On 8 December 2010 10:58, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This is simply because we are at the voluntary phase of agreeing with >> the CT right now. If you wholeheartedly agree with the CT, then you >> can indicate your preference right now. >> >> When we are at the mandatory phase, then and only then will the >> agreement have a decline button. > > With respect, the logic here seems a bit twisted. And, speaking as the > first victim of accidental accession, it doesn't feel very "voluntary" > if I can't unset my CT flag. It feels more like a trap which I > inadvertently stumbled into. >
Steve, Partially a rhetorical question... What would the project do if someone uploaded data to OSM and then said they had not agreed to contributing the data under CC-BY-SA? Out of interest here is the history of project's contributing terms... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/History PS: Your email to LWG was received, but we have not yet had a chance to discuss and respond. We meet again next Tuesday. Regards Grant _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
