mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, Enterprise IT Architect
Phone: (303) 246-5411
Oracle Global IT Service Design Group
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157 greg.s...@oracle.com (work)
Broomfield, CO 80021
@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, Enterprise IT Architect
Phone: (303) 246-5411
Oracle Global IT Service Design Group
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157 greg.s...@oracle.com (work)
Broomfield, CO 80021 gr
drives
for cache, but apparently not.
And Solaris 11 is supposed to be out Real Soon Now. :-)
On 10/14/11 02:54 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
2011-10-14 23:57, Gregory Shaw пишет:
You might want to keep in mind that the X4500 was a ~2006 box, and
had only PCI-X slots.
Or, at least, that's what the 3
over time.
As you mention above, if you've got a number of people to handle the above
problems, they may be a good fit. Otherwise, no way.
As always, YMMV.
-
Gregory Shaw, Enterprise IT Architect
Phone: (303) 246-5411
Oracle Global IT Service Design Group
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157
External SATA disk 3
in box on top
errors: No known data errors
The above would be very useful should a disk fail to identify what
device is what.
Thanks!
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
IT CTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
Phone: (303)-272-8817 (x78817)
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157
updates, san events, etc.
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
IT CTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
Phone: (303)-272-8817 (x78817)
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Broomfield, CO 80021 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
When Microsoft writes an application for Linux
found that most fault mitigation systems concentrate on
just that: faults. Performance degradation isn't treated as a fault,
and usually falls out of any fault management system as a we'd like
to do that, but we've got bigger things to do.
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
IT CTO Group, Sun
(such as bad connections) as well.
And yes, I do know about SMART. SMART can pre-indicate a disk
failure. However, I've run SMART on drives with bearings that were
gravel that passed smart, even though I knew the 10k drive was
running at about 3k rpm due to the bearings.
-
Gregory Shaw
that passed smart, even though I knew the 10k drive
was running at about 3k rpm due to the bearings.
ditto.
-- richard
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 272-8817 (x78817)
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work
On Feb 21, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:35:06PM -0700, Gregory Shaw wrote:
Below is another paper on drive failure analysis, this one won best
paper at usenix:
http://www.usenix.org/events/fast07/tech/schroeder/schroeder_html/
index.html
What I found most
isn't cheap, however. The justification for a dual-
array solution really depends on the data value.
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
IT CTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
Phone: (303)-272-8817
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Broomfield, CO 80021 [EMAIL
://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
IT CTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
Phone: (303)-272-8817
500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-157 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Broomfield, CO 80021 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
When Microsoft writes an application for Linux
a great idea. It may not be for everybody, but I think the ability to treat some of my files as critical is a excellent feature. -Gregory Shaw, IT ArchitectPhone: (303) 673-8273 Fax: (303) 673-2773ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.500 Eldorado Blvd, UBRM02-401 [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Gregory Shaw, IT ArchitectPhone: (303) 673-8273 Fax: (303) 673-8273ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.1 StorageTek Drive MS 4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)Louisville, CO 80028-4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)"When Microsoft writes an application for Linux, I'v
=ditto_blocks_the_amazing_tapeJeff___zfs-discuss mailing listzfs-discuss@opensolaris.orghttp://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -Gregory Shaw, IT ArchitectPhone: (303) 673-8273 Fax: (303) 673-8273ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.1 StorageTek Drive MS
Hey, does anybody know the timeframe for when Legato Networker will support ZFS?Or, perhaps, a workaround whereby backups of ZFS by Networker will succeed? -Gregory Shaw, IT ArchitectPhone: (303) 673-8273 Fax: (303) 673-2773ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.1 StorageTek Drive ULVL4-382
listzfs-discuss@opensolaris.orghttp://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -Gregory Shaw, IT ArchitectPhone: (303) 673-8273 Fax: (303) 673-2773ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.1 StorageTek Drive ULVL4-382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)Louisville, CO 80028-4382
://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive MS 4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO 80028-4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home
and try to restore what was damaged.
On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:26:24PM -0600, Gregory Shaw wrote:
You're using hardware raid. The hardware raid controller will
rebuild
the volume in the event of a single drive failure. You'd need to
keep
J Moffat
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive MS 4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO 80028-4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
When Microsoft writes an application
errors it detects.
Gregory Shaw wrote:
Most controllers support a background-scrub that will read a
volume and repair any bad stripes. This addresses the bad block
issue in most cases.
It still doesn't help when a double-failure occurs. Luckily,
that's very rare. Usually
On Jun 27, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Al Hopper wrote:On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Gregory Shaw wrote: Yes, but the idea of using software raid on a large server doesn'tmake sense in modern systems. If you've got a large database serverthat runs a large oracle instance, using CPU cycles for RAID iscounter
@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-2773
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive ULVL4-382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO 80028-4382
,
then it could be much much longer than 4 years.
Actually - That's an interesting. I assume ZFS only writes something
when there is actually data?
:)
Nathan.
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 06:25, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:18:34PM -0600, Gregory Shaw wrote:
Wouldn't that be:
5 seconds per
missing?
Thanks!
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive MS 4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO 80028-4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
When Microsoft writes
does the group think?
Thanks!
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive MS 4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO 80028-4382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
When Microsoft
to remove an entire toplevel vdev,
migrating the data off of it in the process. This would give you what
you want for the case of an unreplicated pool.
Does this satisfy the usage scenario you described?
- Eric
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 07:52:37AM -0600, Gregory Shaw wrote:
Pardon me if this scenario has
, Gregory Shaw wrote:
DATASET OBJECT RANGE
1b 2402lvl=0 blkid=1965
I haven't found a way to report in human terms what the above object
refers to. Is there such a method?
There isn't any great method currently, but you can use 'zdb' to find
this information
to. Is there such a method?
I can clear the error using existing tools, but I'd like to know what
is broken before I destroy it.
Thanks!
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive ULVL4-382
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:12 -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:42:58AM -0700, Charlie wrote:
Sorry to revive such an old thread.. but I'm struggling here.
I really want to use zfs. Fssnap, SVM, etc all have drawbacks. But I
work for a University, where everyone has a
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 16:43 -0500, James Dickens wrote:
On 5/18/06, Gregory Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:12 -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:42:58AM -0700, Charlie wrote:
Sorry to revive such an old thread.. but I'm struggling here
term performance implications of COW data.
On May 15, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Roch Bourbonnais - Performance
Engineering wrote:
Gregory Shaw writes:
I really like the below idea:
- the ability to defragment a file 'live'.
I can see instances where that could be very useful
capability. Luckily,
creating new database tables is a relatively infrequent event.
Does anybody else have any other points on this?
On May 12, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Roch Bourbonnais - Performance
Engineering wrote:
From: Gregory Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED
is running/file is open).
- Franz
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun
-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive ULVL4-382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO
-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-
Gregory Shaw, IT Architect
Phone: (303) 673-8273Fax: (303) 673-8273
ITCTO Group, Sun Microsystems Inc.
1 StorageTek Drive ULVL4-382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
Louisville, CO 80028-4382
36 matches
Mail list logo
