I want to thank everyone for their valuable input. I have passed all this along 
the parties that originally asked me, to ask the question. And they can decide 
what to do with it. 

 

Richard L. Mote CET

Rimrock Design Services, LLC

Middleburg, PA 17842

Mobile 570-541-2685

EMAIL  <mailto:rimrock.design.servi...@gmail.com> 
rimrock.design.servi...@gmail.com

WEB: www.rimrockdesignservicesllc.com

 

From: Anthony Carrizosa <anth...@archerconstruction.com> 
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 3:42 PM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe Calculations

 

Very valuable input Steve and something we should all keep on our minds when 
designing fire systems.

 

The OP stated that it is a four-story building designed to NFPA 13R standards.  
 as such it is not classified as a high-rise building. If it were a high rise 
then it wouldn’t be designed to NFPA 13R but rather NFPA 13 standards and would 
be fully sprinklered thus allowing the maximum of 1000 GPM. So if not a high 
rise then manual wet standpipes are allowed so if he needs to include all 
required stairs then he must calculate them to a max of 1250 GPM and list the 
pressure and flow requirements for the fire department pumper.

 

OP stated that the water supply isn’t sufficient which must mean that the 
pressure is not sufficient because if they didn’t have the required minimum 
fire flow ( most likely 1500 GPM minimum)  then they would not be allowed to 
build this building. Or would have to provide stored water supply to achieve 
this minimum required flow.

So the quick answer is design the flow rate for each required stair to a 
maximum of 1250 GPM for a manual wet standpipe and note the required pressure 
and volume on the sign attached for the FDC. It would be good to meet with the 
FM to discuss this in advance as NFPA 14 states.

 

 

Anthony Carrizosa 

Project Manager | Fire Protection 

7855 S 206th St Kent, WA 98032

Cell: 206-679-5283 | Office Dir: 253-341-4593 



 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2farcherconstruction.com%2f&c=E,1,Wdb65AWzMgSBzW3HDw91SfcRQCtxDUQKoJf-UowQ-WnB_WMosgG-8W7eLePJ42PwWQvLiQx16Pls052VqwHO7tKm-_u5AnWly0ewkNiMkxn-AjQb1JI,&typo=1>
 https://archerconstruction.com

 

From: Steve Leyton <st...@protectiondesign.com 
<mailto:st...@protectiondesign.com> > 
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 10:23 AM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> >
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe Calculations

 

It’s the committee’s intent that the 1,000 gpm threshold is applicable only to 
buildings sprinklered per NFPA 13.   There have been numerous fires in 
13R-protected buildings where the structure became involved, many of which were 
roof burn-offs.   Fire service is acutely aware of this nationwide, and any 
member of the residential sprinkler committee will affirm that every cycle, 
there is at least one but usually multiple inputs that propose to add 
sprinklers in attics if not all combustible concealed spaces.   So the language 
in 14 is based on fire incident reporting and other empirical data that inform 
us that it’s not prudent to limit hose stream capacity in 13R-protected 
buildings, so than an added measure (one additional attack stream) of hydraulic 
capability is backed into the standpipe system. 

 

 

The foregoing is my opinion only and does not represent NFPA or the NFPA 14 
Technical Committee, nor intended to serve as an interpretation of the standard.

 

Protection Design and Consulting

Steve Leyton, President

T  |  619.255.8964 x 102  |   
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.protectiondesign.com%2f&c=E,1,VZSZ56jk4A1jC5CHa5teWnpcljH1W1CUPmEthqeDeLPNDe47OnqIrhU23nO3FmpDGXqBuCpGHWeTr9VWJz9wDoxo7kX09dTCOxpRiiBxcGUDHy9UMA,,&typo=1>
 www.protectiondesign.com 
2851 Camino Del Rio South  |  Suite 210  |  San Diego, CA  92108
Fire Protection System Design | Consulting | Planning | Training

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Ken Wagoner <k...@parsleyconsulting.com 
<mailto:k...@parsleyconsulting.com> > 
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2024 10:10 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> 
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Standpipe Calculations

 

I disagree, Jose.

I'm not terribly confused by the omission of a direct reference to 13R in that 
section.  As the text reads "...for buildings that are not sprinklered 
throughout in accordance with NFPA 13."

Wouldn't you agree that 13R is other than NFPA 13?

sincerely,

Ken Wagoner, SET
Parsley Consulting
500 West Mechanic Street
Harrisonville, Missouri 64701-2235
Phone: (760) 745-6181 
Visit the website 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.parsleyconsulting.com%2f&c=E,1,Y5zKJKPEh1mBEBqSR-VE9cUKl5y-eyP8BpvmE_5j9ZqW2eJbNphYzrCMBZ-2YuX6d-RRkHI4gQ1FV-cvOeCfRC58uZS9NiToZv2mx7909oCqLvCW_n5hDHeK&typo=1>
  

 

On 4/4/2024 10:28 AM, Jose Anibal Castillo wrote:

It appears there's a conflict in understanding, as section 10.6.1.1.6 outlines 
a requirement for a flow rate of 1,250 gallons per minute (gpm) for buildings 
lacking sprinkler coverage, in line with NFPA 13 standards. Yet, 10.6.1.1.6 
omits any mention of NFPA 13R, leading to confusion about the necessity of 
meeting the 1,250 gpm requirement in scenarios where NFPA 13 standards might 
not be mandated by the building code but NFPA 13R. Furthermore, NFPA 14 does 
not discuss provisions for buildings with partial sprinkler protection 
according to NFPA 13R.

