Brian, If good quality TIGER data exists for this area and can validate the changes then I suggest it's OK to change the source to TIGER, otherwise it seems prudent to backout all the changesets tagged as sourced from Google Maps.
The one-way flows can sometimes be inferred from pavement markings and Bing aerials. Best, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Brian May <b...@mapwise.com> wrote: > I just ran into an area where someone tagged streets with source=google > maps. Looks like an un-aware new user who only had 8 changesets over two > days and that was it. What to do about this? > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**user/Hercumike/edits<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Hercumike/edits> > > Brian > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-us<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us> > -- John Novak 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676) http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnanovak/ OSM ID:oldtopos OSM Heat Map: http://yosmhm.neis-one.org/?oldtopos OSM Edit Stats:http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?oldtopos
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
