Thanks - I'll give that a try.  I know the Eyeon guys complain that
Autodesk doesn't adhere to the FBX standards (even though didn't AD come up
with FBX?) and so Fusion's FBX support isn't 100%.

It'd be nice to have Alembic in both..

-Paul



On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Mikael Pettersén <mikael.petter...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Paul: If you export the fbx as 2010 in Softimage the animation will work
> in Fusion as well.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Paul Griswold <
> pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com> wrote:
>
>> Fusion is great with Softimage & it's 3D environment is fantastic.
>>  Getting things back and forth isn't as easy as I'd like, though.  You can
>> export your scenes as FBX, but Fusion won't/doesn't see camera animation in
>> FBX files from XSI for some reason.  So you have to export your camera as a
>> dotXSI, and then import it into Fusion - then you get your geometry & your
>> animated camera.
>>
>> Fusion doesn't support Sub-D's, though, so any subdivided object comes in
>> un-subdivided.
>>
>> The new C4D-AE pipeline only interests me for motion graphics.  I think
>> AE is a real pain to work with for serious compositing.
>>
>> -Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Christopher <
>> christop...@thecreativesheep.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Nuke pipeline to expensive for me.  The only thing I hate with AE is the
>>> slew of plug-ins, that is the plus Nuke has, it's all mostly within the
>>> software.  Fusion is another alternative, considering the plugins for AE,
>>> maybe I should go the fusion route.
>>>
>>> Christopher
>>>
>>>   Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com>
>>>  Friday, April 05, 2013 10:33 PM
>>>  If you work with Nuke, also be SURE to check-out  T.I.M. XSI 2 Nuke (!)
>>>
>>> Imports objects (planes or more complex object along with UVs),
>>> cameras, all with anims (not sure about deforms) flawlessly!
>>>
>>> Must have in a XSi Nuke Pipeline
>>>
>>>
>>>   Paul Griswold <pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com>
>>>  Friday, April 05, 2013 8:53 PM
>>> I brought up a little while ago that I really wish Softimage had better
>>> AE integration & the announcement of the Adobe/Maxon agreement.
>>>
>>> This is what I was talking about:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.itsartmag.com/features/cineware-live-3d-pipeline-in-after-effect/#.UV9xH9ysh8E
>>>
>>> Watch the videos & you'll see what I mean.
>>>
>>> I don't think Softimage necessarily needs that level of integration, but
>>> right now there is zero official support, so something would be better than
>>> what we've got now.
>>>
>>> -PG
>>>
>>>
>>
>

<<compose-unknown-contact.jpg>>

Reply via email to