Thanks for this answer! Very informative!
On a side note: The shutdownrossi.com site has been deleted. I of course
don't know why, perhaps it has been hacked... ;)
Wolf
Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Out of curiosity: Has there ever been a scam in
Daniel asks:
Anyway, why is big science bad?
Had the hundreds of billions of dollars spend on hot fusion and massive
particle colliders been put into material science, nanotech, graphene,
alternative fuels, etc., we would probably be much closer to sustainable
clean energy by now. Putting
Why not wishing the money coming from somewhere else where the spent money
is hundred times bigger for the same amount time, like, saying, from
defense?
2012/9/14 MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Daniel asks:
“Anyway, why is big science bad?”
** **
Had the hundreds of
I think QuantumRabbit is a major researcher into changing carbon into iron.
Ron Kita
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:38 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
What would happen if you took a bundle of moderate length carbon nanotubes
that are suspected of being capable of superconducting and
S.R. Hadden: First rule in government spending: why build one when you
can have two at twice the price?
Hi Vortex,
Some updates on Papp development.. Which most of you know is a noble gas
that is charged (by RF/spark) and drives a piston with an unexplained (?)
force. Harvesting the force and residual energy to produce overunity power
remains to be seen.
Have I been asleep? I did a search on my archive here, but couldn't find
any mention of Bianchini's test, performed in July.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105322688/Penon4-1
In it, he describes a 6 hour test of the hot cat, which delivered
between 378 - 758 kwh of energy from 8.3 kwh of input
Indeed, I was misreading it. the 378 - 758 kwh of energy is energy
density. That's per kilogram of fuel.
However, it appears that the total energy used was 8.3 kwh and the
output was between 2.4 kw and 3.66 kw for the 6.5 hour period, which
would mean that the output energy was between 15.55 kwh
Interesting article:
http://www.vice.com/read/whoa-dude-are-we-inside-a-computer-right-now-329-v19n9
excerpt:
The other interesting thing is that the natural world behaves exactly
the same way as the environment of Grand Theft Auto IV. In the game,
you can explore Liberty City seamlessly in
Here is my official well-learned opinion about the means or mode of
Technology that we (modern-day mankind) are using to interpret or decipher the
world around us, and especially when it comes to pictures or images so-called
videos It's really only insufficient, inadequate, confusing,
Mr. Basgall has responded to the questions below with the
followinghttp://lenr-coldfusion.com/2012/09/12/universal-lenr-reactor-fuel-preparation/#comment-74
:
RobL: I dont’ know for sure that the gold or the triangle shaped wire would
make any difference at all in the LENR reactions.
After
Thanks Brad,
A deluxe popper, indeed ! Even if the open-source part is in doubt, the need
for a miracle is not.
It will be interesting to see the energy balance, in the end. I hope that
Russ will strive to provide that, even if a rough estimate. Otherwise this
device may linger in the collective
Cold fusion: smoke and mirrors, or raising a head of steam?
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion
I've only skimmed it.
(lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat -- and the
defkalion hyperion -- Hi, google!)
At 10:26 AM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion
I've only skimmed it.
Lots of Krivit
ps : Steven Vincent Johnson already had it up. but it wasn't (still
isn't) showing on the web archive.
so why isn't the experiment and quantum mechanics just another part of
simulation?
harry
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting article:
http://www.vice.com/read/whoa-dude-are-we-inside-a-computer-right-now-329-v19n9
excerpt:
The other
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
so why isn't the experiment and quantum mechanics just another part of
simulation?
Too much positive feedback.
T
At 10:33 AM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion
I've only skimmed it.
I put a summary up on the wiki. I doubt that it will survive editing.
At 11:22 AM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion
I put a summary up on the wiki. I doubt that it will survive editing.
Deleted already.
Good read Terry,
IMO, these are exactly the kind of observations a contemporary more
technically acceptable religion will incorporate into the core of it's
philosophy. Strange as this might sound, a lot of these observations
appear to be compatible with Buddhist and Zen related philosophies -
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I put a summary up on the wiki. I doubt that it will survive editing.
Deleted already.
Like I sez, you got no business in Wikipedia. I mean, what? -- are you *
asking* to be collapsed and arbitrated?
