CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:www
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/03/01 19:40:15
Log message:
fix typo
Modified files:
./:
rel430.html
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 www/rel430.html
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Andrew C Aitchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X -configure comments these values out because many apps used to
get confused by having precise dpi values and displayed silly
fonts. I think that at one time a 85x90 dpi screen would make
Netscape
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Note that CONFIG_INPUT (the new input layer) exists in 2.4.x kernels
as well... so you can test right now. It's just that 2.5.x (and
2.6.0 when released) has made the new input layer the default.
I'm not really up to speed on the 2.4 stuff, never
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
Ok, ...
I take it, there will be a 4.4.0 before 5.0 ?
Well, i am not sure i follow you completely here, but my interrest in
MV but XAA is an all or nothing thing.
Could you please explain that? Do you mean that if you use XAA, you
can no longer wrap at the GCOps level?
Juliusz
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SD some fonts can't be displayed any more which worked with freetype1
SD based freetype module
Yes. The FreeType 1 library had been fine-tuned to include
workarounds for a number of common font bugs (much against David
Turner's preferences). These hacks are only now getting into
FreeType 2.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
BTW, is the stuff you were working on accessible on a CVS branch or
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 03:18, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Hmmm. I've never tried it on a PowerBook. I guess I will have
to see if I can borrow one from around here to play with. Unfortunately,
that means it's unlikely to be fixed in 4.3 (I recall having a difficult
time with Linux PPC
The discussion thread
has focused on multi-head for a single user. What about plans for multi-user? Matrox
and Nvidia have four port cards. Why couldnt a single system (maybe multi-processor)
support eight simultaneous users if it had two of those cards and USB input
devices? What would be
On 1 Mar 2003, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
MV but XAA is an all or nothing thing.
Could you please explain that? Do you mean that if you use XAA, you
can no longer wrap at the GCOps level?
You can wrap them, but if you are above XAA you MUST call down.
XAA expects to see every rendering
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
That said, another thing that would be nice, would be the possibility to
specify one display section for every depth, instead of just copying it
for each supported depth. Do many people in these times of 64+Mo of
onboard memory specify different
On Saturday 01 March 2003 03:18, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Can you VT switch back to the X-server OK, and startx again after
quitting?
Yes, I can.
If so, it's probably just a matter of not enough stuff
being saved and restored in the UnLoad/LoadStateExt functions in
riva_hw.c.
Hmm, how can
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Christoph Pittracher wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2003 03:18, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
Can you VT switch back to the X-server OK, and startx again after
quitting?
Yes, I can.
If so, it's probably just a matter of not enough stuff
being saved and restored in the
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include/setjmp.h.
This is libc 2.2. so it doesn't set HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP.
SYMCFUNCALIAS chokes on this. This is gcc 2.95.3.
I think the HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP set logic is wrong.
Mark.
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include/setjmp.h.
This is libc 2.2. so it doesn't set HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP.
SYMCFUNCALIAS chokes on this. This is gcc 2.95.3.
I think the HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP set logic is wrong.
You've got
Regard to that one BUG with the mention that it persist in 4.3.0 too
and any CVS too:
By Rene:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86m=104526841725691w=2
By mysef:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86m=104385693307371w=2
I send more deBug:
Around 16 o'clock on Feb 28, Yun-Ta Tsai wrote:
I found some patches that will fix several truetype fonts problems
with asian characters both on printing to printer and showing on screen, also
support asian font name. Unfortunatelly, I can't patch by myself because qt
keep releasing , so I
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, B. Levin wrote:
I have a dual dvi (special version, sort of) matrox g550. many times when I
startx it seems to hang for a minute and then you eventually get video.
(not sure if its related or random but when I startx as root I -think- it
starts faster, but I might be
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Reid Vail wrote:
I have this older ATI card (Xpert 98 AGP) and am wondering if theATI
driver that runs under Xfree86 4.3 supports the AGP functionality? The
Xfree86 site which references this seems pretty ambigious to me. It
says it supports the Rage classd. But the
Hi,
I'm having problems with XFree86 4.2.1 and a Matrox Mystique card. I'm
trying to use the card in a P2 box with an onboard ATI Mach64. When
running with the mga driver things seem to work fine at first, but when
I start moving windows or opening fvwm2 menus a bit too fast everything
just
Hi,
I installed Suse 7.2 on a Toshiba 2410 404 and have a
persisting problem with the XF86Config File
(XFree4.0.3):
During the installation process I skipped X11
configuration and starting up the first time I ran
sax2 and here my problem starts: it came up with a
800x600 resolution with 8 bit
Hello colleagues:
Please, i have a doubt. I need make a investigation about graphic
servers in Unix, but I don't know anything about this. I need to
somebody help me... i don't know that graphic server use Linux, Suse and
the others distribution... or all distribution use xfree86 like graphic
Thanks for your help! I'll just look at what old cards are still
available in the stores and
check them out on the Driver Status page *before* I will buy one. (It's
a pity that no such list as I looked for exists, however, since it would
clearly be a good advertisement for those vendors
hi all
has anyone tried installing the 4.3 rpm's from the suse ftp?
