Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that there
is not enough room for the form labels on my end, so several of them wrap.
Would you be able to post a link to the form in question?
Thanks
***
List
site check please www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group,
check our new site for problems please? :)
www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
: [WSG] Site check please
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group,
check our new site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:53:13 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check
our new
site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that
there is not enough room for the form
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:53:13 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check
our new
site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that
there is not enough room for the form
Taco Fleur wrote:
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group,
check our new site for problems please? :)
www.clickfind.com.au
It is a little difficult to read. The fonts scale well. The overall look
is nice. But color on color is sometimes a difficult trick
Thanks.
It is a little difficult to read.
Can you elaborate on the above?
The fonts scale well. The overall look is nice. But color on color is
sometimes a difficult trick to pull off.
Hozriontal overlap when fonts are scaled on this page:
http://testing.clickfind.com.au:777/browse.cfm
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:31:30 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that there
is not enough room for the form labels on my end, so several of them wrap.
Would you be able to post a link to the form in question?
The link is the one you gave. I
http://www.phillipwrayracing.com
XHTML error - img tag has been opened but not closed add alt
attributes to those images.
Other than that nice!
Thanks,
Al
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Jermayn Parker wrote:
just wondering if people can have a quick look at the following website
for any major errors, suggestions etc
http://www.phillipwrayracing.com
It is a little slow to load. I regret that font-scaling drops the floats
and/or breaks the layout.
Best,
~dL
--
Hi Jermayn, I notice the left and right columns white background
colors (or image) are overlapping the 'g-background.jpg'.
You either need to may transparent color for left/right column or if
background images are used, use nee to make them narrower or maybe
add z-index properties.
Hi folks,
just wondering if people can have a quick look at the following website
for any major errors, suggestions etc
The one thing that has given me major trouble is aligning the columns
the same over browsers (I am sure I have a few gray hairs from that), so
unless its horriable wrong, I am
,
Kepler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Hi Felix thanks for the effort.
A solution to the problem would
Taco Fleur wrote:
http://web-strategists.com:888
Could do with suitable 'min-width' and 'max-width'.
Not well prepared for regular 'minimum font size', or even for 'font
resizing' in IE/win.
Also, I get the off-screen text for the click here to start selling
in at the left side on really
http://web-strategists.com:888
You've got a transparent background-color set somewhere as all of the
white space on the sides of the content and under the footer is
currently browser default (mine is set to pink so I can see sites that
aren't defining background-colors!). This prob isn't much
http://web-strategists.com:888
Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png
transparency for the floating logo.
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp
-best
kvn
***
List
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
http://web-strategists.com:888
Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png
transparency for the floating logo.
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp
-best
kvn
For some reason my other emails ended up in someone else's thread, even
though I created a new message from scratch.
Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?
http://web-strategists.com:888
Thanks in advance...
Taco Fleur
www.pacificfox.com.au website design
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco,
Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:
The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand with it. The content instead eventually hides as it passes
. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco,
Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:
The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand
[I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.]
On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur apparently typed:
Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?
http://web-strategists.com:888
I like it a lot above the yellow, but I don't like 3.5 word line lengths at
all. An unset background
font. You can't win in every situation ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco,
Everything looks
No, its perfectly fine, its exactly what I was asking for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 3:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco
Anyone interested in a site check, please visit
http://web-strategists.com:888/ http://web-strategists.com:888/
(Sellmystuff)
Thanks in advance.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Anyone interested in a site check, please visit
http://web-strategists.com:888/ (Sellmystuff)
Thanks in advance.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Hi,
Could you please have a look at http://digitaluwphotography.com/ and
let me know what you think?
I also have a problem with the top div#access links that I don't know
why just don't work (skip and site info).
TIA,
Elle
http://designbyelle.com.au/
I am still in learning-process but in my opinion your site is excellent!
Just test your site for example at ' http://www.sidar.org '. This
validator found some problems.
What I miss is a 'skip to main content' and accesskeys.
