Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Designer
Bert Doorn wrote: I sense an utterly erroneous presumpton that the designer knows best what suits people they have never met. Bert - Isn't that what all good 'designers' do? The 'consumers' then decide if they like the design and whether they want it or not. There is little point in anyone

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Vincent Hasselgård
About 4-5 months ago they built a new national library here in Norway, the architects worked alot with making the place accesible for users with different disabilites. Essentially they did everything wrong. The biggest mistake was of course not to talk with anyone blind or in a wheelchair. There

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Designer
Vincent Hasselgård wrote: When it comes to font-sizes I'd really like to blame the browsers. I don't think it's up to us to provide tools for enlarging or shrinking fonts, just like it's not up to newspapers to provide a spyglass with every paper. Both Windows and MacOS are shipped with

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Designer wrote: Maybe 'provider' is a better term than designer. Or Georg's term : 'Web carpenter' is more to the point here. Depends on what you put into that term... :-) A good carpenter should know how to do his/her job in order to make a building functional for inhabitants and visitors,

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Felix Miata
Designer wrote Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:06:36 +: Bert Doorn wrote Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:22:22 +0800: I sense an utterly erroneous presumpton that the designer knows best what suits people they have never met. Bert - Isn't that what all good 'designers' do? The 'consumers' then decide if

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Hassan Schroeder
Bert Doorn wrote: To use similarly strong wording, I sense an utterly erroneous presumpton that the designer knows best what suits people they have never met. A Designer gets paid to understand their audience. The vast majority of users, even those working in high-tech firms here in Silicon

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Felix Miata
Hassan Schroeder wrote Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:21:36 -0800: The vast majority of users, even those working in high-tech firms here in Silicon Valley, *never* change *any* settings -- of the OS or any applications -- from the supplied defaults. Where is the data that backs up this assertion? Why

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Hassan Schroeder
Felix Miata wrote: The vast majority of users, even those working in high-tech firms here in Silicon Valley, *never* change *any* settings -- of the OS or any applications -- from the supplied defaults. Where is the data that backs up this assertion? That assertion is based on my experience

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Bert Doorn
Hassan Schroeder wrote: Felix Miata wrote: The vast majority of users, even those working in high-tech firms here in Silicon Valley, *never* change *any* settings -- of the OS or any applications -- from the supplied defaults. Where is the data that backs up this assertion? That

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/18/06, Vincent Hasselgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My argument: Newspapers comes out with fixed font-size, but people who's got low vision may very easily use a spyglass to read easier. People in need of a spyglass gets themselves one. The same thing applies to web and computers, it's

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Christian Montoya wrote: How many websites do we come across with some Java or server-side option to increase text size? It's almost as common as the XHTML and CSS validator links. Is it really useful? No, not really... Completely agree. how about if these sites had a link to a page that

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Felix Miata
Patrick H. Lauke wrote Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:00:21 +: But is it our job as web *content* developers to teach our users how to use their browsers? The onus is on the browser developers to make their tools more intuitive and user friendly, and to expose that functionality to users in a much

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Designer
Christian Montoya wrote: [snip] How many websites do we come across with some Java or server-side option to increase text size? It's almost as common as the XHTML and CSS validator links. Is it really useful? No, not really... how about if these sites had a link to a page that explained how

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Felix Miata wrote: Nobody seems to want to take the first step on this. I doubt M$ will, so it's probably up to open source contributors to make the first move, but from what incentive? If you know any you can convince, here are two places to start:

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-18 Thread David Hucklesby
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:21:36 -0800, Hassan Schroeder wrote: To ignore the fact that the most common browser has crap defaults and minimal resizing capability is to abdicate your responsibilities as a Designer. Hassan, With all due respect, I find that IE's default settings are just fine for

RE: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread kvnmcwebn
i might leave this site the way it is but on my next site i will try and implement a font size adjuster. lisa, If you provide the user with a Javascript pop-up window that they right-click to display a pretty flash-based font-increasing app, the user could increase the font as much as they

RE: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Patrick Lauke
kvnmcwebn lisa, If you provide the user with a Javascript pop-up window that they right-click to display a pretty flash-based font-increasing app, the user could increase the font as much as they like. It's known as the 'Clydesdale Hack'. can you give me an example of the

RE: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread kvnmcwebn
Lisa forgot to put the sarcasm tags around her content. She wasn't being serious there... ...lisa please stop horsing around... i guess i will have to research the issue more... try and find the balance.. -best kvn ** The discussion list

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Felix Miata
kvnmcwebn wrote: i guess i will have to research the issue more... try and find the balance.. When your page respects the user's decision what size fonts are most appropriate for him, your page needs no resizer, because the user won't need to again resize just for having visited your page.

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Hassan Schroeder
Felix Miata wrote: When your page respects the user's decision what size fonts are most appropriate for him, your page needs no resizer, because the user won't need to again resize just for having visited your page. He's presumably already done that in his browser. ..which is the utterly

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Felix Miata
Hassan Schroeder wrote Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:36:35 -0800: Felix Miata wrote: When your page respects the user's decision what size fonts are most appropriate for him, your page needs no resizer, because the user won't need to again resize just for having visited your page. He's presumably

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Bert Doorn
Hassan Schroeder wrote: Felix Miata wrote: When your page respects the user's decision what size fonts are most appropriate for him, your page needs no resizer, because the user won't need to again resize just for having visited your page. He's presumably already done that in his browser.

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Hassan Schroeder wrote: Felix Miata wrote: When your page respects the user's decision what size fonts are most appropriate for him, your page needs no resizer, because the user won't need to again resize just for having visited your page. He's presumably already done that in his browser.

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Mark Harris
Hassan Schroeder wrote: Felix Miata wrote: When your page respects the user's decision what size fonts are most appropriate for him, your page needs no resizer, because the user won't need to again resize just for having visited your page. He's presumably already done that in his browser.

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Mark Harris wrote: Then you should try educating them, rather than 'managing' them So then educated users set their preferred font size, and then (apart from a few sites that do the right thing and don't go below 100%) the rest of the web appears even smaller (or in any case differently

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Felix Miata
Patrick H. Lauke wrote Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:26:54 +: Mark Harris wrote Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:39:00 +1300: Then you should try educating them, rather than 'managing' them So then educated users set their preferred font size, and then (apart from a few sites that do the right thing and

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-17 Thread Mark Harris
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Mark Harris wrote: Then you should try educating them, rather than 'managing' them So then educated users set their preferred font size, and then (apart from a few sites that do the right thing and don't go below 100%) the rest of the web appears even smaller (or in

RE: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-16 Thread Herrod, Lisa
Yes but Patrick, If you provide the user with a Javascript pop-up window that they right-click to display a pretty flash-based font-increasing app, the user could increase the font as much as they like. It's known as the 'Clydesdale Hack'. L -Original Message- From: Patrick H.

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-16 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Herrod, Lisa wrote: Yes but Patrick, If you provide the user with a Javascript pop-up window that they right-click to display a pretty flash-based font-increasing app, the user could increase the font as much as they like. It's known as the 'Clydesdale Hack'. But only if the button for

Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-16 Thread Mark Harris
Herrod, Lisa wrote: Yes but Patrick, If you provide the user with a Javascript pop-up window that they right-click to display a pretty flash-based font-increasing app, the user could increase the font as much as they like. It's known as the 'Clydesdale Hack'. L song id=yankee-doodle Oh,

RE: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes

2006-02-16 Thread Herrod, Lisa
I've always wanted my own theme song. I believe I have finally arrived. -Original Message- From: Mark Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 12:27 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] site check: FONT sizes Herrod, Lisa wrote: Yes