On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > So, this is awkward.
> From a pragmatic legal perspective, it seems to me that any > nearmap-sourced edits that I made while under the effects of the CT > are totally invalid anyway, so should be moved to a non-CT account. We're* also expecting to implement a way for you to flag edits that shouldn't be promoted to CT/ODbL, so you'll be able to accept CT, and flag those changesets that are incompatible individually. The bad ones won't be brought forward but your survey-based, direct-observation contributions will continue. Many other benefits to this approach, but that's a discussion for another list. * LWG have been discussing it, but the server team / community will end up implementing it. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