Just out of curiosity, how long did it take them to
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I put a summary up on the wiki. I doubt that it will survive editing.
Deleted already.
Just out of curiosity, how long did it take them to delete this? They stay
on their
From Lorenheyer:
...
Then, and only then, will THEY *know,*
(w/o question) once and for all, that our God is all truly powerfull and all
knowing, and/or has no equal. THEIR so-called religion, prophets, and/or god
will then be All Ah or All Uh, Up In The
It is all about the way it is written, a patent examination based on LENR
application alone might or might have been rejected, but by including it in
a list alongside more mainstream applications, and concentrating on
material processing side they have found a way to get it through without as
much
At 12:31 PM 9/14/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Like I sez, you got no business in Wikipedia. I mean, what? -- are
you asking to be collapsed and arbitrated?
Just out of curiosity, how long did it take them to delete this?
They stay on their toes!
I warned them in Talk that there was a wired
From James:
Just out of curiosity, how long did it take them to delete this? They stay
on their toes!
2 minutes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Energy_Catalyzeroldid=512455124
Wow! That's just amazing! What dedication!
CSICOP should take notes.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
I will ask David French what he thinks about this patent.
- Jed
At 12:47 PM 9/14/2012, James Bowery wrote:
2 minutes:
I've got to learn to scroll before I post.
btw The Lede currently ends with an extended quoted from Ugo Bardi (From
March)
Professor Ugo Bardi of the University of Florence, noting contradictory
claims made by Rossi regarding the emission or
I do hope someone like the esteemed Mr. Lomax is documenting this Wiki
editing behavior. I think a book discussing the pros cons of the
Wikipedia philosophy would make for a fascinating educational
analysis.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I warned them in Talk that there was a wired article : 17:52
Edited the lede : 18:18
Deleted : 18:20
2 minutes!!!
That's hysterical.
I suppose Wikipedia has some kind of alert system to tell people a document
has been changed, so it is
At 12:26 PM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Cold fusion: smoke and mirrors, or raising a head of steam?
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion
With friends like this, who needs enemies?
The article does, at least, pay some attention to developments, but:
1. NiH
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/**archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusionhttp://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion
With friends like this, who needs enemies?
. . . 1. NiH reactions are not scientifically established. The article
does
At 04:48 PM 9/13/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher mailto:a...@well.coma...@well.com wrote:
Thanks to AK for the correct link (which I'd already fixed on the
wiki -- though even my comments in talk have been collapsed -- and
I'm being threatened with arbitration.)
'Dat's how it
At 04:18 PM 9/14/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Well, very funny, Jed. However,
Mr. Fletcher is essentially clueless as to what would be acceptable as a
source for Wikipedia. I looked about and didn't see where he was
threatened with arbitration, which is weird. The last thing
that the cabal
At 10:53 AM 9/13/2012, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
See http://QuantumHeat.org for updates on the Celani cold fusion
replication kit project Nicolas is spearheading.
One of the reasons that this whole affair has dragged out so long is
that both sides are crazy.
The physics community is crazy
At 03:33 PM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I remember now why I gave up in December last year. But I thought it
was my turn to put in a shift or two at the coalface (or whatever).
I'm now getting my feet wet in Cold Fusion ... let's see how quick
THEY are. (Some of the players are the
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Problem is, the massive amounts of energy haven't been confirmed, if by
massive we mean commercial level, which is the implication.
I do not see that implication. To me, massive amounts of energy refers to
energy normalized to the mass of
At 08:09 PM 9/14/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Problem is, the massive amounts of energy haven't been confirmed,
if by massive we mean commercial level, which is the implication.
I do not see that implication. To me,
Just propose the admin a bet :
If you are so sure that LENR is false, bet your administrative Tenure on
tha fact that LENR is false... If it became true, you are fired.
In exchange I remove my edit.
If I'm proved wrong, with I'm fired
or if you can safely fear that LENR is true, just accept the
*We don't know whether NiH results are actually LENR, because we don't know
what the ash is and therefore we don't know what the reaction is.*
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax and Jed Rothwell be advised that Defkalion has provided
us with a comprehensive list of ash products that resulted from the long
term
39 matches
Mail list logo
