I tried to update my gentoo VM on Linode.com today. I used "emerge --update
--deep --with-bdeps=y @world" and sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2 was one of the items
reported by portage. Portage stated that the compile failed. Here are the last
few lines of the build.log. Any hel
Hi,
One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list
!!! Error: Pattern does not match any installed version of binutils!
exiting
c2stable ~ #
All other machiness do something akin to:
k2 ~ # eselect binutils list
Installed binutils for
Who's bug is this error?
Remember the instructions : ( Gentoo news item )
-
emerge -1v /lib32 /usr/lib32
-
Every time that command was run it would recompile 'sys-devel/binutils'.
Why?
It was finding 'libiberty, liboppcodes, libbfd' from
'sys-libs/binutils
On 08/09/2012 07:24 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
> Am 08.08.2012 14:14, schrieb Raffaele BELARDI:
> I have a problem compiling binutils.
> Full build log can be found here http://smash-net.org/temp/build_log.txt
>
> I tried tha vanilla flag and diabled zlib as suggested via google
> s
:
_
* Package:cross-armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabi/binutils-2.22.90
* Repository: proaudio
* Maintainer: toolch...@gentoo.org
* USE:amd64 cxx elibc_glibc kernel_linux nls userland_GNU zlib
* FEATURES: sandbox
>>> ESC[1mESC[37mcfg-update-1.8.2-r1ESC[0mESC[0m: Checksum index is u
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes:
>One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>
> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list
> !!! Error: Pattern does not match any installed version of binutils!
> exiting
> c2stable ~ #
>
> All other machiness do
After I do an update, I get this message:
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
* - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
* used by
/usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.25.1/libopcodes-2.25.1.so
(sys-devel/binutils-2.25.1-r1)
Use emerge @
On 03/14/2017 08:45 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> After I do an update, I get this message:
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
>* - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
>* used by
> /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-g
/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.21.1-r1/work/build/bfd/../libiberty/pic
-liberty -ldl ../libiberty/libiberty.a -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.21.1
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: yes: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [size] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp
On 07/02/2017 07:37 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> During upgrade I get an error trying to compile "binutils-libs-2.28-r1"
>
> Any hint what to do with it?
>
>
> XSParagraph.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got
> handshake key 0xd700
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.08.2012 10:04, schrieb Raffaele BELARDI:
> On 08/09/2012 07:24 AM, Norman Rieß wrote:
>> Am 08.08.2012 14:14, schrieb Raffaele BELARDI: I have a problem
>> compiling binutils. Full build log can be found here
>> http
On one of my machines I see
gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ eselect binutils list
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.28.1 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.29.1
[3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.30
[4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.31.1
But I also see
gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ eix -I -e binutils
[?] sys-devel/binutils
...
(2.28.1
I am one of the users experiencing the
infinite rebuild of binutils
bug. Today it took a turn I find worrisome
To summarize for months now after every emerge I get
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.28.1
* - /usr/lib64/libbfd-
On 2017-03-14, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 14/03/2017 17:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> After I do an update, I get this message:
>>
>> !!! existing preserved libs:
>> >>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
>>* - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
&g
在 2010/2/4 05:45:00，Harry Putnam ：
> After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils
> broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another
> revdep-rebuild and it finds the same thing.
>
> Anyone seen something similar or have an idea what
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500
Andrew Penhorwood wrote:
> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase):
> * emake failed
> *
> * Call stack:
> * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_compile
> * environment, line 2823:
Grant Edwards writes:
> Can somebody give a clue how to specify the binutils to be used when
> building a Linux kernel?
$ man binutils-config
The binutils-config script allows you to switch between different
versions of binutils when you have installed multiple copies (see
USE=multislot
On Monday, April 15, 2019 4:40:44 PM CEST allan gottlieb wrote:
> On one of my machines I see
>
> gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ eselect binutils list
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.28.1 *
> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.29.1
> [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.30
> [4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.31.
On 2022-10-10, (Alan J. Wylie)
wrote:
> Grant Edwards writes:
>
>> Can somebody give a clue how to specify the binutils to be used when
>> building a Linux kernel?
