I doubt the NRC aauthority extends to LENR yet.
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneKevin O'Malley
kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi knows that in order to get his reactors to be approved in the USA, he
needs to show zero nuclear effects. He KNOWS it is nucular, but to the
Jones
I think Celani had a coincidence counter setup to look for e-p annihaltion.
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneKevin O'Malley
kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi knows that in order to get his reactors to be approved in the USA, he
needs to show zero nuclear effects. He
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
By the time he sells ten thousand units, the NRC gets wise and has no
capability to reign him in.
What would stop them? Even if he sold 10 million units, the government can
start regulating them anytime it wants. The government did not begin
Robin
It may be possible to measure differential voltages vs time at different places
on the SC, if it is not instantaneous. I would expect to see no differential
voltages.
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphonemix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to frobertcook's message of
I think putative DDL state hydrogen (Df/H) and probably hydrinos would be
more stable that you give them credit. At our environmental temperatures,
the average kinetic energy is 1.5 kT which is about .04 eV at room
temperature. Hydrinos would probably need 50eV in an inelastic collision
to
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:16 AM, frobertcook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I doubt the NRC aauthority extends to LENR yet.
It extends to anything producing ionizing radiation.
Terry
It is my understanding that NRC authority only applies to radioactive materials
made in fission reactors using fissile materials. Thus, for example,
accelerator activated materials are not controled by NRC.
However the Energy Reorganization Act which created the NRC spells out the
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hydrinos would probably need 50eV in an inelastic collision to re-inflate,
and Df/H would need something like 500keV.
Yes, this occurred to me, too. It will no doubt depend upon the population
of hydrinos and how far
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to Bob Higgins's message:
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must
GIVE UP energy to enter the DDL state.
RvS: Actually this may not be so far from the truth. Consider a situation
where lots of
The following message did not appear, presumably because it contained a table,
which has been dropped.
From: Axil Axil
* Rossi saw 512KeV gamma from positrons in his early reactors.
No, he didn’t. Rossi says over and over that there is no gamma radiation. He
says Focardi’s
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Ø Rossi saw 512KeV gamma from positrons in his early reactors.
No, he didn’t. Rossi says over and over that there is no gamma radiation.
He says Focardi’s theory had predicted gamma, but none was ever observed.
On the other hand, Celani said he did
Why would Rossi enclose his reactor in LEAD if no gamma's were ever seen?
Is it in his interest to mislead the world in believing that no gammas were
seen, I think it would be. It would keep the NRC out of his business. Is
Rossi totally honest in everything he says, I think he is not. Are you
question is the dose...
Rossi mostly said that ther was no dangerous radiation, not much above
baclground.
a peak, eg at 511kev is not necessarily a danger yet can be detected.
from ed Storms books and papers it is clear there are x-rays, but not much
and there is a cutoff energy...
section 4.6
The point about gamma radiation is a theoretical one. In order to claim
that a polariton condensate can fractionalize gamma frequencies, there must
be gamma radiation produces by LENR in some circumstances at the least.
Jones primary position states that LENR does not produce gamma radiation
In reply to frobertcook's message of Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:32:26 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Bob
In semi conductors electrons r enter and seem to change the energy states of
all the electrons in the semi conductor over a considerable distance
associated with QM system of the SC. TMK it's instantaneous.
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:12:23 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
You seem to favoring the terminology of IRH over DDL and that is fine
with me, however, DDL invokes Dirac, which is wise - and also it is not
necessarily limited to two dimensions as is IRH which means the reaction
From: Axil Axil
Jones primary position states that LENR does not produce gamma radiation
because LENR is not a nuclear process. Therefore, gamma level radiation cannot
be produced in any conceivable event. This is the same position that Mills
takes.
Axil - this is incorrect, except
Rossi knows that in order to get his reactors to be approved in the USA, he
needs to show zero nuclear effects. He KNOWS it is nucular, but to the
authorities he will be saying showing NO nucular effects. none. By the
time he sells ten thousand units, the NRC gets wise and has no capability
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I have previously suggested that a dense cluster might also absorb the
energy in
the form of kinetic energy distributed among thousands of densely clustered
atoms.
I see that Robin and Jones were talking about hydrino reinflation
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would Rossi enclose his reactor in LEAD if no gamma's were ever seen?
In Rossi's own 2010 patent, he states that the lead (and boron) shield is
there to protect from harmful radiation: In particular, the inventive
I wrote:
In Rossi's own 2010 patent, he states that the lead (and boron) shield is
there to protect from harmful radiation: In particular, the inventive
apparatus is coated by boron layers and lead plates both for restraining
noxious radiations and transforming them into energy, without
Jones,
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must
GIVE UP energy to enter the DDL state. What you propose is that the H/D
atoms could absorb the gamma emission from the transmutation and
fractionate the photons to DDL energy chunks. For this to occur, the
coupled
From: Bob Higgins
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must GIVE
UP energy to enter the DDL state.
That would be true under Mills theory, but one big objection to Mills concept
is that if it were true - as a logical matter, there would be nothing
*Dear Jones,*
*I have been trying to move you to the “Superabsorption” concept for the
last year or two. I am pleased that you are getting nearer to appreciate
Superabsorption of gamma radiation.*
*Superabsorption is the reciprocal concept to Superradiance. *
*You were kind enough to clue
The reason why a quantum dot idea won't work is the fact that electrons
conform to the Pauli exclusion principle.
The quantum dot can be thought of as a single atom with thousands of
ascending electron orbital energy levels. As these levels absorb gamma
radiation, it get increasingly harder for
Axil,
Of all the wild possibilities that we consider on vortex – most of which are
eventually rejected as impossible, gamma fractionalization still appears to me
to be the least likely major holdover theory (from the cold fusion era) to be a
physical reality in the NiH era. This is despite
Rossi saw 512KeV gamma from positrons in his early reactors. He put this
fact into his 2010 patent in reference to nickel to copper transmutation.
On January the 14th 2011, Rossi and Focardi gave the first public
demonstration of the low temperature E-Cat to a personally invited group. A
short
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:42:39 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Jones,
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must
GIVE UP energy to enter the DDL state. What you propose is that the H/D
atoms could absorb the gamma emission from the transmutation
28 matches
Mail list logo
