On Jan 22, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
I highly doubt that anyone can come close to predicting what will
happen from here... Clean, cheap
energy will touch EVERY ASPECT OF LIVING, COMMERCE and INTERACTION
BETWEEN COUNTRIES. The
complexity of those interactions makes it difficult
In reply to Robin's email of Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:40:04 -0800
Hi Robin,
Regarding the interest of examiner Snow. [snip] ...or perhaps he's just
curious? (like us) ;) [/snip]
I hope this means some consideration is being given to the circumstances
under which the Mill's patent was
http://wattsupwiththat.com, a widely-read website, has a
non-sneering article about the Rossi claims.
Did you go to his site? Even more curious. Bizarre is more like it.
Look under 'litigation' - the plaintiff is a name known to many of us, but
the nature of the lawsuit is not clear.
From: Mark Iverson [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 8:50 PM
To:
On 01/23/2011 01:12 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
This whole issue /[of steam quality measurements]/ may be of academic
interest only...
Only if another demonstration is done with no input (closed loop).
Otherwise it's still extremely interesting because, if this measurement
was botched as
I think there will be even more data posted Monday
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/01/report-ufficiale-esperimento-della.html
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
We can thus see from this table that if 1 percent by volume of the steam is
entrained water micro-droplets, easily not seen in tubing or exhaust ports,
that only 5.6 percent of the heat of vaporization is required to produce
that mixture.
I do
I think that Cold Fusion technology will totally change the world.
I think that NOTHING will be considered impossible again.
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, January 23, 2011 1:16:22 AM
Subject: [Vo]: The tides have
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:34 AM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think that NOTHING will be considered impossible again.
I have always believed anything was possible given adequate time and
funding. CF reduces the funding cost.
T
This is helpful! Although I hope they do post more data. You can see these
are old professors since they post screen images of the computer data
instead of the output from the instruments converted directly into a graph.
This report says the probe used with the RH meter is an HP474AC. See:
Notice that Levi was careful to mount the machine and control box so that
you can see underneath it:
Prudentially I have lifted the control box in search for any other
eventually hidden cable and found none.
He has a sufficiently suspicious mind. That's good.
- Jed
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Did you go to his site? Even more curious. Bizarre is more like it.
Look under ‘litigation’ – the plaintiff is a name known to many of us, but
the nature of the lawsuit is not clear.
I am a bit puzzled by this statement:
During the test the main resistor, used to ignite the reaction, two
failed to defective welding. Even That condition in the reactor
started operation successfully using the other resistors But The
duration of the experiment in full power ( ≈ 40 min) Was to
Does anyone have Dr. Levi's CV? You can't just google his name.
Well, you can; but, there's many of him. :)
T
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
It would seem to me that there might be an upper limit in the mass of a
halo nucleus.
Could be, but why? Is that because no one has looked for it, or not? There
is too little data on this subject to be sure.
As we have discussed here before,
Aha. Shades of the Rusi affair ...
The 'fix' is still on. How long before NET picks up on this?
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Jones Beene wrote:
Look under 'litigation' - the plaintiff is a name known to many of us, but
the nature of the lawsuit is not clear.
it's here in Italian
http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?upn=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.itTabControl1=TabCV
http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?upn=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.itTabControl1=TabCV
Peter
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Does
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
it's here in Italian
http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?upn=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.itTabControl1=TabCV
Many thanks, Peter. You are a gentleman and a scholar!
Dr. Levi certainly looks qualified to participate
Thanks for the compliment - I am an expert websearcher,
see Informavore's Sunday No 439 at my blog Ego Out
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com, I have won more
contests- e.g. who wants to be a millionaire with time
control (you get points not money) Always happy and ready
to help, if you have such
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:59 AM, peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
http://wattsupwiththat.com, a widely-read website, has a
non-sneering article about the Rossi claims.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/22/cold-fusion-going-commercial/#more-32272
This article has a photo from an angle which
From Rossi's website comments, we now know the volume of the reactor... 1
liter.
Much smaller than Jed's earlier estimate.
Andrea Rossi
January 23rd, 2011 at 10:49 AM
Dear Mr Giorgio Roncolato:
The volume of the reactor is 1 liter.
If you read carefully the report you find all yuo are
In the discussion her:
http://pesn.com/2011/01/21/9501749_Fighting_the_Infection_of_Cynical_Skepticism_with_Cold_Fusion/
Someone named Guest insists that it is possible to boil 8.8 kg of water in
30 min with 700 W input. He give a set of reasons similar to the ones cited
here by Horace Heffner;
Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
From Rossi's website comments, we now know the volume of the reactor... 1
liter.
