You (and people like you) really dont get it. This mailing list is about
people discussing topics of different kinds, among them, e.g., LENR as
well as Rossi. As long as there is doubt (on either side of the coin,
i.e., either pro or contra) there have to be discussions, i.e., people
allow other people to think and interpret the things they see and tell
the rest how they see it and what they make of it. This is already the
point, where you are being lost, as your behavior clearly shows! I could
also translate this to such a simple concepts as "freedom of speech" and
"live and let live" that you don't seem to get. The way that you try to
push your opinions (because it is nothing more than that despite your
saying otherwise) down our throats is just disgusting. I (and I think,
although I myself am pretty new to this group, can speak for the rest
here) have absolutely nothing against people who think otherwise on any
topic, on the contrary! It is especially this process of at first
disagreeing on a topic, then each person making their point with
_constructive arguments_, then again letting the other person react to
your arguments and so on, which creates a productive and constructive
environment for new thoughts and theories that could actually be able to
explain everything that is going on (because rarely a topic is just
black and white!). In contrast to that, you stop at your very first
thought (no matter if it is positive or negative, I am adressing both
kind of people), you just leave absolutely no room for any kind of
interpretation / doubt / whatsoever. And therefore its just not science.
Its just some stupid blather which doesn't do anyone any good (except
probably your self-inflated egoes). So just get off here, we really
really really (have I said "really"?) have read what your thoughts are,
more often than we actually care. And, believe it or not: We took
notice! And, again, believe it or not: Most of the people already took
notice a long time before you arrived here.
Wolf
Oh I am sorry.
I forgot that Rossi is such an honest man that he would of course have
put the temperature probe inside the "pressure cooker"
Duh!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Andre Blum <andre_vor...@blums.nl>
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, 22 January 2012 11:48 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on
Rossi blog
+1
On 01/22/2012 07:45 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
This is were you clearly crossed the line. Get some air and do
something else besides insulting people and repeating yourself!
Wolf
You are not very bright are you Jed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
<mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>
*To:* John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:09 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked
on Rossi blog
John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
<mailto:john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
If the water was at 5 to 10 bars, it could easily be heated to
150 - 180 C. in the preheating process. At that point, being
wrapped up in that massive insulation blanket, it would stay
over 100 C for hours.
There was a TC in the reactor. It measured over 100 deg C, but not
150 to 180 deg C.
Also, in that scenario, the surface temperature of the reactor would
be very hot when the internal temperature reached 180 deg C,then it
would gradually cool down. That is not in evidence. The surface
temperature was measured several times. It did not vary much.
- Jed