>
> $ man binutils-config
>
> The binutils-config script allows you to switch between different
&
Hi Leon,
have you really run
lafilefixer --justfixit
and some time, ago, I had problems because of
dangling symlinks, so I've run
symlinks -dr /usr
(which remove all dangling symlinks in /usr/**/*)
Then re-emerge sys-devel/binutils again
I hope this helps,m
Helmut.
On 4 Feb, Leon
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 15.04.2019 kell 10:40, kirjutas allan gottlieb:
> On one of my machines I see
>
> gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ eselect binutils list
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.28.1 *
> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.29.1
> [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.30
> [4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22:13/02/04/10, Leon Feng wrote:
> ??? 2010/2/4 05:45:00???Harry Putnam ???
> > After todays update world, I run revdep-rebuild which reports binutils
> > broken and uses `oneshot' to reinstall it. Follow with another
>
On 14/03/2017 17:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
> After I do an update, I get this message:
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
>* - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
>* used by
> /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-g
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:52:07 -0400,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> On 14/03/2017 17:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > After I do an update, I get this message:
> >
> > !!! existing preserved libs:
> > >>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
> >* - /usr
On 13/04/2019 17:38, Matthias Hanft wrote:
Despite gcc was *not* recompiled after the glibc upgrade, it now
tells
$ gcc -o hello hello.c
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/8.2.0/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as:
/lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.28' not found (required by
/usr/lib/binutils
.
* Collecting system binaries and libraries
* Generated new 1_files.rr
* Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
* Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
* Checking dynamic linking consistency
[ 37% ] * broken
/usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la (requires
- -liberty)
* broken
* /usr/lib64
ries broken by a package
> * update
> * will be emerged.
>
> * Collecting system binaries and libraries
> * Generated new 1_files.rr
> * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
> * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> [ 37% ] * broken
>
On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500
> Andrew Penhorwood wrote:
>
>> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase):
>> * emake failed
>> *
>> * Call stack:
>> * eb
On 03/14/2017 09:52 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 14/03/2017 17:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> After I do an update, I get this message:
>>
>> !!! existing preserved libs:
>> >>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
>>* - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.2
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:41 AM allan gottlieb wrote:
> On one of my machines I see
>
> gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ eselect binutils list
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.28.1 *
> [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.29.1
> [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.30
> [4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.31
On 16/09/2017 22:31, allan gottlieb wrote:
> I am one of the users experiencing the
>infinite rebuild of binutils
> bug. Today it took a turn I find worrisome
Replying here so it's at the top.
Several things are happening, but I suppose the primary one is (and I
sorts nee
kage
> * update
> * will be emerged.
>
> * Collecting system binaries and libraries
> * Generated new 1_files.rr
> * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
> * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> [ 37% ] * broken
> /usr/lib64/binutils/x
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 21:31, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
[SNIP]
> > Calculating world dependencies . ... done!
> > [ebuild N] sys-devel/binutils [2.16.1-r3]USE="nls
> > -multislot -multitarget -test -vanilla" 109 kB
$ emerge -pv binutils
These ar
Am Samstag, 16. September 2017, 22:31:03 CEST schrieb allan gottlieb:
> I am one of the users experiencing the
>infinite rebuild of binutils
> bug. Today it took a turn I find worrisome
>
> To summarize for months now after every emerge I get
>
> !!! ex
ust ignore them? They're pretty ugly. How do
I get rid of them? Did I ignore a step? Which one?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -l /usr/i386-pc-linux-gnu/lib
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 Dec 20 2005 ldscripts ->
/usr/lib/binutils/i386-pc-linux-gnu/2.15.92.0.2/ldscripts
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
v depclean" portage will drop 2.31.1 from your
system.Maybe 2.29 too.
But i find this really weird.
Regards.
Hasan Çalışır
15 Nis 2019 Pts 5:41 PM tarihinde allan gottlieb şunu
yazdı:
> On one of my machines I see
>
> gottlieb@E6430 ~ $ eselect binutils list
> [1] x86_64-
On 14/03/2017 19:51, Willie M wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 09:52 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 14/03/2017 17:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> After I do an update, I get this message:
>>>
>>> !!! existing preserved libs:
>>> >>> package: sys-libs/b
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not let binutils emerge gcc?
