It is good to see that the ban is being enforced.
I guess it is obvious that someone who has an irresistible impulse
to reply to a topic in vortex with a political rant, could just
change the To: field to vortexb. The topic, converted to a
political rant, would continue in vortexb with a life of
On 21/05/2016 11:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Once again people have claimed you can release 1 MW with no ill
effects in a small facility, without industrial scale ventilation.
People should apply some common sense metrics!
Rossi says the facility is 6,500 sq. feet. Conventional heating calls
On 17/03/2017 2:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
. . .
I see no reason why this will not happen sooner or later. Machines are
far from being able to do this now, because they have brains roughly
the size of a bird's brain. Birds do not understand human language.
. . .
So I believed until quite
A decade ago I would clean the microwave by putting a bowl in the microwave
with water and dishliquid and nuke the crap out of it, it wouldn't boil but
then I'd throw a teaspoon in it and it would explode with hot bubbles and
froth, the microwave was cleaned with superheated water and steam, but
All this talk of pinning is just fine, but all of this is nicely predicted
by the basic laws of electrical induction and the zero resistivity offered
by a superconductor, you would expect repulsion or attraction to occur.
Now if this were done in a Vacuum then there would be zero air friction
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:First video from the October 28th, 1 MW E-Cat test event
Obviously told to point the camera down most of the time
Hard to fudge the input figures when the ecat is powered by a gen set - I
like that
and very easy to work out the
the building there would
still be questions. Its a no win situation but I think the most practical and
easiest to monitor solution is the gen set supplying all the power for a stand
alone test.
John
- Original Message -
From: Larry Ectsnte
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday
- Original Message -
From: John Harris
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi 1MW : Why is the energy hidden behind pressboard?
Jed Wrote
Also, square reactors are a really, really bad idea.
Safety and the Rossi reactor
Have only
- Original Message -
From: John Harris johnharri...@dodo.com.au
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY
- Original Message -
From: Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de
In natural science and technology lies
- Original Message -
From: John Harris johnharri...@dodo.com.au
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY
- Original Message - - Original Message - From: Peter
Heckert
peter.heck...@arcor.de
Ha, how ironic, stay hosted can't keep his site up!
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.comwrote:
He's hosted here: http://stayhosted.com/, I expect they suspend if the
site exceeds it's traffic volume.
I've had my company site disappear from a hosting service
that has the same index of refraction as skin/flesh.
It is possible that without a large change in the index of refraction skin
and flesh more transmissive than we expect.
Photos of a bat or a human arm being see-through like an x-ray were
included, but this was quite very old.
John
On Sun, Mar 7
What am I missing here?
I have not kept up with Vort all that well lately but this message must be
missing a lot of context!
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:15 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
The Alien Scientist and I have been spoofed. I made a few more phone
calls to get to the bottom of this
The entire population of the human race can be traced a single individual
who lived – not 3-4 billion years ago, when homo sapiens split from homo
erectus, but instead only ~70,000 years ago.
A hermaphrodite?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Ok, I read the wired article only, are they claiming that the photon can be
copied without collapsing the wave function yet produce non-entangled
copies?
Probably not, but if so then that could be used to cheat and actually read
the copies without collapsing the wave function.
That is of course
I came across some info that said there is no way to fix it and that there
is so much oil it will go on to the point of extreme disaster and beyond.
And that only a nuke which might make it dramatically worse has any chance
of fixing it.
So I had a thought, what if you turned the ocean water into
You can kill a randomly selected sample first to get the average
calcium-bone figures.
However this is not the only claim of biological transmutation...
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:52 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:36:58 -0700:
Hi,
Ok, I'm missing something here, how does having robotic factories give
people jobs?