With ff the text from the main-content overlapps the footer by using
Good afternoon,
I'm currently in the process of designing a site that resides in a dev
environment: http://dev5.headclerk.net/
It's CSS-driven and XHTML compliant. I make every effort to ensure that
I use valid, well-formed semantically correct markup, but often I'm too
close to the project to
Mario,
Some of your CSS does not validate.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2warning=2uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdev5.headclerk.net%2F
My only major issue with the design is the Upcoming Training
background. There is not enough contrast between the type and the
background for
did you test it in firefox yet?
In ff your footer seems to break way out of the wrapper.
-best
kvnmcwebn
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
sorry please disregard that last observation i made about your footer
breaking. i had another style sheet loaded into the page by accident
looks good
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Thank you Justin! I've begun the process of fixing those errors.
Respectfully,
Mario
Mario,
Some of your CSS does not validate.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2warning=2uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdev5.headclerk.net%2F
My only major issue with the design is the Upcoming
Hello All,
I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site
(http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/). Nearly complete and
just requires copywriting completion.
Specifically the following are of interest:
Rendering on mac in Safari and IE,
Usability,
Mistakes I may
With larger text sizes, your sidebar headings become white on white.
I'd suggest vertically expanding that background image, or setting a
similar background color along with the image. That and a few things
like empty paragraph elements and stray /div on some of the pages.
Last (and probably
Last (and probably least), a future-proofing warning: If you ever
decide to serve that site as xhtml instead of text/html, it'll break
because of the content of your style elements.
Nevermind, it might not. I've become so paranoid that I tend to
enclose any non-xml/html in cdata's because I
Kenny Graham (thoughtfully) wrote:
With larger text sizes, your sidebar headings become white on white.
I'd suggest vertically expanding that background image, or setting a
similar background color along with the image. That and a few things
like empty paragraph elements and stray /div on
Jay Gilmore wrote:
I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site
(http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/). Nearly complete and
just requires copywriting completion.
All opinions are welcome. If there are mistakes out of ignorance please
point me to a
On 12/22/05, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site
(http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/).
On this page: http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/renovations/
the last photo is overlapped by the
Guys and Gals,
I have just switched my site to a fluid layout vs. the old 750 pixels
wide approach. I have also changed all my font sizes to em's to adjust
as needed.
Can people in mac and linux take a glance to make sure all is well for me?
Thanks,
Joe Taylor
http://sitesbyjoe.com
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Guys and Gals,
I have just switched my site to a fluid layout vs. the old 750 pixels
wide approach. I have also changed all my font sizes to em's to adjust
as needed.
Can people in mac and linux take a glance to make sure all is well for
me?
Thanks,
Joe
On 12/12/05, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe, The site looks ok but I have a few of comments:
Why are you using a transitional doctype? What elements or deprecated
attributes are you using that require this?
Why are you using pnbsp/p for spacing? ...
Why are you using spans to
The poor practices mostly come from this code being slowly updated since
version 1, (which was really bad), hopefully in time all the no-no's
will be removed.
I appreciate the time you spent looking in there and noticing that
stuff, I forgot all about those stupid span tags all over the
pretty cool jay,
what about the top links bottom border disapearing on the hover though?
-kvnmcwebn
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
kvnmcwebn wrote:
pretty cool jay,
what about the top links bottom border disapearing on the hover though?
-kvnmcwebn
kvnmcwebn,
Are you talking about my site: http://www.smashingred.com or Joe's
site: http://www.sitesbyjoe.com ?
All the best,
Jay
Jay Gilmore
Developer/Consultant
kvnmcwebn,Are you talking about my site: http://www.smashingred.com or Joe's
site: http://www.sitesbyjoe.com
?
sorryimeant joe not jay,
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
Hi All
I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is
still
rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design.
You know how things are when you look at it for too long...
http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
very
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
Hi All
I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is
still
rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design.
You know how things are when you look at it for too long...
http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
p.s.
Hi All
I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is still
rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design.
