Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 20.04.2011 09:30, schrieb Jerome Renard:
I would say the main problem with Ant is there is no loops and
conditionals
I have never needed programming structures like that in my build
automation scripts. But I think I understand where the problem is: you
are
Am 20.04.2011 09:30, schrieb Jerome Renard:
I would say the main problem with Ant is there is no loops and
conditionals
I have never needed programming structures like that in my build
automation scripts. But I think I understand where the problem is: you
are trying to use a build
Jerome Renard wrote:
Hello,
I started to test Pake in the context of AZC.
You can get the Pakefile if you svn up website/
You may also browse the file here:
-
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/zetacomponents/website/Pakefile?r=1091818
As you will see it is quite simple et much more
Gaetano,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Gaetano Giunta
giunta.gaet...@gmail.com wrote:
Jerome Renard jero...@apache.org wrote on 14/04/2011 11:11:
[...]
I believe you can define environment variables on Windows:
-
On 04/14/2011 11:36 AM, Jerome Renard wrote:
I still prefer cli options than env vars for 90% of the time though, as it's
easier to understand what is happening when the options are explicit.
But, as far as I can see in your code, what you can do is that you can swap
out one config file with
Tobias Schlitt wrote:
On 04/14/2011 11:36 AM, Jerome Renard wrote:
I still prefer cli options than env vars for 90% of the time though, as it's
easier to understand what is happening when the options are explicit.
But, as far as I can see in your code, what you can do is that you can swap
out
Hi Alexey,
thanks for your feedback.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Alexey Zakhlestin indey...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Any feedback welcome :)
line 30:
I'd use pake_echo_comment() instead. same for other similar lines
Fixed.
lines 94-117:
1) I'd use pake_sh($command, true)
Fixed.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Gaetano Giunta
giunta.gaet...@gmail.com wrote:
As I proposed pake in the 1szt place, no need to assert any more that I like
it enough.
+1 from here as well. We use Pake anyway for Midgard packaging and
installation. So at least Zeta Components have already
- is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P)
probably the only one ;-)
I will try to give Pake a try as soon as possible. But if one of you
already has experience with
Phing or Pake I would be happy to get your feedback about these tools :)
I have no experience and no preference with
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
- is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P)
probably the only one ;-)
Not sure if this is a joke, but xml simply has to die (TM).
I will try to give Pake a try as soon as possible. But if one of you
already has experience with
Phing or Pake I would be happy
- is not XML based (Derick will appreciate that :P)
probably the only one ;-)
Not sure if this is a joke, but xml simply has to die (TM).
No joke. And XML has some good benefits. I don't want it to die.
Probably I am oldschool.
Not a good doc by any stretch, but to hit the ground running:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
And while we are at it, consider to join the incubator.apache.org with
pake. I am pretty sure there are some supporters around.
I wouldn't mind seeing Pake and some other stuff from Alexey - like
the AppServer in
12 matches
Mail list logo