Oh wait, I know http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFR07vsnWjA
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* fznidar...@aol.com
attention the apparent fact that a prominent critic
of R. Mills CQM theory, John Connett (aka Nora Baron – from the old Yahoo
Hydrino group) has recently apologized to Randy for criticizing certain
mathematical aspects of his CQM theory. I haven't found the direct source
but an indirect source
Our ancestors left us printing presses and vaccinations for free. Those
alone are worth more than all the money in the world. If you have writing,
good health and enough food, you can rebuild a ruined industrial
civilization in a decade, as the people in Japan did after WWII. *
Of course I
I tend to agree with Robin.
There is no reason that those without jobs could not be employed as not
everything can be exported.
Now there are many ways that extra employment could be found, one of them
would be a significant pickup in aerospace.
Since mysteriously no one wants to revisit the
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:26:47 -0400, you wrote:
I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if
they start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller
should stop turning.
Maybe I am missing something.
- Jed
---
Notice from the pitch of the propeller and its
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:01:42 +0100, you wrote:
This must be a scam. As Jed said, at the point where the craft is going
downwind at the speed of the wind, the relative wind across the propeller
would be zero so it could not accelerate from this point on. If it did, the
force from the prop would
from the wheels to
the prop.
Right, John?
---
I think so since, even if the prop was coupled to an underwater screw,
the coeffiction of friction between the water and the screw would be
so much weaker than that between a wheel and the ground that it would
be hard to keep the prop from turning
=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVwmtwZLG88feature=related
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:23 AM, John Fields
jfie...@austininstruments.comwrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:12:27 -0400, you wrote:
Sailboats vary enormously in terms of their favored point of sailing.
I would guess that most
Isn't this a bit backwards?
Shouldn't we be skeptical of the person often talking in all caps, making up
new words and claiming government connections?
Maybe Jack's stuff is a distorted view of the work I'm doing, or maybe it's
bunk I am not in the right mood to check, but Jack, have you shared
You are assuming that the labs would openly receive and report, in fact they
do claim to have given it to testing labs and they got positive results but
didn't want to be named.
That makes sense, since a lab would be rubbished for reporting such.
And what president would collapse the oil
300 percent is a ratio on input to output, not a quantity.
The quantity might be small and it suggests it is (the video)
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:19 AM, peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
You are assuming that the labs would openly receive and report,
in fact they do claim to have given it
Odd, gmail spam filter is normally very good.
Maybe you have marked some as spam once?
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Good grief! The messages I was sending to Vortex were coming back and being
vectored into the Gmail spam folder! Hoist by my own
Wow, just checked and found a swag of recent vort emails in there, none from
you though. odd.
maybe if everyone who uses gmail marks vort false positives as not spam
gmail will get the message.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:17 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Odd, gmail spam filter
Hey, I ticked 'not spam' on all of the one previously, and now I just
checked and none show in the spam filter.
So Jed, did you take this step?
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
some of jack's messages get dumped. big
Frank, I don't think that is quite right...
Larry Springs made a book I've got lyring around here and he makes a very
strong case for the width being half the wavelength (when collapsed).
But I think he claims the length is twice as long as you do, so twice as
long but half as wide might give
http://www.larryspring.com/
http://www.larryspring.com/Ah, here his site is, it seems there is quite a
bit more than just his info on the photon.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:55 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Frank, I don't think that is quite right...
Larry Springs made a book I've
but I really think that you
should at least consider if his views on the photon make sense with your
model somehow.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:59 AM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.larryspring.com/
http://www.larryspring.com/Ah, here his site is, it seems there is quite
a bit
The problem is that they say 300% but they don't say 300% of what?
300% of a few milliwatts? 1 watt? 10 watts? 100 watts?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Some of the people in this latest video have appeared in earlier Steorn
videos.
Harry
-
Is it just me or is science getting pretty absurd.
Photons having a temperature!?!?
Can the temperature of a photon be measured?
If the sun was cold but emitted the same amount of light, would it heat us
less?
If this is so, then could you use light as a heat sink?
Can you get 2 light sources
ignored and ridiculed.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:30 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to John Berry's message of Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:25:35 +1300:
Hi,
[snip]
Is it just me or is science getting pretty absurd.
