Jun 19, 2020, 15:30 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 23:14, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <> > talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> Can you consider using more specific surface? Like surface=asphalt? >> > > The problem here is this way is the crossing, so will likely cover mulitple > surface types, usually asphalt on the road, concrete for the gutter, and > paving_stones or concrete for the pavement. So surface=paved I'd say is > better when it's not clearly any single surface type. > I sometimes split in parts, but I see why it could be an overkill.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
