Sorry, something went wrong there? Second photo was supposed to be: https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.5363504,153.5387022,3a,16.3y,166.14h,87.28t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8k6sIMX0JXgsu_mhFc29Pg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en
& the crossing: https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.5366306,153.5385725,3a,75y,143.74h,54.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJk_cDNVsoMaKLtY5FlWlyg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en Thanks Graeme On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 08:53, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are a number of similar signs to these on the M1 in NNSW, this > particular one near Brunswick Heads. > > > https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.5357775,153.5389296,3a,57.4y,164.26h,86.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sazs46cEWdkGbHMJ5jZM-zg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en > > First: > https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.5357775,153.5389296,3a,15y,154.68h,89.33t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sazs46cEWdkGbHMJ5jZM-zg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en > > Second: > https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.5357775,153.5389296,3a,57.4y,164.26h,86.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sazs46cEWdkGbHMJ5jZM-zg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en > > Crossing: > https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-28.5357775,153.5389296,3a,57.4y,164.26h,86.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sazs46cEWdkGbHMJ5jZM-zg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en > > I don't know whether they are legally enforceable to say that all cyclists > "must" cross here, or if it's just a suggestion / recommendation for your > own safety? > > I've mapped it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666546115 just as a > test, but I don't think it's a perfect solution? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 00:39, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au < > talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > >> >> >> >> Jun 19, 2020, 15:30 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: >> >> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 23:14, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au < >> talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> >> Can you consider using more specific surface? Like surface=asphalt? >> >> >> The problem here is this way is the crossing, so will likely cover >> mulitple surface types, usually asphalt on the road, concrete for the >> gutter, and paving_stones or concrete for the pavement. So surface=paved >> I'd say is better when it's not clearly any single surface type. >> >> I sometimes split in parts, but I see why it could be an overkill. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