I agree.
Photons having a temperature!?!?
Really low temperature ones
There are a number of claims of dropped rotating objects falling differently
than non-rotating.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is beginning to sound like that great Heretic Eric Laithwaite.
Appropriately, here is his Christmas Lecture:
. if you want to get
one.you can check it out .
I shall take this opportunity to wish you a Blessed Christmas and a healthy
and happy New Year.
Regards,
John Berry
Please ignore this crap.
No idea how this is being done but spammers are using my address book and
email and name to spam people.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:31 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
Just a couple of days ago we bought an Apple MacBook Pro MC024LL/Afrom !
this website
, 2011 at 11:27 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Please ignore this crap.
No idea how this is being done but spammers are using my address book and
email and name to spam people.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:31 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
Just a couple of days ago we
It Should be the same surely.
No doubt about that, now is it? That is a different question.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:39 PM, David Jonsson davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Imagine a ball lying on a plane. The wheight is the mass times the
gravitational acceleration.
Imagine a
Of course, in practice the results can sometimes indicate that momentum
isn't conserved.
This example is in principle not dissimilar to some inertial propulsion
concepts and there is evidence that some may work.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
On
Interesting post on 22passi.blogspot.com
From
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/11/ni-come-national-instrument.html?commentPage=2
andrew ha detto...
Hi everybody, this is the first time I'm actually leaving a comment on this
blog but I've been following the intricate debate for a long time
I had a thought last night for the first time that light can have a few
more properties that we (or I) usually consider.
Of course the most obvious aspect is frequency and then if it is coherent,
how it is polarized and if the wave state has collapse or not.
The next aspect I am aware of but
One other thought is that for a given electric charge to move in a way that
creates a photon it must move it's inertial mass around.
The issue is that the inertial mass of an electron and a proton is highly
different.
This begs the question of if it takes the same energy or not to release the
Hi everyone!
Last November, Sven Kullander promised a detailed isotopic analysis of the
ash from Rossi's E-Cat by Christmas. (http://ecatnews.com/?p=1416)
It's now well past Christmas, and I haven't seen any signs of this report.
Does anyone know what happened to it?
John
Rossi's facility?
What does that suggest about his story that the secret customer took delivery
of it?
John
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Interesting new video from ecat.com
I wonder if Rossi would allow someone to come in and see/photograph the state
of his warehouse today? That might clear up a lot of confusion.
John
And yet, you insist that he COULDN'T have confused and outwitted the people
attending his demonstrations?
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Interesting new video from
Is for all we know the new standard for judging evidence?
From: Energy Liberator energylibera...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Interesting new video from ecat.com
For all we know NI have a
Jed Rothwell said:
It is also because he thrives on controversy. He loves confusing and
outwitting people,
Jed Rothwell also said:
He never fools me. He does not seem to be trying to fool me.
How fortunate that you appear to be the only person who isn't being bamboozled
by Rossi.
I haven't seen or heard of any reports by credible witnesses to either of
these. Are they buried somewhere in the LENR library?
In the case of Ampenergo, at least, I'm not overly impressed with a company
that consists of nothing but a one-page, content-free web site and an rental
office that
Maybe they just got tired of the hundreds, if not thousands of annoying emails
and phone calls from Rossi's fans, demanding a detailed accounting of just how
great Rossi's invention really is?
It isn't at all unusual for a company to release a statement on an issue that
is generating more than
. Is that not correct?
John
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi often says things he does not mean
John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com wrote:
I haven't seen or heard
...
... I'm sending them to
vortex-l@eskimo.com. Is that not correct?
Hi John,
The same thing is happening to me, as with Jed. When I hit the reply
button, to reply to one of your vortex-l posts, I don't get the
vortex-l address. I get your personal email address. There must be a
setting
For what it's worth, here are the relevant links I have on Rossi's claims of
having been working with the University of Bologna...
January 21, 2011, Rossi says, We made an important test with the University of
Bologna, with whom we are going to make a 1 year research program also.