Much smaller than Jed's earlier estimate.
Well, I was assuming it was a hollow dummy device. Evidently the walls are
thick and there is actual equipment in there, not
Below is a follow up posting at the web site. As far as I can tell, this
would apply to Heffner's calculation as well. Assuming the frying pan makes
1% wet steam, it should have taken about 4 minutes for all of the water to
leave the pan, by his calculation.
I do not think my frying pan is
Thank you, Jed.
That was a worthwhile experiment.
And his wife said Jed can't cook.
T
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:29:03 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
...but you are not actually producing wet steam. You are producing dry steam
that then condenses to some extent upon contact with the cool air. Real wet
steam might be produced in a situation where the flow of steam
From Mark Iverson:
Good or bad, the genie is out of the bottle and there's
no way anyone can stuff it back in... I sincerely hope,
pray, that the human species has matured enough to accept
the responsibility that comes with this kind of discovery.
I agree, Mark.
Sunday Sermon
Potential
Personally, I hope that 2012 will usher in a new sun. Not a supernova
of Betelgeuse; but, a slow, cold fusion which will render the
petrodollar obsolete. May the end of the Mayan calender on the winter
solstice be the day that megawatt H-Ni steam engine goes online.
T
Terry sez:
Personally, I hope that 2012 will usher in a new sun. Not a supernova
of Betelgeuse; but, a slow, cold fusion which will render the
petrodollar obsolete. May the end of the Mayan calender on the winter
solstice be the day that megawatt H-Ni steam engine goes online.
In which
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Levi%20and%20Bianchini%20Reports.pdf
I hope for the better.
Harry
From: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, January 23, 2011 10:34:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: The tides have changed... The genie is out of the bottle.
I think that Cold Fusion technology will totally change the world.
I think
The unfamiliar should be feared at least a little bit.
Harry
From: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 9:58:49 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Fusing Fear and Science - Lets Stick to Nickel and Hydrogen
My hope is that lots of people will stand up and say
Thanks all. Easy when getting it explained. Net linear momentum is the same
so this means impulse have to be the same too.
Actually I was thinking about gas molecules in a container. If heating would
increase weight. The ball example shows it can't increase pressure on the
bottom.
David
David
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If it's pure steam (no entrained air) at 100 C, then the RH must be
100%, a priori, since the vapor pressure of water at 100 C is 1
atmosphere.
I think it is mixed with air, otherwise the water pump would have to work
harder
and harder as a vacuum is
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
...but you are not actually producing wet steam. You are producing dry
steam
that then condenses to some extent upon contact with the cool air.
Also with the sides of the pot. I figured that out after I wrote it. With
the flow calorimetry
I think it does entrain
On 01/23/2011 09:49 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If it's pure steam (no entrained air) at 100 C, then the RH must be
100%, a priori, since the vapor pressure of water at 100 C is 1
atmosphere.
I think it is mixed with air, otherwise the water pump would
The truck would be lighter while it crosses the bridge if the chickens could
jump so high that they remain in the air until the truck is over the bridge.
Assuming the chickens have super thighs and aren't boxed in. ;-)
Harry
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:36 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
On 24-1-2011 4:04, Harry Veeder wrote:
The truck would be lighter while it crosses the bridge if the chickens
could jump so high that they remain in the air until the truck is over
the bridge. Assuming the chickens have super thighs and aren't boxed
in. ;-)
Harry
This was actually tested by
preliminary radiation and heat findings on two recent tests Dec 16 and
Jan 14 on the same HNi fusion Rossi reactor by U. Bologna scientists,
D Bianchini, G Levi: Rich Murray 2011.01.23
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/01/report-ufficiale-esperimento-della.html
[ Rich Murray: minor typos and
From: Man on Bridges manonbrid...@aim.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, January 23, 2011 10:12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Force from bouncing ball higher than resting ball?
On 24-1-2011 4:04, Harry Veeder wrote:
The truck would be lighter while it crosses the bridge if the
- Original Message
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, January 23, 2011 9:58:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:HP474AC probe measures Relative Humidity, not steam quality
On 01/23/2011 09:49 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence
On 01/23/2011 10:04 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The truck would be lighter while it crosses the bridge if the chickens
could jump so high that they remain in the air until the truck is over
the bridge. Assuming the chickens have super thighs and aren't boxed
in. ;-)
But then the chickens have
On 01/23/2011 10:32 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
No, I don't think so. The stuff pumped out of the supply tank, and into
the reactor, is 100% water; air comes into the supply tank at the top
and displaces the water in the tank as it's pumped out.
Well you
44 matches
Mail list logo