You know how things are when you look at it for too long...
http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
I was trying to keep it liquid
: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:59 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] site check please
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
I really like the look of that one - but...
- Scrolling left isn't easy, so maybe try this adjustment:
body { padding-left: 95px
Re: http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
I think a nice Georgia font would go down well
with that template.
Edward Clarke
ECommerce and Software Consultant
TN38 Consulting
http://blog.tn38.net
Creative Media Centre
17-19 Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
Hi All
I've been working on a re-design of my web site and I know the code is still
rough. However, I think I could use some outside eyeballs on the design.
You know how things are when you look at it for too long...
http://www.tdrake.net/joan/index-liquid.html
Hi all,
I have a WAI-AAA icon at the bottom of the pages and I'd like to know if I
can leave it there or if I have a few more things to work on
:-)
I'm using label with all my input elements, but the one for the search
form at the top at the page. Does using the title attribute make it
accessible
I'm using label with all my input elements, but the one for the search
form at the top at the page. Does using the title attribute make it
accessible enough or do I must use label?
Label is in Priority 2, title is enough for Priority 1.
BTW placing a label there and hiding it via CSS does the job
I'm using FF 1.0.1 on Fedora 3 and the links are working for me. Which version/platform FF are you using?
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 07:39 -0700, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Hi all,
I have a WAI-AAA icon at the bottom of the pages and I'd like to know if I
can leave it there or if I have a few more
Jan Brasna wrote:
Label is in Priority 2, title is enough for Priority 1.
BTW placing a label there and hiding it via CSS does the job too...
Duh! LOL
Thanks,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
**
The discussion list for
diona kidd wrote:
I'm using FF 1.0.1 on Fedora 3 and the links are working for me. Which
version/platform FF are you using?
I'm using v. 0.8 and 1.0.2 on WinXP
When you say working, do you mean you can click on them and jump to the
anchors or that you can tab through all the links in the main
Hi Thierry,
I think your page has issued with Safari (Jaguar), it shuts down the browser
after 2 or 3 second of loading. I tested 4 times, same result.
tee
Jan Brasna wrote:
Label is in Priority 2, title is enough for Priority 1.
BTW placing a label there and hiding it via CSS does the
tee wrote:
Hi Thierry,
I think your page has issued with Safari (Jaguar), it shuts down the
browser after 2 or 3 second of loading. I tested 4 times, same result.
Hi Tee,
I was going to reply off-list, but on the other hand I'd like to see someone
else using Jaguar to check the page.
Just to
BTW, what OS is Jaguar? (you can answer this off-list)
Mac OS X 10.2
I've checked with Safari v. 1.2.4 in OSX v.10.3.7 and it is working fine...
1.2.4 on 10.3.8 also fine
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:19 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:29:27 -0400, Hope Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
So, I'd be very interested hear your comments.
http
Thanks Thierry for your detailed reply! I've implemented all your
suggestions except the IE5/mac dropdowns -- I haven't had time to look at
the suggested link yet, but I will.
Regards,
Hope
On 28/4/05 2:27 PM, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ope Stewart wrote:
comments. The design
congrats, very nice design :)
2 errors in home page
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23-championships/index.html
cheers
Daniel
http://www.gizax.it
Hope Stewart wrote:
I've been working on a huge site for over a year and it still has a long way
to go.
] On
Behalf Of Hope Stewart
Sent: Thursday, 28 April 2005 1:29 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: [WSG] site check please - Rowing History
I've been working on a huge site for over a year and it still has a long way
to go. Unfortunately, I had not heard about Web Standards until well after
starting
On 28/4/05 6:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 errors in home page
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23-
championships/index.html
Thanks for this. Just goes to show that I need to validate EACH time I make
changes!
Cheers
Hope(less)
On 28/4/05 8:46 PM, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I really don't like is that when you click a link the top
menu disappears and the only way I can get it back is to click the Back
button. (I'm using IE6)
If you click one of the links in the top green menu, it takes you to a
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:29:27 -0400, Hope Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
So, I'd be very interested hear your comments.
http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23-championships/index.html
Quick look in XP_SP2 at 1280 in Opera8.0 of the above page only:
Seems fine on this end, although I
Seems fine on this end, although I can't for the life of me figure
out what the bw image is that appears to be a grasshopper?