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:34:07, thorium breeder said:
Can rossi achieve do it yourself isotopic separation?
That ties in to the missing detailed isotopic analysis that Sven Kullander
promised before Christmas.
I've been trying to find prices for specific Nickel isotopes, and no one seems
to be
, including Krivit's water boiler. You need to go high
pressures and high steam velocities in order to produce stable wet steam. So
please, at least you should get the basic physics right.
—Jouni
On Jan 21, 2012 1:25 PM, Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/01/2012 9:28 PM, John
If you trust Rossi, then you might as well accept the numbers presented by the
unknown consultant of the secret company.
If you don't trust Rossi, then there is absolutely nothing from the October
28th test to indicate that the MegaWatt E-Cat even got slightly warm (AFAIK),
with or without the
. If there is any chance that the process can be adapted
for something other than Nickel, then it would have, um, explosive consequences
should it fall into unfriendly hands.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January
Have any of these people reported any signs of the E-Cat actually working
during the October 28th test? Or did they simply accept the write-up produced
by Rossi and the unknown consultant for the secret company.
I find it interesting that with all the intense interest in this story, it
Just because GM is selling a real electric car doesn't mean that Tilley was
legitimate. (http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/)
Just because there are real companies selling real solar power systems doesn't
mean that Greg Watson (apparently AKA Aussie Guy E-Cat) and his Sun Cube was
legit.
convince the nay-sayers.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I`ll just leave this here
Just Levi and the AP reporter, which were the only ones that were present
!
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I`ll just leave this here
In the specific case of Rossi, he wants to exclude nickel below 62, but purity
is not a necessity, but an optimazation. So, if he
Thanks for reposting that information.
So, if the fuel or ash from an E-Cat contained excess 64-Ni, that would be
compelling evidence that he really does have a new and revolutionary means of
enriching Nickel isotopes, since it seems unlikely that he would have the
resources to spike his
Do either of these methods of transmutation work with the various isotopes of
Nickel?
Are either of them able to produce the kilogram quantities, for pennies a gram,
that Rossi would require?
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
The trouble is, if only 64Ni is converted into Copper (and/or Iron?), and the
ash is 30% Copper, then wouldn't there have to be 30% 64Ni in the fuel?
Otherwise, where is the Copper coming from?
And if Rossi can convert less than 1% 64Ni into at least 30%, and 64Ni is going
for $30,000/g, I
on the order of $1 (since he said a refueling will cost about $10,
and the cost of enriching the fuel adds about 10% to the cost).
Reducing the cost of a gram of 64Ni from $30,000 to $0.04 is quite an
achievement!
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John
.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment
Why to 0.04$? To 100$ would be a great thing too.
Do you know of any way to enrich Nickel, or any other metal, for a few pennies
per gram? Either there is some known way to do this, or Rossi has made a major
breakthrough (with really, really dangerous WMD overtones), or Rossi is lying.
I have yet to hear of any enrichment method that is
, can they?
To end up with an ash containing 30% Copper in its natural isotope ratio (as
has been reported), you must start out with the companion Nickel isotopes
greatly enriched from their natural isotope ratios.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John
, January 21, 2012 2:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment
From: John Milstone
* I have yet to hear of any enrichment method that is within several
orders of magnitude of what Rossi *must* have, if he's really selling 100g
of fuel for $10.
Then why even attempt to believe it?
Yes
Ew! We are all being PUNished.
Anyone who understands these references needs to see the Mystery Science
Theater 3000 movie, which poked fun at This Island Earth.
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21,
.
John
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment
John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, you're saying that Jed Rothwell is wrong
Rossi got just short of a year's worth of borrowed credibility from his lies
about involvement with the University of Bologna. I documented at least three
times (the earliest was last January) when Rossi claimed he was *currently*
working with the U of B. I've read numerous statements by
The most reasonable answer to why he signed the contract was to gain borrow the
credibility of the University. Note that is was commonly reported that at
least some of his tests were conducted *at* the U of B, which as far as I know
is false. Note that Rossi waited until after the big finale
That might have some value if Lewan mentioned it *before* this issue blew up in
Rossi's face.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment
Shaun Taylor
Do you have any evidence that Rossi said it had not been delivered to the
secret customer from *before* this issue blew up?
