Gesendet: 22:01 Dienstag, 11.September 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a
conspiracy
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:
This is a completely different institute, and one probaly has to know the
intricacies of the Max-Planck organization
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes you did say. You said that hot fusion researchers are trying to
'suppress' it and indeed hot fusion research is operating with extremely
big money.
As noted that was Abd, not me. However, it is true that the plasma fusion
scientists played a
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes you did say. You said that hot fusion researchers are trying to
'suppress' it and indeed hot fusion research is operating with extremely
big money.
...
I suppose
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 16:12 Dienstag, 11.September 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a
conspiracy
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes you did say
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:
not over here (Germany). As far as i know, the MPP, which is the
biggest May-Planck-Institute, tried to replicate F/P and failed. so the
issue was settled.
I do not know about this test, but it would be ridiculous to reject cold
fusion based
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 20:23 Dienstag, 11.September 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion has been suppressed -- no evidence for a
conspiracy
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:
not over here
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:
This is a completely different institute, and one probaly has to know the
intricacies of the Max-Planck organization.
The same or different, you would think that the Director's opinions might
have weight when it comes to accepting or rejecting
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Besides that your idea about the funding cuts is silly conspiracy theory
and if you are throwing such lazy arguments, it will not help the field.
It irks me when people write this! Why does this nonsense about a
conspiracy so often come up? Who
Unfortunately, Jed, the accusers of conspiracy theorizing may have a
legal leg to stand on given this plain language instruction to the jurors
in California civil cases regarding
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, Jed, the accusers of conspiracy theorizing may have a
legal leg to stand on given this plain language instruction to the
jurors in California civil cases regarding
I wrote:
Miles was a Fellow of the Institute at China Lake. A Fellow means
someone who can study any subject he wants, like a tenured professor.
Speaking of tenured professors, see:
Jed sez:
...
I think that I know why Jouni Valkonen accused me of being a conspiracy
theorist. He did that to make me look silly or gullible. People often accuse
me of being a conspiracy theorist because in the minds of most people, a
conspiracy theorist is a paranoid person who wears a
Jed, many people and thousands of scientist have looked the data and they are
concluded that scientific data is nowhere near sufficient. It is in best case
speculative, suggestive and inconclusive.
There is no 'big money suppression'. That kind of idea is silly and
non-informative and it is an
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, many people and thousands of scientist have looked the data and they
are concluded that scientific data is nowhere near sufficient.
Thousands of scientists download papers from my website every week. I hear
from them often. Not one of them has
On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no 'big money suppression'.
Did I say anything about big money?
Yes you did say. You said that hot fusion researchers are trying to 'suppress'
it and indeed hot
There is no 'big money suppression'.
Did I say anything about big money?
Yes you did say.
Actually perhaps it was Abd who said: »But the physics community, dependent
upon large subsidies for hot fusion research, did not operate, here, by the
normal standards of science. They, instead,
16 matches
Mail list logo