Haha - It's a grasshopper wearing a jail bird stripy outfit- haha..
Actually, looks like people rowing - like they're supposed to be in
motion. ( I think)
-David
On 29/4/05 1:30 PM, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems fine on this end, although I can't for the life of me figure
out what the bw image is that appears to be a grasshopper?
Haha - It's a grasshopper wearing a jail bird stripy outfit- haha..
Actually, looks like people rowing -
I've been working on a huge site for over a year and it still has a long way
to go. Unfortunately, I had not heard about Web Standards until well after
starting this site, but it's never too late!
The latest section I'm about to add to the site is totally CSS and not a
table in sight, except for
Hello all,
I would really really like your feedback on this.
I have now completed my investigations into emulating frames with overflow
etc, and have settled instead on a very neat method which uses an expression
for IE. The method is basically the one by Anne van Kesteren [1] and it's
really
If it wouldn't be too much of a problem, I'd like it if someone checked
my site.
I've made all the pages valid code (last time I checked), but I'm not
very knowledgeable about accessability issues and would like some
suggestions on that.
Thanks in advance,
Alan Trick
d'oh, normally I'm not this stupid, really :-[
here's the url: http://jellybean.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
You have some problems on PC/FF as well...
The position:relative on the footer produces the horizontal scrollbar
on my PC. Furthermore something is wrong with your style sheet... I
don't get the footer bg img and the arrows, green side bar etc.
BTW... what is this style doing?
* {
padding:0;
Hi All,
I have another request for a site check and, once again, Mac users are
especially needed.
Please see: http://www.manisheriar.com/globalrocket/indexNEW.htm
THANK YOU!
(And, yes, I realize it's a bit cheesy ... but you should have seen the
logo I was given to work with and stay as close
Hi All,
I would be grateful for any and all feedback on a redesign I've done for a
site which presents an illustrated novel. Some of it is a weeny bit hybrid,
but (a small amount of flash aside) it all validates as xhtml and
presentational matter is down to an absolute minimum. I have not done
Hello,
My only beef with this site is you seem to have *two* splash pages. One
is bad enough...
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
designer wrote:
Hi All,
I would be grateful for any and all feedback on a redesign I've done for a
site which presents an illustrated novel. Some
Bob,
Purely from the aesthetics level.
Drop the entire first page - or two - The very first one blinked on my screen for perhaps 3 seconds and was gone. The second was the spinning record. The main window - number three, is where I should land right off - no other pages between me and your main
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:31:50 +1100, Richard Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all :o)
Would appreciate any comments.
PLEASE NOTE: Mac people - sorry not there yet, so don't even bother.
I've served you up a crappy print style sheet :o(
Here she is -
Hi guys,
Could I please have a few Mac users (both IE and Safari) have a look at this
page and tell me if it's working right? My friend has looked at it on her
Mac and reported a few problems, but since her computer's been playing up
lately I want to check that there is actually a problem and not
Seona Bellamy wrote:
Any PC users who want to look and give opinions would also be appreciated.
:)
The site: http://www.onehouseproductions.com/ohp2/
You should try a better positioning-method for that curved menu.
The items leave the curved background-image and ends up all over the
place upon
I see problems in both.
In Safari 1.2.3, the navigation buttons separate (seeming to move progressively to the right), leaving funny white shapes where there should be a smooth grey curve.
In IE 5.2, the footer is in the middle of the page, overlaying One House Productions - is...
Looks good
]
Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 9:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check please (especially Mac)
Seona Bellamy wrote:
Any PC users who want to look and give opinions would also be
appreciated.