The only actual statement about the location of the BBB that I know of is from
October 30, when Rossi answered both of these questions 1. Is the 1MW
container gone? 2.
Very interesting!
It's obvious that the water being released at the end of the video is at a
*MUCH* higher pressure than the water/steam coming out of the rubber hose. I
guess that means that there are two separate containers of water. According to
Mats Lewan, that high-pressure stream
.
But Rossi admitted recently that he's working on the old box to make it ready
for the secret customer, who you claim has a different, previously unknown box.
Sure! That makes perfect sense.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l
on a second box (lie, unless he's building the second box at a
different location).
From: John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old
was gone, and that he had a new box he was constructing.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage.
That's his sandbox! While
the secret customer hauled off an
untested BBB, or the October 28th test was nothing more than a publicity stunt
by Rossi.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo
Yes, I remember reading Horace Hefner's analysis.
As I recall, he (as well as some others) have repeatedly questioned the very
stability you mention. It seems unlikely that the core can know how much
energy to produce to keep the device exactly at the right temperature to just
barely keep the
OK. Have a nice day.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage.
Rossi installed the other box at the customer's site, he
Perhaps. I don't see what this theory offers that makes it more likely than
Rossi is a con man.
Since you mention his TE... In the Army report, it says that Rossi returned to
Italy to continue working on it. What that report doesn't say is that Rossi
had every intention of returning to the
If Rossi's relationship with Sterling D. Allan didn't make this point, I don't
know what could!
For what it's worth, here's a link to an article by Allan, touting the
wonderful Tilley perpetual motion electric car!
http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/tilley_article.pdf
at the University of Bologna,
I guess it's just a reasonable to assume that he lied about conducting TE tests
at the University of New Hampshire!
From: Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 12:40 PM
Subject
I'll take one of each, please!
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Paradox
what about fame and sex.
Wow! What blind faith.
It really doesn't occur to you that the reason for all the fraud by Rossi (and
pals) is because he don't have anything real.
I'll make a counter prediction: Rossi will *NEVER* allow a truly independent
test of his gadget by a reputable organization. He will *NEVER* be
At the risk of confusing the issue, is it possible that Rossi is trying to
*reduce* the apparent temperature of the system?
After seeing the video of the September test, and reading Eff Wiavkeef's
comments here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg61747.html
it seems obvious
and it became so
abusive that the forum was closed. They are a cancer and a barrier to progress
because of their own egos.
These people include Mary Yugo, Axil Axil, John Milstone, Eff Wivakeef and
others. You know who you are. If you will not stop this childish nonsense, I
ask you to shut up and go
of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog
John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com wrote:
It would also explain the long, forceful jet of water/steam coming out of the
E-Cat then the high-pressure side was opened at the end of the video. Rossi
would have to hide the fact that the system
.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog
It was above 100 deg C but that does not prove the heat came from
and secret tests mean nothing.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog
John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Jan 22, 2012 5:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog
John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com wrote:
If the water was at 5 to 10 bars
to me.
The fact that an ferrite toroid would not work at high frequencies requires
it to be rather large to ensure that it is magnetized differently on the 2
sides.
Thanks for reading.
John Berry
Allegations of a surge in extreme weather events has been quashed by a
surprising source - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/29/ipcc_srex_thermageddon/
___
John Steck
BUSINESS
The spirit of Greg lives on...
-john
18 ~ MAGNETIC MOTOR-GENERATORS --
This eNotice highlights *Permanent Magnet Motors*. Specifically motors
intended to be prime movers and /powered ONLY by permanent magnets/. Here
are some interesting
1 - 100 of 1582 matches
Mail list logo
