Exactly my own situation, except following poor advice I accepted the new CT. Apparently it is not possible to change the CT status and my formal request to have my suspect data deleted seems to have been ignored.
My recommendation is not to accept the CT, and reenter those items that you did from direct observation under a new account. Cheerio John On 15 June 2011 19:06, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: > Back in 2006 I wrote the following when it still wasn't clear what the > ODbL acceptance terms would be like: > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If someone presents me with a boolean "Do you allow relicensing under > > the ODbL" I'll have to say no because some of my edits are derived > > from CC-BY-SA data I don't have permission to license (and I probably > > can't even recall what all of it is). > > > > Which'll mean nuking >50% of all the data in Iceland most of which > > I've touched at some point. > > I've been away for a while. But it seems to me from reading the terms > that I can't say yes to them in good faith, not because I don't want > to, but because I remember I derived a few things from external > CC-BY-SA, and I can't now recall what they were (and this was before > we had changeset comments). > > What are my options in that situation? Do I either have to see all my > work removed because I can't account for 100% of my edits or lie on > the ODbL acceptance form? > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