:)
The site: http
Of Marilyn
LangfeldSent: Thursday, 2 December 2004 9:08 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check please
(especially Mac)I see problems in both. In Safari
1.2.3, the navigation buttons separate (seeming to move progressively to the
right), leaving funny white shapes where
Maybe add a slight outline/glow/etc effect to the menu items as they
don't stand out too well, especially when hovering. Also find a way of
reducing image size that doesn't result in noticeable grain.
Later
Seona Bellamy wrote:
Hi guys,
Could I please have a few Mac users (both IE and Safari)
Thanks. I'll pass those suggestions on to her, since the design is hers (I'm
deliberately making this one not my problem - I have enough problems getting
this site up and running...).
Anyone have any more suggestions about what to do about the glitching
positioning in Mac browsers? I'm at a
Seona Bellamy wrote:
Hmm... Any suggestions about how I could better do it so that it
stays put? I would have thought that absolute positioning with the
coordinates given in px would have been fairly static. :( I'm not
sure what else to try.
You are relative-positioning those links inside an
Hi all :o)
Would appreciate any comments.
PLEASE NOTE: Mac people - sorry not there yet, so don't even
bother. I've served you up a crappy print style sheet :o(
Here she is -
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/withPassion/
Thanks in advance :o)
Richard
Aloha,
Cosmetically, it looks okay. There's one bug where the top navigation
element sticks out of the left side, and doesn't reach the right side
completely.
Your dropdown menus function perfectly, but it would be better to make
those liks use the pointer cursor on mouseover, as to indicate
PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] Site Check
Please
Hi all :o)
Would appreciate any comments.
PLEASE NOTE: Mac people - sorry not there yet, so don't even
bother. I've served you up a crappy print style sheet :o(
Here she is -
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/withPassion/
Thanks in advance :o
for the top nav
elements?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Richard Czeiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Site Check Please
Hi all :o)
Would appreciate any comments.
PLEASE NOTE: Mac people - sorry
Thanks Ted and John :o)
The disconnecting text is not something I can change as this design element
was specified by the client.
I've fixed the topNav -10px wierdness - only happened on the home page -
quelle bizarre! :o)
No hover effect on action items (yet)
Top Nav landing pages do not exist
For me, the top nav is not only ten px to the left, it is also ten px up.
Leaves a brown gap between your sliced images of the wedding couple.
Not sure if that is fixed in your latest changes.
Cheers
Natalie
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:25:02 +1100, Richard Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
Link?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:20:04 +1100, James Gollan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a small issue on the home page with the hover state in firefox/win.
On the link to the help page the hover state underline is pushing the
content box and footer down by 1px creates a little
Ok well compare that with this one:
Median Windows Settings
96DPI (normal fonts)
IE7.1 set to Medium
How does one get IE 7.1?
Oh DER!!! I'm using IE6.0.2900 - the one that came with WinXP Pro SP2.
It's NETSCAPE that's up to 7.1. Whoops.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP
Michael Kear wrote:
How does one get IE 7.1?
Oh DER!!! I'm using IE6.0.2900 - the one that came with WinXP Pro SP2.
It's NETSCAPE that's up to 7.1. Whoops.
Netscape's been up to 7.2 since August. 7.1 has security bugs.
--
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
Michael,
Whoops, that was a typo. I should, of course, have written 76% or
0.76em.
I read somewhere (I'm sure someone on the list will remember where)
that 76% works for all modern browsers better than 75%, because of a
rendering difference in one of the browsers.
-Hugh
5) I'd suggest
aspect of the site, as long as it's polite.CheersMike
KearAFP WebworksWindsor, NSW, Australia
- Original Message From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check please -
launched it finally!Date: 15/11/04 10:06Mich
- Original Message From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check please -
launched it finally!Date: 15/11/04 10:06Michael,Whoops, that was a typo. I should, of course,
have written "76% or0.76em&qu
Hugh Todd wrote:
Michael wrote:
I'd still welcome input from designers http://hawkradio.org.au
5) I'd suggest setting your body font size to 76% or 0.7em. It looks
just a little better at that size.
It already is .7em, which is only half default size (49% of the total
pixels per
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
