Adam Burmister (DSL AK) wrote:
Hi everybody,
Long time reader - first time poster here.
I've currently got a doozie that I've been struggling with for hours.
The final product looks simple enough, but I can't for the life of me
get it - help me WSG, you're my only hope.
is there a url where
Head on over to
http://juicystudio.com/article/ie-keyboard-navigation.php#comment10
(and #comment11) for a great IE focus bug fix that doesn't sully your
html source.
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
On 22 Aug 2005, at 12:59 PM, Andy Kirkwood|Motive wrote:
Watch out for IE keyboard navigation
Hey list,
Since ditching tables I've lost the ability of vertical alignment, so
I've been using line heights for vertical positioning.
For vertically centred, this works best in IE. By setting a line
height in px, font resizing doesnt affect this value and the text
stays perfectly aligned in
Hello all,
I often hire freelancers to do visual design and template coding work for me.
To make project communication easier I plan to draw up a document to
detail my requirements with regard to standards-compliant coding and
accessibility. It is my intention that this document would be
Thanks for the excellent link Michael - much appreciated.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Sorry gang for not unsubscribing temporarily. I hope I didn't send out a
truckload of out of office reminders.
I was at the Business Blog Summit in San Francisco. Microsoft had a large
presence; they even bought our support by handing out some absolutely fab
messenger bags. Regardless of my
David Nicol wrote:
1. Has anyone else created a document of this nature and, if so, would
they be willing to share it?
Hi,
Roger Johansson, of 456 Berea Street, put together a guide he calls
Developing With Web Standards: Recommendations and best practices
[01]. It's not as detailed as an
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
Did I mention how cool the bag was? Must like IE7...Must like IE7...
Must
like IE7 For some reason, this keeps repeating in my mind every time I
pick up the magnificently useful and hip bag.
dunt, dunt, dunt, another one bites the dust. ;^)
--
Dwain Alford
[EMAIL
Duncan Stigwood wrote:
Have I given up too quickly on 'vertical-align'? Is there something
i'm missing which is preventing it from working?
if memory serves me well, which it tricks me sometimes, i think you can
do this in your css:
{display:table-cell;vertical-align:center;}
But it doesn't work in IE . . . , naturally.
Bob
dwain alford wrote:
Duncan Stigwood wrote:
Have I given up too quickly on 'vertical-align'? Is there something
i'm missing which is preventing it from working?
if memory serves me well, which it tricks me sometimes, i think you
can do
Have I given up too quickly on 'vertical-align'? Is there something
i'm missing which is preventing it from working?
Its own specification. See the specs which display values use the
vertical-align.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
But it doesn't work in IE . . . , naturally.
http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
designer wrote:
But it doesn't work in IE . . . , naturally.
Bob
dwain alford wrote:
Duncan Stigwood wrote:
Have I given up too quickly on 'vertical-align'? Is there something
i'm missing which is preventing it from working?
if memory serves me well, which it tricks me sometimes, i
I've been beating my head against a wall all weekend, trying to create
a new site using css for positioning. Clearly there are a few things
I'm not getting about which tag goes in which spec / what's the best
approach to create a free floating centered body of fixed width.
I'd much appreciate
that's perfect then. because in IE it doesnt resize a px line-height.
Thanks guys :)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
Sorry for delays in replying -
http://labs.flog.co.nz/css-help/ has an example image of what I'm after
and some XHTML and CSS code to look at.
Hopefully that will explain it far better than I have previously :)
- A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
The only problem I see in IE (IE6/Win) is that the sidebar's unordered
list isn't lined up correctly. That's because IE uses margins to
indent lists by default, and gecko uses padding. And you
specified margin: 0 for the list, which removed the indent in IE.
I recommend setting the padding to 0 in
Try keeping them inline, and setting line-height to 40px. As long
as word-wrap doesn't become a factor, that should work fine. But
since you're using pixels, I'm guessing word-wrap would already cause
problems anyway.
On 23 Aug 2005, at 7:48 AM, Kenny Graham wrote:
Try keeping them inline, and setting line-height to 40px. As long as
word-wrap doesn't become a factor, that should work fine. But since
you're using pixels, I'm guessing word-wrap would already cause
problems anyway.