 

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:07 AM John Denhardt <jdenha...@firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:jdenha...@firesprinkler.org> > wrote:

Correct - for standpipe calculations purposes, buildings protected with NFPA 
13R systems do not meet the requirements to limit the flow to 1,250 GPM 

 

10.6.1.1.6 in NFPA 14 - 2024

 

John August Denhardt, P.E. 

Vice-President Engineering and Technical Services

American Fire Sprinkler Association 

301-343-1457

 

On Apr 3, 2024, at 09:49, Fpdcdesign <fpdcdes...@gmail.com 
<mailto:fpdcdes...@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

13R buildings are not considered to be fully sprinklered. 

 

 

On Apr 3, 2024 at 9:45 AM, <Shawn Foor <mailto:shawn.f...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Why would you do 1250 if it’s a fully sprinklered building?  



Shawn Foor, SET

 

FOOR DESIGN, LLC

10208 E 98TH ST

TULSA, OK 74133

P:918-237-1400

 

 

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 08:43 <rimrock.design.servi...@gmail.com 
<mailto:rimrock.design.servi...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Asking this on behalf of Rowe Sprinkler Systems (Temporally Un-Retired)

 

We have a 4-story modular apartment building sprinklered in accordance with 
NFPA 13R with allowed exceptions, with 4 standpipes. The standpipes are 
connected at the 1st floor level. One each at the ends of the L shaped building 
and two at the approximate mid-point on either side of a 2-hour separation wall 
with self-closing, rated doors in the corridor. 

The question is for purposes of calculating the standpipe can these be treated 
as two separate buildings? For example, 250 gpm at the far end of the 4th 
floor, 250 gpm at the far end of the 3rd floor and 250 gpm at the at the 
connecting point of the middle standpipe, for a total of 750 gpm. 

Or do we have to calculate the additional standpipes up to 1250 gpm. Available 
water is the issue. 

 

 

Richard L. Mote CET

Rimrock Design Services, LLC

Middleburg, PA 17842

Mobile 570-541-2685

EMAIL rimrock.design.servi...@gmail.com 
<mailto:rimrock.design.servi...@gmail.com> 

WEB: www.rimrockdesignservicesllc.com 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.rimrockdesignservicesllc.com%2f&c=E,1,fadOAhD1mKGvCFWt7jrP2oLszlCspZTT5BSu8H81evDY3kMwLE2S5shTT2WaFp1uqmRpO2pEuksmYEzOP3xZZeFh4mWqFPOw08uqfTwAde9QA5BQAru8mo6B1Bc,&typo=1>
 

 


_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,DMX3V7_sNc-eXIYZbrAGVHLe4Fmdh9jLIZLD2iXU_UaxirRa8eQCx4YEjUC0qb7IDR8Mp6mavkpNKTPrEzcTXYIxqzcEF81JYuZOlDmNKWVQl69Nsz4c&typo=1>
 
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org> 

_________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
mailing list: 
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,VvHdoe9-e_IKAkGUQK2DPsVfeDe1EFGflcbrpkiZx6IZQ0eN-VwNqpS-mzh6v2YiCKKFk7mTXIpr_SEp8TUBlkvXuG0lKMskaE3VxodIFpr8g5SnvQ,,&typo=1>
  To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org>  


_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,lbgXEkkwQSKnU01v-sW-UGRcQX1x-P2AmYrkqSxYb2Ac1GRGdm5wKI0N3Eb-zNLOsConNgMXYop-BYBFQUxyz_uaWdsGK88Ps0WUHnmgogCf65UD5hF-Rw,,&typo=1>
 
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org> 


_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,ruK8tYSTXJSa3fZeagThEnDiDVyRtxkgPscbJ3VCNYg0yBhGGEhLua7hmu1RVzzgP98xU2f_ip3GBUH8703TqC_ZerMtGYjgpaXzxNvHQKECtGI,&typo=1>
 
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org> 



-- 

 

José Anibal Castillo M.S. (FP UMD)

Ingeniero Electromecánico 

Especialista en Sistemas Contra Incendio

Cel:+(507) 6349.6217

 

 
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flist%2fsprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,JiIm_fGcgIlfcFWDgivTokX21dFlrZs4qeRDFVfGgkBHrGcVjQ4MUzEFX8YD3Sg9nQgU2DDbtzRz7SgAtUiL0Z7jW00yoZhXv_MuqWQ1&typo=1>
 
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org 
<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org> 

 

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to