Cheers,
Wol
couple of
days ago), namely 200506-01, in binutils and elfutils (I don't have
elfutils).
Hmm, buffer overflow error, sounds bad. All right, but I updated
binutils earlier today, and usually when one does that it's supposed to
plug the hole, right? So I investigated further.
Here
Holly Bostick wrote:
>OK, I'm following both of you so far. Yes, I do have 'multislot' for
>binutils. I admit it was just guesswork on my part; I read the USE flag
>description, thought about automake and autoconf, thought that binutils
>sounded like the kind of sys
a how to fix.
>>>
>>> The first one is like this:
>>>>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
>>> * - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
>>> * used by
>>> /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.25.1/libopcodes-2.25.1.so
>>
I will try the -j1. This is a VM that is initially setup my Linode.com.
Andrew
On 1/11/2014 6:19 PM, walt wrote:
On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500
Andrew Penhorwood wrote:
* ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase
:
> >>> Hi. I am having a couple of preserved rebuild problems which I have
> >>> no idea how to fix.
> >>>
> >>> The first one is like this:
> >>>>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
> >>> * - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2
Holly Bostick wrote:
>Hi,
>
>So my questions are:
>
>1) Am I supposed to have 4 versions of binutils in the first place?
>
>
Do you have USE 'multislot' or 'multitarget' for binutils? If so, then
looking at /usr/portage/eclass/toolchain-binutils.eclass
On 09/17/2022 01:58:09 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I've just bin told to run binutils-config instead.
This solves the problem as well.
Hi,
am I the only one where suddenly all binutils couldn't be invoked?
My fix is
cd /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
ln -s binutils-bin/2.39 bin
I hope
On Dienstag, 14. März 2017 18:43:07 CET John Covici wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:52:07 -0400,
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 14/03/2017 17:45, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > After I do an update, I get this message:
> > > !!! existing preserved libs:
> >
LIBRARY_PATH
> > * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
> > * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> > [ 37% ] * broken
> > /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la (requires
> > -liberty)
> > * broken
> > * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20
On Mon, Sep 18 2017, allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18 2017, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> No need to do anything complicated. Just run
>>
>> emerge --depclean --ask
>>
>> and have it remove outdated binutils versions (it will keep the current one,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>
> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list
> !!! Error: Pattern does not match any installed version of binutils!
> exiting
> c2stable ~ #
>
Confirm
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:16:20 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> 1) trim out a bunch of binutils slots that I may or may not need (and
> therefore whose loss may break unknown applications), so that glsa-check
> (which is apparently broken with respect to binutils compiled with the
> multis
Neil Bothwick schreef:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:16:20 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>>1) trim out a bunch of binutils slots that I may or may not need (and
>>therefore whose loss may break unknown applications), so that glsa-check
>>(which is apparently broken with r
t; * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr
> > * Checking dynamic linking consistency
> > [ 37% ] * broken
> > /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la (requires
> > -liberty)
> > * broken
> > * /usr/li
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:37:01 -0500,
Tuomo Hartikainen wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> On 2017-01-29 05:11, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. I am having a couple of preserved rebuild problems which I have
> > no idea how to fix.
> >
> > The first one is like this:
> >
Hi group,
I don't even know if this is a problem because my unit
is a 686 but these all display in flashing white on
red:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -l /usr/i386*/bin
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 Dec 20 2005 addr2line ->
/usr/i386-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/2.15.92.0.2/addr2line
lrwx
On Oct 10, 2022, 12:46 PM Alan J. Wylie wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2022-10-10, (Alan J. Wylie)
> > wrote:
> >> $ man binutils-config
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > AFAICT, that changes the binutils configuraiton for the entire
&
Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
is in (not listed below)
bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16
[2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16.1 *
[3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.17
[4] i686-pc-linux
Hi there!
I am following the gcc upgrade guide, emerge -e system just completed fine.
But emerge -e world gives this error message:
Calculating world dependencies -
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=app-text/binutils-2.15.94".
(dependency required by "sys-
nued my emerge (the ctrl-z +
%% worked at this point).
I'll reply here again with the next issue...
Thanks,
Simon
>>> Emerging (35 of 151) sys-devel/binutils-config-1.9-r4
* Package:sys-devel/binutils-config-1.9-r4
*
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:00:49 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
> which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
>
> With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply t
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not let binutils
gentoo.org.