Hmm... line-height on
I got it working in firefox and almost in IE/Win (height is way bigger
than it's supposed to be in IE) by changing the li a in Nick's
example to:
li a {
background: #eee;
display: inline-block ;
/*height: 50px;*/
line-height: 50px;
font-size: 14px;
padding: 17px 20px;
}
Now, keep in mind
Title: RE: [WSG] Center aligning links with a specified height
I think Ive found a solution it requires a separate padding style for IE though.
http://labs.flog.co.nz/css-help/solution.htm
ul {
list-style-type:none;
background: #cfc;
height: 40px;
overflow: hidden;
}
li a {
On 23 Aug 2005, at 8:41 AM, Adam Burmister ((DSL AK)) wrote:
Could somebody please check it in Safari?
Hmm again - not quite.
See http://www.omnivision.com.au/test/safari.gif
Sorry, gotta go to work right now - I'll check in later and see how
you're doing...
N
From: David Nicol
To make project communication easier I plan to draw up a document to
detail my requirements with regard to standards-compliant coding and
accessibility. It is my intention that this document would be
re-usable - it should be applicable to all projects we handle in the
Does anyone have any good iCalendar resources to share? Other than
hCal, I can't find many good iCal examples, let alone tutorials.
I hope this is an appropriate question for the WSG -- if not, where
else could I look for answers?
Matt Hampel
Matt Hampel wrote:
Does anyone have any good iCalendar resources to share? Other than
hCal, I can't find many good iCal examples, let alone tutorials.
I hope this is an appropriate question for the WSG
Aeh...how do you think this relates to web standards?
-- if not, where else could I look
Matt Hampel wrote:
Does anyone have any good iCalendar resources to share? Other than
hCal, I can't find many good iCal examples, let alone tutorials.
I hope this is an appropriate question for the WSG -- if not, where
else could I look for answers?
Matt Hampel
I would also be interested, a
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Aeh...how do you think this relates to web standards?
Hmm...after my initial snappy comment I realised you meant the iCal/hCal
*formats*, rather than the actual iCal application...so my reaction was
admittedly a tad uncalled for. Apols.
--
Patrick H. Lauke
User testing?
On 23/08/05, Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
First, I'd just like to check I understand something correctly.
Validation for WAI AAA = WCAG 1.0 Priority 3. Is this correct?
Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML
* CSS
* WAI
* Section
From: Jen Simmons
http://www.redbonepress.com/index1.htm
and the css is at:
http://www.redbonepress.com/redbonestyles.css
The three elements: masthead, sidebar and main content just
don't want to stay where they belong.
It looks good (and very similar) in both IE6 and FF1.06 on
Win XP
Hi all,
Sorry to be a pain, but I am new to this list. Is there a place somewhere that lists the tools/techniques for doing the below?
Ok, we can validate for: * W3C HTML/XHTML * CSS * WAI * Section 508And I've recently learnt about accessibility checks for: * Colour blindness * Contrast *
Hey
Dave,
Try looking
ingoogle 1st ;)
.
Ben
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David
PietersenSent: Tuesday, 23 August 2005 2:29 p.m.To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility, the
possibilities
Hi all,
Sorry to
Sorryall, That was meant to
be off-list.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Ben Wrighton -
StraightForwardSent: Tuesday, 23 August 2005 2:53 p.m.To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] Accessibility, the
possibilities
Hey
Dave,
From: David Pietersen
...tools/techniques for doing the below?
Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML
* CSS
* WAI
* Section 508
David,
The W3C maintain a useful website that has validators for x/html and
css.
http://validator.w3.org/
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new design
and
structure
alistapart has many articles on accesibility
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
should be:
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Damian
**
From: Damian Sweeney
Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new design
alistapart has many articles on accesibility
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
should be:
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Damian,
Your link gave me a 404. I'm really not sure
Well, this is curious.
I get a 404 for http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
and a page full of articles for
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Can anyone break this deadlock?
Damian
From: Damian Sweeney
Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new
On 8/22/05 10:18 PM Damian Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
I get a 404 for http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
Works for me.
and a page full of articles for
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
404
Okay, now everybody immediately clear caches
37 matches
Mail list logo
