012/2/24 Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de mailto:wolffisc
As long as there is not at least a press release from Siemens about
this, i wouldn't consider this being more than some very early
discussions about a potential future working relation.
Wolf
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=1278sid=5d586d1c2c35f0d82953353c6d922a99
Understandable on one side, however what did they expect with those
actions which they took?...
Wolf
This again looks like the exact same container at the exact same spot as
from last october. Shouldn't this one have been shipped by now?
Wolf
Along with his Behemoth:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=257289961053144set=a.257289254386548.58520.255415831240557type=3permPage=1
Sorry, my bad.
They're from february... nothing new here.
2012/7/17 Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de
This again looks like the exact same container at the exact same
spot as from last october. Shouldn't this one have been shipped by
now?
Wolf
It seems to be that none of the speakers is from a company with
reputation... Not a good sign in my opinion.
Wolf
Hello group,
This is via E-CW (as most of the text below).
In a different thread here on Vortex-L I hinted that a conference
which might involve Rossi and his products would be
Did they say anything new? The audio quality is pretty bad, so I didn't
understand everything:
They are
a) Talking to several countries (79 if I remember correctly)
b) Trying to build production lines (which might take several years? I
thought they were already building one...)
c) Are they
Did anybody read the 100+ mails between Roger Green, the Australian
E-Cat licencee and Robert K. on shutdownrossi.com?
http://shutdownrossi.com/?page_id=759
Just some more hints as to how the scam might work...
Wolf
So, he's a NATO Colonel, a Professor, an engineer the secret customer (used
Roger Green will be one of the presenters at the Ecat gathering /
conference in September in Zurich, so there seems to / must? be some
stronger connection between Rossi and him...
http://www.borderlands.de/Links/Kongress080912M-e.pdf
Wolf
Wasn’t impressed with the shutdownrossi.com site...
Still - didn't SGS have to test this prototype in some way to find out
if it runs within their safety parameters? How did they run these tests?
Wolf
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote . . . or translated, I
guess, the small print:
This
Out of curiosity: Has there ever been a scam in which a safety
certificate from a big and independent organization has been granted?
Wolf
At 02:58 PM 9/13/2012, Craig Haynie wrote:
Can someone confirm the power output? The certificate says:
Power In: 200 kw (max) Power Out: 1MW
Water flow
Thanks for this answer! Very informative!
On a side note: The shutdownrossi.com site has been deleted. I of course
don't know why, perhaps it has been hacked... ;)
Wolf
Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Out of curiosity: Has there ever been a scam
70 matches
Mail list logo