The program that is failing ("ar") comes from binutils. Maybe you can
try the 2.17 version of binutils...it's what I built OOo with.
echo "~sys-devel/binutils-2.17 ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge --oneshot binutils
binutils-config -l # make sure
Hi,
am I the only one where suddenly all binutils couldn't be invoked?
My fix is
cd /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
ln -s binutils-bin/2.39 bin
I hope this might help some of you,
Helmut
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote:
> Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
> inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
> is in (not listed below)
>
> bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l
> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 00:03:15 Alex Schuster wrote:
> I am following the gcc upgrade guide, emerge -e system just completed fine.
> But emerge -e world gives this error message:
>
> Calculating world dependencies -
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=ap
Is there a way for a local quick fix...or am I lost for a
> longer period of time... ;) ???
>
>
> Best regards, mcc
>
> Log: _
>
>
>
>
> * Package:cross-armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabi/binutils-2.22.90 *
> Repository: proaudio * Maintainer: toolch.
eck
> =sys-libs/glibc-2.5` (requires either gentoolkit or portage-utils) to
> verify that no harm will be caused by unmerging glibc-2.2.5-r2. Then
> unmerge glibc-2.2.5-r2.
OK. The check shows no problem, I unmerged it.
> > I grepped in /var/cache/edb, nothing there, and locate
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 12:04:32 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/04/2024 11:48, Wols Lists wrote:
> > On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> >>> On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
> >>>>
erge. I will use "emerge kover" as an example.
>
> [...]
>
> > >configure:2772: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe conftest.c
> > >
> > > >&5 i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No
> > >
> > > such fil
Thanks.. I have created the sym-links in $PKGDIR/sys-devel directory,
but now after running the "emerge" command, I am getting the following
error:-
localhost sys-devel # emerge -K1 =sys-devel/binutils-2.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:19:23 -0800
walt wrote:
> On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500
> > Andrew Penhorwood wrote:
> >
> >> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile
> >> phase):
> &g
merge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the same
logic and not let binutils emerge gcc?
Just to follow up to myself, I've just done a complete u
in /var/cache/edb, nothing there, and locate binutils|grep text
> also showed nothing. Just in case this could mean anything.
Hmm... I actually see this on my system too.. I assume you just didn't manage
to grep the right files...
# grep app-text/binutils /var/cache/edb/dep/$(portageq
portdi
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 04:12:10 W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > > On a mixed stable/unstable x86, which binutils should one generally
> > > use?
> >
> > So why do you use multislot at all?
>
> On a previous job (long ago now) I was switching gcc's and needed
On 07/04/2024 11:15, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:00:49 BST Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", sh
Richard Fish schreef:
> Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>>OK, I'm following both of you so far. Yes, I do have 'multislot' for
>>binutils. I admit it was just guesswork on my part; I read the USE flag
>>description, thought about automake and autoconf, though
--justfixit
Then ran revdep-rebuild again it still finds broken binutils so
I'm letting it `oneshot' the emerge.
Was the expectation that running `lafilefixer --justfixit' would stop
revdep-rebuild from continuously finding a broken binutils?
Or was I expected to run lafilefixer -
Leon Feng writes:
[...]
>> I'm running ~x86 on everything and latest version of gentoolkit (I
>> don't have gentoolkit-dev installed)
>>
>> I've emerged lafilefixer (thanks Steve) and ran
>>lafilefixer --justfixit
>>
>> Then ran re
On Friday 01 December 2006 23:39, Randy Barlow wrote:
[SNIP]
> binutils seemed to have merged correctly, but the configure script for
> gcc seems to be having issues. The last few lines of output show:
>
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc -mtune=i686 -pipe -march=pentium3
> -O
Richard Fish schreef:
>> Holly Bostick wrote:
>>
>>
>>So my questions are:
>>
>>1) Am I supposed to have 4 versions of binutils in the first place?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Do you have USE 'multislot' or 'multitarget' fo
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:18 PM, walt wrote:
> On 06/24/2012 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>> One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>>
>> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list
>> !!! Error: Pattern does not match any installed vers
On 06/24/2012 03:18 PM, walt wrote:
> On 06/24/2012 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi, One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>>
>> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list !!! Error: Pattern does not
>> match any installed version of binutils! exiti
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>
> c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list
> !!! Error: Pattern does not match any installed version of binutils!