Mine went ok, however my 3d accel for some reason sometimes
freezes the computer. Has anyone else seen this with a Radeon 7000?
I'm using to most recent 2.4.20 kernel...
Tom
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
The problem you are having concerns the X Font Server (XFS, not to be
confused with SGI's filesystem for IRIX and Linux that goes by the same
acronym), and an inability of XFree86 to locate it's fixed font file.
But first, I see you are running a pre-release version of the XFree86.
Although this
Every Linux distribution that I know of uses XFree86 for its
implementation of the X Window System. You can also buy commercial
versions of the X Window System, but they tend to be pricey, and what's
the point, anyway, when XFree86 works just fine?
Other UNIX-like operating systems that use
Then, UNIX only use xfree86 like grafic server?
-Original Message-
From: Josh Liechty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [XFree86] ONE QUESTION
Every Linux distribution that I know of uses XFree86 for its
implementation
Hello.
I have compiled 2.4.20-ac1 kernel and installed NVIDIA_kernel and NVIDIA_GLX
packages.
When i types:
# startx
server is not starting and i giving that message:
XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Warren
Warren Sypteras wrote:
Folks;
I've loaded Linux Mandrake 9.0 onto my Compaq Evo
N610c which uses the
ATI Radeon Mobility M7 LW video.
X -version = 4.2.1 Release date 3 September 2002
The display gets unstable under various conditions
Almost all Unix systems include a version of the X Window System - generally
based off the original MIT/X Consortium/X.org sources. XFree86 is a branch
off those sources which is used by most open source releases. You can find
more information at http://www.x.org/
(Technically, in order to claim
You may want to try X 3.3.6
--- Scott Elgram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I am trying to set up this old Toshiba Satellite T2105CS that I found in
my server room at work. Its an old machine (486dx, I think, 350mb HD,
12mb RAM). I put slackware 8.0 on it an it runs fine, but, I am
Usually you can disable it in the BIOS setup...
Lionel
--- Lars Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems with XFree86 4.2.1 and a Matrox Mystique card. I'm
trying to use the card in a P2 box with an onboard ATI Mach64. When
running with the mga driver things seem to work
Hi,
I'm trying to set up my ATi RADEON 9000 PRO, and I'm a
little confused: should I use the ati or radeon driver
for dual-head + xinerama?
Best regards,
Carlos.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
Didn't you use the phobe option it usally get the video card you have now.
Is the white box the Professional Edition of Red Hat 8.0
From: Oisin C. Feeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [XFree86] ATI Radeon 7500 series on a Red Hat 8.0
Radeon
From: Carlos Carnero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [XFree86] ATi RADEON 9000: ait or radeon driver?
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Hi,
I'm trying to set up my ATi RADEON 9000 PRO, and I'm a
little confused: should I use the ati
Not really... For Video adapter something in the BIOS I have the options
Onboard and Auto. Choosing Auto makes the Mystique card active but the
ATI card is still found during the pci scans as you can see in the log
files. There is no option for completely disabling the onboard card.
Besides,
I've seen this on my Radeon VE/7000, as well. If you kill the offending
app (I can get it to occur with the endgame screenhack from
xscreensavers most easily) by logging in remotely, you can get X back.
Not sure what can be done about this, except for a 4.3.1.
I got my source tree from CVS,
Manual DPMS commands (e.g. xset dpms force off) worked correctly in XFree86
4.2.0 but no longer work in 4.3.0; instead the screen blanks but the monitor
does NOT enter DPMS poweroff mode.
The monitor in question is a Sony GDM-500PS.
Here is the log:
XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27
Today, I installed Gentoo's latest stable kernel 2.4.20-gentoo-r1
which includes the GR security patches. I have enabled the kmem
protection of the GR security patches, which prohibits writing to
/dev/kmem and /dev/mem (and also mmapping them for write) and opening
/dev/port, but - according
Dear XFree86,
This happened on a new Dell 2350 with 1.7 MHz Celeron.
Fatal server error:
XFree86 has found a valid card configuration.
Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h.
Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team.
When reporting a
Hi,
Can someone recommend any video cards that fit the following criteria:
* Has dual-head support
* Can run each head at different resolutions / depths (1 head at
1600x1200, 1 head at 1280x1024)
* Supports mixed analogue / DVI output (1 head analogue, 1 head DVI)
* Works with
Warren Sypteras wrote:
Folks;
I've loaded Linux Mandrake 9.0 onto my Compaq Evo
N610c which uses the
ATI Radeon Mobility M7 LW video.
I had a couple of similar problems to yours. Check the list archives
(look for my name and/or Radeon) and/or visit:
http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~domi/linux.html
I've been pretty happy, overall, with the matrox g550.
its somewhat cheap (compared to what dualhead cards used to cost), it DOES have
dual vga and dvi (if you find the SPECIAL version that explicitly says 'dual
dvi'; its not very common to find this).
its fast, its pretty well supported and
Greetings,
Today I patched my original 4.2.0 tree with those I found in the main ftp site,
following the instructions. When installing, I followed the very same procedure
as I did with 4.2.0 and 4.2.1, I also used the same /etc/X11/XF86Config. But I
have the following problem; when I 'm writing in
On Saturday 01 March 2003 05:05 am, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems with XFree86 4.2.1 and a Matrox Mystique card. I'm
trying to use the card in a P2 box with an onboard ATI Mach64. When
running with the mga driver things seem to work fine at first, but when
I start moving windows or
Tom Wesley wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2003 12:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen this on my Radeon VE/7000, as well. If you kill the offending
app (I can get it to occur with the endgame screenhack from
xscreensavers most easily) by logging in remotely, you can get X back.
Not sure what can
On Saturday 01 March 2003 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Wesley wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2003 12:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen this on my Radeon VE/7000, as well. If you kill the offending
app (I can get it to occur with the endgame screenhack from
xscreensavers most easily)
Ok, thanks...
then actually the only system based in Unix that not use XFree86 is
MacOS?
-Original Message-
From: Alan Coopersmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [XFree86] ONE QUESTION
Almost all Unix systems
The driver knows nothing about the hotkey switch. It doesn't
even have a way to know that a switch occurred. It's all done by
the bios which is the only reason the switch even partially works.
Maybe the Font key might change things a little, but the
core of the matter is that hot key
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Nik Clayton wrote:
Can someone recommend any video cards that fit the following criteria:
* Has dual-head support
* Can run each head at different resolutions / depths (1 head at
1600x1200, 1 head at 1280x1024)
* Supports mixed analogue / DVI output (1 head
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, William Kucharski wrote:
Manual DPMS commands (e.g. xset dpms force off) worked correctly in XFree86
4.2.0 but no longer work in 4.3.0; instead the screen blanks but the monitor
does NOT enter DPMS poweroff mode.
The nv
I cant find the extract.exe or extract file. Can you help?
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
___
XFree86
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 04:01:12PM -0800, Charles Curley scrawled:
Regarding: xcursorgen: No such file or directory
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 Version: 4.3.0
OS: Linux Red Hat 8.0, 2.4.18-14
Area: Compilation/Installation
Dear lists,
I've made new binary versions of my Radeon suspend/resume-capable DRI
drivers available at http://cpbotha.net/dri_resume.html
There are XFree86 4.3.0 and XFree86 DRI CVS versions of these drivers
available.
Thanks,
Charl
--
charl p. botha http://cpbotha.net/
hi there ,,,
i have problem with the xf86config ,, my vga card
isNVIDIA GeForce2 . and i have FreeBSD Version 5.0 ..
when i do the config then i try to start the X .. i
have errno 61 .. errno 3 ,, bad display name "My.localHost:0"
what i should do to config the X ?
.. thanx alot
bye
try to configure X after a default of install
of openbsd 3.2. I have search on google for a fix with no success.
sunmobile# scanpci -v
pci bus 0x cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor
0x1106 device 0x0305VIA Device unknownCardVendor
0x103c card 0x0022 (HP, Card unknown) STATUS
0xa210
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
You only need the updated kernel if you want direct rendering support.
If this is worthless to you, don't bother with the updated kernel.
Unfortunately this might not be true. Or rather, it's probably not just
the kernel that is the problem, rather it's
From: Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 17:11:34 +0200
Unable to handle kernel paging request
\|/ \|/
@'/ .. \`@
/_| \__/ |_\
\__U_/
setserial(104): Oops
The program setserial is
During make install:
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/war/4.3.0/source/xc/lib/GL/GL'
installing in lib/GL/mesa/src/OSmesa...
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/war/4.3.0/source/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/OSmesa'
gcc-c -o ../../../../../lib/GL/mesa/src/X86/common_x86_asm.o
Regard to that one BUG with the mention that it persist in 4.3.0 too
and any CVS too:
By Rene:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86m=104526841725691w=2
By mysef:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86m=104385693307371w=2
I send more deBug:
I had OS/2 4.2.99.1 running (ok - except everything was red).
Unzipped the following 4.3 files: bin.zip, lib.zip, x11.zip
Using setup from 4.2.99.1, 4.3 xfree86.exe does not succeed:
(Full contents of /usr/adm/XFree86.0.log)
_XSERVTransSocketCreateListener: failed to bind listener
I've successfully built and installed 4.3 on my Quicksilver (2001) and
everything is working...except the cursor shadow. I've tried enabling it
in the Device section but the log file tells me that option is not
used. I've had this working with 4.2.99.3 without even having
specified. Did something
62 matches
Mail list logo