> exiting
> c2stable ~ #
Mine doe
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 03:24 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote:
> > Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version
> > inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update
> > is
maxim wexler wrote:
Hi group,
I don't even know if this is a problem because my unit
is a 686 but these all display in flashing white on
red:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -l /usr/i386*/bin
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 Dec 20 2005 addr2line ->
/usr/i386-pc-linux-gnu/binutils-bin/2.1
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
> On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
> > What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
> > which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
> >
> > With gcc it says
wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", should I apply the
same
logic and not let binutils emerge gcc?
Just to follow up t
Hi,
Richard Fish wrote:
>Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>
>
>>OK, I'm following both of you so far. Yes, I do have 'multislot' for
>>binutils. I admit it was just guesswork on my part; I read the USE flag
>>description, thought about automake and autoconf,
On 07/04/2024 11:48, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:23, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:21:00 BST Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/04/2024 11:00, Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge
gefunden
> make: *** [libudev.a] Fehler 127
[SNIP]
> support... /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5/work/glibc-2.5/configure:
> line 5513: readelf: command not found
> no
> configure: error: Need linker with .init_array/.fini_array support.
These belong to binutils. Most likely your binu
On 06/26/2012 10:51 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:18 PM, walt wrote:
>> On 06/24/2012 11:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect:
>>>
>>> c2stable ~ # eselect binutil
there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> > > ">=app-text/binutils-2.15.94". (dependency required by
> > > "sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3" [ebuild])
> > >
> > > !!! Problem resolving dependencies for gnome-base/gconf
> > > !!! Depgraph creatio
On 07/04/2024 11:15, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 11:00:49 BST Wols Lists wrote:
What do I do here - "emerge binutils" (step 9) wants to emerge gcc,
which the instructions say "emerge AFTER binutils".
With gcc it says "don't let it emerge glibc", sh
Holly Bostick wrote:
>$ useflag multislot
>/usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc:sys-devel/binutils:multislot -
>Allow for multiple versions of binutils to be emerged at once for same
>CTARGET
>/usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc:sys-devel/gcc:multislot - Allow for
>SLOTs to inc
Hi all,
Since this morning (the 10 last hours at least here in Europe), while
performing a simple 'emerge -uD world', I am stopped at binutils, the
patch binutils-2.16.1-patches-1.10.tar.bz2 can apparently be found on no
portage server.
Am I the only one? Anyone knows where it is?
Thx
Mariusz Ceier writes:
>> But if I am reading revdep-rebuild output correctly, it means that
>> your binutils is compiled to be linked against that library. But the
>> library cannot be found by revdep-rebuild. Hence the error.
>>
>> W
> libiberty.a comes f
Hi
We were able to install the cross compiler binary packages. The commands
used were as follows:-
$ echo cross-${CTARGET} >> /etc/portage/categories
$ emerge -k binutils
$ emerge -k gcc
$ emerge -k glibc
$ emerge -k linux-headers
The above series of commands installs the cross compiler pa
* Target Portage ARCH: arm
* Target System: arm-softfloat-uclinux-gnu
* Stage: 4 (C/C++ compiler)
* binutils: binutils-[latest]
* gcc: gcc-[latest]
* headers: linux-headers-[latest]
* libc: glibc-[latest
On Friday 30 June 2006 17:49, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Since this morning (the 10 last hours at least here in Europe), while
> performing a simple 'emerge -uD world', I am stopped at binutils, the
> patch binutils-2.16.1-patches-1.10.tar.bz2 can apparently be found on
Hi John,
On 2017-01-29 05:11, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I am having a couple of preserved rebuild problems which I have
> no idea how to fix.
>
> The first one is like this:
> >>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
> * - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
> * u
On 04/29/2017 01:38 PM, lee wrote:
> !!! existing preserved libs:
>>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27
> * - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so
> * used by
> /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.25.1/libopcodes-2.25.1.so
> (sys-devel/binutils-2.25.1-r1)
>
1 - 100 of 1345 matches
Mail list logo
